1
|
Olmez O, Bilici A, Er Ö, Sevinç A, Akman T, Uslu R, Mandel N, Yalçın Ş, Teomete M, Görümlü G, Demir A, Namal E, Alıcı S, Selçukbiricik F, Bavbek S, Paksoy F, Başaran G, Özer L, Şener N, Harputluoğlu H. 2008P The effect of the use of complex molecular profiling in advanced solid organ tumours on clinical decision: Turkey molecular profiling in advanced cancers trial (TUMPACT). Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.1314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
2
|
Bilici A, Menekse S, Akin S, Degirmenci M, Olmez OF, Avci N, Sakalar T, Tural D, Kaplan MA, Tanriverdi O, Bilgetekin I, Uslu R. Abstract P6-18-37: The efficacy and safety analysis of the treatments of everolimus and exemestane combination in 101 metastatic breast cancer patients: Real-life experience from Turkey. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p6-18-37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Endocrine treatment and chemotherapy are a treatment options for patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, response to first-line hormone treatment could not obtained in all patients, and even patients who havea response will eventually relapse. After disease progression, second-line hormonal treatmentoptions are used sequentially. Everolimus with exemestane has demonstrated promising activity in patients with HR-positive HER2-negative endocrine-resistant MBC with respect to the results of the BOLERO-2 study. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination in the real-life clinical setting for the unselected population in Turkey. Material and Methods: One hundred and one patients with HR-positive HER-2 negative MBC progressing after prior endocrine treatment who were treated with everolimus with exemestane were retrospectively analyzed. The tolerability and efficacy of this combination were evaluated in the unselected Turkish patients. Results: Among 101 patients, 45% of patients had visceral and %50 patients had only bone metastasis. Everolimus with exemestane treatment was administered as a second-line in 21.3% of patients, third-line in 40.4% and forth-line and later in 38.2%. The objective response rate was 24.7% (CR+PR) and stable disease was obtained in 37.7% of patients. At the median follow-up time of 13.5 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time and 1-year PFS were 13.8 months and 57.2%, while the median overall survival (OS) interval and 1-year OS were 40 months and 85%. The median treatment duration was 8.3 and 6.5 months for exemestane and everolimus, respectively. The most frequent reason for discontinuation of treatment were disease progression (39%). Moreover, the most common advers events (AE) causing permanent discontinuation were stomatitis (3%) and pneumonitis (3%). A total of 81 % of patients experienced at least one AE of any grade, 25% of patients at least one grade 3 or 4 AE. Due to AEs, everolimus dosage was reduced to 5 mg in 16 (15.8%) of patients. Conclusions: Our findings confirmed that the combination of everolimus with exemestane was the safe and effective treatment options for patients with HR-positive HER-2 negative MBC after second or later lines treatments.
Citation Format: Bilici A, Menekse S, Akin S, Degirmenci M, Olmez OF, Avci N, Sakalar T, Tural D, Kaplan MA, Tanriverdi O, Bilgetekin I, Uslu R. The efficacy and safety analysis of the treatments of everolimus and exemestane combination in 101 metastatic breast cancer patients: Real-life experience from Turkey [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-37.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bilici
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - S Menekse
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - S Akin
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - M Degirmenci
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - OF Olmez
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - N Avci
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - T Sakalar
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - D Tural
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - MA Kaplan
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - O Tanriverdi
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - I Bilgetekin
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| | - R Uslu
- Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Ege University, Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ali Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital, Bursa, Turkey; Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayser, Turkey; Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dicle University, Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Medical Faculty, Mugla, Turkey; Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barlesi F, Vansteenkiste J, Spigel D, Ishii H, Garassino M, De Marinis F, Özgüroğlu M, Szczesna A, Polychronis A, Uslu R, Krzakowski M, Lee J, Calabro L, Frontera O, Ellers-Lenz B, Bajars M, Ruisi M, Park K. OA05.05 Avelumab vs Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC: Primary Analysis of the Phase 3 JAVELIN Lung 200 Trial. J Thorac Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
4
|
Bicakli D, Guney S, Uslu R, Coker A. The relationship between nutritional status, performance status and survival time in patients with pancreatic cancer. Clin Nutr 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.1317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
5
|
Yilmaz F, Soyer N, Uslu R, Erdogan AP, Karaca B, Saydam G, Sahin F, Vural F. Retrospective analysis of patients with relapsed or refractory testicular nonseminous germ cell tumors treated with autologous stem cell transplantation. Indian J Cancer 2018; 54:415-420. [PMID: 29469069 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_284_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM About 20-25% of the testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) are relapsed or refractory after first line therapy and optimal treatment for this group is poorly defined. We aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in this patient group.Material and. METHODS 19 patients with 28 ASCT were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were treated with BEP (Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin) as first line therapy and TIP(paclitexalifosfamide, cisplatin) was given as salvage chemotherapy. Stem cell collection was performed with TIP and granulocyte stimulating factor. ASCT was performed with carboplatin(700mg/m2) and etoposite(750mg /m 2). The results were provided as median(min-max). P<0.05 was accepted as statistical significant level. RESULTS After ASCT, complete(CR) and partial remission (PR) rates were 47.3% and 31 .5% respectively. The median overall survival(OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were 18(0-37.4 months) and 7(0-15months) months respectively. Estimated 2-year OS was 47.4% and PFS was 35.3%. Grade 3/4 toxicities including diarrhea, mucositis, and toxic hepatitis were observed in 5 patients. Only one patient died due to complication of transplantation. CONCLUSION Although the number of the patients in this study is limited, ASCT seems to be a safe and effective treatment modality in relapsed refractory non-seminomatousTGCT with an acceptable OS, PFS and mortality rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Yilmaz
- Department of Hematology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - N Soyer
- Department of Hematology, Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - R Uslu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - A P Erdogan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - B Karaca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - G Saydam
- Department of Hematology, Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - F Sahin
- Department of Hematology, Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - F Vural
- Department of Hematology, Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Karadeniz Cakmak G, Uslu R, Emre AU, Elmas O, Karadere Y, Konuk MB, Engin H, Dogan Gun B. Abstract P3-01-08: Axillary staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: The comparison of surgeon performed axillary ultrasound and 18F-FDG PET/CT with pathologic status of sentinel lymph nodes in clinically node-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p3-01-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective: In the era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), the most accurate method for axillary staging is a challenge for surgeon. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the recommended choice of care for axillary staging in clinically node-negative (cN0) disease. Nevertheless, the role of preoperative axillary ultrasound (AUS) or 18F-FDG PET/CT in case of cN0 patients after NAC (ycN0) is controversial. The purpose of the presented study is to assess the correlation between surgeon performed AUS and PET/CT data with SNLB results to further determine the predictive role of AUS in pathologic staging of cN0 axilla after NAC.
Materials-Methods: A single institution, retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was analyzed to identify ycN0 breast cancer patients with AUS and 18F-FDG PET/CT. All AUS studies were interpreted by a dedicated breast surgeon experienced in ultrasound, as "normal" according to the absence of specific characteristics shown to be commonly associated with metastatic involvement at diagnosis and at the date of operation. 18F-FDG PET/CT scans was termed as negative or positive due to the standardized uptake value (SUV). Patient, tumor and operative variables including age, body mass index (BMI), date of diagnosis and surgery, AUS, 18F-FDG PET/CT scans, SLNB results, and final pathology data were evaluated.
Results: Of the 69 patients with cN0 axilla after NAC, SNLB was found to be positive in 37 patients (53.6%). 2 (9.5%) out of 21 patients with a normal AUS and 3 (21.4%) out of 14 patients with negative PET/CT were ultimately found to be node-positive on pathologic assessment of SLNB. Intraoperative sonography accurately identified the SLN in 92.7% of cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 94.5%, 59.3%, 72.9% and 90.5% for surgeon-performed AUS and 91.8%, 34.4%, 61.8% and 78.6% for PET/CT scans, respectively. Overall accuracy was found to be %78.2 for AUS and 65.2.% for PET/CT. The presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), micrometastasis, primary tumor size, and body mass index were found to be significantly different between true and false negative AUS. None of the clinicopathological features of the primary tumor were significantly associated with FDG uptake in the axillary lesion. Micrometastatic disease, the size and number of metastatic nodes were significantly associated with FDG uptake leading to a difference between true and false negative PET/CT for axillary disease. No significant difference was noted with regard to patient age, tumor grade, histologic type, hormone receptor status, and time between AUS or PET/CT and axillary surgery.
