4
|
Olmez OF, Bilici A, Gursoy P, Cubukcu E, Sakin A, Korkmaz T, Cil I, Cakar B, Menekse S, Demir T, Acikgoz O, Hamdard J. Impact of systemic inflammatory markers in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with crizotinib. Pulmonology 2023; 29:478-485. [PMID: 36564237 DOI: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prognostic utility of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with ALK-positive metastatic or non-resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with crizotinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 82 patients with ALK-positive metastatic or non-resectable NSCLC who received ALK TKI crizotinib were included. Pre-treatment modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the impact of pretreatment mGPS, PNI, and SII on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS The ORR was 77.2%, while 1-year OS and PFS rates were 95.0% and 93.5%, respectively. The univariate analysis revealed significantly higher 1-year PFS (89.4 vs. 64.4%, p=0.043) and OS (92.0 vs. 83.3%, p=0.01) rates in patients with low (<934.7) vs. high (≥934.7) SII scores. Multivariate analysis revealed that PNI ≥0.09 was a significant determinant of poorer 1-year OS rates (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-4.85, p=0.035). No significant difference was observed in survival rates according to gender, age, smoking status, prior lines of therapy, or mGPS scores, while higher mGPS scores (odds ratio [OR]: 0.1, 95%CI 0.16-1.04; p=0.009) and higher PNI scores (OR: 0.16, 95% CI 0.02-0.55; p=0.035) were associated with poorer ORR. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate the prognostic significance of PNI and SII in terms of survival outcome and the impact of mGPS and PNI on treatment response in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC treated with crizotinib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O F Olmez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - A Bilici
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - P Gursoy
- Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - E Cubukcu
- Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - A Sakin
- University of Health Sciences Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - T Korkmaz
- Acıbadem University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - I Cil
- Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - B Cakar
- Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - S Menekse
- Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - T Demir
- Bezmialem University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul; Turkey
| | - O Acikgoz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - J Hamdard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bilici A, Menekse S, Akin S, Degirmenci M, Olmez OF, Avci N, Sakalar T, Tural D, Kaplan MA, Tanriverdi O, Bilgetekin I, Uslu R. Abstract P6-18-37: The efficacy and safety analysis of the treatments of everolimus and exemestane combination in 101 metastatic breast cancer patients: Real-life experience from Turkey. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p6-18-37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Endocrine treatment and chemotherapy are a treatment options for patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, response to first-line hormone treatment could not obtained in all patients, and even patients who havea response will eventually relapse. After disease progression, second-line hormonal treatmentoptions are used sequentially. Everolimus with exemestane has demonstrated promising activity in patients with HR-positive HER2-negative endocrine-resistant MBC with respect to the results of the BOLERO-2 study. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination in the real-life clinical setting for the unselected population in Turkey. Material and Methods: One hundred and one patients with HR-positive HER-2 negative MBC progressing after prior endocrine treatment who were treated with everolimus with exemestane were retrospectively analyzed. The tolerability and efficacy of this combination were evaluated in the unselected Turkish patients. Results: Among 101 patients, 45% of patients had visceral and %50 patients had only bone metastasis. Everolimus with exemestane treatment was administered as a second-line in 21.3% of patients, third-line in 40.4% and forth-line and later in 38.2%. The objective response rate was 24.7% (CR+PR) and stable disease was obtained in 37.7% of patients. At the median follow-up time of 13.5 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time and 1-year PFS were 13.8 months and 57.2%, while the median overall survival (OS) interval and 1-year OS were 40 months and 85%. The median treatment duration was 8.3 and 6.5 months for exemestane and everolimus, respectively. The most frequent reason for discontinuation of treatment were disease progression (39%). Moreover, the most common advers events (AE) causing permanent discontinuation were stomatitis (3%) and pneumonitis (3%). A total of 81 % of patients experienced at least one AE of any grade, 25% of patients at least one grade 3 or 4 AE. Due to AEs, everolimus dosage was reduced to 5 mg in 16 (15.8%) of patients. Conclusions: Our findings confirmed that the combination of everolimus with exemestane was the safe and effective treatment options for patients with HR-positive HER-2 negative MBC after second or later lines treatments.
Citation Format: Bilici A, Menekse S, Akin S, Degirmenci M, Olmez OF, Avci N, Sakalar T, Tural D, Kaplan MA, Tanriverdi O, Bilgetekin I, Uslu R. The efficacy and safety analysis of the treatments of everolimus and exemestane combination in 101 metastatic breast cancer patients: Real-life experience from Turkey [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-37.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bilici
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - S Menekse
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - S Akin
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - M Degirmenci
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - OF Olmez
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - N Avci
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - T Sakalar
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - D Tural
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - MA Kaplan
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - O Tanriverdi
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - I Bilgetekin
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - R Uslu
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|