Reduced Surgical Time and Higher Accuracy of Distal Locking with the Electromagnetic Targeting System in Humeral Shaft Intramedullary Nailing

Fluoroscopy-free distal screw locking in intramedullary nailing: A retrospective study

Intramedullary nailing is a common orthopedic procedure, but current methods for distal screw locking have several limitations. This study introduces and evaluates a novel technique that aims to overcome these challenges. The findings were statistically significant, with P-values set at .05. Compared to the traditional method, the novel technique demonstrated several advantages. Mean operation times were reduced to 1.2 hours for the new method, in contrast to 1.5 hours for the control group. Hospital stays also favored the new technique, with a mean duration of 2 days, while the control group averaged 3 days. A significant benefit was the marked decrease in radiation exposure, with the new technique eliminating radiation entirely, recording 0.0 mSv compared to the control group's 2.5 mSv. The procedure's success, gauged by the accurate positioning of screws, was higher for the new technique at 92% versus the control's 78%. Furthermore, complication rates were notably lower in the new method, with a 6% incidence compared to 16% in the traditional approach. While the data suggest that the new technique holds promising advantages, such as reduced operation times, decreased radiation exposure, and fewer complications, it is essential to conduct more extensive research for comprehensive validation. Despite the optimistic results, the study acknowledges the need for larger-scale trials to solidify these findings.

Humeral shaft fracture: systematic review of non-operative and operative treatment

INTRODUCTION

Humeral shaft fractures can be treated non-operatively or operatively. The optimal management is subject to debate. The aim was to compare non-operative and operative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture in terms of fracture healing, complications, and functional outcome.

METHODS

Databases of Embase, Medline ALL, Web-of-Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were systematically searched for publications reporting clinical and functional outcomes of humeral shaft fractures after non-operative treatment with a functional brace or operative treatment by intramedullary nailing (IMN; antegrade or retrograde) or plate osteosynthesis (open plating or minimally invasive). A pooled analysis of the results was performed using MedCalc.

RESULTS

A total of 173 studies, describing 11,868 patients, were included. The fracture healing rate for the non-operative group was 89% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84-92%), 94% (95% CI 92-95%) for the IMN group and 96% (95% CI 95-97%) for the plating group. The rate of secondary radial nerve palsies was 1% in patients treated non-operatively, 3% in the IMN, and 6% in the plating group. Intraoperative complications and implant failures occurred more frequently in the IMN group than in the plating group. The DASH score was the lowest (7/100; 95% CI 1-13) in the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis group. The Constant-Murley and UCLA shoulder score were the highest [93/100 (95% CI 92-95) and 33/35 (95% CI 32-33), respectively] in the plating group.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that even though all treatment modalities result in satisfactory outcomes, operative treatment is associated with the most favorable results. Disregarding secondary radial nerve palsy, specifically plate osteosynthesis seems to result in the highest fracture healing rates, least complications, and best functional outcomes compared with the other treatment modalities.