1
|
Tang S, Shahriari M, Xiang J, Pasternak T, Igolkina A, Aminizade S, Zhi H, Gao Y, Roodbarkelari F, Sui Y, Jia G, Wu C, Zhang L, Zhao L, Li X, Meshcheryakov G, Samsonova M, Diao X, Palme K, Teale W. The role of AUX1 during lateral root development in the domestication of the model C4 grass Setaria italica. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY 2022; 73:2021-2034. [PMID: 34940828 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erab556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
C4 photosynthesis increases the efficiency of carbon fixation by spatially separating high concentrations of molecular oxygen from Rubisco. The specialized leaf anatomy required for this separation evolved independently many times. The morphology of C4 root systems is also distinctive and adapted to support high rates of photosynthesis; however, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that have driven the evolution of C4 root system architecture. Using a mutant screen in the C4 model plant Setaria italica, we identify Siaux1-1 and Siaux1-2 as root system architecture mutants. Unlike in S. viridis, AUX1 promotes lateral root development in S. italica. A cell by cell analysis of the Siaux1-1 root apical meristem revealed changes in the distribution of cell volumes in all cell layers and a dependence of the frequency of protophloem and protoxylem strands on SiAUX1. We explore the molecular basis of the role of SiAUX1 in seedling development using an RNAseq analysis of wild-type and Siaux1-1 plants and present novel targets for SiAUX1-dependent gene regulation. Using a selection sweep and haplotype analysis of SiAUX1, we show that Hap-2412TT in the promoter region of SiAUX1 is an allele which is associated with lateral root number and has been strongly selected for during Setaria domestication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sha Tang
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Mojgan Shahriari
- Institute of Biology II, University of Freiburg, Schänzlestrasse 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jishan Xiang
- Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Regional Ecological Protection & Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Development, Chifeng University, Chifeng, 024000, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Taras Pasternak
- Institute of Biology II, University of Freiburg, Schänzlestrasse 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anna Igolkina
- Department of Computational Biology, Center for Advanced Studies, St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, 195259, Russia
| | | | - Hui Zhi
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Yuanzhu Gao
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Farshad Roodbarkelari
- Institute of Biology III, University of Freiburg, Schänzlestrasse 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Yi Sui
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Guanqing Jia
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Chuanyin Wu
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Linlin Zhang
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Lirong Zhao
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Xugang Li
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, Daizong Street 61, Tai'an, 271018, China
| | - Georgy Meshcheryakov
- Department of Computational Biology, Center for Advanced Studies, St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, 195259, Russia
| | - Maria Samsonova
- Department of Computational Biology, Center for Advanced Studies, St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, 195259, Russia
| | - Xianmin Diao
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Klaus Palme
- Institute of Biology II, University of Freiburg, Schänzlestrasse 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
- Centre of Biological Systems Analysis and BIOSS Centre for Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
| | - William Teale
- Institute of Biology II, University of Freiburg, Schänzlestrasse 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Olofsson JK, Curran EV, Nyirenda F, Bianconi ME, Dunning LT, Milenkovic V, Sotelo G, Hidalgo O, Powell RF, Lundgren MR, Leitch IJ, Nosil P, Osborne CP, Christin PA. Low dispersal and ploidy differences in a grass maintain photosynthetic diversity despite gene flow and habitat overlap. Mol Ecol 2021; 30:2116-2130. [PMID: 33682242 DOI: 10.1111/mec.15871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Geographical isolation facilitates the emergence of distinct phenotypes within a single species, but reproductive barriers or selection are needed to maintain the polymorphism after secondary contact. Here, we explore the processes that maintain intraspecific variation of C4 photosynthesis, a complex trait that results from the combined action of multiple genes. The grass Alloteropsis semialata includes C4 and non-C4 populations, which have coexisted as a polyploid series for more than 1 million years in the miombo woodlands of Africa. Using population genomics, we show that there is genome-wide divergence for the photosynthetic types, but the current geographical distribution does not reflect a simple habitat displacement scenario as the genetic clusters overlap, being occasionally mixed within a given habitat. Despite evidence of recurrent introgression between non-C4 and C4 groups, in both diploids and polyploids, the distinct genetic lineages retain their identity, potentially because of selection against hybrids. Coupled with strong isolation by distance within each genetic group, this selection created a geographical mosaic of photosynthetic types. Diploid C4 and non-C4 types never grew together, and the C4 type from mixed populations constantly belonged to the hexaploid lineage. By limiting reproductive interactions between photosynthetic types, the ploidy difference probably allows their co-occurrence, reinforcing the functional diversity within this species. Together, these factors enabled the persistence of divergent physiological traits of ecological importance within a single species despite gene flow and habitat overlap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill K Olofsson
- Department of Animal and Plant Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Emma V Curran
- Department of Animal and Plant Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Florence Nyirenda
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Matheus E Bianconi
- Department of Animal and Plant Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Luke T Dunning
- Department of Animal and Plant Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Vanja Milenkovic
- Department of Animal and Plant Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Graciela Sotelo
- Department of Animal and Plant Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | - Marjorie R Lundgren
- Department of Animal and Plant Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Patrik Nosil
- Department of Animal and Plant Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Colin P Osborne
- Department of Animal and Plant Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|