1
|
Kaufmann J, Huber D, Engelhardt T, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kranke P, Riva T, von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Fuchs A. [Airway management in neonates and infants : Recommendations according to the ESAIC/BJA guidelines]. DIE ANAESTHESIOLOGIE 2024; 73:473-481. [PMID: 38958671 PMCID: PMC11222175 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-024-01424-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
Securing an airway enables the oxygenation and ventilation of the lungs and is a potentially life-saving medical procedure. Adverse and critical events are common during airway management, particularly in neonates and infants. The multifactorial reasons for this include patient-dependent, user-dependent and also external factors. The recently published joint ESAIC/BJA international guidelines on airway management in neonates and infants are summarized with a focus on the clinical application. The original publication of the guidelines focussed on naming formal recommendations based on systematically documented evidence, whereas this summary focusses particularly on the practicability of their implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jost Kaufmann
- Kinderkrankenhaus der Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, Amsterdamer Str. 59, 50735, Köln, Deutschland.
- Fakultät für Gesundheit, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Deutschland.
| | - Dennis Huber
- Universitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerzmedizin, Inselspital, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz
| | - Thomas Engelhardt
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Kanada
| | - Maren Kleine-Brueggeney
- Klinik für Kardioanästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Berlin, Deutschland
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, korporatives Mitglied der Freien Universität Berlin und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Peter Kranke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Riva
- Universitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerzmedizin, Inselspital, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz
| | - Britta S von Ungern-Sternberg
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, WA, Australien
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australien
- Institute for Paediatric Perioperative Excellence, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australien
- Perioperative Medicine Team, Perioperative Care Program, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA, Australien
| | - Alexander Fuchs
- Universitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerzmedizin, Inselspital, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Disma N, Asai T, Cools E, Cronin A, Engelhardt T, Fiadjoe J, Fuchs A, Garcia-Marcinkiewicz A, Habre W, Heath C, Johansen M, Kaufmann J, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kovatsis PG, Kranke P, Lusardi AC, Matava C, Peyton J, Riva T, Romero CS, von Ungern-Sternberg B, Veyckemans F, Afshari A. Airway management in neonates and infants: European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and British Journal of Anaesthesia joint guidelines. Br J Anaesth 2024; 132:124-144. [PMID: 38065762 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.08.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Airway management is required during general anaesthesia and is essential for life-threatening conditions such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Evidence from recent trials indicates a high incidence of critical events during airway management, especially in neonates or infants. It is important to define the optimal techniques and strategies for airway management in these groups. In this joint European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) and British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) guideline on airway management in neonates and infants, we present aggregated and evidence-based recommendations to assist clinicians in providing safe and effective medical care. We identified seven main areas of interest for airway management: i) preoperative assessment and preparation; ii) medications; iii) techniques and algorithms; iv) identification and treatment of difficult airways; v) confirmation of tracheal intubation; vi) tracheal extubation, and vii) human factors. Based on these areas, Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) questions were derived that guided a structured literature search. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to formulate the recommendations based on those studies included with consideration of their methodological quality (strong '1' or weak '2' recommendation with high 'A', medium 'B' or low 'C' quality of evidence). In summary, we recommend: 1. Use medical history and physical examination to predict difficult airway management (1C). 2. Ensure adequate level of sedation or general anaesthesia during airway management (1B). 3. Administer neuromuscular blocker before tracheal intubation when spontaneous breathing is not necessary (1C). 4. Use a videolaryngoscope with an age-adapted standard blade as first choice for tracheal intubation (1B). 5. Apply apnoeic oxygenation during tracheal intubation in neonates (1B). 6. Consider a supraglottic airway for rescue oxygenation and ventilation when tracheal intubation fails (1B). 7. Limit the number of tracheal intubation attempts (1C). 8. Use a stylet to reinforce and preshape tracheal tubes when hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades are used and when the larynx is anatomically anterior (1C). 9. Verify intubation is successful with clinical assessment and end-tidal CO2 waveform (1C). 10. Apply high-flow nasal oxygenation, continuous positive airway pressure or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for postextubation respiratory support, when appropriate (1B).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Disma
- Unit for Research in Anaesthesia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Takashi Asai
- Department of Anesthesiology, Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Evelien Cools
