1
|
Ronceret A, Bolaños‐Villegas P. Plant reproduction research in Latin America: Toward sustainable agriculture in a changing environment. PLANT-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS (HOBOKEN, N.J.) 2024; 5:e10143. [PMID: 38764600 PMCID: PMC11101159 DOI: 10.1002/pei3.10143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
Food production and food security depend on the ability of crops to cope with anthropogenic climate change and successfully produce seed. To guarantee food production well into the future, contemporary plant scientists in Latin America must carry out research on how plants respond to environmental stressors such as temperature, drought, and salinity. This review shows the opportunities to apply these results locally and abroad and points to the gaps that still exist in terms of reproductive processes with the purpose to better link research with translational work in plant breeding and biotechnology. Suggestions are put forth to address these gaps creatively in the face of chronic low investment in science with a focus on applicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Ronceret
- Instituto de Biotecnología/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)CuernavacaMorelosMexico
| | - Pablo Bolaños‐Villegas
- Fabio Baudrit Agricultural Research StationUniversity of Costa RicaAlajuelaCosta Rica
- Lankester Botanical GardenUniversity of Costa RicaCartagoCosta Rica
- Faculty of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Rodrigo Facio Campus, School of AgronomyUniversity of Costa RicaSan JoseCosta Rica
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dereli I, Telychko V, Papanikos F, Raveendran K, Xu J, Boekhout M, Stanzione M, Neuditschko B, Imjeti NS, Selezneva E, Tuncay H, Demir S, Giannattasio T, Gentzel M, Bondarieva A, Stevense M, Barchi M, Schnittger A, Weir JR, Herzog F, Keeney S, Tóth A. Seeding the meiotic DNA break machinery and initiating recombination on chromosome axes. Nat Commun 2024; 15:2941. [PMID: 38580643 PMCID: PMC10997794 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47020-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Programmed DNA double-strand break (DSB) formation is a crucial feature of meiosis in most organisms. DSBs initiate recombination-mediated linking of homologous chromosomes, which enables correct chromosome segregation in meiosis. DSBs are generated on chromosome axes by heterooligomeric focal clusters of DSB-factors. Whereas DNA-driven protein condensation is thought to assemble the DSB-machinery, its targeting to chromosome axes is poorly understood. We uncover in mice that efficient biogenesis of DSB-machinery clusters requires seeding by axial IHO1 platforms. Both IHO1 phosphorylation and formation of axial IHO1 platforms are diminished by chemical inhibition of DBF4-dependent kinase (DDK), suggesting that DDK contributes to the control of the axial DSB-machinery. Furthermore, we show that axial IHO1 platforms are based on an interaction between IHO1 and the chromosomal axis component HORMAD1. IHO1-HORMAD1-mediated seeding of the DSB-machinery on axes ensures sufficiency of DSBs for efficient pairing of homologous chromosomes. Without IHO1-HORMAD1 interaction, residual DSBs depend on ANKRD31, which enhances both the seeding and the growth of DSB-machinery clusters. Thus, recombination initiation is ensured by complementary pathways that differentially support seeding and growth of DSB-machinery clusters, thereby synergistically enabling DSB-machinery condensation on chromosomal axes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ihsan Dereli
- Institute of Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine at the TU Dresden, Fiedlerstrasse 42, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Vladyslav Telychko
- Institute of Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine at the TU Dresden, Fiedlerstrasse 42, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Frantzeskos Papanikos
- Institute of Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine at the TU Dresden, Fiedlerstrasse 42, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Kavya Raveendran
- Institute of Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine at the TU Dresden, Fiedlerstrasse 42, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jiaqi Xu
- Molecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Michiel Boekhout
- Molecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Marcello Stanzione
- Institute of Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine at the TU Dresden, Fiedlerstrasse 42, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Benjamin Neuditschko
- Institute Krems Bioanalytics, IMC University of Applied Sciences, 3500, Krems, Austria
| | - Naga Sailaja Imjeti
- Institute of Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine at the TU Dresden, Fiedlerstrasse 42, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elizaveta Selezneva
- Friedrich Miescher Laboratory of the Max Planck Society, Max-Planck-Ring 9, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hasibe Tuncay
- Department of Developmental Biology, University of Hamburg, 22609, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sevgican Demir
- Institute of Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine at the TU Dresden, Fiedlerstrasse 42, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Teresa Giannattasio
- University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Section of Anatomy, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Marc Gentzel
- Core Facility Mass Spectrometry & Proteomics, Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering (CMCB), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Anastasiia Bondarieva
- Institute of Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine at the TU Dresden, Fiedlerstrasse 42, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michelle Stevense
- Institute of Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine at the TU Dresden, Fiedlerstrasse 42, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marco Barchi
- University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Section of Anatomy, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy
- Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy
| | - Arp Schnittger
- Department of Developmental Biology, University of Hamburg, 22609, Hamburg, Germany
| | - John R Weir
- Friedrich Miescher Laboratory of the Max Planck Society, Max-Planck-Ring 9, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Franz Herzog
- Institute Krems Bioanalytics, IMC University of Applied Sciences, 3500, Krems, Austria
| | - Scott Keeney
- Molecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Attila Tóth
