Perspectives on Intravenous Oxycodone for Control of Postoperative Pain

Harmonising IV Oxycodone with Paediatric Perioperative Medications: A Compatibility Study Through Y-Type Connectors

Purpose

Co-administering multiple intravenous (IV) agents via Y-connectors is a common practice in hospitalised and fasting surgical patients. However, there is a lack of reliable data confirming the physical compatibility of some combinations including IV oxycodone, a drug that is gaining increasing popularity in the perioperative period. Concern regarding physical drug incompatibilities precludes concurrent coadministration with other common drugs through a single lumen. This can result in the cessation of infusions to allow the administration of other medications, resulting in exacerbation of acute pain. This study aims to evaluate the physical compatibility of IV oxycodone with some commonly co-administered drugs and IV fluids.

Methods

Mixtures of oxycodone (1mg.mL-1) and the tested drugs and IV fluids were prepared in a ratio of 1:1. The mixtures were examined at 0 and 60 minutes from mixing and assessed using the European Conference Consensus Standards. This involved visual inspection (precipitation, turbidity, colour change, gas formation), spectrophotometry, and pH change. The tested drugs included ketamine, tramadol, clonidine, vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, dexmedetomidine, cefotaxime, gentamicin, and paracetamol. In addition, the commonly used IV fluids tested included glucose 5% + sodium chloride 0.9% + 60 mmol potassium chloride, plasmalyte + dextrose 5%;plasmalyte + dextrose 5% + 55 mmol potassium chloride, plasmalyte + dextrose 5% + 55mmol potassium acetate, plasmalyte + dextrose 5% + 55mmol potassium dihydrogen phosphate, Hartmann's solution, Standard pediatric Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) 20/100 and TPN 25/150.

Results

IV oxycodone (1 mg.mL-1) showed no visual changes; no spectrophotometric absorption variability at 350, 410, or 550nm; and no pH changes of >0.5 at 0 or 60 minutes with any of the tested drugs or fluids in the concentrations tested.

Conclusion

According to European Consensus Conference Standards, IV Oxycodone at 1 mg.mL-1 is physically compatible in a ratio of 1:1 v/v with all investigated drugs and fluids tested for at least 60 minutes.

Pharmacological Treatments and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients with Chronic Pain

Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience that affects every aspect of a patient's life and which may be treated through different pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. Analgesics are the drugs most commonly used to treat pain, and in specific situations, the use of opioids may be considered with caution. These drugs, in fact, do not always induce optimal analgesia in patients, and several problems are associated with their use. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe the pharmacological approaches currently used for the management of chronic pain. We review several aspects, from the pain-scale-based methods currently available to assess the type and intensity of pain, to the most frequently administered drugs (non-narcotic analgesics and narcotic analgesics), whose pharmacological characteristics are briefly reported. Overall, we attempt to provide an overview of different pharmacological treatments while also illustrating the relevant guidelines and indications. We then report the strategies that may be used to reduce problems related to opioid use. Specifically, we focus our attention on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), a tool that could help clinicians select the most suitable drug and dose to be used for each patient. The actual potential of using TDM to optimize and personalize opioid-based pain treatments is finally discussed based on recent scientific reports.

Lung cancer patients with positive programmed death-ligand 1 expression endure graver postoperative pain