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Thomas Engelhardt
- Department of Anaesthesia, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - John Fiadjoe
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander Fuchs
- Unit for Research in Anaesthesia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy; Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Annery Garcia-Marcinkiewicz
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Walid Habre
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Chloe Heath
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; Perioperative Medicine Team, Perioperative Care Program, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Mathias Johansen
- Department of Anaesthesia, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jost Kaufmann
- Department for Pediatric Anesthesia, Children's Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Faculty for Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | - Maren Kleine-Brueggeney
- Department of Cardiac Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC) and Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pete G Kovatsis
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter Kranke
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Andrea C Lusardi
- Unit for Research in Anaesthesia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Clyde Matava
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - James Peyton
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas Riva
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carolina S Romero
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Methodology Department, Universidad Europea de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Britta von Ungern-Sternberg
- Perioperative Medicine Team, Perioperative Care Program, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia; Division of Emergency Medicine, Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Arash Afshari
- Department of Paediatric and Obstetric Anaesthesia, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet & Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Disma N, Asai T, Cools E, Cronin A, Engelhardt T, Fiadjoe J, Fuchs A, Garcia-Marcinkiewicz A, Habre W, Heath C, Johansen M, Kaufmann J, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kovatsis PG, Kranke P, Lusardi AC, Matava C, Peyton J, Riva T, Romero CS, von Ungern-Sternberg B, Veyckemans F, Afshari A. Airway management in neonates and infants: European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and British Journal of Anaesthesia joint guidelines. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2024; 41:3-23. [PMID: 38018248 PMCID: PMC10720842 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
Airway management is required during general anaesthesia and is essential for life-threatening conditions such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Evidence from recent trials indicates a high incidence of critical events during airway management, especially in neonates or infants. It is important to define the optimal techniques and strategies for airway management in these groups. In this joint European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) and British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) guideline on airway management in neonates and infants, we present aggregated and evidence-based recommendations to assist clinicians in providing safe and effective medical care. We identified seven main areas of interest for airway management: i) preoperative assessment and preparation; ii) medications; iii) techniques and algorithms; iv) identification and treatment of difficult airways; v) confirmation of tracheal intubation; vi) tracheal extubation, and vii) human factors. Based on these areas, Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) questions were derived that guided a structured literature search. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to formulate the recommendations based on those studies included with consideration of their methodological quality (strong '1' or weak '2' recommendation with high 'A', medium 'B' or low 'C' quality of evidence). In summary, we recommend: 1. Use medical history and physical examination to predict difficult airway management (1С). 2. Ensure adequate level of sedation or general anaesthesia during airway management (1B). 3. Administer neuromuscular blocker before tracheal intubation when spontaneous breathing is not necessary (1С). 4. Use a videolaryngoscope with an age-adapted standard blade as first choice for tracheal intubation (1B). 5. Apply apnoeic oxygenation during tracheal intubation in neonates (1B). 6. Consider a supraglottic airway for rescue oxygenation and ventilation when tracheal intubation fails (1B). 7. Limit the number of tracheal intubation attempts (1C). 8. Use a stylet to reinforce and preshape tracheal tubes when hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades are used and when the larynx is anatomically anterior (1C). 9. Verify intubation is successful with clinical assessment and end-tidal CO 2 waveform (1C). 10. Apply high-flow nasal oxygenation, continuous positive airway pressure or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for postextubation respiratory support, when appropriate (1B).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Disma