- Institute of Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine at the TU Dresden, Fiedlerstrasse 42, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The raison d'être of meiosis is shuffling of genetic information via Mendelian segregation and, within individual chromosomes, by DNA crossing-over. These outcomes are enabled by a complex cellular program in which interactions between homologous chromosomes play a central role. We first provide a background regarding the basic principles of this program. We then summarize the current understanding of the DNA events of recombination and of three processes that involve whole chromosomes: homolog pairing, crossover interference, and chiasma maturation. All of these processes are implemented by direct physical interaction of recombination complexes with underlying chromosome structures. Finally, we present convergent lines of evidence that the meiotic program may have evolved by coupling of this interaction to late-stage mitotic chromosome morphogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Zickler
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Nancy Kleckner
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dereli I, Telychko V, Papanikos F, Raveendran K, Xu J, Boekhout M, Stanzione M, Neuditschko B, Imjeti NS, Selezneva E, Erbasi HT, Demir S, Giannattasio T, Gentzel M, Bondarieva A, Stevense M, Barchi M, Schnittger A, Weir JR, Herzog F, Keeney S, Tóth A. Seeding the meiotic DNA break machinery and initiating recombination on chromosome axes. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.11.27.568863. [PMID: 38077023 PMCID: PMC10705248 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.27.568863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Programmed DNA double-strand break (DSB) formation is a unique meiotic feature that initiates recombination-mediated linking of homologous chromosomes, thereby enabling chromosome number halving in meiosis. DSBs are generated on chromosome axes by heterooligomeric focal clusters of DSB-factors. Whereas DNA-driven protein condensation is thought to assemble the DSB-machinery, its targeting to chromosome axes is poorly understood. We discovered in mice that efficient biogenesis of DSB-machinery clusters requires seeding by axial IHO1 platforms, which are based on a DBF4-dependent kinase (DDK)-modulated interaction between IHO1 and the chromosomal axis component HORMAD1. IHO1-HORMAD1-mediated seeding of the DSB-machinery on axes ensures sufficiency of DSBs for efficient pairing of homologous chromosomes. Without IHO1-HORMAD1 interaction, residual DSBs depend on ANKRD31, which enhances both the seeding and the growth of DSB-machinery clusters. Thus, recombination initiation is ensured by complementary pathways that differentially support seeding and growth of DSB-machinery clusters, thereby synergistically enabling DSB-machinery condensation on chromosomal axes.
Collapse
|
5
|
Guo T, Jiang L, Li B, Jiang H, Zheng T, Luo J, He Y. ZmRPN1 confers quantitative variation in pollen number and boosts hybrid seed production in maize. PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL 2023; 21:1978-1989. [PMID: 37341033 PMCID: PMC10502757 DOI: 10.1111/pbi.14105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
The number of pollen grains is a critical determinant of reproductive success in seed plants and varies among species and individuals. However, in contrast with many mutant-screening studies relevant to anther and pollen development, the natural genetic basis for variations in pollen number remains largely unexplored. To address this issue, we carried out a genome-wide association study in maize, ultimately revealing that a large presence/absence variation in the promoter region of ZmRPN1 alters its expression level and thereby contributes to pollen number variation. Molecular analyses showed that ZmRPN1 interacts with ZmMSP1, which is known as a germline cell number regulator, and facilitates ZmMSP1 localization to the plasma membrane. Importantly, ZmRPN1 dysfunction resulted in a substantial increase in pollen number, consequently boosting seed production by increasing female-male planting ratio. Together, our findings uncover a key gene controlling pollen number, and therefore, modulation of ZmRPN1 expression could be efficiently used to develop elite pollinators for modern hybrid maize breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Guo
- MOE Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, National Maize Improvement Center of ChinaChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Lu‐Guang Jiang
- MOE Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, National Maize Improvement Center of ChinaChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Bo Li
- MOE Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, National Maize Improvement Center of ChinaChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Huan Jiang
- MOE Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, National Maize Improvement Center of ChinaChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Tong‐Xin Zheng
- MOE Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, National Maize Improvement Center of ChinaChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Jin‐Hong Luo
- MOE Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, National Maize Improvement Center of ChinaChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Yan He
- MOE Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, National Maize Improvement Center of ChinaChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rafiei N, Ronceret A. Crossover interference mechanism: New lessons from plants. Front Cell Dev Biol 2023; 11:1156766. [PMID: 37274744 PMCID: PMC10236007 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1156766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Plants are the source of our understanding of several fundamental biological principles. It is well known that Gregor Mendel discovered the laws of Genetics in peas and that maize was used for the discovery of transposons by Barbara McClintock. Plant models are still useful for the understanding of general key biological concepts. In this article, we will focus on discussing the recent plant studies that have shed new light on the mysterious mechanisms of meiotic crossover (CO) interference, heterochiasmy, obligatory CO, and CO homeostasis. Obligatory CO is necessary for the equilibrated segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. The tight control of the different male and female CO rates (heterochiasmy) enables both the maximization and minimization of genome shuffling. An integrative model can now predict these observed aspects of CO patterning in plants. The mechanism proposed considers the Synaptonemal Complex as a canalizing structure that allows the diffusion of a class I CO limiting factor linearly on synapsed bivalents. The coarsening of this limiting factor along the SC explains the interfering spacing between COs. The model explains the observed coordinated processes between synapsis, CO interference, CO insurance, and CO homeostasis. It also easily explains heterochiasmy just considering the different male and female SC lengths. This mechanism is expected to be conserved in other species.
Collapse
|