Pierre Bourdieu: Expanding the scope of nursing research and practice

A call for theory-inspired analysis in qualitative research: Ways to construct different truths in and about healthcare

Over the last 50 years, there has been significant development of qualitative research and related methods in healthcare. Theoretical frameworks support researchers in selecting appropriate research approaches, procedures and analytical tools. However, the implications of the choice of theory are sparsely elucidated. Based on a text excerpt from a public debate article, the study aimed to show how different theory-inspired analytical perspectives produced varied understandings of the same text. The study presented three subanalyses inspired by Bourdieu's sociological theory, Lazarus and Folkman's psychological theory and utilitarian ethics, respectively. The analyses showed that by using different theoretical analytical perspectives in inductive processes, an immediate interpretation of the text was not obvious. It became possible to spot the underlying meta-theoretical assumptions, as the interpretations were not taken for granted or indisputable. Our analyses suggest that different theoretical lenses lead to different interpretations of the same empirical material, recognising the existence of multiple truths or realities. Thus, utilising a theoretical perspective in inductive analyses can enhance transparency and rigour because the analytical optics are made explicit to the reader. This allows the reader to follow the analysis processes and comprehend from which theoretical starting point a truth arises.

Different senses of one's place: Exploring social adjustment to home-based care services among family caregivers from minority ethnic backgrounds who have relatives living with dementia

Western dementia care policies emphasise that family caregivers from minority ethnic backgrounds must become more engaged in healthcare services. However, research exploring experiences of receiving services such as home-based care, and thus adjustment to the service, among family caregivers from minority ethnic backgrounds who have relatives with dementia is still scarce. Therefore, inspired by Pierre Bourdieu's theoretical concepts of field, habitus and capital, we explored how family caregivers from different minority ethnic backgrounds justified decisions about whether to receive home-based care and their social adjustment to the service. Using empirical data from semi-structured interviews with nine family caregivers from different minority ethnic backgrounds, we demonstrated that different mindsets and available social resources gave rise to various actions. Although some family caregivers were optimistic about receiving home-based care, our findings point to tensions between the ideals of care practices and the organisational structures surrounding home-based care as a service. Among those who had experiences with home-based care, we found that organisational limitations, particularly in terms of efficiency demands and time constraints, influenced their behaviours and thus their social adjustments to the service. For some, these limitations eventually resulted in cancellation of the service. However, not all had the same opportunities to make these decisions, indicating that, although family caregivers from minority ethnic backgrounds receive home-based care, this does not necessarily entail a deficiency-free service. Furthermore, we argue that public discourses on this subject can be challenged by encouraging one to look beyond ethnic and cultural labels towards other factors, such as organisational structures, that might largely influence the use of home-based care among these family caregivers.

An integrative literature review and critical reflection on nurses' agency

The idea of agency has long been used in the nursing literature in the study of nurses' roles regarding the patients they take care of, but it has not often been used to study its relationship with nurses themselves and their status in the healthcare system. The purpose of this article is to analyze how the idea of agency is used in nursing research to better understand how we might advance our thinking around nurses' agency to shape nursing and healthcare with an emancipatory intent. Based on the results of a literature review focused on the study of conceptions, treatments, and applications of the concept of agency in nursing, we present a critical discussion to reflect on the need to consistently define the idea of nurses' agency, to guide research concerned with this topic in theoretical frameworks with emancipatory and social change tenets, and to make a call to develop the idea of agency as a central one to rework nurses' relationship with themselves. The idea of agency provides a valuable analytical framework for the study of a wide range of issues around nurses' status in healthcare organizations and in the healthcare system while offering a means for nurses' emancipation.

Making things work: Using Bourdieu's theory of practice to uncover an ontology of everyday nursing in practice

Seeking to answer the question of what it is that nurses do, scholars researching nursing have worked with theoretical approaches ranging from the more abstract to the concrete: from philosophizing the nature of nursing to emphasizing the interpersonal nature of nursing practice to exploring processes of clinical decision-making. In this paper, we engage with Bourdieu's theory of practice as an alternative approach that helps to understand the finer points of nurses' everyday practices of nursing as being grounded in an ontology of practice. We first outline the foundations of Bourdieu's thinking as he established both a relational philosophy of science and an embodied philosophy of action to develop the theory of practice around notions of habitus, capital and field. Then, using the inter-relationships of these key elements of the theory of practice as a 'toolkit to think with', we explore an instance of nursing in practice in an acute care setting and show how, in taking account of social context, the dialectics between the elements reveal the social interactions that are accomplished in the doing. Moving to the relationships of these three elements with Bourdieu's further notions of illusio, symbolic power and symbolic violence, we uncover an ontology of nursing practices in the everyday. We conclude by summarising what this ontology of practice has to offer investigations into practices of nursing in any social context.

Interactions between healthcare personnel and family caregivers of people with dementia from minority ethnic backgrounds in home-based care-An explorative qualitative study

AIMS

To explore how healthcare personnel in home-based care perceive interactions with family caregivers of people with dementia from minority ethnic backgrounds.