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is common in lung cancer patients, and it is unclear whether cancer itself participates in pain regulation. Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expressed by tumours may be analgesic. Our study aimed to detect the association between PD-L1 and acute postoperative pain.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent VATS for lung cancer with tumour PD-L1 expression analysed in our centre from Jan 2017 to Jul 2020. They were divided into PD-L1 (-) group and PD-L1 (+) group and were further divided into four subgroups according to opioids for postoperative analgesia: sufentanil PD-L1 (-), sufentanil PD-L1 (+), oxycodone PD-L1 (-), and oxycodone PD-L1 (+). We compared the numeric rating scale (NRS) for the first three postoperative days at rest or cough between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 369 patients (167 in PD-L1 (-) vs. 202 in PD-L1 (+)) were included. On the first postoperative day, NRS at cough in the PD-L1 (+) patients were higher than those in the PD-L1 (-) patients (2.91 ± 1.07 vs. 2.66 ± 1.01, p = 0.018). On the third day, NRS at cough in PD-L1 (+) patients was higher (2.50 ± 1.02 vs. 2.26 ± 1.09, p = 0.043). For patients with oxycodone, NRS was higher in PD-L1 (+) than in PD-L1 (-) (p = 0.041) at cough after surgery. In contrast, those with sufentanil did not significantly differ in NRS between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PD-L1 (+) suffered graver pain in the early postoperative period after VATS for lung cancer compared with PD-L1 (-) on tumours. Analgesia with sufentanil seemed to overcome this effect better than oxycodone.

SIGNIFICANCE

We demonstrated that patients with positive programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) on tumours suffered graver pain in the early postoperative period after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer and reacted differently with opioids. It might be beneficial to adjust analgesic protocols according to tumour PD-L1 expression for individualized postoperative pain management.

Differential dosing of oxycodone in combination with propofol in diagnostic painless gastroscopy in elderly patients: A prospective randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of different doses of oxycodone in combination with propofol during painless gastroscopy.

METHODS

120 patients underwent painless gastroscopy under general anesthesia. According to the different doses of oxycodone, patients were divided into 4 groups, group A (oxycodone 0.025 mg/kg + propofol), group B (oxycodone 0.05 mg/kg + propofol) and group C (oxycodone 0.1 mg/kg + propofol), control group (propofol alone), with 30 cases in each group. The general characteristics of all patients were then evaluated. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded at different time points, including the time before anesthesia (T0), failure of the lash reflex (T1), successful placement of the mirror (T2), removal of the mirror (T3) and waking up (T4). The intraoperative propofol dosage and the operative time of gastroscopy were recorded. The occurrence of adverse effects in the 4 groups was also compared.

RESULTS

General characteristics, gastroscopy operative time and SpO2 did not differ significantly between the 4 groups (P > .05). However, group C had the lowest amount of propofol during gastroscopy (P < .05). At T1, groups A, B, and C had a faster HR than the control group (P < .05). At T2, groups A, B, and C had a lower MAP than the control group (P < .05). Groups B and C had fewer adverse effects than groups A and the control group (P < .05). Importantly, groups B and C had a shorter recovery time than groups A and the control group (P < .05), but no statistically significant differences were found between groups B and C.

CONCLUSION

0.05 mg/kg oxycodone in combination with propofol can be used safely and effectively for painless gastroscopy, with the advantages of a low propofol dose, maintenance of hemodynamic stability and few adverse effects.

Opioids for acute pain management in children

Opioids are integral to multimodal analgesic regimens in children with moderate to severe acute pain. Throughout normal childhood there are marked changes in physiology, and social and psychological development that influence the perception and expression of pain, the pharmacology of opioids, and how they are used. A multidimensional pain assessment is key to guiding appropriate opioid prescribing. Most of the commonly used opioids in adults are used in children, with the increasing exception of codeine (as a result of regulatory change), and are generally well tolerated. Patient groups at increased risk of ventilatory impairment include neonates and those with obstructive sleep apnoea, severe neurodevelopmental conditions, trisomy 21, and severe epilepsy. Slow-release opioids are not recommended for general use, but may be used in select populations, for example, following scoliosis surgery, major trauma or burns. Prescribing and administration errors are a major issue in paediatrics generally; the potential consequences of opioid prescribing or administration errors are serious, particularly following hospital discharge. Opioids prescribed at discharge are frequently in excess of a child's analgesic requirements; three to five days supply appears sufficient for the majority of common paediatric operations. Discharge opioid prescriptions have been linked to long-term opioid use in adolescents with risk factors. Misuse of prescription opioids by adolescents is also concerning, with prevalence estimates ranging from 1.1% to 20%. Caregivers have a tendency to underdose opioids in their children; caregiver education may improve appropriate administration. Caregivers must also be provided with instructions on safe storage and disposal of unused opioids.