Conclusion: Surgeon performed AUS is a beneficial tool with the potential of accurate prediction of axillary disease in up to 78% of patients after NAC. Nevertheless, the accuracy of AUS findings should be interrogated cautiously particularly for larger tumors with LVI or micrometastasis in overweight patients. Similarly, our data also imply that PET/CT had a limited value in the evaluation of axillary nodes and is not sufficient to predict axillary status particularly in case of micrometastasis after NAC.
Citation Format: Karadeniz Cakmak G, Uslu R, Emre AU, Elmas O, Karadere Y, Konuk MB, Engin H, Dogan Gun B. Axillary staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: The comparison of surgeon performed axillary ultrasound and 18F-FDG PET/CT with pathologic status of sentinel lymph nodes in clinically node-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-01-08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - R Uslu
- BEUN The School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
| | - AU Emre
- BEUN The School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
| | - O Elmas
- BEUN The School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
| | - Y Karadere
- BEUN The School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
| | - MB Konuk
- BEUN The School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
| | - H Engin
- BEUN The School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
| | - B Dogan Gun
- BEUN The School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yurekli BS, Karaca B, Kisim A, Bozkurt E, Atmaca H, Cetinkalp S, Ozgen G, Yilmaz C, Uzunoglu S, Uslu R, Saygili F. AT-101 acts as anti-proliferative and hormone suppressive agent in mouse pituitary corticotroph tumor cells. J Endocrinol Invest 2018; 41:233-240. [PMID: 28730425 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-017-0733-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2016] [Accepted: 07/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gossypol, a naturally occurring compound in cottonseeds, has anticancer effects against several tumor cell lines. It has been extensively studied in clinical trials and is well tolerated with a favorable safety profile. AT-101, a derivative of R (-)-gossypol, binds to Bcl-2 family proteins and induces apoptosis in vitro. Although transsphenoidal surgical excision of the pituitary corticotroph adenoma is the gold standard of care, it is not successful all the time. Medical therapy for Cushing's disease still remains a challenge for the clinicians. We aimed to investigate the cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of AT-101 in mouse pituitary corticotroph tumor AtT20 cells. METHODS Cytotoxic effect of AT-101 was assessed by XTT cell viability assay. Apoptosis was shown by measuring DNA fragmentation and Caspase-3/7 activity. Changes in mRNA expressions of apoptosis-related genes were investigated by qPCR array after treatment with AT-101. ACTH was measured by ACTH-EIA Kit. RESULTS AT-101 induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis in AtT20 cells. mRNA levels of pro-apoptotic genes such as TNFR-SF-10B, Bid, PYCARD, Caspase-8, Caspase-3, and Caspase-7 were induced by 2.0-, 1.5-, 1.7-, 1.5-, 1.6-, and 2-fold, respectively, in AtT20 cells by AT-101 treatment. Moreover, some of the anti-apoptotic genes such as BCL2L10, NAIP1, and PAK-7 were reduced by 2.1-, 2.3-, 4.0-fold, respectively, in AtT20 cells. AT-101 also decreased ACTH secretion significantly. CONCLUSION AT-101 induces apoptosis in mouse pituitary corticotroph tumor cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B S Yurekli
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ege University School of Medicine, 35100, Izmir, Turkey.
| | - B Karaca
- Division Medical Oncology, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, Ege University School of Medicine, 35100, Izmir, Turkey
| | - A Kisim
- Section of Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Letters, Celal Bayar University, 45140, Muradiye/Manisa, Turkey
| | - E Bozkurt
- Section of Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Letters, Celal Bayar University, 45140, Muradiye/Manisa, Turkey
| | - H Atmaca
- Section of Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Letters, Celal Bayar University, 45140, Muradiye/Manisa, Turkey
| | - S Cetinkalp
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ege University School of Medicine, 35100, Izmir, Turkey
| | - G Ozgen
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ege University School of Medicine, 35100, Izmir, Turkey
| | - C Yilmaz
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ege University School of Medicine, 35100, Izmir, Turkey
| | - S Uzunoglu
- Section of Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Letters, Celal Bayar University, 45140, Muradiye/Manisa, Turkey
| | - R Uslu
- Division Medical Oncology, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, Ege University School of Medicine, 35100, Izmir, Turkey
| | - F Saygili
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ege University School of Medicine, 35100, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Coker A, Hopanci D, Oruc N, Aydin A, Uslu R, Goker E. SUN-P076: Effects of Oral Nutrition Support on Quality of Life in Cachectic Pancreatic Cancer Patients. Clin Nutr 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0261-5614(17)30551-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
9
|
Im YH, Uslu R, Lee KS, Nagarkar R, Sohn J, Sevinc A, Altundag K, Chang YC, Abdel-Razeq H, Im SA, Jeong J, Park HY, Arpornwirat W, Bastick P, Le TH, Ocak Arikan O, Xue HL, Canatar A, Valenti R, Kim SB. Abstract P4-13-09: Clinical effectiveness of everolimus and exemestane in advanced breast cancer patients from Asia and Africa: First efficacy and updated safety results from the phase IIIb EVEREXES study. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p4-13-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
BOLERO-2 phase III trial established the efficacy of everolimus (EVE) plus exemestane (EXE) for the treatment of postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (aBC). However, in this study only a minority (<10%) of patients were recruited from African and Asia Pacific countries. Considering the potential effects of ethnic and cultural differences on treatment effectiveness, it remains compelling to confirm the safety and efficacy profile of EVE+EXE in these populations.
Methods
EVEREXES is an open-label phase IIIb, single arm, multi-center trial, which from March 2013 to October 2014 enrolled 232 post-menopausal, HR-positive and HER2-negative, aBC patients previously treated with aromatase inhibitors, across 13 countries in Asia Pacific, Middle East, North and South Africa, with a significant majority of patients being of Asian ethnicity (196, 84.5%). Its primary objective was to investigate the safety and tolerability profile of EVE+EXE. Secondary objectives were the evaluation of efficacy (assessed by PFS, ORR, and CBR based on RECIST 1.1 criteria) and change in ECOG performance status.
Results
At data cut off of 31st of January 2015, at a median follow up of 11.7 months, median PFS for the ITT population was 9.5 months [9.2-11.6 months], based on local assessment, with the observation of 1 (0.4%) CR and 35 (15.4%) PR. Regarding safety and tolerability, a majority (81.1%) of grade (G) 1/2 adverse events (AEs) was reported. In particular, the following pattern was observed in terms of % of patients who developed G1/G2/G3 mTOR-inhibition induced AEs: stomatitis (36.1, 13.7, 10.6), rash (21.6/6.2/0), fatigue (10.6, 4.4, 2.2), hyperglycemia (6.2, 11.5, 7.0), weight decrease (7.5, 7, 0.9), pneumonitis (5.7, 7, 0.9). No Grade 4 AEs related to EVE+EXE treatment were observed, with exception of one case of non infectious pneumonitis (0.4%). Median dose intensity of everolimus was 9.2 mg/day.
Conclusions
Efficacy and safety results from EVEREXES trial further confirm the role of EVE+EXE for the treatment of HR+/Her2- advanced BC patients in Eastern countries. Results were consistent with data previously reported in BOLERO-2 trial.