BACKGROUND

Research shows that the organization of home-based care rarely allows opportunities to provide support to family caregivers in practice. However, how these organizational structures influence the way in which healthcare personnel perceive their interactions with family caregivers of people with dementia from minority ethnic backgrounds remains an unexplored area.

DESIGN

An explorative qualitative study inspired by a critical realist approach using Pierre Bourdieu's theoretical concepts of field, habitus and capital.

METHODS

Data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews with six nurses and four auxiliary nurses employed in home-based care in Norway. The data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. The participants were recruited in September and October 2020.

FINDINGS

'Family caregivers perceived as facilitators of or barriers to collaborative care' was identified as an overarching theme, supported by two main themes: 'Preconditions for successful collaboration' and 'Challenges for collaborative relationships'. The findings revealed that the participants mainly focused their attention on the dementia patients from minority ethnic backgrounds, while they felt that the family caregivers influenced the way in which they provided healthcare.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate that timesaving strategies have a major influence on healthcare personnel's perceptions of family caregivers from minority ethnic backgrounds. Attention towards the needs of the family caregivers was often replaced by evaluations of their usefulness in the provision of healthcare to the dementia patients.

IMPACT

This study raises concerns about home-based care as a rigid and inflexible system. It therefore provides opportunities to raise questions on status quo, stimulate debate and encourage fresh thinking with regards to the support and inclusion of family caregivers in the home-based care system for people with dementia from minority ethnic backgrounds.

'The desire for a harmonious interaction': A qualitative study of how healthcare professionals in community-based dementia teams perceive their role in reaching and supporting family caregivers from minority ethnic backgrounds

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To explore how healthcare professionals in community-based dementia teams perceive their role in reaching and supporting family caregivers from minority ethnic backgrounds when caring for a family member suffering from dementia or cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND

Despite increased focus on barriers to accessing the dementia healthcare service for family caregivers from minority ethnic backgrounds, the lack of knowledge on how to address these barriers in order to reach and support this group is evident.

DESIGN

The study has a qualitative, explorative design. The principles of consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) were applied for reporting methods and findings.

METHODS

Based on data from semi-structured interviews (n = 9) conducted in two large Norwegian municipalities, a thematic analysis influenced by Braun and Clarke was used. The analytical findings draw on Pierre Bourdieu's theoretical concepts of field, habitus and capital.

FINDINGS

'The desire for a harmonious interaction' was identified as an overarching theme. However, while desirable, the analysis shows that healthcare professionals in community-based dementia teams do not always succeed in reaching and supporting family caregivers from minority ethnic backgrounds. The study reveals that the dementia healthcare service is a complex, normative and sometimes rigid system that requires a number of distinct attributes to navigate.

CONCLUSIONS

The different social structures within the dementia healthcare service can both create and retain barriers that prevent family caregivers from minority ethnic backgrounds from receiving support on their own terms.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

A practical implication of allowing critical reflection on the dementia healthcare service is that it provides opportunities for discussion. Healthcare professionals in community-based dementia teams need to reflect on how normative ideals and 'taken-for-granted' mindsets can affect their ability to reach and support family caregivers from minority ethnic backgrounds.

Knowing what the patient wants: a hospital ethnography studying physician culture in shared decision making in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVES

To study physician culture in relation to shared decision making (SDM) practice.

DESIGN

Execution of a hospital ethnography, combined with interviews and a study of clinical guidelines. Ten-week observations by an insider (physician) and an outsider (student medical anthropology) observer. The use of French sociologist Bourdieu's 'Theory of Practice' and its description of habitus, field and capital, as a lens for analysing physician culture.

SETTING

The gynaecological oncology department of a university hospital in the Netherlands. Observations were executed at meetings, as well as individual patient contacts.

PARTICIPANTS

Six gynaecological oncologists, three registrars and two specialised nurses. Nine of these professionals were also interviewed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Common elements in physician habitus that influence the way SDM is being implemented.

RESULTS

Three main elements of physician habitus were identified. First of all, the 'emphasis on medical evidence' in group meetings as well as in patient encounters. Second 'acting as a team', which confronts the patient with the recommendations of a whole team of professionals. And lastly 'knowing what the patient wants', which describes how doctors act on what they think is best for patients instead of checking what patients actually want. Results were viewed in the light of how physicians deal with uncertainty by turning to medical evidence, as well as how the educational system stresses evidence-based medicine. Observations also highlighted the positive attitude doctors actually have towards SDM.

CONCLUSIONS

Certain features of physician culture hinder the correct implementation of SDM. Medical training and guidelines should put more emphasis on how to elicit patient perspective. Patient preferences should be addressed better in the patient workup, for example by giving them explicit attention first. This eventually could create a physician culture that is more helpful for SDM.