Different Doses of Oxycodone for Endoscopic Injection Sclerotherapy of Esophageal Varices

Background

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of different doses of oxycodone during endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) for esophageal varices with painless sclerosing agents.

Material/Methods

A total of 119 patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: Group A, midazolam and 0.075 mg/kg oxycodone (n=40); Group B, midazolam and 0.1 mg/kg oxycodone (n=40); and Group C, midazolam and 0.125 mg/kg oxycodone (n=39). The main observation index was the incidence of body movement during the perioperative period. The secondary indices were additional propofol usage; postoperative analgesic usage; other adverse effects, such as hypoxia, myoclonus, and cough; and satisfaction scores for surgeons and patients.

Results

The incidence rates for body movement during the perioperative period in groups A, B, and C were 33%, 13%, and 0, respectively (P<0.001). The satisfaction scores for surgeons and patients were highest in Group C (0.125 mg/kg oxycodone). The incidence rates for hypoxia before EIS were 15%, 8%, and 33% (P=0.026) and during EIS were 23%, 3%, and 0% (P<0.001), respectively. There were no significant between-group differences with respect to other adverse effects.

Conclusions

The ideal dose of oxycodone for perioperative analgesia during EIS for esophageal varices is 0.125 mg/kg.

Post-operative opioid-related adverse events with intravenous oxycodone compared to morphine: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The value of intravenous oxycodone compared to morphine remains controversial. The purpose of this trial was to compare opioid-related adverse events (ORAES) of intravenous oxycodone and morphine after total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty were enrolled in this study of post-operative pain treatment with intravenous oxycodone or intravenous morphine (ratio 1:1). After surgery, patients received similar drug regimens for titration in the post-operative care unit followed by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The primary outcome was the number of patients with ≥1 ORAEs within the first 24 hours defined as either nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, pruritus, urinary retention requiring evacuation, allergy, hallucinations. Secondary outcomes included pain scores and opioid consumption.

RESULTS

The analysis included 238 patients with similar characteristics. There were 55 patients with at least one ORAEs in the oxycodone group vs 46 in the morphine group: 48% vs 40%, P = .19; relative risk = 1.22 (0.91:1.63). Intravenous oxycodone vs intravenous morphine requirements were respectively (median, IQR): 6 (0-11) vs 8 (0-12) mg (P = .06) for titration, 15 (8-26) vs 8 (5-16) mg (P = .001) for PCA, and 22 (12-37) mg vs 19 (11-28) mg for cumulated intravenous consumption (P = .048). During the first 24 hours, there was no difference in secondary outcomes (oxycodone vs morphine, respectively, in %): nausea (15 vs 13), vomiting (5 vs 5), urinary retention (20 vs 12) or pain scores.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that IV oxycodone did not significantly reduce ORAEs within the first 24 hours compared to similar ratio of IV morphine.

The Median Effective Dose of One Intravenous Bolus of Oxycodone for Postoperative Analgesia After Myomectomy and Hysterectomy With Local Ropivacaine Wound Infiltration: An Up-Down Dose-Finding Study

BACKGROUND

Oxycodone has been shown to be an effective analgesic for early postoperative analgesia, especially for abdominal operations associated with severe visceral pain. However, the dose needed varies depending on the operation and application of multimodal analgesia, such as local ropivacaine wound infiltration. Therefore, we conducted this study to estimate the median effective dose (ED50) of oxycodone that provides analgesia for hysterectomy and myomectomy with local ropivacaine wound infiltration.

