Age and the amplitude of accommodation measured using dynamic retinoscopy

Objective and subjective assessment of accommodative insufficiency

SIGNIFICANCE

A variety of subjective and objective procedures are available to measure the amplitude of accommodation. However, it is unclear whether the standard criterion of Hofstetter's minimum minus 2 D can be used to diagnose accommodative insufficiency with each of these techniques.

PURPOSE

The use of objective dynamic retinoscopy and three subjective techniques to diagnosis accommodative insufficiency was examined.

METHODS

A total of 632 subjects between 8 and 19 years of age were enrolled. Accommodative lag, monocular accommodative facility, and subjective (push-up, modified push-down, and minus lens) and objective (dynamic retinoscopy) amplitude of accommodation were quantified. Accommodative insufficiency was diagnosed based on Hofstetter's minimum minus 2 D for each subjective method, as well as adding an additional subjective criterion (either accommodative lag exceeding 0.75 D or monocular accommodative facility falling below the age-expected norms).

RESULTS

The prevalence of accommodative insufficiency was lowest and highest with the push-up (7.9 and 1%) and dynamic retinoscopy (94 and 12%) procedures when measured without and with the additional subjective criteria, respectively. Comparing the validity of dynamic retinoscopy against the traditional criterion, moderate to low sensitivity and high specificity were found. However, adding the additional subjective criteria improved the findings with moderate to high sensitivity and high specificity. Using a cutoff for dynamic retinoscopy of 7.50 D showed moderate diagnostic accuracy based on likelihood ratios.

CONCLUSIONS

It is clear that a revised definition of accommodative insufficiency is required, which must include the method of assessing accommodation. The various objective and subjective methods for quantifying the amplitude of accommodation are not interchangeable, and subjective assessment does not provide a valid measure of the accommodative response.

Higher order aberrations and retinal image quality during short-term accommodation in myopic and non-myopic children

INTRODUCTION

Despite the known associations between near work and myopia, and retinal image quality and eye growth, accommodation-induced changes in higher order aberrations (HOA's) and retinal image quality in children with different refractive errors are poorly understood.

METHODS

Ocular HOA's were measured using a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor (COAS-HD, Wavefront Sciences) in 18 myopic and 18 age- and sex-matched non-myopic children during short-term accommodation tasks (four demands of 0, 3, 6 and 9 D) presented using a Badal optometer. Eighth order Zernike polynomials were fitted across a 2.3 mm pupil diameter to determine refractive power vectors (M, J₁₈₀ and J₄₅ ) and the accommodation error, and a 4 mm pupil was used for HOA analyses. Retinal image quality was examined using the visual Strehl ratio based on the optical transfer function (VSOTF) for third to eighth radial orders only.

RESULTS

Most refractive error group differences were observed for the 6 and 9 D demands. Myopic children underwent greater changes in with-the-rule astigmatism (J₁₈₀ ), higher order and third order RMS values, primary vertical ( C 3 - 1 $$ {C}_3^{-1} $$ ) and horizontal coma ( C 3 1 $$ {C}_3^1 $$ ), and several other individual Zernike coefficients compared with non-myopic children (all refractive error group by demand interaction p-values of ≤0.02). Non-myopic children exhibited a greater negative shift in primary ( C 4 0 $$ {C}_4^0 $$ ) and positive shift in secondary spherical aberration ( C 6 0 $$ {C}_6^0 $$ ) (both refractive error group by demand interaction p-values of ≤0.002). The VSOTF degraded for the 6 and 9 D demands in both groups, but the myopic children underwent a greater mean (SE) reduction from 0 D of -0.274 (0.048) for the 9 D demand, compared with -0.131 (0.052) for the non-myopic children (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

These results may have implications for the association between near work, accommodation and myopia development, particularly related to the use of short working distances during near tasks.

Does visual acuity predict visual preference in progressive addition lenses?

PURPOSE

We aimed to determine if visual acuity (VA) could differentiate the quality of vision with two ophthalmic lenses with unwanted astigmatism.

METHODS

Twenty presbyopic subjects (48 to 62 years old; VA better than 0.0 logMAR) graded the magnitude of their preference between two progressive addition lenses (plano addition 2.00D) and their visual acuities were measured with both lenses at various eccentricities from -12 to +12 mm from the near vision point every 3 mm in controlled conditions.