LIMPRINT: A Sociological Perspective on "Chronic Edema"

Background: Chronic edema is a condition that is biologically complex, distressing for patients and sociopolitically weak. Like many other complex and chronic conditions, it has a low status within health care. The result is that it has a low priority in health policy and consequently is undervalued and undertreated. While evidence-based practice promotes a hierarchy of evidence, it is also the case that clinical practice is influenced by a hierarchy of social status. These are as much political as they are scientific.

Methods and Results: This article will provide an explanation for why chronic edema is a low priority. It will do this through a critical review of the literature. We examine this through the theoretical lens of Pierre Bourdieu. The sociology of Bourdieu frames an understanding of power relations through habitus, field, and capital. We will employ these theoretical tools to understand the way that chronic edema is situated within the policy arena. We identify a number of social mechanisms that affect the status of chronic edema, including diagnostic uncertainty, social capital, scientific capital, cultural capital and economic capital.

Conclusion: We argue that a whole system approach to care, based on human need rather than unequal power relations, is a prerequisite for the delivery of good health care. The specialty of chronic edema is not a powerless group and we identify some of the ways that the social mechanism that acts as barriers to change, can also be employed to challenge them.

The potential contribution of critical theories in healthcare transition research and practice

BACKGROUND

Healthcare transition has been established as a significant topic of interest in pediatric rehabilitation. Healthcare transition research has primarily focused on barriers to self-management and achievement of a productive adulthood. Healthcare transition experts have recently called for further attention to social structural factors. Theoretical approaches are, therefore, needed to account for how such factors shape the lives of youth with disabilities, particularly those who experience marginalization and social exclusion.

PURPOSE

Taking up this call, the aim of this paper is to examine the potential contributions of two critical theories to healthcare transition research and practice.

METHODS

Review two theories - intersectionality and critical discourse analysis.

RESULTS

Intersectionality highlights how multiple intersecting social locations and social structures interact with youth's experiences, choices and health care needs. Critical discourse analysis focuses on how discourses and assumptions in healthcare transition research and practice contribute to marginalization and can be resisted and changed by youth, families, researchers, and clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

The uptake of critical theories within health care transition research and practice can account for the complex interplay of social structures, power relations and youth's experiences. Such analysis can contribute to refining assessments and developing interventions that reflect how marginalization and exclusion impact youth's well-being.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONWhile critical theories have been applied in health and rehabilitation, there has been limited uptake of these theories in healthcare transition research and practice.Critical theories can promote awareness of how youth's experiences, choices and actions throughout the healthcare transition process are shaping and shaped by structural factors and assumptions about a productive adulthood.Applying critical theories in healthcare transition practice involves being responsive to the structural factors that may be shaping youth's experiences, choices and opportunities.Intersectional and critical discourse analyses can surface how to reduce social exclusion and marginalization for youth transitioning to adulthood through analyses of language, power, dominant discourse and practices amenable to change.

Moving Beyond the Behavior-Change Framework for Smoking Cessation: Lessons for a Critical Ontology From the Case of Inpatient Psychiatric Units

BACKGROUND: Leading scholars have called on nursing schools to pay more attention to smoking cessation in the education of nursing students. AIM: This article argues that attention to this subject should include a rethinking of the behavior-change framework that forms the methodological basis of this field. METHOD: Drawing on classic and contemporary work in sociology, anthropology, and critical public health, this article explores the specific example of smoking in long-term inpatient units to illustrate the limitations of a behavior-based ontology and suggest an alternative conceptual vocabulary. RESULTS: An alternative approach posits smoking as a social practice. It sheds light on situational factors that incentivize smoking and might be contributing to patient resistance to cessation. CONCLUSIONS: A different conceptual framing of smoking can point to interventions beyond the level of individuals, focusing instead on the broader interface between people and situations, where decisions and desires meet institutional and organizational dynamics and structures of opportunity and access.

Pierre Bourdieu's Theory of Practice offers nurses a framework to uncover embodied knowledge of patients living with disabilities or illnesses: A discussion paper

AIM

To discuss how Bourdieu's theory of practice can be used by nurse researchers to better uncover the embodied knowledge of patients living with disability and illness.

BACKGROUND

Bourdieu's theory of practice has been used in social and healthcare researches. This theory emphasizes that an individual's everyday practices are not always explicit and mediated by language, but instead an individual's everyday practices are often are tacit and embodied.

DESIGN

Discussion paper.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL and SCOPUS were searched for concepts from Bourdieu's theory that was used to understand embodied knowledge of patients living with disability and illness. The literature search included articles from 2003 - 2017.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Nurse researchers should use Bourdieu's theory of practice to uncover the embodied knowledge of patients living with disability and illness, and nurse researchers should translate these discoveries into policy recommendations and improved evidence-based best practice. The practice of nursing should incorporate an understanding of embodied knowledge to support disabled and ill patients as these patients modify "everyday practices" in the light of their disabilities and illnesses.

CONCLUSION

Bourdieu's theory enriches nursing because the theory allows for consideration of both the objective and the subjective through the conceptualization of capital, habitus and field. Uncovering individuals embodied knowledge is critical to implement best practices that assist patients as they adapt to bodily changes during disability and illness.