METHODS

In this dose-finding study, the ED50 of oxycodone for postoperative analgesia was estimated separately for laparoscopic hysterectomy, transabdominal hysterectomy, laparoscopic myomectomy, and transabdominal myomectomy. We used the sequential allocation designed by Dixon. Trials were conducted simultaneously in the 4 surgical type groups. A predefined dose of oxycodone was injected 30 minutes before the end of the operation with an initial dose of 0.1 mg/kg. A series of trials were performed following the rule of a relative 10% increase in dose after inadequate analgesia and a relative 10% decrease in dose after adequate analgesia. The study was conducted until the collection of 7 crossover points was achieved. Local ropivacaine wound infiltration was administered during abdominal stitching. The mean blood pressure (MBP) and heart rate (HR) were analyzed to assess the hemodynamic changes associated with oxycodone administration.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients were included in the estimation of ED50: 28 each in the laparoscopic hysterectomy group and transabdominal myomectomy group, 27 in the transabdominal hysterectomy group, and 30 in the laparoscopic myomectomy group. The estimated oxycodone ED50 (95% confidence interval [CI]) after laparoscopic hysterectomy, transabdominal hysterectomy, laparoscopic myomectomy, and transabdominal myomectomy was 0.060 mg/kg (0.053-0.068), 0.079 mg/kg (0.072-0.086), 0.060 mg/kg (0.051-0.071), and 0.092 mg/kg (0.086-0.098), respectively, for postoperative analgesia with local ropivacaine wound infiltration. The ED50 of oxycodone was different between laparoscopic surgeries and transabdominal surgeries (P < .001). The MBP and HR before and after oxycodone injection were different, regardless of surgical type.

CONCLUSIONS

The oxycodone ED50 for postoperative analgesia was lower for laparoscopic hysterectomy (0.060 mg/kg) and laparoscopic myomectomy (0.060 mg/kg) than for transabdominal hysterectomy (0.079 mg/kg) and transabdominal myomectomy (0.092 mg/kg) when combined with local ropivacaine wound infiltration. A single intravenous injection of oxycodone is associated with an acceptable decrease in MBP and HR within a short time.

Oral versus patient-controlled intravenous administration of oxycodone for pain relief after cesarean section

PURPOSE

The optimal postoperative analgesia after cesarean section (CS) remains to be determined. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether oral oxycodone provides the same or better pain control and satisfaction with pain relief as oxycodone given intravenously using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) infusion device. The secondary objectives were to compare the gastrointestinal symptoms and postsurgical recovery of the two groups.

METHODS

This prospective randomized trial was conducted at a University Hospital between February 2015 and June 2017. Altogether 270 CS patients were randomly assigned to receive postoperative oxycodone pain relief by IV PCA (n = 133) or orally (n = 137). Pain control and satisfaction with pain treatment were assessed by a numeric rating scale (NRS) at 2, 4, 8, and 24 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

No differences were found in NRS pain scores or satisfaction between the groups except at 24 h pain when coughing; there was a statistically significant difference favoring the IV PCA group (p = 0.006). In the IV PCA group, the patients experienced more nausea at 4 h (p = 0.001) and more vomiting at 8 h (p = 0.010). Otherwise, postoperative recovery was similar in both groups. The equianalgesic dose of oxycodone was significantly smaller in the oral group (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that oral oxycodone provides pain control and satisfaction with pain relief equal to IV oxycodone PCA for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section. Satisfaction with pain treatment was high in both groups, and both methods were well tolerated. Early nausea was less common with oral medication.

Intravenous Oxycodone Versus Other Intravenous Strong Opioids for Acute Postoperative Pain Control: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction

Optimal pain management is crucial to the postoperative recovery process. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous oxycodone with intravenous fentanyl, morphine, sufentanil, pethidine, and hydromorphone for acute postoperative pain.