RESULTS

The Lens with the least peripheral astigmatism was preferred by 75% of the subjects. VA measured at the near vision point was statistically worse (p<0.01) with this lens whereas the contrary was observed in the periphery (± 12 and -9 mm of eccentricity). The Friedman test shows that the eccentricity (p<0.001) has a significant effect on visual acuity. However, the lens did not show any significant effect (p=0.76). The choice of the favorite lens was predicted for only 35% when considering central VA (up to 6mm) and 80% of the subjects when considering peripheral VA (9 to 12mm). However, the magnitude of the difference could be predicted by peripheral VA in only 60% of the subjects.

CONCLUSION

High contrast Visual acuity was clearly able to differentiate the 2 lens designs tested in our experiment. However, even under the controlled conditions of this study, it was not possible to predict the quality of vision, as measured by a subjective appreciation, through progressive addition lenses at various eccentricities from the near vision with an addition of 2.0D.

Tweenager Computer Visual Syndrome Due to Tablets and Laptops during the Postlockdown COVID-19 Pandemic and the Influence on the Binocular and Accommodative System

The aim of our study was to compare computer visual syndrome (CVS) in a tweenager student population who use tablets and laptops only to play versus CVS in tweenagers who use these digital devices at school to study, in addition to playing. The tests performed were a validated survey for children for the detection of CVS and accommodative and vergence tests. The CVS item questionnaire was divided into four main groups based on questions concerning the following: (I) the digital device usage time, (II) musculoskeletal and ergonomic nature, (III) visual symptoms, and (IV) ocular surface symptoms. The high-demand digital device group showed worse punctuation in all item groups. From the optometric perspective, when the subjects were classified according to the CVS, high-demand participants presented a clear tendency to exophoria with statistically significant differences in distance vision (−1.94 ± 4.48 Δ) and near vision (−5.78 ± 8.62 Δ) (p < 0.01). Our results establish a relationship between the increased use of electronic devices and computer vision syndrome in the preadolescent population. In addition, this situation is related to the presence of visual, accommodative, and binocular dysfunctions that could affect the efficiency of the visual system.

A Biomechanical Model for Evaluating the Performance of Accommodative Intraocular Lenses

Accommodation alters the shape of the eye lens to change focus from distant to near vision. This function declines with age in the development of presbyopia and most people experience a near total loss of accommodative ability by 55 years. Currently, there are no surgical procedures that correct presbyopia, but considerable work has been done in the development of accommodative intraocular lenses (AIOLs) implanted during cataract surgery. Despite these efforts, AIOLs only restore ∼ 20% of youthful accommodative amplitude and they suffer from high rates of visually-debilitating fibrosis. An important design tool that is lacking that could aid in improving AIOL designs is modeling. Herein, we addressed this need through the development of a fully 3-D finite element model that was used to predict the behavior of a dual-optic AIOL implanted within the post-surgical lens capsule. Models of the native human lens were developed to identify the stress-free configuration of the lens capsule needed to accurately predict the accommodated state of the lens and the configuration of the zonular traction needed for the disaccommodated state. The AIOL model demonstrated the functional importance of implant stiffness and predicted an approximately linear relationship between zonular traction magnitude and axial displacement of the optics. To our knowledge, this is the first model that can be used to gain insights into AIOL efficacy. It provides a foundation for continued development of a predictive tool that could ultimately improve AIOL designs that seek to restore youthful accommodative function.

A Meta-Analysis Assessing Change in Pupillary Diameter, Accommodative Amplitude, and Efficacy of Atropine for Myopia Control

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of atropine on pupillary diameter, accommodative amplitude as well as myopia progression.

METHODS

Medical databases and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies from 1980 until June 2020. The primary and secondary outcomes were: a) change in pupillary diameter (PD) and accommodative amplitude (AA) and b) annualized mean change in spherical equivalent and axial length with various concentrations of atropine compared to control.

RESULTS

Thirteen trials (6 RCTs, 7 observational studies) that studied 9 atropine concentrations (0.01-1.0%) were included. The relation between atropine and change in PD and AA was nonlinear; at < 0.10% atropine, the slope of the curve was steep but the change in PD (+0.7 mm; 95% CI: +0.1 to +1.4) and AA (-1.6D; 95% CI: -3.9 to +0.7) was smaller whereas at ≥0.10% atropine, the slope plateaued but change in PD (+3.2 mm, 95% CI: +2.8 to +3.5) and AA (-10.7D; 95% CI: -12.2 to -9.2) was high.Reduction in myopia progression with atropine at <0.10% and ≥0.10% as compared to controls was 0.37D (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.58) versus 0.75D (95% CI: 0.17 to 1.33) for spherical equivalent and -0.10 mm (95% CI: -0.24 to 0.05) versus -0.23 mm (95% CI: -0.34 to -0.13) for axial length.