Citation Format: Im Y-H, Uslu R, Lee KS, Nagarkar R, Sohn J, Sevinc A, Altundag K, Chang Y-C, Abdel-Razeq H, Im S-A, Jeong J, Park HY, Arpornwirat W, Bastick P, Le TH, Ocak Arikan O, Xue HL, Canatar A, Valenti R, Kim S-B. Clinical effectiveness of everolimus and exemestane in advanced breast cancer patients from Asia and Africa: First efficacy and updated safety results from the phase IIIb EVEREXES study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y-H Im
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - R Uslu
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - KS Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - R Nagarkar
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - J Sohn
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - A Sevinc
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - K Altundag
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Y-C Chang
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - H Abdel-Razeq
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - S-A Im
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - J Jeong
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - HY Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - W Arpornwirat
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - P Bastick
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - TH Le
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - O Ocak Arikan
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - HL Xue
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - A Canatar
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - R Valenti
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - S-B Kim
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Curie Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, India; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Soul, Korea; Gaziantep University Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, Australia; Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chí Minh, Viet Nam; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 1Novartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hopanci Bicakli D, Ozveren A, Karabulut B, Uslu R, Dalak R, Cehreli R, Akcicek F, Uyar M. SUN-PP124: Correlation between Mini Nutritional Assessment and Hand Grip Strength in Geriatric Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer. Clin Nutr 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0261-5614(15)30275-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
11
|
Surmeli Z, Cakar B, Gursoy P, Karabulut B, Sanli U, Uslu R. 1917 Prognostic role of surrogate intrinsic subtypes in non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)30866-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
12
|
Karaca B, Surmeli Z, Erdoğan A, Sanli U, Sezgin C, Uslu R. Prognostic Effect of Primary Tumor Characteristics in Metastatic Melanoma. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu344.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
13
|
Erdoğan A, Karaca B, Yasdik H, Surmeli Z, Sanli U, Karabulut B, Uslu R. Comparison of Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer in Women ≤35 Years and > 35 Years: Does Age Matter? Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu329.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
14
|
Karaca B, Surmeli Z, Gursoy P, Erdogan A, Sanli U, Uslu R. Trastuzumab/At-101 Combination Induces Apoptosis and Shows Synergistic Cytotoxicity in Her2-Positive Breast Cancer Cells By Inhibition of Pi3K Signaling: a Novel Combination to Overcome Resistance to Anti-Her2 Therapy. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu358.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
15
|
Dirican A, Atmaca H, Bozkurt E, Erten C, Karaca B, Uslu R. Novel combination of docetaxel and thymoquinone induces synergistic cytotoxicity and apoptosis in DU-145 human prostate cancer cells by modulating PI3K-AKT pathway. Clin Transl Oncol 2014; 17:145-51. [PMID: 25060568 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-014-1206-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2014] [Accepted: 07/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) still remains as an important challenge of daily oncology practice. Docetaxel significantly prolongs overall survival in men with CRPC. Thymoquinone (TQ), one of the flavonoid compounds isolated from Nigealla sativa, has been shown to possess cytotoxic activity against a variety of cancer cell lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS The aim of the study was to investigate the possible synergistic cytotoxic/apoptotic effects of a novel combination, docetaxel and TQ in DU-145 hormone- and drug-refractory prostate cancer cells and their effects on PI3K and ERK signaling pathways. RESULTS We observed that the combination of docetaxel and TQ resulted in a significant synergistic cytotoxicy and apoptosis as compared to any single agent alone, in a dose-dependent manner. It was found that viability of the combination treated cells was not significantly changed in the presence of LY294002 as compared to inhibitor treated cells. However, in the presence of FR180204, viability of combination treated cells was significantly decreased as compared to inhibitor treated cells. In conclusion, cytotoxic effect of the docetaxel and TQ combination is correlated with the block of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in DU-145 cells. CONCLUSION Therefore, this combination strategy may be an alternative approach for the challenging era of daily oncologic practice. Also, the combination of docetaxel and TQ might allow a reduction in docetaxel doses and diminish adverse effects of docetaxel while maintaining the therapeutic effect in patients with CRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Dirican
- Department of Medical Oncology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, 35360, Izmir, Turkey,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Oktem G, Sercan O, Guven U, Uslu R, Uysal A, Goksel G, Ayla S, Bilir A. Cancer stem cell differentiation: TGFβ1 and versican may trigger molecules for the organization of tumor spheroids. Oncol Rep 2014; 32:641-9. [PMID: 24927163 DOI: 10.3892/or.2014.3252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2014] [Accepted: 02/26/2014] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have the ability to self-renew similar to normal stem cells. This process is linked with metastasis and resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In the present study, we constructed an in vitro differentiation model for CSCs. CSCs isolated and proliferated for one passage were maintained as monolayers or spheroid-forming cells with serum included media for differentiation process. Differentiation of adhesion molecules and cellular ultrastructural properties were investigated and compared in both monolayer and spheroid cultures. CD133+/CD44+ cancer-initiating cells were isolated from DU-145 human prostate cancer cell line monolayer cultures and propagated as tumor spheroids and compared with the remaining heterogeneous cancer cell bulk population. Microarray-based gene expression analysis was applied to determine genes with differential expression and protein expression levels of candidates were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Electron microscopy showed detailed analysis of morphology. TGFβ1 was found to be significantly upregulated in monolayer CSCs. High expression levels of VCAN, COL7A1, ITGβ3, MMP16, RPL13A, COL4A2 and TIMP1 and low expression levels of THBS1, MMP1 and MMP14 were detected when CSCs were maintained as serum-grown prostate CSC spheroids. Immunohistochemistry supported increased immunoreactivity of TGFβ1 in monolayer cultures and VCAN in spheroids. CSCs were found to possess multipotential differentiation capabilities through upregulation and/or downregulation of their markers. TGFβ1 is a triggering molecule, it stimulates versican, Col7A1, ITGβ3 and, most importantly, the upregulation of versican was only detected in CSCs. Our data support a model where CSCs must be engaged by one or more signaling cascades to differentiate and initiate tumor formation. This mechanism occurs with intracellular and extracellular signals and it is possible that CSCc themselves may be a source for extracellular signaling. These molecules functioning in tumor progression and differentiation may help develop targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Oktem
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova 35100, Izmir, Turkey
| | - O Sercan
- Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Narlidere 35340, Izmir, Turkey
| | - U Guven
- Department of Stem Cell, Ege University Institute of Health Science, Bornova 35100, Izmir, Turkey
| | - R Uslu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova 35100, Izmir, Turkey
| | - A Uysal
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova 35100, Izmir, Turkey
| | - G Goksel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Celal Bayar University, Manisa 45030, Turkey
| | - S Ayla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zeynep Kamil Gynecology and Maternity Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34668, Turkey
| | - A Bilir
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Emine-Bahaeddin Nakiboglu Medical Faculty, Zirve University, Gaziantep 27100, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cakar B, Karaca B, Uslu R. Sexual dysfunction in cancer patients: a review. J BUON 2013; 18:818-823. [PMID: 24344003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Cancer is a life-threatening disease despite the advanced therapeutic strategies now available. A common problem is that physicians and patients tend to concentrate on intensive medical treatment options and underestimate the treatment-related adverse effects. In this review, we summarize one of these adverse effects in cancer patients; sexual dysfunction (SD). In addition, current therapeutic choices with optimal doses and patient selection strategies are defined. All patients should be informed about problems associated with therapy-related SD and must be guided toward the most appropriate therapeutic options before starting treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Cakar
- Ege University Schhol of Medicine, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sezgin C, Karabulut B, Uslu R, Sanli UA, Goksel G, Zekioglu O, Ozdemir N, Goker E. Potential Predictive Factors for Response to Weekly Paclitaxel Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Chemother 2013; 17:96-103. [PMID: 15828451 DOI: 10.1179/joc.2005.17.1.96] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