- From the Unit for Research in Anaesthesia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy (ND, AF, ACL), Department of Anesthesiology, Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan (TA), Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (EC, WH), Medical Library, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA (AC), Department of Anaesthesia, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada (TE, MJ), Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA (JF, PGK, JP), Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (AF, TR), Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA (AG-M), Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand (CH), Perioperative Medicine Team, Perioperative Care Program, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA, Australia (CH, BvU-S), Department for Pediatric Anesthesia, Children's Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany (JK), Faculty for Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany (JK), Department of Cardiac Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC) and Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (MK-B), Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (PK), Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada (CM), Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Methodology Department, Universidad Europea de Valencia, Valencia, Spain (CSR), Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia (BvU-S), Division of Emergency Medicine, Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia (BvU-S), Faculty of Medicine, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium (FV), Department of Paediatric and Obstetric Anaesthesia, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet & Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark (AA)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Balakrishnan A, Sanghera RS, Boyle EM. New techniques, new challenges—The dilemma of pain management for less invasive surfactant administration? PAEDIATRIC AND NEONATAL PAIN 2020; 3:2-8. [PMID: 35548851 PMCID: PMC8975189 DOI: 10.1002/pne2.12033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Recent years have seen the increasing use of noninvasive respiratory support in preterm infants with the aim of minimizing the risk of mechanical ventilation and subsequent bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Respiratory distress syndrome is the most common respiratory diagnosis in preterm infants, and is best treated by administration of surfactant. Until recently, this has been performed via an endotracheal tube using premedication, which has often included opiate analgesia; subsequently, the infant has been ventilated. Avoidance of mechanical ventilation, however, does not negate the need for surfactant therapy. Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in spontaneously breathing infants is increasing in popularity, and appears to have beneficial effects. However, laryngoscopy is necessary, which carries adverse effects and is painful for the infant. Conventional methods of premedication for intubation tend to reduce respiratory drive, which increases the likelihood of ventilation being required. This has led to intense debate about the best strategy for providing appropriate treatment, taking into account both the respiratory needs of the infant and the need to alleviate procedural pain. Currently, clinical practice varies considerably and there is no consensus with respect to optimal management. This review seeks to summarize the benefits, risks, and challenges associated with this new approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Elaine M. Boyle
- Department of Health Sciences University of Leicester Leicester UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carbajal R, Lode N, Ayachi A, Chouakri O, Henry-Larzul V, Kessous K, Normand A, Courtois E, Rousseau J, Cimerman P, Chabernaud JL. Premedication practices for tracheal intubation in neonates transported by French medical transport teams: a prospective observational study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e034052. [PMID: 31727669 PMCID: PMC6886912 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Premedication practices for neonatal tracheal intubations have not yet been described for neonatal transport teams. Our objective is to describe the use of sedation/analgesia (SA) for tracheal intubations and to assess its tolerance in neonates transported by medical transport teams in France. SETTING This prospective observational study was part of the EPIPPAIN 2 project and collected around-the-clock data on SA practices in neonates intubated by all five paediatric medical transport teams of the Paris region during a 2-month period. Intubations were classified as emergent, semiemergent and non-emergent. Sedation level and conditions of intubation were assessed with the Tonus, Reactivity, Awareness and Conditions of intubation to Help in Endotracheal intubation Assessment (TRACHEA score). The scores range from 0 to 10 representing an increasing ladder from adequate to inadequate sedation, and from excellent to very poor conditions of intubation. PARTICIPANTS 40 neonates intubated in 28 different centres. RESULTS The mean (SD) age was 34.9 (3.9) weeks, and 62.5% were intubated in the delivery room. 30/40 (75%) of intubations were performed with the use of SA. In 18/30 (60.0%) intubations performed with SA, the drug regimen was the association of sufentanil and midazolam. Atropine was given in 19/40 intubations. From the 16, 21 and 3 intubations classified as emergent, semiemergent and non-emergent, respectively, 8 (50%), 19 (90.5%) and 3 (100%) were performed with SA premedication. 79.3% of intubations performed with SA had TRACHEA scores of 3 or less. 22/40 (55%) infants had at least one of the following adverse events: muscle rigidity, bradycardia below 100/min, desaturation below 80% and nose or pharynx-larynx bleeding. 7/24 (29.2%) of those who had only one attempt presented at least one of these adverse events compared with 15/16 (93.8%) of those who needed two or more attempts (p<0.001). CONCLUSION SA premedication is largely feasible for tracheal intubations performed in neonates transported by medical transport teams including intubations judged as emergent or semiemergent. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01346813; Results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Carbajal
- Service des Urgences Pédiatriques, Hôpital Trousseau, Paris, France
- Médecine Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMR 1153 Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Paris, France
| | - Noella Lode
- Neonatal Transport Team, SMUR Pédiatrique, Hôpital Robert Debré, SAMU de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Azzedine Ayachi
- Neonatal Transport Team, SMUR Pédiatrique, SAMU de Seine Saint Denis (AP-HP), Montreuil, France
| | - Ourida Chouakri