CONCLUSIONS

A nonlinear dose-response relationship exists between atropine and PD and AA. Further work is warranted to determine the concentration that provides maximal efficacy with tolerable side effects.

Higher order aberrations and retinal image quality during short-term accommodation in children

Changes in higher order aberrations (HOA's) and retinal image quality during accommodation have not previously been examined in children. This study measured ocular HOA's in ninety non-myopic, school-aged children during short-term accommodation tasks at 0, 3, 6, and 9 D demands presented via a Badal optometer mounted to a Hartmann-Shack wavefront aberrometer (COAS-HD, Wavefront Sciences). Eighty-four participants who exhibited active accommodation were included in the analyses. An eighth order Zernike polynomial was fit across a 2.3 mm, 4 mm, and natural pupil diameter to evaluate changes in refractive power vectors (M, J₁₈₀, and J₄₅), accommodation errors (lags and leads), HOA root mean square (RMS) variables, individual Zernike coefficients, and the visual Strehl ratio based on the optical transfer function (VSOTF). All HOA RMS variables changed significantly with accommodation, with the greatest change observed for the 9 D demand. Of the individual Zernike coefficients, primary (C₄⁰) and secondary spherical aberration (C₆⁰) exhibited the greatest magnitude of change, becoming negative and positive with increasing accommodation, respectively. The VSOTF changed significantly with greater accommodation for both the 4 mm and natural pupil size, becoming significantly worse for the 9 D demand. HOA's increase and retinal image quality decreases significantly during higher levels of accommodation in children, similar to adults. These findings provide a greater understanding of the optical properties of children's eyes and insights into possible mechanisms for the association between accommodation, near work, and refractive error development.

The relationship between functional head impulse test and age in healthy individuals

BACKGROUND

fHIT is an easily applicable test battery that indirectly evaluates the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) from a functional perspective.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to Individuals determine the correlation between age and the percentage of correct answers (% CA) obtained in the functional head impulse test (fHIT) in healthy individuals.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 105 volunteers, 50 males and 55 females, between the ages of 18 and 70 years, participated in the study. A Beon Solution fHIT system (Zero Branco (TV), Italy) was used in the study.

RESULTS

In our study, a decrease in the mean % CA was observed in all semicircular canals (SCCs) with increasing age. Between age and mean % CA, a significant negative moderate (-0.311) correlation was observed in lateral SCCs, and a significant negative low (-0.257) correlation was observed in posterior SCCs (p <  0.05). In anterior SCCs, there was no statistically significant relationship between age and mean % CA (p >  0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study performed in a healthy population will be helpful in terms of making comparisons in studies to be conducted in various vestibular diseases. It will also be a guide for identifying pathological consequences in vestibular diseases.

Prediction of cycloplegic refraction for noninvasive screening of children for refractive error

Detection of refractive error in children is crucial to avoid amblyopia and its impact on quality of life. We here performed a retrospective study in order to develop prediction models for spherical and cylinder refraction in children. The enrolled 1221 eyes of 617 children were divided into three groups: the development group (710 eyes of 359 children), the validation group (385 eyes of 194 children), and the comparison group (126 eyes of 64 children). We determined noncycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction values by autorefractometry. In addition, several noncycloplegic parameters were assessed with the use of ocular biometry. On the basis of the information obtained from the development group, we developed prediction models for cycloplegic spherical and cylinder refraction in children with the use of stepwise multiple regression analysis. The prediction formulas were validated by their application to the validation group. The similarity of noncycloplegic and predicted refraction to cycloplegic refraction in individual eyes was evaluated in the comparison group. Application of the developed prediction models for spherical and cylinder refraction to the validation group revealed that predicted refraction was significantly correlated with measured values for cycloplegic spherical refraction (R = 0.961, P < 0.001) or cylinder refraction (R = 0.894, P < 0.001). Comparison of noncycloplegic, cycloplegic, and predicted refraction in the comparison group revealed that cycloplegic spherical refraction did not differ significantly from predicted refraction but was significantly different from noncycloplegic refraction, whereas cycloplegic cylinder refraction did not differ significantly from predicted or noncycloplegic values. Our prediction models based on ocular biometry provide estimates of refraction in children similar to measured cycloplegic spherical and cylinder refraction values without the application of cycloplegic eyedrops.

