Craniofacial morphology and soft tissue profile outcomes for complete unilateral and complete bilateral cleft lip and palate in New Zealand

Cephalometric Soft Tissue Morphology of Adults With Unoperated Submucous Cleft Palate

The aim of this study was to compare craniofacial soft tissue characteristics between subjects with unrepaired submucous cleft palate (SMCP) and noncleft individuals.

This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on 27 subjects with unrepaired SMCP (13 male and 14 female subjects; mean age, 21.77 ± 4.09 years) and 30 noncleft controls (14 male and 16 female subjects; mean age, 22.67 ± 4.28 years). The predictor variable was cleft deformity. The outcome variable was cephalometric soft tissue measurements. Other study variables were gender and age. Independent samples t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for intergroup comparison. P value was set at .05.

Significant differences were observed in the facial profile angle, total facial profile angle, soft tissue A-N-B angle, nasal base prominence, upper lip length, lower lip protrusion, and the ratio of upper lip length to mentolabial height between subjects with unoperated SMCP and noncleft controls.

The primary deformity of the cleft palate leads to unsatisfactory facial soft tissue morphology, especially in the middle facial region.

Does Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding Reduce the Need for Future Bone Grafting in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) is a technique that is utilized in patients with cleft lip/palate before performing lip surgery. This procedure has been shown to result in a more aesthetic nose with lesser columellar deviation and reduced scaring. The aim of our study was to evaluate the long-term results of NAM and gingivoperiosteoplasty in patients with cleft lip and palate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An electronic search of databases (ie, PubMed, ISI Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar) from inception to March 2021 was performed and after selecting the eligible studies, relevant data were collected using piloted extraction forms. The success rate of NAM and gingivoperiosteoplasty, and Bergland score were pooled using random-effects inverse variance meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis and systematic review. The pooled mean success rate of NAM with gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) based on the continuity of alveolar bone structure was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 54-85). This means that in 71% of cases NAM + GPP treatment eliminated the need for future bone grafts. Also, no significant difference between the success rate (risk ratio = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.64-1.58) and mean Bergland score (mean difference = 0.64, 95% CI = -1.04 to 2.31) of NAM + GPP and skeletal bone graft was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Nasoalveolar molding and gingivoperiosteoplasty was successful in 71% of cases treating patients with cleft lip and palate. This treatment is similar with the secondary alveolar bone graft in both the success rate and the alveolar height that it generates while being less invasive and with lower morbidity.

Speech Outcomes of a National Cohort of Children with Orofacial Cleft at 5 and 10 Years of age

OBJECTIVE

To assess speech outcomes at five and ten years of age in a nationwide study of children with orofacial cleft.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

Children born with orofacial cleft and having primary surgery in New Zealand. Speech samples were available for 151 five-year-old, and 163 ten-year-old children.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intelligibility, Acceptability, Velopharyngeal function, Hypernasality, Hyponasality, severity of airflow evaluated by perceptual speech assessment (using the standardised Rhinocleft assessment), and overall assessment of requirement for clinical intervention.

RESULTS

A large proportion of five-year-old children had speech that was considered to be not completely intelligible, was not acceptable, and had inadequate velopharyngeal function. The noted deficiencies led to a clinical judgement that further speech and/or surgical intervention was required in 85% with cleft lip and palate, 65% with cleft palate and 26% with cleft lip. The proportion of children with poor speech outcomes in the ten-year-old children was lower, though of clinical importance, further intervention required for 25% with CLP, 15% with CP and 3% with CL. The number of sound production errors in both age groups followed the same pattern with fewest in those with CL and most in those with CLP.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of children with orofacial cleft were found to have poor speech outcomes requiring further treatment. The outcomes are poor compared to centres reported in the UK and Scandinavia. New Zealand requires a review of the current services for individuals born with cleft to improve speech outcomes and interdisciplinary care.