The authors compare results obtained from weekly paclitaxel treatment in advanced breast cancer patients with biological and clinical prognostic factors. Expression of c-erbB-2, Ki-67, p53 and hormone receptors (HR) was examined by immunohistochemistry in samples of breast tissue from 30 patients. Univariate analysis showed that Ki-67 positivity and low performance status (PS) were associated with poor outcome (P <0.05). We observed that expression of p53 and c-erbB-2 did not have any negative effect on response to chemotherapy and survival. HR-negative patients had better response and slightly statistically significant overall survival (OS) rates compared to HR-positive patients (P >0.05). In a multivariate analysis low PS was the only significant predictor of shorter survival (P <0.05). In conclusion, while the expression of p53 and c-erbB-2 did not have any effect on treatment results, negative Ki-67 expression and negative HR status were associated with better OS in this patient population. PS was the only significant predictor for OS.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use
- Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
- Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Breast Neoplasms/metabolism
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology
- Female
- Humans
- Immunoenzyme Techniques
- Ki-67 Antigen/metabolism
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology
- Paclitaxel/therapeutic use
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism
- Survival Rate
- Treatment Outcome
- Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Sezgin
- Ege University School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Bornova/Izmir
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Varol U, Cirak Y, Cakar B, Karaca B, Sezgin C, Uslu R, Karabulut B. Survival analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who were treated with the five major therapeutic agents over the course of disease. J BUON 2013; 18:647-652. [PMID: 24065478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Exposure to all active agents may be more important than specific sequence of drug administration in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) of mCRC patients who were treated with all 5 major therapeutic agents used in this malignancy. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 395 mCRC patients referred to our clinic. The study included patients who received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-, irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and at least 3 cycles of bevacizumab and 4 weeks of cetuximab sequentially in various combinations. RESULTS Forty mCRC patients received the 5 major therapeutic agents effectively and sequentially, and their mean OS was 26.43±2.04 months. The 3- and 4- year OS survival rates were 26.7% and 16.7%, respectively. When survival analysis was limited to the metastatic patients with at least 6 cycles of bevacizumab therapy in addition to standard duration of other chemotherapeutic agents (N=33), the mean OS was 26.7±2.38 months. With a further survival analysis limited to metastatic patients who were treated with at least both 6 cycles of bevacizumab and 8 weeks of cetuximab in addition to other therapies (N=17), the mean OS was 44.8±11.03 months. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that in mCRC patients there may be a significant survival advantage if an adequate tumor response was achieved with all major therapeutic agents. Therefore, we believe that we should treat our patients with the 5 major therapeutic drugs as effectively as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Varol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mugla University Research and Training Hospital, Mugla, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ergun M, Eyigor S, Karaca B, Kisim A, Uslu R. Effects of exercise on angiogenesis and apoptosis-related molecules, quality of life, fatigue and depression in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2013; 22:626-37. [PMID: 23731173 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to explore the effects of exercise on angiogenesis and apoptosis-related molecules, quality of life, fatigue and depression in patients who completed breast cancer treatment. Sixty breast cancer patients were randomised into three groups, as supervised exercise group, home exercise group and education group. Angiogenesis and apoptosis-related cytokine levels and quality of life (EORTC QOL-C30: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C30), fatigue (Brief Fatigue Inventory) and depression (BDI: Beck Depression Inventory) scores were compared before and after a 12-week exercise programme. After the exercise programme, statistically significant decreases were found in interleukin-8 and neutrophil activating protein-78 levels in the home exercise group (P < 0.05). The education group showed a statistically significant increase in monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 level (P < 0.05). Functional score and global health score of EORTC QOL-C30 in the supervised exercise group and functional score of EORTC QOL-C30 in the home exercise group increased significantly after exercise programme (P < 0.05). BDI score was significantly lower in the supervised exercise group after the exercise programme (P < 0.05). Changes in angiogenesis and apoptosis-related molecules in the study groups suggest a possible effect of exercise on these parameters. Exercise programmes are safe and effective on quality of life and depression in breast cancer patients whose treatments are complete.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ergun
- Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Department, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cakar B, Bulut G, Kisim A, Bozkurt E, Atmaca H, Uzunoglu S, Uslu R, Karaca B. AT-101 (-/- Gossypol) in Combination with Trastuzumab Triggers Apoptosis Through Inhibiting BCL-2, BCL-XL AND MCL-1 Protein Levels in Human HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Cells. Ann Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt086.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
22
|
Karaca B, Yasdik H, Surmeli Z, Gursoy P, Karabulut B, Sezgin C, Sanli U, Uslu R. Interpreting Genomic Diversity for Breast Cancer: Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer in Very Young Women (≤35 Y) in Western Turkey. Ann Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt078.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
23
|
Cakar B, Varol U, Junushova B, Muslu U, Gursoy Oner P, Gokhan Surmeli Z, Cirak Y, Karaca B, Sezgin C, Karabulut B, Uslu R. Evaluation of the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer. J BUON 2013; 18:372-376. [PMID: 23818348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed at comparing the disease-free survival (DFS) in high-risk TNM stage II colon cancer patients who had been subjected to adjuvant chemotherapy and TNM low-risk stage II patients who did not receive chemotherapy. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of stage II colon cancer patients between January 2006 and December 2011. High-risk patients were defined those with any colonic obstruction/perforation, mucinous histology, inadequate lymph node sampling, T4 disease, lymphatic/ vascular or perineural invasion, preoperatively elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and high-grade tumor. All patients with high-risk features received adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS There were 42 patients in the high-risk treatment group and 21 patients in the non-treatment (observation) group. There were no significant differences in terms of gender, tumor size, tumor localization, or the number of excised lymph nodes between the groups. The median follow- up time was 33.9 months in the treatment group and 29.3 months in the non-treatment group. Recurrence developed in 4 patients (6.3%), 3 of which were in the treatment group. DFS in both groups was statistically similar. CONCLUSION Adjuvant chemotherapy in the high-risk patients resulted in similar DFS as that in the low-risk patients. Although the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer is unclear, it is rational to offer adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Cakar
- Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Robichon C, Annereau JP, Gomes B, Pillon A, de Vries L, Cussac D, Meyer N, Lamant L, Kruczynski A, Guilbaud N, Kluza J, Jendoubi M, Corazao-Rozas P, Andre F, Jonneaux A, Guerreschi P, Formstecher P, Mortier L, Marchetti PHI, Bozkurt E, Atmaca H, Uzunoglu S, Uslu R, Karaca B, Erenpreisa J, Jackson TR, Huna A, Salmina K, Innashkina I, Jankevics E, Townsend PA, Cragg MS, Atmaca H, Bozkurt E, Uzunoglu S, Uslu R, Karaca B, Ramos SP, Bin M, Neto MDS, Curvello R, de Souza ACS, Nunes M, Weiswald LB, Vrignaud P, Vacher S, Turlotte E, Richon S, Roman-Roman S, Bieche I, Dangles-Marie V, Morais-Santos F, Pinheiro C, Vieira A, Schmitt F, Paredes J, Baltazar F, Zhang T, Lee YW, Rui YF, Cheng TY, Li G, Sreelatha KH, Reshma RS, Veena S, Rakesh SN, Thara S, Jem P, Priya S, Veena S, Sreelatha KH, Reshma RS, Rakesh SN, Priya S. Poster session 5. Translational research. Ann Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
25
|
Bozkurt E, Atmaca H, Uzunoglu S, Uslu R, Karaca B. P53 Modulates Trabectedin Mediated Cytotoxicity in Glioblastoma Multiforme Cells (U-87MG and T98G). Ann Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt047.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
26
|
Atmaca H, Bozkurt E, Uzunoglu S, Uslu R, Karaca B. A Diverse Induction of Apoptosis by Trabectedin in MCF-7 (HER2-/ER+) and MDA-MB-453 (HER2 + /ER-) Breast Cancer Cells. Ann Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt047.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
27
|
Abulkhair O, Uslu R, Sezgin C, Büyükberber S, Darwish T, Isikdogan A, Gumus M, Dane F, Sevinc A, Halawani H, Uncu D, Marrero N, Tobler J, Soares C, Landis S, Moraes E, Gidekel R, Santillana S, Nunez P, Cagnolati S, Rodriguez JG. Abstract OT1-1-08: Clinical outcomes among ErbB2+ MBC patients treated with lapatinib-capecitabine after trastuzumab progression: Role of early switch to lapatinib (TYCO study). Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-ot1-1-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Lapatinib in combination with capecitabine is a standard of care treatment for ErbB2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who have progressed after anthracyclines, taxanes and trastuzumab treatment. Results from the lapatinib pivotal trial showed that the addition of lapatinib to capecitabine increased median time to progression (TTP) even among heavily pre-treated patients (median of 4 prior lines of therapy). A post-hoc exploratory sub-group analysis of this trial suggested that earlier administration of lapatinib-capecitabine in MBC patients who progress after trastuzumab may produce better clinical outcomes. The TYCO study was designed to evaluate if early initiation of lapatinib-capecitabine in patients with ErbB2+ MBC who have progressed on trastuzumab-containing regimen improves TTP in comparison with a delayed start of the therapy.