Methods

A systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases was performed for randomized controlled trials published from 2008 through 2017 (inclusive) that evaluated the acute postoperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous oxycodone against fentanyl, morphine, sufentanil, pethidine, and hydromorphone in adult patients (age ≥ 18 years). Outcomes examined included analgesic consumption, pain intensity levels, side effects, and patient satisfaction.

Results

Eleven studies were included in the review; six compared oxycodone with fentanyl, two compared oxycodone with morphine, and three compared oxycodone with sufentanil. There were no eligible studies comparing oxycodone with pethidine or hydromorphone. Overall, analgesic consumption was lower with oxycodone than with fentanyl or sufentanil. Oxycodone exhibited better analgesic efficacy than fentanyl and sufentanil, and comparable analgesic efficacy to morphine. In terms of safety, there was a tendency towards more side effects with oxycodone than with fentanyl, but the incidence of side effects with oxycodone was comparable to morphine and sufentanil. Where patient satisfaction was evaluated, higher satisfaction levels were observed with oxycodone than with sufentanil and comparable satisfaction was noted when comparing oxycodone with fentanyl. Patient satisfaction was not evaluated in the studies comparing oxycodone with morphine.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that intravenous oxycodone provides better analgesic efficacy than fentanyl and sufentanil, and comparable efficacy to morphine with less adverse events such as sedation. No studies comparing intravenous oxycodone with pethidine or hydromorphone were identified in this review. Better alignment of study methodologies for future research in this area is recommended to provide the best evidence base for a meta-analysis.

Funding

Mundipharma Singapore Holding Pte Ltd, Singapore.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40122-019-0122-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effect of Intravenous Oxycodone Versus Sufentanil on the Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery

More than 30% of patients who undergo surgery will experience postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) if no prophylactic treatments are used. Although numerous studies have been performed to investigate the factors related to PONV, the effect of perioperative intravenous oxycodone on the incidence of PONV has not been well investigated. In this study, gynecological patients (grade I-II, aged 18-65 years, scheduled to undergo elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia) were randomized to the oxycodone group or the sufentanil group. In the oxycodone group, patients received intravenous oxycodone for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia, as well as postoperative analgesia, while sufentanil was used in the sufentanil group. The primary outcome variable was the incidence of PONV. As secondary outcomes, time to first PONV, the rating of the most severe PONV, postoperative pain scores at different time points, hemodynamics, and side effects were evaluated. We found that, compared with sufentanil, oxycodone decreased the incidence of PONV by 13.5% (P = .041). The time to first vomiting was longer in the oxycodone group than in the sufentanil group. Postoperative pain scores at different time points and hemodynamics were comparable between the oxycodone and sufentanil groups. We concluded that the incidence of PONV in gynecological patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery was lower when using intravenous oxycodone for anesthesia induction, anesthesia maintenance, and postoperative analgesia than when using intravenous sufentanil. However, oxycodone and sufentanil provided the same stable hemodynamics during surgery and satisfactory postoperative analgesia.

New Advances in Acute Postoperative Pain Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Postoperative pain remains one of the most common challenges following inpatient and outpatient surgeries. With our advances in modern medicine, pain following surgical procedures still remains a challenge, though significant accomplishments have been made over the past few decades. This article highlights some of the promising new advances and approaches in postoperative pain management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last decade, Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways and protocols are becoming the benchmark standards for enhancing postoperative recovery. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) is an essential component of such care. Further, in the wake of serious and persistent concern on the opioid epidemic in the USA, there has been a recent renewal of interest in non-opioid alternatives or adjuncts in controlling postoperative pain, often in the context of MMA. Intravenous (IV) acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), magnesium, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, liposomal bupivacaine, and newer neuraxial and peripheral regional techniques as well as patient-controlled modalities are gaining importance. Gabapentinoids have become popular but recent meta-analytic reviews have cast doubt on their routine use in perioperative settings. Among opioids, sublingual sufentanil, IV oxycodone, and iontophoretic transdermal fentanyl hold promise. Acupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation may be useful as adjuncts in MMA packages. Genetic testing, derivatives of herbal preparations, and an extended role of acute pain services may emerge as potential areas of importance in the future. There are, however, critical gaps in good quality evidence in many of the practice guideline recommendations. In the era of opioid epidemic, several lines of evidence have emerged to support non-opioid-based drugs and approaches along with a few newer opioid formulations for postoperative pain management, although more research is needed to find the right balance of efficacy and safety.

