1
|
Vamos M, Zsigmond EJ, Biffi M, Gausz FD, Keller N, Kupo P, Szili-Torok T, Ziacchi M, Benz AP, Spittler R, Vagvolgyi A. Efficacy and safety of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with and without obesity: A meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm 2024:S1547-5271(24)02902-3. [PMID: 39019386 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has emerged as an alternative to transvenous systems for prevention of sudden cardiac death. However, concerns have been raised regarding its efficacy and safety in obese individuals. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the S-ICD in patients with obesity by assessing the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes. METHODS A comprehensive search of multiple databases was conducted for English-language peer-reviewed studies reporting clinical outcomes in S-ICD recipients with (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and without obesity (BMI <30 kg/m2). Data on preimplantation screening failure, defibrillation testing, complications, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and survival were analyzed using standard, random-effects, meta-analytical techniques. RESULTS Twenty-nine studies involving 20,486 patients were included. There was no statistically significant difference in mean BMI values of patients with failed or successful preimplantation screening (mean difference -0.60 kg/m2; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.06 to 0.86). Obesity was associated with higher rates of failed defibrillation testing at ≤65 J (odds ratio [OR] 2.16; 95% CI 1.39-3.35), and malpositioning/suboptimal positioning occurred more frequently in obese compared to nonobese patients (OR 3.37; 95% CI 1.76-6.44). Increased BMI as a continuous variable (per increase in 1 kg/m2 BMI) was associated with elevated defibrillation thresholds (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.03-1.08); higher risk of complications (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04; 95% CI 1.02-1.05); a trend toward an increased number of appropriate shocks (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.04); and no significant increase in the risk of inappropriate shocks (HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.99-1.03). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis underscores the importance of considering obesity in S-ICD implantation decisions. Although S-ICD remains effective in obese patients, attention to potential technical challenges and higher complication rates is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mate Vamos
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Division, Cardiology Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
| | - Elod-Janos Zsigmond
- Central Hospital of Northern Pest-Military Hospital, Budapest, Hungary; Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Mauro Biffi
- Department of Cardiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Flora Diana Gausz
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Division, Cardiology Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Nora Keller
- Central Pharmacy, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Peter Kupo
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Tamas Szili-Torok
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Division, Cardiology Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Matteo Ziacchi
- Department of Cardiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alexander P Benz
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany; Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Raphael Spittler
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Anna Vagvolgyi
- Endocrinology and Diabetology Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Magnani S, Ali H, Cappato R. Ten years of subcutaneous defibrillator therapy: Consolidated clinical evidence and future perspectives. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2024; 35:601-607. [PMID: 38287171 DOI: 10.1111/jce.16171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) was developed as an alternative to the traditional transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (TV-ICD), aiming to provide easier implantation, simplified detection algorithm of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and prevention from placing components in the cardiovascular system. The S-ICD is implanted subcutaneously or intramuscularly with the generator placed in the left midaxillary line and the lead tunneled subcutaneously in the left para-sternal region. Preimplant electrocardiogram screening is recommended to prevent implantation in patients at high risk of T wave over-sensing. Currently, the S-ICD is unsuitable for patients requiring pacing or cardiac resynchronization. Since the beginning, the S-ICD underwent extensive preclinical investigation until the first prospective multicentre trial demonstrating high efficacy and safety led to market release. While earlier studies focused on younger patients with higher ejection fraction, more recent studies showed favorable outcomes even in patients with comorbidities similar to those typically observed in patients receiving TV-ICD. The development of second and third generation devices has contributed to reduce inappropriate shocks and overcome previous limitations. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence in the literature over the past decade supporting S-ICD as a valid alternative to TV-ICD in terms of safety and efficacy, highlighting the improvements in technology, as well as outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Magnani
- Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Center, IRCCS Multimedica, Milan, Italy
| | - Hussam Ali
- Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Center, IRCCS Multimedica, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Cappato
- Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Center, IRCCS Multimedica, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Elkasaby MH, Khalefa BB, Yassin MNA, El-Hameed MMA, Elkoumi O, Al Hennawi H. Two-incision versus three-incision implantation technique of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 2076 patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2024; 47:281-291. [PMID: 38071455 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was designed to detect and treat ventricular arrhythmias, which account for nearly half of all cardiovascular fatalities. Transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) complications were reduced by introducing subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD). S-ICD can be implanted using a three (3IT)- or two (2IT)-incision technique. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the 3IT to the 2IT. METHODS We searched medical electronic databases of Cochrane Central, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WOS) from the study's inception until March 8, 2023. We compared 2IT and 3IT techniques of S-ICDs in terms of procedural, safety, and efficacy outcomes. We used Review Manager software for the statistical analysis. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous variables; and the mean difference with its 95% CI for continuous variables. We measured the heterogeneity using the chi-squared and I-squared tests. If the data were heterogeneous, the random-effect (RE) model was applied; otherwise, the fixed-effect model (FE) was used. RESULTS We included three retrospective observational studies of 2076 patients, 1209 in the 2IT group and 867 in the 3IT. There was no statistically significant difference in erosion after S-ICD when 2IT compared with 3IT (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: [0.07, 1.02]; P = .05) (I2 = 0%, P = .90). There was no difference in risk of infection, lead dislocation, or inappropriate shock with either incision technique (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: [0.48, 1.29]; P = .34) (I2 = 0%, P = .71) and (RR = 0.37, 95% CI: [0.02, 8.14]; P = .53) (I2 = 66%, P = .05) respectively. Our meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of both techniques is comparable; Appropriate shock (RR = 0.94, 95% CI: [0.78, 1.12]; P = .48) (I2 = 0%, P = .81) and first shock efficacy (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: [0.44, 1.82]; P = .76) (I2 = 0%, P = .87). CONCLUSION 2IT and 3IT of S-ICD have comparable efficacy and complication rates; however, the 3IT exposes patients to an additional incision without any additional benefits. These findings may provide clinicians with a simpler method for subcutaneous ICD implantation and likely result in improved cosmetic outcomes. Before the 2IT technique can be considered the standard of care, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) must be conducted to assess its long-term safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Hamouda Elkasaby
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
- Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Arlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Basma Badrawy Khalefa
- Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Arlington, Massachusetts, USA
- Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mazen Negmeldin Aly Yassin
- Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Arlington, Massachusetts, USA
- Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Malak Mohamed Abd El-Hameed
- Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Arlington, Massachusetts, USA
- Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Al-Sharqia, Egypt
| | - Omar Elkoumi
- Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Arlington, Massachusetts, USA
- Faculty of Medicine, Suez University, Suez, Egypt
| | - Hussam Al Hennawi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jefferson Abington Hospital, Abington, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Budrejko S, Kempa M, Przybylski A. S-ICD Implantation "Tips and Tricks". Rev Cardiovasc Med 2023; 24:195. [PMID: 39077023 PMCID: PMC11266475 DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2407195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was developed to provide protection against sudden cardiac death. Despite being effective in terminating ventricular arrhythmias, traditional transvenous ICDs appeared over time to have certain limitations related to the need for vascular access and the presence of foreign material inside the circulatory system (namely lead failure and infections). A subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) was developed to overcome those limitations and to provide prevention against sudden cardiac death from outside the cardiovascular system. Utilization of that modern method of treatment is constantly increasing worldwide, and new centers incorporate implantation of that system in their portfolio. This review aims to present the most relevant issues related to S-ICD implantation procedure, based on experience of the authors and an extensive literature search.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Szymon Budrejko
- Department of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Maciej Kempa
- Department of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Andrzej Przybylski
- 1st Department of Cardiology with the Acute Coronary Syndromes Subdivision, Clinical Provincial Hospital No. 2, 35-310 Rzeszow, Poland
- Medical College of Rzeszow University, 35-310 Rzeszow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boersma LV, El-Chami M, Steinwender C, Lambiase P, Murgatroyd F, Mela T, Theuns DAMJ, Khelae SK, Kalil C, Zabala F, Stuehlinger M, Lenarczyk R, Clementy N, Tamirisa KP, Rinaldi CA, Knops R, Lau CP, Crozier I, Boveda S, Defaye P, Deharo JC, Botto GL, Vassilikos V, Oliveira MM, Tse HF, Figueroa J, Stambler BS, Guerra JM, Stiles M, Marques M. Practical considerations, indications, and future perspectives for leadless and extravascular cardiac implantable electronic devices: a position paper by EHRA/HRS/LAHRS/APHRS. Europace 2022; 24:1691-1708. [PMID: 35912932 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas V Boersma