Trial design: TYCO is an international, multicenter, prospective, observational study in 269 ErbB2+ MBC patients whose disease has progressed after treatment with trastuzumab in the metastatic setting. Two cohorts will be compared; Group 1: patients receiving lapatinib-capecitabine just after the first trastuzumab progression, and Group 2: patients receiving lapatinib-capecitabine after two or more lines of treatment after first trastuzumab progression. The study duration is of 12 months with data collection at baseline and approximately every 3 months thereafter.
Major Eligibility Criteria: 1. Females ≥18y with confirmed ErbB2+ MBC who have progressed after a previous trastuzumab-containing regimen,2. Pts eligible for standard therapy with lapatinib-capecitabine at approved conventional doses, as per local approved label.3. Pts eligible to start standard treatment with Lapatinib-capecitabine at conventional doses, or receiving standard treatment with Lapatinib-capecitabine at conventional doses, for no longer than 10 weeks from the start of the treatment to the date of inclusion in the study;
Aims: Primary objective of this study is to determine if early switch to lapatinib-capecitabine in patients with ErbB2+ metastatic breast cancer who have progressed on trastuzumab containing regimen improves time to disease progression as determined by treating physician either clinically or radiologically. Secondary objectives include overall response rate and overall survival.
Statistical Methods: Kaplan-Meier plots will be used to describe the median TTP after start of lapatinib-capecetabine. Cox proportional hazard model will be developed to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (and 95% confidence intervals) comparing TTP for the two treatment group using propensity score methods (trimmed sample, adjustment for the continuous propensity score measure, and doubly robust adjustment) to adjust for potential confounding by indication that may arise due to the non-randomised design.
Present and Target Accrual: Enrollment began in February 2010, and as per May 2012, 266 patients have been included from Turkey, Venezuela, Argentina, Saudi Arabia and Colombia.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-1-08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Abulkhair
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - R Uslu
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - C Sezgin
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - S Büyükberber
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - T Darwish
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - A Isikdogan
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - M Gumus
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - F Dane
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - A Sevinc
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - H Halawani
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - D Uncu
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - N Marrero
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - J Tobler
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - C Soares
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - S Landis
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - E Moraes
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - R Gidekel
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - S Santillana
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - P Nunez
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - S Cagnolati
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - JG Rodriguez
- Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey; Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey; King Abdulaziz Medical City National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah Medical City - Oncology Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep, Turkey; King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; Numune Training and Research Hosptial, Ankara, Turkey; Instituto Docente de Urología, Valencia, Venezuela; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, United Kingdom; Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado, Caracas, Venezuela; Centro Oncologico-FIDES-La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Karaca B, Muslu U, Surmeli Z, Cakar B, Atmaca H, Asli K, Sezgin C, Uzunoglu S, Karabulut B, Uslu R. 98P Octreotide in Combination with Docetaxel Triggers Apoptosis by Inducing Sstr2 and Sstr5 Levels in Human Breast Cancer Cells, Mcf-7 and Mda-Mb-231. Ann Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0923-7534(19)65742-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
29
|
Surmeli Z, Gursoy P, Cakar B, Asli K, Atmaca H, Sezgin C, Karabulut B, Uslu R, Karaca B. 99P Zoledronic Acid in Combination with Serine/Threonine Phosphatase Inhibitors Induces Cytotoxicity and Apoptosis in Human Breast Cancer Cells via Decreasing the Activities of Pp1 and Pp2A. Ann Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0923-7534(19)65743-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
30
|
Icli F, Altundag K, Coskun U, Paydas S, Basaran G, Saip P, Dogu GG, Eralp Y, Uslu R, Sevinc A, Onur H, Mandel NM, Sezgin C, Altinbas M, Guler N, Isikdogan A, Gokmen E, Uygun K, Ustuner Z, Yaren A. Nine versus 52 weeks of adjuvant trastuzumab in early breast cancer: An observational study of the Turkish Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
31
|
Yalcin S, Uslu R, Dane F, Yilmaz U, Zengin N, Buyukunal E, Buyukberber S, Camci C, Sencan O, Kilickap S. Bevacizumab plus capecitabine as maintenance treatment after initial treatment with bevacizumab plus XELOX in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated findings from a randomized, multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.3579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
32
|
Yalcin S, Uslu R, Dane F, Yilmaz U, Zengin N, Buyukunal E, Buyukberber S, Camci C, Sencan O, Kilickap S. A randomized, multicenter phase III trial of bevacizumab plus capecitabine as maintenance treatment after initial treatment with bevacizumab plus XELOX in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
474 Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies, second to breast cancer in women and third to lung cancer and prostate cancer in men. The aim of this study in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was to achieve a better progression-free survival (PFS) and less risk of toxicity by administrating bevacizumab (BEV) + capecitabine + oxaliplatin (XELOX) for 6 cycles, stop oxaliplatin and go with maintenance therapy (BEV + capecitabine) until progression. Methods: BEV (7.5 mg/kg) + XELOX (capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 bid d1–14 + oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d1 q3w) were administered until progression (Arm A) or 6 cycles of BEV + XELOX followed by BEV + capecitabine were administered until progression (Arm B). PFS was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. A sample size of 118 patients (pts) was calculated to achieve 80% power to detect an increase of 1.5 months in median PFS between Arm A (9.5 months) and Arm B (11.0 months) with a standard deviation of 3.9 months and significance level of 0.05 using a 10% drop-out rate. Results: A total of 122 pts were randomized. No significant differences were found in demographic characteristics between the two arms. Median treatment period was 6.1 (range 0.7–13.4) and 6.8 (range 0.7–12.4) months in Arms A and B, respectively. Interim analysis showed no statistically significant differences in median PFS and ORR between arms (see table). Tolerability was also acceptable in both arms with grade 3/4 diarrhoea in 7.7% vs. 8.2%, weakness in 15.2% vs. 8.4%, hand-foot syndrome in 6.3% vs. 9.4%, and neuropathy in 2.8% vs. 4.6% of pts in Arms A and B, respectively. Conclusions: BEV + capecitabine as maintenance therapy following induction BEV + XELOX is non-inferior to continuous BEV + XELOX until progression. While this study is ongoing, these interim findings suggest that maintenance therapy with BEV + capecitabine is an appropriate option following induction BEV + XELOX in pts with mCRC. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Yalcin
- Hacettepe University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ankara Numune Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Gaziantep University Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Ankara University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - R. Uslu
- Hacettepe University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ankara Numune Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Gaziantep University Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Ankara University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - F. Dane
- Hacettepe University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ankara Numune Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Gaziantep University Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Ankara University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - U. Yilmaz
- Hacettepe University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ankara Numune Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Gaziantep University Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Ankara University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - N. Zengin
- Hacettepe University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ankara Numune Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Gaziantep University Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Ankara University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - E. Buyukunal
- Hacettepe University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ankara Numune Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Gaziantep University Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Ankara University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - S. Buyukberber
- Hacettepe University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ankara Numune Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Gaziantep University Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Ankara University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - C. Camci
- Hacettepe University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ankara Numune Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Gaziantep University Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Ankara University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - O. Sencan
- Hacettepe University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ankara Numune Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Gaziantep University Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Ankara University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - S. Kilickap