Intravenous Oxycodone versus Intravenous Morphine in Cancer Pain: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Active-Control Study

Objective

To compare efficacy and safety of intravenous continuous infusion of oxycodone with morphine in patients with cancer pain.

Methods

A 5-day, randomized, open-label, exploratory study at 6 sites in the Republic of Korea. Sixty-six adults aged ≥19 years with moderate-to-severe cancer pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] ≥ 4) were enrolled. The study group received intravenous (IV) oxycodone, and the comparator group received IV morphine which were titrated depending on pain intensity. The efficacy endpoint is change in average NRS score from baseline to Day 5. Other assessments included worst, current, and average pain intensity; patient satisfaction; medication dose; and adverse events.

Results

Both groups achieved >50% reduction in average pain intensity: from “moderate” at baseline (oxycodone versus morphine: 6.0 ± 1.8 versus 5.9 ± 1.4) to “mild” at Day 5 (2.5 ± 1.8 versus 2.8 ± 1.6). While this reduction was similar between groups (3.5 ± 2.2 versus 3.1 ± 1.8, P value = 0.562), oxycodone achieved faster pain relief (average pain: 3.0 ± 1.6 versus 3.9 ± 1.6, P value = 0.020) on Day 2 and significant NRS reductions for worst pain on Day 2 (P value = 0.045) and current pain on Day 2 (P value = 0.035) and Day 5 (P value = 0.020) compared to morphine. Patient satisfaction, adverse events, and adverse drug reactions were similar for both groups.

Conclusions

For Asian patients with cancer pain, IV oxycodone is faster acting and showed similar analgesic efficacy and safety profiles as IV morphine. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02660229.

The Effectiveness of Intravenous Oxycodone in the Treatment of Acute Postoperative Pain: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Intravenous (IV) opioids are administered for management of acute postoperative pain in the postanesthesia care unit. The benefits of parenteral oxycodone for acute pain management are understudied. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of IV oxycodone for acute postoperative pain.

DESIGN

A systematic review of quantitative studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute approach.

METHODS

A search for randomized controlled trials was conducted, revealing 314 potentially relevant studies. These were compared with the inclusion criteria. Those that met these criteria were critically appraised.

FINDINGS

Participants (N = 506) in eight trials were included in this review. Four studies supported the use of IV oxycodone as patient-controlled analgesia and IV bolus. The remaining studies showed equipotent effects between oxycodone and control. Higher incidences of adverse effects were associated with IV oxycodone.

CONCLUSIONS

IV oxycodone can be considered as effective analgesia for acute postoperative pain with careful regards to its adverse effects.

The analgesic efficacy of oxycodone hydrochloride versus fentanyl during outpatient artificial abortion operation: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Problems like body movement, respiratory depression, and complained of pain are still common phenomenon in outpatient artificial abortion general anesthesia. Oxycodone hydrochloride is a semisynthetic opioid and has a good therapeutic effect on visceral pain. We hypothesize that oxycodone hydrochloride would be superior to fentanyl in outpatient artificial abortion surgery.

METHODS

In this clinical trial 149 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II female outpatients scheduled for elective artificial abortion surgeries under general anesthesia were randomly divided into 3 groups: oxycodone hydrochloride 0.06 mg/kg group (group A), oxycodone hydrochloride 0.08 mg/kg group (group B), and control group fentanyl 2 ug/kg (group C). The primary outcome was level body movement and respiratory depression during the surgery, the second outcome included the visual analogue scale (VAS) score 30 minutes after waking.