Subjective Evaluation of Defocus and Astigmatism Combinations Using Image Simulation in Presbyopes

SIGNIFICANCE

Image simulation is a useful and efficient tool to explore the impact of defocus and astigmatism combinations on visual acuity and image quality score when accommodation is taken into account.

PURPOSE

The goal of this experiment was to determine if a simulation is able to predict visual acuity and image quality score (IQS) with defocus and astigmatism combinations in presbyopes.

METHODS

We measured visual acuity and IQS in five defocus and astigmatism combinations in either real or simulated conditions. In real conditions, the subjects viewed a stimulus through an ophthalmic lens or a deformable mirror. In simulated conditions, subjects viewed images of the same stimulus with simulated blur. The amounts of defocus and astigmatism combinations of a progressive addition lens in near vision were generated through a static correction of the subject's aberrations. We simulated three levels of accommodation: subject could not accommodate (FOC0), subject could accommodate to the less hyperopic focal point (FOC1), or subject could accommodate to the circle of least confusion (FOC2).

RESULTS

Visual acuity or IQS did not differ between mirror and progressive addition lens conditions. Visual acuity measured in real blur conditions differed significantly from that in FOC0 simulated blur condition but were similar to that in FOC1 and FOC2 simulated blur conditions. Image quality score obtained in real conditions were between scores measured with the FOC0 and FOC1 simulated conditions, suggesting that the subjects were able to produce a low level of accommodation.

CONCLUSIONS

Accommodation may play a role when comparing optical and simulated defocus and astigmatism combinations. Presbyopic subjects are able to produce a low level of accommodation that may counterbalance a part of the deleterious effect of the astigmatism on image quality. Simulation remains a useful tool if the correct accommodation state is taken into account.

Accommodative and binocular disorders in preteens with computer vision syndrome: a cross-sectional study

To assess computer vision syndrome (CVS) in a preteen population through an adult-validated CVS questionnaire and to evaluate how digital devices affect accommodative and binocular vision, we enrolled 309 preteens in this cross-sectional study. An adult-validated CVS questionnaire adapted to preteens was used for all subjects. Visual acuity testing, unilateral and alternate cover tests, and tests for accommodative and vergence responses were performed for all preteens. The mean age was 10.75 ± 0.67 (10-12) years. Subjects were divided into two groups: the mild CVS group with a mean CVS score ≤2 and the severe CVS group with a mean CVS score >2. Between the mild and severe CVS groups, statistically significant differences were found in near point of convergence break and recovery (P = 0.03 and P = 0.02, respectively) and distance negative fusional vergence break and recovery (P = 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively). More children with severe CVS developed vergence disorders than those with mild CVS. Optometric clinical screening assessments could reduce ocular symptomatology and prevent long-term effects. However, poor optometric findings might have occurred first, and the poor convergence skills resulted in the symptoms reported while using devices.

Sources of error in clinical measurement of the amplitude of accommodation

Measurement of the amplitude of accommodation is established as a procedure in a routine optometric eye examination. However, clinical methods of measurement of this basic optical function have several sources of error. They are numerous and diverse, and include depth of focus, reaction time, instrument design, specification of the measurement end-point, specification of the reference point of measurement, measurement conditions, consideration of refractive error, and psychological factors. Several of these sources of inaccuracy are composed of multiple sub-sources, and many of the sub-sources influence the common methods of measurement of amplitude of accommodation. Consideration of these sources of measurement error casts doubt on the reliability of the results of measurement, on the validity of established normative values that have been produced using these methods, and on the value of reports of the results of surgery designed to restore accommodation. Clinicians can reduce the effects of some of the sources of error by modifying techniques of measurement with existing methods, but a new method may further improve accuracy.