- Hacettepe University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey; Ankara Numune Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Gaziantep University Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey; Ankara University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cakar B, Muslu U, Karaca B, Junushova B, Uslu R, Goker E. Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma originating from the uterine cervix. EUR J GYNAECOL ONCOL 2011; 32:196-198. [PMID: 21614913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Cervical alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma is a rare condition associated with poor prognosis. An 18-year-old patient presented with vaginal bleeding and a protruding mass from the vagina. Biopsy of the mass revealed alveoler rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS), and radiological evaluation demonstrated that it originated from the uterine cervix. First, Wertheim's operation was carried out followed by four cycles of vincristine, actinomycine-D, ifosfamide (VAI) chemotherapy. However, the disease relapsed within three months, and the patient died of disease progression. Despite combination treatment, we could not achieve a desirable survival advantage in ARMS. Future studies may unveil the genomic profile of this rare condition, leading to invention of targeted therapies, which is the emerging trend in the treatment of sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Cakar
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, School of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Eyigor S, Karapolat H, Yesil H, Uslu R, Durmaz B. Effects of pilates exercises on functional capacity, flexibility, fatigue, depression and quality of life in female breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2010; 46:481-487. [PMID: 21224783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are very few randomized controlled studies on exercise in cancer patients. Consequently, there are no guidelines available with regard to the exercises that can be recommended and difficulties are encountered in the clinical practice as to which exercise is more suitable to the patients. AIM The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of pilates exercises on physical performance, flexibility, fatigue, depression and quality of life in women who had been treated for breast cancer. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial. SETTING Out patient group, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital. POPULATION Fifty-two patients with breast cancer were divided into either pilates exercise (group 1) and control group (group 2). METHODS Patients in Group 1 performed pilates and home exercises and patients in group 2 performed only home exercises. Pilates exercise sessions were performed three times a week for a period of eight weeks in the rehabilitation unit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Subjects were assessed before and after rehabilitation program, with respect to, 6-min walk test (6MWT), modified sit and reach test, Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), Beck Depression Index (BDI) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ BR23. RESULTS After the exercise program, improvements were observed in Group 1 in 6-minute walk test, BDI, EORTC QLQ-C30 functional, and EORTC QLQ-C30 BR23 functional scores (P<0.05). In contrast, no significant improvement was observed in Group 2 after the exercise program in any of parameters in comparison to the pre-exercise period (P>0.05). When the two exercise groups were compared, there were significant differences in 6MWT in pilates-exercise group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION Pilates exercises are effective and safe in female breast cancer patients. There is a need for further studies so that its effect can be confirmed. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT This study addressed the effects of pilates exercise, as a new approach, on functional capacity, fatigue, depression and quality of life in breast cancer patients in whom there are doubts regarding the efficacy and usefulness of the exercise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Eyigor
- Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ocal G, Berberoğlu M, Siklar Z, Bilir P, Uslu R, Yağmurlu A, Tükün A, Akar N, Soygür T, Gültan S, Gedik VT. Disorders of sexual development: an overview of 18 years experience in the pediatric Endocrinology Department of Ankara University. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2010; 23:1123-32. [PMID: 21284325 DOI: 10.1515/jpem.2010.177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Disorders of sexual development (DSD) occur when the appearance of the internal and/or external genitalia is at variance with normal development for either sex. We reviewed the characteristics of patients with DSD. PATIENTS Two hundred and eight children aged from newborn to 19 years with DSD from 1990 to 2008. RESULTS 46,XY DSD (52.4%) was more common than 46,XX DSD (34.6%) and gonadal differentiation disorders (12.99%). Thirty-six (33.02%) patients were diagnosed with androgen resistance syndrome, 41 (37.61%) had 5alpha-reductase deficiency, 23 (21.10%) had testosterone synthesis disorders. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia was the most frequent underlying cause of 46,XX DSD. CONCLUSION There are many difficult aspects in the diagnosis and management of DSD. Gender assessment teams of endocrine centers need a multidisciplinary approach for the diagnosis, medical and surgical treatment, genetic counseling, and psychosocial support of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ocal
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Akagunduz O, Karaca B, Atmaca H, Uzunoglu S, Karabulut B, Sanli UA, Haydaroglu A, Uslu R. Radiosensitization of hormone-refractory prostate cancer cells by gossypol treatment. J BUON 2010; 15:763-767. [PMID: 21229643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE many drugs have been tested to increase the sensitivity of prostate cancer cells to radiotherapy. Gossypol, a natural polyphenolic compound extracted from the cotton plant, is one of the agents the efficacy of which has been investigated in the treatment of prostate cancer for this purpose. The main aim of this study was to investigate the best gossypol application with irradiation, when gossypol was applied either sequentially (24 h before and after irradiation) or concurrently in PC-3 hormone-refractory and radioresistant prostate cancer cells. METHODS The XTT viability assay was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of different concentrations of gossypol in PC- 3 cells. Irradiation was applied to PC-3 cells via 6 MV photon linear accelerator and delivered 24 h before, 24 h after radiation or at the same time with gossypol administration. RESULTS gossypol caused radiosensitization of PC-3 cells that are known to be radioresistant, with high Bcl-2 levels. Among different applications of gossypol and irradiation (before, after and concurrent) in prostate cancer cells, the best results were observed by the application of gossypol 24 h before irradiation. CONCLUSION our study suggests that gossypol represents a promising novel anticancer treatment for radiosensitization of human hormone-refractory prostate cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Akagunduz
- Division of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kucukzeybek Y, Gorumlu G, Cengiz E, Karabulut B, Sezgin C, Atmaca H, Sanli UA, Uzunoglu S, Uslu R. Apoptosis-Mediated Cytotoxic Effects of Ibandronic Acid on Hormone- and Drug-Refractory Prostate Cancer Cells and Human Breast Cancer Cells. J Int Med Res 2010; 38:1663-72. [DOI: 10.1177/147323001003800511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Over 80% of patients with advanced breast and prostate cancer ultimately develop bone metastases. Ibandronic acid has proven efficacy for treatment of bone metastasis secondary to breast cancer. This study was designed to investigate the cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of ibandronic acid on hormone- and drug-refractory prostate carcinoma DU-145 and human breast cancer MCF-7 cell lines. Cytotoxicity was evaluated using an XTT cell proliferation kit, and apoptosis was assessed by enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay (histone-DNA fragmentation) and measurement of caspase 3/7 activity. With increasing concentrations of ibandronic acid there was a dose- and time-dependent decrease in cell numbers. MCF-7 cells were more resistant than DU-145 cells (half maximal inhibitory concentrations of 122 and 90 μM, respectively). Ibandronic acid induced apoptosis in both cell lines. The study showed an apoptosis-mediated cytotoxic effect for ibandronic acid (in addition to the already known osteoclast inhibiting effect) in breast cancer patients with bone metastases; which was also observed in prostate cancer cells. Further clinical studies involving breast and prostate cancer patients with bone metastases are warranted to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Kucukzeybek
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, School of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | - G Gorumlu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, School of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | - E Cengiz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Trabzon Numune Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - B Karabulut
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, School of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | - C Sezgin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, School of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | - H Atmaca
- Molecular Biology Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, Celal Bayar University, Muradiye, Manisa, Turkey
| | - UA Sanli
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, School of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | - S Uzunoglu
- Molecular Biology Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, Celal Bayar University, Muradiye, Manisa, Turkey