- Cardiology Department, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Cardiology Department, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mikhael El-Chami
- Medicine/Cardiology Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Clemens Steinwender
- Department of Cardiology and Internal Intensive Care, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Krankenhausstraße 9, Linz, Austria
| | - Pier Lambiase
- Department of Cardiology, UCL & Barts Heart Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, UCL, Barts Heart Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Theofania Mela
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Dominic A M J Theuns
- Erasmus MC, Cardiology, Clinical Electrophysiology, CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Carlos Kalil
- Cardiology Department, Hospital São Francisco da Santa Casa de Misericórdia, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Federico Zabala
- Electrophysiology Unit, Hospital San Martin de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Markus Stuehlinger
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Radoslaw Lenarczyk
- Department of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Disease and Electrotherapy, Medical University of Silesia, Silesian Center for Heart Disease, Curie-Sklodowska Str 9, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
| | - Nicolas Clementy
- Cardiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, France
| | - Kamala P Tamirisa
- Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiac MRI, Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, 11970 N, Central Expressway, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Reinoud Knops
- Cardiology Department, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chu-Pak Lau
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Suite 1303, Central Building, 1 Pedder Street, Central, Hong Kong
| | - Ian Crozier
- Department of Cardiology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Department, Clinique Pasteur, 31076 Toulouse, France.,Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-VUB, Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Brussels, Belgium, and INSERM U970, 75908 Paris Cedex 15 France
| | - Pascal Defaye
- CHU Grenoble Alpes, Unite de Rythmologie Service De Cardiologie, CS10135, 38043 Grenoble Cedex 09, France
| | - Jean Claude Deharo
- Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine, F-13385 Marseille, France.,Cardiology Department, Hospital de Santa Cruz, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Vassilios Vassilikos
- Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece & Hippokrateio General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Mario Martins Oliveira
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Santa Marta, Rua Santa Marta, 1167-024 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Hung Fat Tse
- The Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Hong Kong-Guangdong Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong and Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jorge Figueroa
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China
| | - Bruce S Stambler
- Unidad de Arritmias y Marcapasos, Sanatorio Allende, Obispo Oro 42, CP 5000, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Jose M Guerra
- Piedmont Heart Institute, 275 Collier Road Northwest, Suite 500, Atlanta, GA 30309, USA
| | - Martin Stiles
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, CIBERCV, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manlio Marques
- Waikato Clinical School, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio Chávez, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khanra D, Hamid A, Patel P, Tomson J, Abdalla A, Khan N, Dowd R, Chandan N, Osagie C, Jinadu T, Velu S, Arya A, Spencer C, Barr C, Petkar S. A real-world experience of subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardiac defibrillators-comparison with the PRAETORIAN study. J Arrhythm 2022; 38:199-212. [PMID: 35387142 PMCID: PMC8977574 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background PRAETORIAN is the first randomized controlled trial that demonstrated the noninferiority of subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) in comparison with transvenous ICD (TV-ICD). We retrospectively reviewed electronic records of patients with ICD implanted over the past 6 years, with the primary objective to compare our real-world single tertiary center experience with the randomized data from the PRAETORIAN study. Methods Seventy S-ICD patients were compared with 197 TV-ICD patients, from July 2014 to June 2020 retrospectively, over a median period of 1304 days (296-2451 days). Primary composite endpoints included inappropriate shocks and device-related malfunctions. Results Patients with S-ICD implantation were younger than those who received TV-ICD (mean, 49.7 years vs 63.9 years, p < .001). About 31.4% of S-ICDs were implanted for secondary prevention, and 58.6% of S-ICD patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) with a median left ventricular ejection fraction of 32.5% (range: 10-67%). S-ICDs and TV-ICD had statistically similar inappropriate shocks (4.3% vs 4.6%, p = .78), device-related complications (11.4% vs 9.1%, p = .93), and the overall primary endpoints (15.7% vs 13.7%, p = .68). The findings remained the same even after age and gender adjustments and time-dependent analysis. Conclusion Although single-center experience with a small number of S-ICD patients, results of the PRAETORIAN study has been replicated in our real-world experience of S-ICD and TV-ICD implantations across diverse etiologies, indications, and age groups confirming the comparable performance of S-ICD and TV-ICD when implanted in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dibbendhu Khanra
