Risk Markers and Appropriate Implantable Defibrillator Therapy in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

High-risk imaging characteristics in left ventricular apex for the life-threatening arrhythmic events in Japanese hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients

Left ventricular (LV) apical aneurysm is known to be associated with the life-threatening arrhythmic events in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, the current 2014 ESC guideline has not included apical aneurysm as a major risk factor for sudden cardiac death and 2018 JCS guideline includes it only as a modulator, while it has been included as a new major risk marker in 2020 AHA/ACC guideline. Therefore, we sought to identify high-risk imaging characteristics in LV apex which is associated with a higher occurrence of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF). In 99 consecutive Japanese HCM patients (median age, 65 years; 59 males) undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation for primary prevention following cardiac magnetic resonance including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), the occurrence of appropriate ICD interventions for VT/VF was evaluated for 6.2 (median) years after ICD implantation. Overall, appropriate ICD interventions occurred in 43% with annual rates of 7.0% for appropriate interventions. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the presence of LV apical aneurysm was significantly associated with a higher occurrence of appropriate interventions (annual rates 18.9% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.013). Similarly, patients with high LV mid-to-apex pressure gradient (annual rates 14.9% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.022) and presence of apical LGE (annual rates 10.9% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.001) experienced appropriate interventions more frequently. An aneurysm, high-pressure gradient, and LGE in an apex are associated with VT/VF. These characteristics in apex should be kept in mind when implanting ICD in Japanese HCM patients as a primary prevention.

ICD indication in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: which algorithm to use?

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the agreement in the indication of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, as per the 2014 European Society of Cardiology and 2020 American Heart Association recommendations, and evaluate fragmented QRS as a predictor of cardiovascular outcome.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort with 81 patients was evaluated between 2019 and 2021. Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy ≥16 years old were included. Exclusion criteria include secondary myocardiopathy and follow-up <1 year. Kappa coefficient was used to determine the agreement. Survival and incidence curves were determined by Kaplan-Meier method. A p<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The fragmented QRS was identified in 44.4% of patients. There were no differences between patients with and without fragmented QRS regarding clinical parameters, echocardiography, fibrosis, and sudden cardiac death risk. During follow-up of 4.8±3.4 years, there was no sudden cardiac death, but 20.6% patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator had at least one appropriate shock. Three of the seven appropriate shocks occurred in European Society of Cardiology low- to moderate-risk patients. Three shocks occurred in moderate-risk patients and four in American Heart Association high-risk patients. Overall recommendations agreement was 64% with a kappa of 0.270 (p=0.007). C-statistic showed no differences regarding the incidence of appropriate shock (p=0.644).

CONCLUSION

sudden cardiac death risk stratification algorithms present discrepancies in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indication, both with low accuracy.

Sudden cardiac death in cardiomyopathies: acting upon "acceptable" risk in the personalized medicine era

Patients with cardiomyopathies are confronted with the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) throughout their lifetime. Despite the fact that SCD is relatively rare, prognostic stratification is an integral part of physician-patient discussion, with the goal of risk modification and prevention. The current approach is based on a concept of "acceptable risk." However, there are intrinsic problems with an algorithm-based approach to risk management, magnified by the absence of robust evidence underlying clinical decision support tools, which can make high- versus low-risk classifications arbitrary. Strategies aimed at risk reduction range from selecting patients for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to disqualification from competitive sports. These clinical options, especially when implying the use of finite financial resources, are often delivered from the physician's perspective citing decision-making algorithms. When the burden of intervention-related risks or financial costs is deemed higher than an "acceptable risk" of SCD, the patient's perspective may not be appropriately considered. Designating a numeric threshold of "acceptable risk" has ethical implications. One could reasonably ask "acceptable to whom?" In an era when individual choice and autonomy are pillars of the physician-patient relationship, the subjective aspects of perceived risk should be acknowledged and be part of shared decision-making. This is particularly true when the lack of a strong scientific evidence base makes a dichotomous algorithm-driven approach suboptimal for unmitigated translation to clinical practice.

Role of Myocardial Fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis of Risk Markers for Sudden Death

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is associated with sudden death (SD). Myocardial fibrosis is reportedly correlated with SD.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis, updating the risk markers (RMs) in HCM emphasizing myocardial fibrosis.

METHODS

We reviewed HCM studies that addressed severe arrhythmic outcomes and the certain RMs: SD family history, severe ventricular hypertrophy, unexplained syncope, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) on 24-hour Holter monitoring, abnormal blood pressure response to exercise (ABPRE), myocardial fibrosis and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) in the MEDLINE, LILACS, and SciELO databases. We used relative risks (RRs) as an effect measure and random models for the analysis. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were selected (14,901 patients aged 45 ± 16 years; men, 62.8%). Myocardial fibrosis was the major RISK MARKER (RR, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.95-6.03). The other RMs, except for LVOTO, were also predictors: SD family history (RR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.39-2.20), severe ventricular hypertrophy (RR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.26-2.74), unexplained syncope (RR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.69-3.07), NSVT (RR, 2.79; 95% CI, 2.29-3.41), and ABPRE (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.12-2.08).