| | - R Uslu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, School of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Uslu R, Kapkac M, Karaca B, Camyar H, Durusoy R, Ozdemir N, Aras AB, Oktay A, Ozkilic H, Yilmaz R. Screening for metastasis in primary breast cancer patients having four or more axillary lymph node involvement: is it really necessary? J BUON 2010; 15:561-567. [PMID: 20941828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the necessity and direct cost effectiveness of screening and staging procedures in breast cancer patients having ≥4 positive axillary lymph nodes and to identify further possible biopathological risk factors associated with increased risk of metastasis. METHODS We reviewed the demographic and clinicopathological data from the medical records of 1897 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Patients having ≥4 positive axillary lymph nodes after primary surgery for breast cancer and who had staging examinations for metastasis were eligible. The impact of staging procedures (thoracoabdominal CT, bone scan etc.) for detecting metastasis, decision of adjuvant treatment and direct costs were analyzed in 329 patients with operable breast cancer. RESULTS Thirty-five (10.6%) patients were found with metastasis at diagnosis. Seven (20.0%) among them had multiple metastases. Eighteen (51.4%) had lung, 17 (48.6%) bone, and 7 (20.0%) liver metastasis. Twenty-one (60.0%) patients needed further radiological investigation for metastasis confirmation. Treatment decision was changed in 27 (77.1%) patients. No statistically significant risk factor was identified among the metastatic patients by means of conventional demographic and biopathological parameters. The cost of screening was lower when compared to the cost of treatment without any screening procedure. CONCLUSION Since the conventional clinicopathological data seems not sufficient to define the risk of developing metastasis in breast cancer patients with ≥4 axillary lymph node involvement, all of them should undergo full staging examinations until new parameters based on genomic level are defined. Staging procedures need modification for high risk breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Uslu
- Tulay Aktas Oncology hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Eyigor C, Karaca B, Kuzeyli-Yildirim Y, Uslu R, Uyar M, Coker A. Does the tumor localization in advanced pancreatic cancer have an influence on the management of symptoms and pain? J BUON 2010; 15:543-546. [PMID: 20941825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The symptoms and survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer show great variability according to tumor localization. The main purpose of this study was to see for any differences between the intensity of symptoms, mainly pain, and the need for analgesic treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer patients with different (head vs. body-tail) tumor localizations. METHODS Ninety-six patients with histologically confirmed pancreatic cancer were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into 2 subgroups according to tumor localization: group 1 (n=50) with head tumors and group 2 (n=46) with body and tail tumors. The demographic features of the patients as well as disease stages, onset of symptoms and necessity and consumption of analgesics were recorded. Patients were followed-up until death, and survival data was also analysed. RESULTS At the time of diagnosis, patients with body and tail tumors had more advanced disease stages compared to head tumors (p=0.006). While jaundice was the most common initial symptom in head tumors (p<0.0001), it was pain in body and tail tumors (p<0.001). Patients with body and tail tumors had more analgesics consumption as compared to those with head tumors (p=0.009). No statistically significant difference in survival was detected between the 2 groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION We believe that pancreatic cancer should be accepted as two diverse disease types according to tumor localization, and pain and symptom management should be organized based on this fact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Eyigor
- Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesiology Department, Pain Clinic, and Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Karaca SB, Muslu U, Cakar B, Kisim A, Atmaca H, Unuvar Purcu D, Uzunoglu S, Uslu R. Synergistic cytotoxic/apoptotic effects of AT-101, a phytochemical with BH3-mimetic property, in combination with paclitaxel in human breast cancer cells. J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.e21082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
41
|
Demirci S, Ozkok S, Yalman D, Zeytunlu M, Nart D, Yuzer Y, Coker A, Uslu R, Goker E. Postoperative gemcitabine alone and concurrent with radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.e14664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
42
|
Varol U, Karaca B, Tunali D, Degirmenci M, Cirak Y, Purcu DU, Uzunoglu S, Sezgin C, Karabulut B, Sanli UA, Uslu R. The effect of racemic gossypol and at-101 on angiogenic profile of ovcar-3 cells: a preliminary molecular framework for gossypol enantiomers. Exp Oncol 2009; 31:220-225. [PMID: 20010531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
AIM To compare the effect of racemic gossypol with its (-)/(-) enantiomer (AT-101) on expression profiles of angiogenic molecules by mRNA levels in human ovarian cancer cell line OVCAR-3. METHODS Cell viability assay (2,3-bis (2-methoxy-4-nitro-5- sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino) carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide) was used to detect cytotoxicity of gossypol enantiomers. DNA fragmentation by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) assay was used to evaluate the rate of apoptosis. The mRNA expression levels of angiogenic molecules were investigated by Human Angiogenesis RT2 ProfilerTM PCR Array (SuperArray, Frederick, MD). RESULTS Both racemic form and AT-101 resulted in a significant cytotoxicity and induced apoptosis. This effect was observed in a dose- and time dependent manner. However, AT-101 was much more potent. In addition, the treatment of 10 microM of racemic gossypol alone and 3 microM of AT-101 alone resulted in significant down-regulation (>or= 3 fold) in mRNA levels of some pivotal angiogenic molecules in OVCAR-3, but altered gene profiles were different by the treatment of each enantiomer. CONCLUSION The efficacy of two gossypol enantiomers in OVCAR-3 cells showed distinction. AT-101 was much more potent than racemic gossypol, not only by means of cell death and apoptosis, but also by modulation of angiogenic molecules released from OVCAR-3 cells. Further studies with endothelial cells should be done to verify the anti-angiogenic effect of gossypol enantiomers in cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Varol
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, School of Medicine, Ege University, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Eyigor S, Karapolat H, Korkmaz OK, Eyigor C, Durmaz B, Uslu R, Uyar M. The frequency of fibromyalgia syndrome and quality of life in hospitalized cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2009; 18:195-201. [PMID: 19267737 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.00997.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
To explore the frequency of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) among hospitalized cancer patients and address the relationships between pain, fatigue and quality of life with regard to the extent of pain, a cross-sectional and descriptive study was carried out in the Oncology Supportive Care Unit on 122 hospitalized cancer patients. Pain, sleep, disease impact (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire), fatigue (Brief Fatigue Inventory), quality of life (Short Form 36 and European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer questionnaires Quality of Life-C30) were gathered using standardized measures. Thirteen of the hospitalized cancer patients (10.7%) included in the study were diagnosed with FMS. There were no statistically significant differences among three pain groups with respect to demographic characteristics (P > 0.05). There were significant differences among groups with regard to the presence of metastasis, fatigue, sleep disorder, pain, Brief Fatigue Inventory, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, most of subscores of Short Form 36 and European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer questionnaires Quality of Life-C30 scores (P < 0.05). In the present study, we have calculated the frequency of FMS among patients admitted to the oncology hospital in addition to establishing the relationships between pain, fatigue and quality of life with regard to the extent of pain. We believe that the descriptive data presented in this study would be helpful in future studies and therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Eyigor
- Ege University Faculty of Medicine Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Department, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, Supportive Care Unit, Izmir, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Eyigor S, Karapolat H, Korkmaz OK, Uslu R. The level of satisfaction in cancer patients with completed treatments: a 7-year screening. J BUON 2009; 14:681-687. [PMID: 20148462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer patients encounter many problems in the post-diagnosis period and they want to establish a good contact with the treatment team in order to get better information about their condition. This study attempted to investigate in patients with completed treatment the level of satisfaction they derived from the treatment and the treatment team. METHODS The archive of medical records of the Medical Oncology Department comprising 4622 patients was randomly screened between the years 2000 and 2006. Charts of 528 patients were reached via phone and analysed for clinical data. RESULTS Approximately 78.8% of the patients had been informed about their malignant diseases. The rates of satisfaction from the treatment team, the treatment itself, and communication with the physician was higher among informed patients compared to uninformed ones (p<0.05). Of all the evaluated patients, 38.5% had been recommended to practise general exercises. CONCLUSION The great majority of our patients were informed about their diseases and treatments, although without being given adequate importance, and the satisfaction rates were higher among informed patients. We believe that our study will provide new approaches in relation to the importance and methods of communicating with and informing patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Eyigor
- Ege University, Faculty of Medicine, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Department, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, Supportive Care Unit, Bornova-Izmir, Turkey.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Karaca B, Atmaca H, Uzunoglu S, Karabulut B, Sanli UA, Uslu R. Enhancement of taxane-induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis by gossypol in human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. J BUON 2009; 14:479-485. [PMID: 19810142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gossypol is a natural polyphenolic compound extracted from cotton plant (Gossypium species) which has shown potent inhibitory effect on cell growth of many types of cancers. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the interaction of gossypol with some conventional drugs known to be effective in the treatment of breast cancer, like taxanes, doxorubicin, gemcitabine, cisplatin and vinorelbine, in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS The XTT viability assay was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of various cytotoxic agents alone and in combination with gossypol in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. The combination effect analysis of Chou and Talalay was used to identify the most synergistic drug combinations. The possible synergistic effects of the combination of drugs on apoptosis were also evaluated by using two different apoptosis assays. RESULTS We identified strong synergistic cytotoxic and apoptotic activity of gossypol with taxanes among all other studied cytotoxic drugs. CONCLUSION This study provides proof that gossypol combined with taxanes may have potential as a novel future treatment for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Karaca