- New Cross Hospital, Heart and Lung Centre, Division of Electrophysiology and DevicesRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustUK
| | - Abdul Hamid
- New Cross Hospital, Heart and Lung Centre, Division of Electrophysiology and DevicesRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustUK
| | - Peysh Patel
- New Cross Hospital, Heart and Lung Centre, Division of Electrophysiology and DevicesRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustUK
| | - John Tomson
- New Cross Hospital, Heart and Lung Centre, Division of Electrophysiology and DevicesRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustUK
| | - Ahmed Abdalla
- New Cross Hospital, Heart and Lung Centre, Division of Electrophysiology and DevicesRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustUK
| | - Nasrin Khan
- New Cross Hospital, Heart and Lung Centre, Division of Electrophysiology and DevicesRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustUK
| | - Rory Dowd
- New Cross Hospital, Heart and Lung Centre, Division of Electrophysiology and DevicesRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustUK
| | - Nakul Chandan
- New Cross Hospital, Heart and Lung Centre, Division of Electrophysiology and DevicesRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustUK
| | - Christopher Osagie
- New Cross Hospital, Heart and Lung Centre, Division of Electrophysiology and DevicesRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustUK
| | - Tomilola Jinadu
- New Cross Hospital, Heart and Lung Centre, Division of Electrophysiology and DevicesRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustUK
| | - Selvakumar Velu
- New Cross Hospital, Heart and Lung Centre, Division of Electrophysiology and DevicesRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustUK
| | - Anita Arya
- New Cross Hospital, Heart and Lung Centre, Division of Electrophysiology and DevicesRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustUK
| | - Charles Spencer
- New Cross Hospital, Heart and Lung Centre, Division of Electrophysiology and DevicesRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustUK
| | - Craig Barr
- New Cross Hospital, Heart and Lung Centre, Division of Electrophysiology and DevicesRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustUK
| | - Sanjiv Petkar
- New Cross Hospital, Heart and Lung Centre, Division of Electrophysiology and DevicesRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustUK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Karimianpour A, John L, Gold MR. The Subcutaneous ICD: A Review of the UNTOUCHED and PRAETORIAN Trials. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 2021; 10:108-112. [PMID: 34401183 PMCID: PMC8353550 DOI: 10.15420/aer.2020.47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The ICD is an important part of the treatment and prevention of sudden cardiac death in many high-risk populations. Traditional transvenous ICDs (TV-ICDs) are associated with certain short- and long- term risks. The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) was developed in order to avoid these risks and complications. However, this system is associated with its own set of limitations and complications. First, patient selection is important, as S-ICDs do not provide pacing therapy currently. Second, pre-procedural screening is important to minimise T wave and myopotential oversensing. Finally, until recently, the S-ICD was primarily used in younger patients with fewer co-morbidities and less structural heart disease, limiting the general applicability of the device. S-ICDs achieve excellent rates of arrhythmia conversion and have demonstrated noninferiority to TV-ICDs in terms of complication rates in real-world studies. The objective of this review is to discuss the latest literature, including the UNTOUCHED and PRAETORIAN trials, and to address the risk of inappropriate shocks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmadreza Karimianpour
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, US
| | - Leah John
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, US
| | - Michael R Gold
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, US
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Francia P, Adduci C, Angeletti A, Ottaviano L, Perrotta L, De Vivo S, Bongiorni MG, Migliore F, Russo AD, De Filippo P, Caravati F, Nigro G, Palmisano P, Viani S, D'Onofrio A, Lovecchio M, Valsecchi S, Ziacchi M. Acute shock efficacy of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator according to the implantation technique. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2021; 32:1695-1703. [PMID: 33969578 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The traditional technique for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation involves three incisions and a subcutaneous (SC) pocket. An intermuscular (IM) 2-incision technique has been recently adopted. AIMS We assessed acute defibrillation efficacy (DE) of S-ICD (DE ≤65 J) according to the implantation technique. METHODS We analyzed consecutive patients who underwent S-ICD implantation and DE testing at 53 Italian centers. Regression analysis was used to determine the association between DFT and implantation technique. RESULTS A total of 805 patients were enrolled. Four groups were assessed: IM + 2 incisions (n = 546), SC + 2 incisions (n = 133), SC + 3 incisions (n = 111), and IM + 3 incisions (n = 15). DE was ≤65 J in 782 (97.1%) patients. Patients with DE ≤65 J showed a trend towards lower body mass index (25.1 vs. 26.5; p = .12), were less frequently on antiarrhythmic drugs (13% vs. 26%; p = .06) and more commonly underwent implantation with the 2-incision technique (85% vs. 70%; p = .04). The IM + 2-incision technique showed the lowest defibrillation failure rate (2.2%) and shock impedance (66 Ohm, interquartile range: 57-77). On multivariate analysis, the 2-incision technique was associated with a lower incidence of shock failure (hazard ratio: 0.305; 95% confidence interval: 0.102-0.907; p = .033). Shock impedance was lower with the IM than with the SC approach (66 vs. 70 Ohm p = .002) and with the 2-incision than the 3-incision technique (67 vs. 72 Ohm; p = .006). CONCLUSIONS In a large population of S-ICD patients, we observed a high defibrillation success rate. The IM + 2-incision technique provides lower shock impedance and a higher likelihood of successful defibrillation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Francia