Diurnal variations of amplitude of accommodation in different age groups

Clinical assessment of amplitude of accommodation (AA) involves measuring the ability of the eye to change its optical power and focus on near tasks/objects. AA gradually decreases with increasing age. However, details of age-related diurnal changes in AA are not well known. This study compared diurnal changes in AA in the adolescents, the twenties, and the forties age groups. Measurement of AA using the push-up method was performed in six sessions at two-hourly intervals for 154 subjects (48, 56, 50 subjects for the adolescents, twenties, and forties age groups, respectively); the first measurements were taken from 9:00–10:00 a.m. and the final measurements from 7:00–8:00 p.m. The mean AA was 14.67 D (highest: 16.15 D in the 3:00–4:00 p.m. session, lowest: 13.35 D in the 9:00–10:00 a.m. session) for the adolescent group; 11.13 D (highest: 11.69 D in the 3:00–4:00 p.m. session; lowest: 10.61 D in the 9:00–10:00 a.m. session) in the twenties group; and 5.53 D (highest: 5.80 D in the 1:00–2:00 p.m. session, lowest: 5.11 D in the 7:00–8:00 p.m. session) in the forties age group. The measured AA showed significant difference between sessions; however, diurnal variations were greater in the younger groups. The measured AA was low at the beginning of the day in the adolescents and twenties groups and low at the end of the day in the forties age group. All age groups showed a high AA during the afternoon hours of the day (1:00–4:00 p.m.). Since the difference between each session was larger in younger subjects, AA should be evaluated while taking the age-related diurnal variations into account.

Comparison of Dynamic Retinoscopy and Autorefraction for Measurement of Accommodative Amplitude

SIGNIFICANCE

This study promotes the use of dynamic retinoscopy to obtain objective measures of accommodative amplitude (AA) in the clinical setting in lieu of the subjective push-up technique.

PURPOSE

This study compared the agreement between open-field autorefraction and a modified dynamic retinoscopy for the objective measurement of AA.

METHODS

Accommodative amplitude was measured using two objective techniques for subjects aged 5 to 60 years. Test order was randomized and monocular AA was measured as subjects viewed printed letters 0.9 mm in height with their dominant eye and distance refraction. For retinoscopy, subjects held a near rod and viewed the target at the nearest (most proximal) point of clear vision. The examiner then performed dynamic retinoscopy along the horizontal meridian and identified the physical location of neutrality of the reflex, which was converted to AA in diopters. Autorefraction was performed obtaining repeated measures of refraction beginning from a target demand of 2.5 D and increasing in discrete steps until there was no subsequent increase in accommodative response. Refractions were converted to power in the horizontal meridian and expressed as accommodation in diopters with the maximal value termed the AA. Distance overrefractions were measured for both techniques to adjust AA for any uncorrected refractive error. Difference versus mean analysis was used to compare agreement between tests.

RESULTS

The 95% limits of agreement between techniques were calculated after removal of two young outliers who responded poorly to one of the techniques. The overall mean difference for 95 subjects was 0.02 ± 0.97 D, with limits of agreement spanning -1.87 to 1.92 D. No significant linear relationship between the magnitude of the AA and the differences between techniques was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Agreement between dynamic retinoscopy and open-field autorefraction was less than 2 D with no systematic bias, suggesting that dynamic retinoscopy may be a suitable clinical technique to measure objective AA.

Effect of Optical Defocus on Choroidal Thickness in Healthy Adults With Presbyopia

Purpose

To investigate changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) induced by retinal defocus in presbyopic adults.

Methods

Thirty-seven healthy presbyopic subjects (age 57.74 ± 4.06 years) with low refractive errors (+0.08 ± 1.09 Diopters [D]) viewed a distant target (video movie at 6 m) for 60 minutes on two occasions while SFCT was monitored with optical coherence tomography every 20 minutes. On each occasion, both eyes were optimally corrected for distance: one eye acted as control, while the other (experimental) eye viewed through an additional ophthalmic lens: a +2.00 D lens imposing myopic defocus on one occasion and a -2.00 D lens imposing hyperopic defocus on the other occasion.

Results

Baseline SFCT was not different between experimental and control eyes (226 ± 72 μm vs. 232 ± 75 μm; P = 0.28). Myopic defocus caused a significant (P < 0.001) increase in SFCT in the defocused eye by 20 minutes (and +10 ± 5-μm increase at 60 minutes: P < 0.001), while hyperopic defocus caused a significant decrease in SFCT by 20 minutes (and -10 ± 5-μm decrease at 60 minutes: P < 0.001) with no change in control eyes.

Conclusions

In presbyopic subjects, imposed myopic retinal defocus caused thickening of SFCT, while hyperopic defocus caused thinning of SFCT. This implies that uncorrected presbyopia, which is associated with hyperopic retinal defocus for near objects and which is highly prevalent in the developing world, would likely be associated with choroidal thinning and possibly reduced choroidal blood flow with prolonged periods in a near visual environment.