- Neonatal Transport Team, SMUR Pédiatrique Necker, Hôpital Necker, SAMU de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | | | - Katia Kessous
- Neonatal Transport Team, SMUR Pédiatrique, Hôpital Robert Debré, SAMU de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Audrey Normand
- Neonatal Transport Team, SMUR Pédiatrique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, SAMU des Hauts de Seine, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud (AP-HP), Clamart, Hauts de Seine, France
| | - Emilie Courtois
- Paediatric Emergency Department, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Jessica Rousseau
- INSERM UMR 1153 Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Paris, France
| | - Patricia Cimerman
- Centre National de Ressources de Lutte Contre la Douleur, Hopital Armand Trousseau, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Louis Chabernaud
- Neonatal Transport Team, SMUR Pédiatrique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, SAMU des Hauts de Seine, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud (AP-HP), Clamart, Hauts de Seine, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ancora G, Lago P, Garetti E, Merazzi D, Savant Levet P, Bellieni CV, Pieragostini L, Pirelli A. Evidence-based clinical guidelines on analgesia and sedation in newborn infants undergoing assisted ventilation and endotracheal intubation. Acta Paediatr 2019; 108:208-217. [PMID: 30290021 DOI: 10.1111/apa.14606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Revised: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
AIM This review informed pain control guidelines for clinicians performing mechanical ventilation, nasal continuous positive airway pressure and endotracheal intubation on term and preterm newborn infants. METHODS We reviewed literature published between 1986 and June 2017 on analgesia and sedation during assisted ventilation and before endotracheal intubation in newborn infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units. The subsequent guidelines were developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS Our review produced five strong standard of care recommendations. One, reduce neonatal stress and use nonpharmacological analgesia during invasive ventilation. Two, favour intermittent boluses of opioids, administered after pain scores and before invasive procedures, during short expected periods of mechanical ventilation, mainly in preterm infants affected by respiratory distress syndrome. Three, do not use morphine infusion in preterm infants under 27 gestational weeks. Four, always use algometric scores to titrate analgesic drugs doses. Five, use premedication before endotracheal intubation for a more rapid, less painful, less traumatic and safer manoeuvre. We also developed 30 conditional recommendations on therapeutic options. CONCLUSION Our review produced 35 recommendations on standard care and therapeutic options relating to the analgesia and sedation of newborn infants during ventilation and before endotracheal intubation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina Ancora
- NICU; Azienda Sanitaria Romagna; Infermi Hospital Rimini; Rimini Italy
| | - Paola Lago
- NICU; Azienda ULSS 2 MarcaTrevigiana; CàFoncello Hospital; Treviso Italy
| | - Elisabetta Garetti
- NICU; Women's and Children's Health Department; Azienda Ospedaliera; University of Modena; Modena Italy
| | - Daniele Merazzi
- NICU; Mother's and Infant's Department; Valduce Hospital; Como Italy
| | - Patrizia Savant Levet
- NICU; Maria Vittoria Hospital; Mother's and Infant's Department; ASL Città di Torino Italy
| | | | | | - Anna Pirelli
- NICU; Rho Hospital; ASST Rhodense; Garbagnate Milanese; Milano Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Kort EHM, Andriessen P, Reiss IKH, van Dijk M, Simons SHP. Evaluation of an Intubation Readiness Score to Assess Neonatal Sedation before Intubation. Neonatology 2019; 115:43-48. [PMID: 30278443 DOI: 10.1159/000492711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Premedication for neonatal intubation facilitates the procedure and reduces stress and physiological disturbances. However, no validated scoring system to assess the effect of premedication prior to intubation is available. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the usefulness of an Intubation Readiness Score (IRS) to assess the effect of premedication prior to intubation in newborn infants. METHODS Two-center prospective study in neonates who needed endotracheal intubation. Intubation was performed using a standardized procedure with propofol 1-2 mg/kg as premedication. The level of sedation was assessed with the IRS by evaluating the motor response to a firm stimulus (1 = spontaneous movement; 2 = movement on slight touch; 3 = movement on firm stimulus; 4 = no movement). Intubation was proceeded if an adequate effect, defined as an IRS of 3 or 4, was reached. IRS was compared to the quality of intubation measured with the Viby-Mogensen intubation score. RESULTS A total of 115 patients, with a median gestational age of 27.7 weeks (interquartile range 5.3) and a median birth weight of 1,005 g (interquartile range 940), were included. An adequate IRS was achieved in 105 patients, 89 (85%) of whom also had a good Viby-Mogensen intubation score and 16 (15%) had an inadequate Viby-Mogensen intubation score. The positive predictive value of the IRS was 85%. CONCLUSIONS Preintubation sedation assessment using the IRS can adequately predict optimal conditions during intubation in the majority of neonates. We suggest using the IRS in routine clinical care. Further research combining the IRS with other parameters could further improve the predictability of adequate sedation during intubation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen H M de Kort
- Department of Neonatology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The .,Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The
| | - Peter Andriessen
- Department of Neonatology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Irwin K H Reiss
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique van Dijk
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sinno H P Simons
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|