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, School of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Degirmenci M, Karaca B, Gorumlu G, Durusoy R, Demir Piskin G, Bozkurt MT, Cirak Y, Tunali D, Karabulut B, Sanli UA, Uslu R. Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus capecitabine and irinotecan regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer. Med Oncol 2009; 27:585-91. [PMID: 19526201 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-009-9253-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2009] [Accepted: 06/02/2009] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Recent phase III trials have proven the fact that adding bevacizumab to irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) should be preferred as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). But, since the data regarding bevacizumab administered together with capecitabin, an oral fluoropyrimidine, and irinotecan in patients with mCRC is limited, we aimed to analyse the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab with capecitabine plus irinotecan (BEV-CAPIRI) regimen in mCRC patients. Records of patients treated with BEV-CAPIRI regimen between January 2005 and March 2008 were reviewed. Efficacy data regarding response rates (RR) as well as safety data were collected. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses were done by using the Kaplan-Meier method. A total number of 53 metastatic colorectal cancer patients were treated with BEV-CAPIRI regimen. The median age of this population was 57.3 +/- 11.5 (range 29-78). The treatment was well tolerated. The RR was 43.3%, while 30.1% of the patients achieved stable disease (SD). Median PFS and OS were 12.6 +/- 1.4 and 20.6 +/- 1.7 months, respectively. However, median OS was 21.3 months for male and 14.6 months for female patients. In addition, median OS and PFS was 25.3 months and 16.2 months for the patients who received BEV-CAPIRI as first-line treatment, respectively, and for the other patients it was 15.2 months and 10.2 months, respectively. In conclusion, BEV-CAPIRI is an effective and well-tolerated alternative regimen for mCRC, leading to disease control in a vast majority of patients with mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Degirmenci
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tulay Aktas Oncology Hospital, Ege University School of Medicine, Bornova, 35100, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kapci EG, Uslu R, Turkcapar H, Karaoglan A. Beck Depression Inventory II: evaluation of the psychometric properties and cut-off points in a Turkish adult population. Depress Anxiety 2009; 25:E104-10. [PMID: 17876817 DOI: 10.1002/da.20371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Numerous studies have been previously conducted to assess the Beck Depression Inventory-II's [BDI II; Beck et al., 1996] psychometric properties. However, none of these studies has examined whether the original cut-off scores were applicable to other cultures. Thus, in addition to evaluating its psychometric properties, we also determined the cut-off scores of the BDI II for the Turkish population. Data from nonclinical (n = 362) and clinical psychiatric outpatients diagnosed as depressive disorder according to DSM-IV criteria (n = 176) were gathered. Analyses for internal consistency and test-retest reliabilities and for convergent and discriminant validities were computed. Two confirmatory factor analyses, one derived from the present exploratory factor analyses and the other proposed in the original study were conducted for both groups. A receiver operating characteristics curve was utilized to determine the cut-off scores for the Turkish population revealing 0-12 for minimal, 13-18 for mild, 19-28 for moderate and 29-63 for severe depression. The internal consistency for the nonclinical and clinical groups were .90 and .89, respectively; test-retest stability was also high (r = .94). Convergent and discriminant validity results were satisfactory. Findings confirmed the present model for the clinical group and equally confirmed both models for the nonclinical group. Furthermore, the cut-off scores to classify minimal, mild, moderate, and severe depression were quite akin to the cut-off points previously suggested for the American population. Taken as a whole our findings revealed that BDI II has sound psychometric properties and comparable cut-off scores for the Turkish population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emine Gul Kapci
- Department of Psychological Services in Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gorumlu G, Kucukzeybek Y, Kemal-Gul M, Karaca B, Cosan-Terek M, Karabulut B, Sanli UA, Akman L, Ozsaran A, Dikmen Y, Uslu R. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in heavily pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer patients. J BUON 2008; 13:349-352. [PMID: 18979548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE While most patients with ovarian cancer respond to first-line treatment, 50-75% of these patients will eventually relapse. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is an active agent indicated for the treatment of patients with disease that is refractory to both paclitaxel- and platinum-based regimens, but skin toxicity remains the dose-limiting toxicity of the drug. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the activity and safety of this agent in patients with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with platinum-refractory/ resistant, paclitaxel-pretreated epithelial ovarian carcinoma were treated with PLD 50 mg/m2 in 4-week courses until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients had progressive disease (PD) before starting PLD. Primary endpoints were response rate, progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity and secondary endpoints duration of response (DOS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Seventeen heavily pretreated patients (median number of previous chemotherapy regimens 3, range 1-5) with taxane- and platinum-refractory disease were analysed. No complete response (CR) was achieved, while 3 (17%) partial responses (PR) and 2 (11%) cases with stable disease (SD) were observed. The median PFS was 15 weeks (range 10-21) and median OS 32 weeks (range 16-47). Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) occurred in 4 (23%) patients and was of grade 4 in 1 (6%) patient. Stomatitis occurred in 3 (17%) patients and was grade 3 in 1 (6%) patient. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in only 2 (12%) patients. No febrile neutropenia was encountered. CONCLUSION Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is an active and tolerable agent in heavily pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer patients.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/complications
- Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/drug therapy
- Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/secondary
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Aged
- Carcinoma, Papillary/complications
- Carcinoma, Papillary/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Papillary/secondary
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/complications
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/drug therapy
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/secondary
- Disease-Free Survival
- Doxorubicin/analogs & derivatives
- Doxorubicin/therapeutic use
- Female
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/complications
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/secondary
- Organoplatinum Compounds/adverse effects
- Ovarian Neoplasms/complications
- Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
- Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use
- Salvage Therapy
- Survival Rate
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Gorumlu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ege University School of Medicine, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bolukbasi Y, Yalman D, Cok G, Goksel T, Uslu R, Ozkok S. Concomitant cisplatin-docetaxel chemotherapy with 3-D conformal radiotherapy followed by adjuvant cisplatin-docetaxel chemotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Toxicity and tolerability. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.7600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
50
|
Kucukzeybek Y, Gorumlu G, Karaca B, Erten C, Cengiz E, Kemal Gul M, Karabulut B, Uslu R, Sanli UA, Goker E. Docetaxel and platinum combination chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic head and neck cancer. J BUON 2008; 13:199-203. [PMID: 18555465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the efficacy and toxicity of the docetaxel and platinum combination in patients with locoregionally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 24 patients with metastatic or locoregionally advanced SCCHN treated with docetaxel and platinum combination chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. All of them had histologically proven SCCHN, measurable disease and ECOG performance status of 2 or less, and were treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) as a 60 min i.v. infusion on day 1, followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) or carboplatin AUC 6 as a 60 min i.v. infusion on day 1 every 3 weeks, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were evaluated for response, survival and toxicity. RESULTS Seven (29%) patients showed partial response (PR) and 1 (4%) complete response (CR) for an overall response rate of 33%. Twelve (50%) patients had stable disease (SD). Disease control rate was 83%. The median follow-up time was 26.4 months (range 2-127), the median time to progression 16 months (range 2-20), and the median overall survival 19 months (range 2-22). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 13 (54%) patients. Febrile neutropenia was seen in 5 (21%) patients. CONCLUSION Docetaxel plus cisplatin or carboplatin is an effective regimen with acceptable safety profile for palliation of locally advanced or metastatic SCCHN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Kucukzeybek
- Division of Medical Oncology, Ege University School of Medicine, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|