RESULTS

A total of 120 participants completed the study, n = 40 in each group. There was no significant difference in patients' age, body mass index (BMI), preoperative heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, consumption dose of propofol, intraoperative body movement type and times, and duration of surgery among the 3 groups (P > .05). Comparing the incidence of intraoperative respiratory depression and SPO2 < 90% among the 3 groups, group C's was significantly higher than those of groups A and B, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). Group A had no difference compared with group B. In VAS score 30minutes after waking, group C was the highest, followed by group A, with group B as the lowest. The difference among the 3 groups was statistically significant (P < .05), but a difference delta less than 1 on the VAS scale is not clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

The analgesic effect of oxycodone hydrochloride at 0.06 mg/kg applied to painless artificial abortion surgery is not superior than that of fentanyl, but the incidence of intraoperative respiratory depression and hypoxemia is significantly lower than fentanyl.

Analgesic efficacy, adverse effects, and safety of oxycodone administered as continuous intravenous infusion in patients after total hip arthroplasty

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) causes extensive tissue damage and severe pain. This study aimed to assess the analgesic efficacy, adverse effects (AEs), and safety of continuous intravenous (iv) oxycodone infusion with ketoprofen (injected into the iv line) in patients after THA, and to assay serum oxycodone levels.

Patients and methods

Fourteen patients, aged 59‒82 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or III, underwent THA with intrathecal analgesia and sedation induced by iv propofol. After the surgery, oxycodone (continuous iv infusion) at a dose of 1 mg/h (five patients) or 2 mg/h (nine patients) with 100 mg ketoprofen (injected into the iv line) was administered to each patient every 12 h. Pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS: 0 – no pain, 10 – the most severe pain) at rest and during movement. AEs, including hemodynamic unsteadiness, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, cognitive impairment, and respiratory depression, were registered during the first 24 h after surgery.

Results

Oxycodone (continuous iv infusion) at a dose of 2 mg/h with ketoprofen (100 mg) administered every 12 h provided satisfactory analgesia in all nine patients without the need of rescue analgesics within the first 24 h after THA. In three out of five patients, oxycodone at 1 mg/h was effective. Oxycodone did not induce drowsiness, vomiting, pruritus, respiratory depression, or changes in blood pressure. Bradycardia appeared in two patients, and nausea was observed in one patient.

Conclusion

Oxycodone infusion with ketoprofen administered by iv is effective in patients after THA. Intravenous infusion of oxycodone is a predictable, stable, and safe method of drug administration.

Development and characterization of a mucoadhesive sublingual formulation for pain control: extemporaneous oxycodone films in personalized therapy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was the development of mucoadhesive sublingual films, prepared using a casting method, for the administration of oxycodone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A solvent casting method was employed to prepare the mucoadhesive films. A calibrated pipette was used to deposit single aliquots of different polymeric solutions on a polystyrene plate lid. Among the various tested polymers, hydroxypropylcellulose at low and medium molecular weight (HPC) and pectin at two different degrees of esterification (PC) were chosen for preparing solutions with good casting properties, capable of producing films suitable for mucosal application.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The obtained films showed excellent drug content uniformity and stability and rapid drug release, which, at 8 min, ranged from 60% to 80%. All films presented satisfactory mucoadhesive and mechanical properties, also confirmed by a test on healthy volunteers, who did not experience irritation or mucosa damages. Pectin films based on pectin at lower degrees of esterification have been further evaluated to study the influence of two different amounts of drug on the physicochemical properties of the formulation. A slight reduction in elasticity has been observed in films containing a higher drug dose; nevertheless, the formulation maintained satisfactory flexibility and resistance to elongation.

CONCLUSIONS

HPC and PC sublingual films, obtained by a simple casting method, could be proposed to realize personalized hospital pharmacy preparations on a small scale.