Presbyopia: Effectiveness of correction strategies

Presbyopia is a global problem affecting over a billion people worldwide. The prevalence of unmanaged presbyopia is as high as 50% of those over 50 years of age in developing world populations, due to a lack of awareness and accessibility to affordable treatment, and is even as high as 34% in developed countries. Definitions of presbyopia are inconsistent and varied, so we propose a redefinition that states "presbyopia occurs when the physiologically normal age-related reduction in the eye's focusing range reaches a point, when optimally corrected for distance vision, that the clarity of vision at near is insufficient to satisfy an individual's requirements". Strategies for correcting presbyopia include separate optical devices located in front of the visual system (reading glasses) or a change in the direction of gaze to view through optical zones of different optical powers (bifocal, trifocal or progressive addition spectacle lenses), monovision (with contact lenses, intraocular lenses, laser refractive surgery and corneal collagen shrinkage), simultaneous images (with contact lenses, intraocular lenses and corneal inlays), pinhole depth of focus expansion (with intraocular lenses, corneal inlays and pharmaceuticals), crystalline lens softening (with lasers or pharmaceuticals) or restored dynamics (with 'accommodating' intraocular lenses, scleral expansion techniques and ciliary muscle electrostimulation); these strategies may be applied differently to the two eyes to optimise the range of clear focus for an individual's task requirements and minimise adverse visual effects. However, none fully overcome presbyopia in all patients. While the restoration of natural accommodation or an equivalent remains elusive, guidance is given on presbyopic correction evaluation techniques.

A Review of Depth of Focus in Measurement of the Amplitude of Accommodation

The aim of this review is to investigate the role of depth of focus (DoF) as a potential confounding variable in the measurement of the amplitude of accommodation (AoA). The role of DoF in human vision is briefly summarised, and it is noted that the prevalent method of measuring AoA is the push-up method. Factors influencing the effect of DoF on the push-up and other methods of measuring AoA are reviewed in detail. DoF is shown to add substantial measurement error in the routine assessment of accommodation when the AoA is measured by methods involving subjective judgement of an object’s clarity. Reliable compensation for this source of error is not realistically possible because of the complexity of the aetiology of DoF, and its inter-individual and intra-individual variation. The method of measurement also influences the extent of the error. It is concluded that methods of measurement of AoA that exclude DoF should be preferred.

Comparison of the amplitude of accommodation determined subjectively and objectively in South African university students

Background: Historically, two clinical methods have been used for measuring the amplitude of accommodation, which are the push-up and minus lens methods. However, it has been documented that the push-up method overestimates amplitude of accommodation, while the minus lens method underestimates it.Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare subjective and objective procedures for determining the monocular amplitude of accommodation in young optometry students.Setting: The study was conducted in the optometry clinic at the university.Methods: Amplitude of accommodation was measured on 45 optometry students (17 males and 28 females, whose ages ranged from 21 to 27 years) using the push-up, push-down, minus lens, modified dynamic retinoscopy and Pascal dynamic retinoscopy methods. Data were collected by three different examiners in this study. One examiner measured all the subjective tests, while another examiner measured the modified dynamic retinoscopy. The third examiner measured the Pascal heterodynamic retinoscopy.Results: The highest amplitude of accommodation was obtained using the push-up method (10.23 ± 1.67 D), while the minus lens method gave the lowest subjective finding (8.43 ± 1.68 D). However, the subjective methods generally produced comparable results. Both retinoscopic methods showed the lowest mean amplitude of accommodation of approximately 6.50 ± 1.40 D. However, there was a high correlation between the various methods.Conclusion: The push-up and push-down methods overestimate the true amplitude of accommodation because of the relative magnification, while the minus lens method creates an abnormal viewing environment in which the target is stationary but the stimulus becomes increasingly minified. Subjective amplitude of accommodation is an inadequate measure to assess any true accommodation because it fails to differentiate between passive depth of focus and an active accommodative power change in the eye. Therefore, subjective measurement of the amplitude of accommodation may suggest that accommodation is present when it is not. Further research is needed to further validate dynamic retinoscopy as the optimal or best possible routine clinical method to assess the true amplitude of accommodation.

Visual and binocular status in elementary school children with a reading problem

PURPOSE

This descriptive study provides a summary of the binocular anomalies seen in elementary school children identified with reading problems.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all children identified with reading problems and seen by the University of Waterloo, Optometry Clinic, from September 2012 to June 2013.