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, St. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmen Adduci
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, St. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Angeletti
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Institute of Cardiology, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Ottaviano
- Unit of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Perrotta
- Arrhythmic Disease Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano De Vivo
- Monaldi Hospital, "Unità Operativa di Elettrofisiologia, Studio e Terapia delle Aritmie", Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Bongiorni
- Division of Second Cardiology, Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Federico Migliore
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Antonio Dello Russo
- Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Paolo De Filippo
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Sciences, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Caravati
- Department of Heart and Vessels, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Gerardo Nigro
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy, Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro Palmisano
- Department of Cardiology, "Card. G. Panico" Hospital, Tricase, Lecce, Italy
| | - Stefano Viani
- Division of Second Cardiology, Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonio D'Onofrio
- Monaldi Hospital, "Unità Operativa di Elettrofisiologia, Studio e Terapia delle Aritmie", Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Matteo Ziacchi
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Institute of Cardiology, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Singh P, Afzal MR, Weiss R. Perioperative considerations during implantation of the subcutaneous defibrillator: State‐of‐the‐art review. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2020; 43:1451-1458. [DOI: 10.1111/pace.14072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Prabhpreet Singh
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center Columbus Ohio
| | - Muhammad Rizwan Afzal
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center Columbus Ohio
| | - Raul Weiss
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center Columbus Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van der Stuijt W, Baalman SWE, Brouwer TF, Quast AFBE, de Groot JR, Knops RE. Long-term follow-up of the two-incision implantation technique for the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2020; 43:1476-1480. [PMID: 32720398 PMCID: PMC7754287 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The two‐incision implantation technique of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (S‐ICD) was introduced as an alternative to the standard three‐incision approach by omitting the superior parasternal incision. Thereby, complications may be prevented. Short‐term follow‐up demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the two‐incision technique. However, long‐term results are lacking. Methods This retrospective study included patients implanted between February 2009 and June 2020. Patients were divided into a group of patients who were implanted with the standard three‐incision technique and a group who were implanted with the two‐incision technique. Outcomes were defibrillation impedance and efficacy and complications requiring intervention. Results A total of 268 patients were included (age 42.4 ± 16.6 years, 35.4% female, BMI 25.1 ± 4.5 kg/m2). Thirty‐one patients underwent S‐ICD implantation with the three‐incision technique and 237 patients with the two‐incision technique. First shock efficacy during defibrillation testing was 93% in the three‐incision group versus 94% in the two‐incision group (P = .69), and shock impedance was 85 versus 68 ohms (P = .04). First shock success was 75% versus 76% for spontaneous episodes (P = 1.00). Complication‐free survival at 5‐year follow‐up in the three‐incision group was estimated at 0.96 (95% CI 0.90‐1.00) versus 0.98 (95% CI 0.96‐1.00) in the two‐incision group (P = .20) and for inappropriate shocks at 5‐year 0.77 (95% CI 0.63‐0.94) versus 0.83 (95% CI 0.77‐0.89, P = .30), respectively. Conclusion Five‐year follow‐up in this S‐ICD cohort showed similar complication rates and effectiveness of two‐incision technique compared to the three‐incision technique. This technique offers physicians a less invasive and more simplified implantation procedure for the S‐ICD, with a better cosmetic result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willeke van der Stuijt
- Heart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah W E Baalman
- Heart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tom F Brouwer
- Heart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne-Floor B E Quast
- Heart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joris R de Groot
- Heart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Reinoud E Knops
- Heart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|