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed the association of myocardial fibrosis and other RMs with severe arrhythmic outcomes in HCM and emphasize the need for new prediction models in managing these patients.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy–Related Sudden Cardiac Death in Young People in Ontario

Background:

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is considered a leading cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in younger people. The incidence of HCM-related SCD and its relationship to exercise have not been well studied in large comprehensive studies outside of tertiary care settings. This study sought to estimate the incidence of HCM-related SCD and its association with exercise in a large unselected population.

Methods:

Using the Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario database encompassing all deaths attended by the coroner, we identified all HCM-related SCDs in individuals 10 to 45 years of age between 2005 and 2016 (70 million person-years). Confirmation of HCM was based on typical macroscopic and microscopic features (definite HCM-related SCD). Sudden deaths with a prior clinical diagnosis of HCM but no autopsy were considered probable HCM-related SCDs. Cases with typical features but no myofiber disarray were considered possible HCM. The completeness of data was verified in a subset of patients in the Toronto area with the use of a registry of all emergency medical services–attended cardiac arrests, with an autopsy rate of 94%. To estimate the number of HCM-related aborted cardiac arrests and lives potentially saved by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, all de novo implantations for secondary prevention and all implantations and appropriate shocks for primary prevention in patients with HCM 10 to 45 years of age, respectively, were identified with the use of a registry containing data on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantations from all implanting sites throughout Ontario.

Results:

Forty-four, 3, and 6 cases of definite, probable, and possible HCM-related SCDs, respectively, were identified, corresponding to estimated annual incidence rates of 0.31 per 1000 HCM person-years (95% CI, 0.24–0.44) for definite HCM-related SCD, 0.33 per 1000 HCM person-years (95% CI, 0.34–0.62) for definite or probable HCM-related SCD, and 0.39 per 1000 HCM person-years (95% CI, 0.28–0.49) for definite, probable, or possible HCM-related SCD (estimated 140 740 HCM person-years of observation). The estimated annual incidence rate for HCM-related SCD plus aborted cardiac arrest and HCM-related life-threatening arrhythmia (SCD, aborted cardiac arrest, and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks) was 0.84 per 1000 HCM person-years (95% CI, 0.70–1.0). The majority (70%) of SCDs occurred in previously undiagnosed individuals. Most SCDs occurred during rest (64.8%) or light activity (18.5%).

Conclusions:

The incidence of HCM-related SCD in the general population 10 to 45 years of age is substantially lower than previously reported, with most cases occurring in previously undiagnosed individuals. SCDs are infrequently related to exercise.

Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: What has Changed in The Guidelines?

Background

The new European Society of Cardiology guidelines for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) define the estimation of sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk as an integral part of clinical management. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is recommended (class IIa) when the risk is ≥ 6%.

Objectives

To compare the SCD risk stratification according to the 2011 and 2014 recommendations for ICD implantation in patients with HCM.

Methods

Retrospective study including 105 patients diagnosed with HCM. The indication for ICD was assessed using the 2011 and 2014 guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 19.0.0.2®. The tests performed were bilateral, considering the significance level of 5% (p < 0.05).

Results

Regarding primary prevention, according to the 2011 ACCF/AHA recommendations, 39.0% of the patients had indication for ICD implantation (level of evidence IIa). Using the 2014 guidelines, only 12.4% of the patients had an indication for ICD implantation. Comparing the two risk stratification models for patients with HCM, we detected a significant reduction in the number of indications for ICD implantation (p < 0.001). Of the 41 patients classified as IIa according to the 2011 recommendations, 68.3% received a different classification according to the 2014 guidelines.

Conclusion

Significant differences were found when comparing the SCD risk stratification for ICD implantation in the two guidelines. The current SCD risk score seems to identify many low-risk patients who are not candidates for ICD implantation. The use of this new score results in a significant reduction in the number of ICD implanted.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the incidence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) has been significantly reduced. Given its widespread use, it is important to identify the outcomes associated with ICD use in patients with HCM. The present paper is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the rates of appropriate and inappropriate interventions, mortality, and device complications in HCM patients with an ICD.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on 27 studies reporting outcomes and complications after ICD implantation in patients with HCM. ICD interventions, device complications, and mortality were extracted for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 3,797 patients with HCM and ICD implantation were included (mean age, 44.5 years; 63% male), of which 83% of patients had an ICD for primary prevention of SCD. The cardiac mortality was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.7-1.3) per year and non-cardiac mortality was 0.8% (95% CI: 0.6-1.2) per year. Annualized appropriate intervention rate was 4.8% and annualized inappropriate intervention was 4.9%. The annual incidence of lead malfunction, lead displacement and infection was 1.4%, 1.3%, and 1.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ICD use in patients with HCM produces low rates of cardiac and non-cardiac mortality, and an appropriate intervention rate of 4.8% per year. However, moderate rates of inappropriate intervention and device complications warrant careful patient selection in order to optimize the risk to benefit ratio in this select group of patients.