RESULTS

Files of 121 children (mean age 8.6 years, range 6-14 years) were reviewed. No significant refractive error was found in 81% of children. Five and 8 children were identified as strabismic at distance and near respectively. Phoria test revealed 90% and 65% of patients had normal distance and near phoria. Near point of convergencia (NPC) was <5cm in 68% of children, and 77% had stereoacuity of ≤40seconds of arc. More than 50% of the children had normal fusional vergence ranges except for near positive fusional vergencce (base out) break (46%). Tests for accommodation showed 91% of children were normal for binocular facility, and approximately 70% of children had an expected accuracy of accommodation.

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate that some children with an identified reading problem also present with abnormal binocular test results compared to published normal values. Further investigation should be performed to investigate the relationship between binocular vision function and reading performance.

Comparing Different Methods of Measuring Accommodative Amplitude with Hofstetter's Normative Values in a Ghanaian Population

AIM

Amplitude of accommodation (AoA) can be determined clinically using different methods. Some methods are known to be more reliable than others for measuring AoA in different age categories. The purpose of this study was to compare Hofstetter's age-expected norms with five recommended methods of measuring AoA in order to determine age-appropriate techniques for a Ghanaian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

AoA was measured using four subjective methods (push-up, push-down, minus lens, and modified push-up) and one objective method, the modified dynamic retinoscopy. The amplitudes obtained by each technique were compared to each other and also compared to the age-expected amplitudes as predicted by Hofstetter's equations.

RESULTS

352 non-presbyopes aged 10-39 years were included in this study. All five methods except the push-up (p = 0.089) and modified push-up (p = 0.081) differed significantly from Hofstetter's data, while the modified dynamic retinoscopy recorded the strongest agreement with Hofstetter's average (ICC = 0.78, p ˂ 0.001). With reference to Hofstetter's expected AoA, the minus lens, push-down, modified dynamic retinoscopy, and modified push-up methods underestimated AoA by -4.18D, -1.99D, -0.48D, and -0.43D, respectively. As age increased, underestimated AoA values by the minus lens (10-19 years: -5.57D, 20-29 years: -3.50D, 30-39 years: -2.39D), modified push-up (10-19 years: -1.51D, 20-29 years: +0.40D, 30-39 years: +0.56D), and push-down (10-19 years: -2.90D, 20-29 years: -1.07D, 30-39 years: -1.46D) methods decreased but the modified push-up in relation to Hofstetter's expected was most accurate for the older age. The push-up, on the other hand, overestimated accommodation in all age categories by +0.42D (10-19 years: +0.01D, 20-29 years: +0.82D, 30-39 years: 0.67D). Thus, the push-up method became more accurate as age decreased.

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that Hofstetter's formulae could be used to predict the amplitudes of Ghanaian non-presbyopes aged 10-39 years using the push-up and modified push-up. With regard to Hofstetter's data, the push-up method was more accurate for the younger age-group 10-19 years while the modified push-up was more accurate for the older age-group 20-39.

Maximum human objectively measured pharmacologically stimulated accommodative amplitude

Purpose

To measure the maximum, objectively measured, accommodative amplitude, produced by pharmacologic stimulation.

Methods

Thirty-seven healthy subjects were enrolled, with a mean age of 20.2±1.1 years, corrected visual acuity of 20/20, and mean spherical equivalent refraction (SER) =-0.83±1.60 diopters. For each subject, the right pupil was dilated with phenylephrine 10%. After 30 minutes, the pupil was measured, the left eye was patched, and the right eye was autorefracted. Pilocarpine 4% was then instilled in the right eye, followed by phenylephrine. At 45 minutes after the pilocarpine, autorefraction and pupil size were again measured.

Results

Mean pupil size pre- and postpilocarpine was 8.0±0.8 mm and 4.4±1.9 mm, respectively. Pre- and postpilocarpine, the mean SER was -0.83±1.60 and -10.55±4.26 diopters, respectively. The mean pilocarpine-induced accommodative amplitude was 9.73±3.64 diopters. Five subjects had accommodative amplitudes ≥14.00 diopters. Accommodative amplitude was not significantly related to baseline SER (p-value =0.24), pre- or postpilocarpine pupil size (p-values =0.13 and 0.74), or change in pupil size (p-value =0.37). Iris color did not statistically significantly affect accommodative amplitude (p-value =0.83).