A Nationwide Survey of Oral Health Related Quality of Life of Children With Orofacial Cleft in New Zealand

OBJECTIVES

To describe (1) oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) for children with orofacial cleft (OFC) in New Zealand and (2) assess any differences in OHRQoL by sex, ethnicity, and cleft phenotype using the 16 item (and 8 item subset) of the Child Perception Questionnaire (CPQ) and Parent version (P-CPQ).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective cross-sectional nationwide study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Children with OFC and their parents completed the 16-item CPQ or the Parent CPQ, respectively, when attending cleft clinic appointments between January 2015 and December 2017.

RESULTS

Overall, 174 children (mean age 10.4 ± 1.2 years) and their parents (n = 181) completed the CPQ or P-CPQ. In multivariable analysis, neither the CPQ nor P-CPQ 16-item or 8-item subset showed significant differences in OHRQoL total score with cleft phenotype. Children with cleft lip and palate (CLP) had higher (worse) well-being scores than those with cleft palate alone (CP) on the P-CPQ. Pacific Island children had consistently higher scores across both CPQ and P-CPQ, total and subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in OHRQoL among children with OFC were found for the well-being domain for children with CLP as reported by P-CPQ, but the symptom domain and total score showed no differences. Poorer scores were reported for children of Pacific Island descent using both questionnaires. The study findings indicate that children with OFC in New Zealand are a group who experience worse OHRQoL when referenced to normative non-OFC data. Further investigations are required to establish greater insight into specific factors influencing OHRQoL.

Behavioral Outcomes in Children With an Orofacial Cleft in a National Study in New Zealand

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether children with an orofacial cleft have higher levels of behavioral problems than the general population and whether this differs by cleft phenotype.

DESIGN

A cohort of children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) born in New Zealand from January 1, 2000.

SETTING

Cleft clinics in New Zealand participating in a larger outcomes study between 2014 and 2017.

PARTICIPANTS

Children (N = 378) aged 5 to 12 years of age and their parents.

MAIN OUTCOMES

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Generic Core Scales 4.0 and Family Impact Module 2.0.

RESULTS

Compared to standardized norms, children with a cleft had higher than expected (defined as 20%) levels of abnormal/borderline SDQ scores for conduct problems (27.4%, P = .0003) and peer relationship problems (31.6%, P < .0001) but lower than expected levels of problems with pro-social skills (6.3%, P < .0001). There were no significant differences by age-group and or cleft phenotype other than an increased risk of hyperactivity in children with CP compared to children with CL. Total difficulties SDQ scores had moderate correlations with the PedsQL.

CONCLUSIONS

While over 90% of children with CL/P had normal prosocial skills, they may not be easily accepted by their peers which may result in behavioral problems. These concerns were moderately related to lower quality of life. Support for establishment and maintenance of peer relationships is important to address externalizing and peer difficulties in children with CL/P. Community knowledge and understanding of CL/P needs to continue to be promoted.

Quality of Life Using General Population Validated Questionnaires in Children With Cleft Lip and/or Palate in New Zealand

Objective:

To determine the level of quality of life (QoL) in children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) and whether this differs by cleft phenotype.

Design:

A cohort of children with CL/P born in New Zealand.

Setting:

A nationwide study of children born with CL/P and having primary surgery in New Zealand.

Participants:

Children with CL/P and their families (n = 397) who attended a cleft clinic between October 1, 2014, and September 30, 2017, and agreed to complete questionnaires on QoL.

Main Outcomes:

Primary outcomes were QoL from the PedsQL 4.0 core generic questionnaires and the PedsQL 2.0 Family impact scale.

Results:

Children with CL/P in New Zealand generally have a high QoL as assessed by the PedsQL. The impact of cleft phenotype had limited effects on the child, however there were significant impacts on parents and families. We found that the family impact scale differed by cleft phenotype with those with CL having the highest QoL and those with cleft palate the lowest, and this was consistent across QoL subscales. Quality of life improved as a whole by age, particularly in physical and cognitive functioning, as well as in the ability to undertake family activities.

Conclusions:

Children with CL/P have generally good levels of QoL in New Zealand, however cleft phenotype impacts on the level, with the lowest levels in those with cleft palate. Psychological support of children with cleft and their families should be an integral part of cleft care.