Conclusion

Following topically applied pilocarpine, the induced objectively measured accommodation in the young eye is greater than or equal to the reported subjectively measured voluntary maximum accommodative amplitude.

Image registration reveals central lens thickness minimally increases during accommodation

Purpose

To evaluate anterior chamber depth, central crystalline lens thickness and lens curvature during accommodation.

Setting

California Retina Associates, El Centro, CA, USA.

Design

Healthy volunteer, prospective, clinical research swept-source optical coherence biometric image registration study of accommodation.

Methods

Ten subjects (4 females and 6 males) with an average age of 22.5 years (range: 20–26 years) participated in the study. A 45° beam splitter attached to a Zeiss IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Jena, Germany) biometer enabled simultaneous imaging of the cornea, anterior chamber, entire central crystalline lens and fovea in the dilated right eyes of subjects before, and during focus on a target 11 cm from the cornea. Images with superimposable foveal images, obtained before and during accommodation, that met all of the predetermined alignment criteria were selected for comparison. This registration requirement assured that changes in anterior chamber depth and central lens thickness could be accurately and reliably measured. The lens radii of curvatures were measured with a pixel stick circle.

Results

Images from only 3 of 10 subjects met the predetermined criteria for registration. Mean anterior chamber depth decreased, −67 μm (range: −0.40 to −110 μm), and mean central lens thickness increased, 117 μm (range: 100–130 μm). The lens surfaces steepened, anterior greater than posterior, while the lens, itself, did not move or shift its position as appeared from the lack of movement of the lens nucleus, during 7.8 diopters of accommodation, (range: 6.6–9.7 diopters).

Conclusion

Image registration, with stable invariant references for image correspondence, reveals that during accommodation a large increase in lens surface curvatures is associated with only a small increase in central lens thickness and no change in lens position.

Non-lens-based surgical techniques for presbyopia correction

INTRODUCTION

Presbyopia is the most prevalent refractive error. With a progressive aging population, its surgical correction is an important challenge for the ophthalmology community, as well as the millions of patients who suffer from it, and who are increasingly demanding alternatives to its correction with glasses or contact lenses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A review is presented with a synthesised discussion on the pathophysiological theories of presbyopia and an updated and analytical description of the non-lens involvement surgical techniques used to treat presbyopia.

RESULTS

Corneal procedures include various types of corneal implants and photo-ablative techniques that generate a multifocal cornea, or monovision. Scleral procedures exert a traction on supralenticular sclera that supposedly would improve the amplitude of accommodation.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the techniques are able to completely eliminate the need for near -vision glasses, but many of them manage to improve the refractive status of the patients. More studies with rigorous and standardised methods and longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the changes in the near vision of the patients, in order to corroborate the real and practical usefulness of many of these techniques.

Prevalence, Correlates, and Impact of Uncorrected Presbyopia in a Multiethnic Asian Population

PURPOSE

To examine the prevalence, correlates, and impact of uncorrected presbyopia on vision-specific functioning (VF) in a multiethnic Asian population.

DESIGN

Population-based cross-sectional study.

METHODS

We included 7890 presbyopic subjects (3909 female; age range, 40-86 years) of Malay, Indian, and Chinese ethnicities from the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Disease study. Presbyopia was classified as corrected and uncorrected based on self-reported near correction use. VF was assessed with the VF-11 questionnaire validated using Rasch analysis. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to investigate the associations of sociodemographic and clinical parameters with uncorrected presbyopia, and its impact on VF, respectively. As myopia may mitigate the impact of noncorrection, we performed a subgroup analysis on myopic subjects only (n = 2742).

RESULTS

In total, 2678 of 7890 subjects (33.9%) had uncorrected presbyopia. In multivariable models, younger age, male sex, Malay and Indian ethnicities, presenting distance visual impairment (any eye), and lower education and income levels were associated with higher odds of uncorrected presbyopia (all P < .05). Compared with corrected presbyopia, noncorrection was associated with worse overall VF and reduced ability to perform individual near and distance vision-specific tasks even after adjusting for distance VA and other confounders (all P < .05). Results were very similar for myopic individuals.

CONCLUSION

One-third of presbyopic Singaporean adults did not have near correction. Given its detrimental impact on both near and distance VF, public health strategies to increase uptake of presbyopic correction in younger individuals, male individuals, and those of Malay and Indian ethnicities are needed.