1
|
Dobija L, Lechauve JB, Mbony-Irankunda D, Plan-Paquet A, Dupeyron A, Coudeyre E. Smartphone applications are used for self-management, telerehabilitation, evaluation and data collection in low back pain healthcare: a scoping review. F1000Res 2024; 11:1001. [PMID: 38846061 PMCID: PMC11153999 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.123331.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Smartphone use has grown in providing healthcare for patients with low back pain (LBP), but the literature lacks an analysis of the use of smartphone apps. This scoping review aimed to identify current areas of smartphone apps use for managing LBP. We also aimed to evaluate the current status of the effectiveness or scientific validity of such use and determine perspectives for their potential development. Methods We searched PubMed, PEDro and Embase for articles published in English up to May 3 rd, 2021 that investigated smartphone use for LBP healthcare and their purpose. All types of study design were accepted. Studies concerning telemedicine or telerehabilitation but without use of a smartphone were not included. The same search strategy was performed by two researchers independently and a third researcher validated the synthesis of the included studies. Results We included 43 articles: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (n=12), study protocols (n=6), reliability/validity studies (n=6), systematic reviews (n=7), cohort studies (n=4), qualitative studies (n=6), and case series (n=1). The purposes of the smartphone app were for 1) evaluation, 2) telerehabilitation, 3) self-management, and 4) data collection. Self-management was the most-studied use, showing promising results derived from moderate- to good-quality RCTs for patients with chronic LBP and patients after spinal surgery. Promising results exist regarding evaluation and data collection use and contradictory results regarding measurement use. Conclusions This scoping review revealed a notable interest in the scientific literatures regarding the use of smartphone apps for LBP patients. The identified purposes point to current scientific status and perspectives for further studies including RCTs and systematic reviews targeting specific usage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lech Dobija
- UNH, INRAE, Université Clermont-Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, Puy de Dôme, 63000, France
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU) de Clermont Ferrand, Cébazat, Puy de Dôme, 63118, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Lechauve
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU) de Clermont Ferrand, Cébazat, Puy de Dôme, 63118, France
| | - Didier Mbony-Irankunda
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU) de Clermont Ferrand, Cébazat, Puy de Dôme, 63118, France
| | - Anne Plan-Paquet
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU) de Clermont Ferrand, Cébazat, Puy de Dôme, 63118, France
| | - Arnaud Dupeyron
- Université Montpellier, Nimes, 30900, France
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU) de Nimes, Nimes, 30900, France
| | - Emmanuel Coudeyre
- UNH, INRAE, Université Clermont-Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, Puy de Dôme, 63000, France
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU) de Clermont Ferrand, Cébazat, Puy de Dôme, 63118, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barbero M, Cescon C, Schneebeli A, Falla D, Landolfi G, Derboni M, Giuffrida V, Rizzoli AE, Maino P, Koetsier E. Reliability of the Pen-on-Paper Pain Drawing Analysis Using Different Scanning Procedures. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024; 67:e129-e136. [PMID: 37898312 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pen-on-paper pain drawing are an easily administered self-reported measure that enables patients to report the spatial distribution of their pain. The digitalization of pain drawings has facilitated the extraction of quantitative metrics, such as pain extent and location. This study aimed to assess the reliability of pen-on-paper pain drawing analysis conducted by an automated pain-spot recognition algorithm using various scanning procedures. METHODS One hundred pain drawings, completed by patients experiencing somatic pain, were repeatedly scanned using diverse technologies and devices. Seven datasets were created, enabling reliability assessments including inter-device, inter-scanner, inter-mobile, inter-software, intra- and inter-operator. Subsequently, the automated pain-spot recognition algorithm estimated pain extent and location values for each digitized pain drawing. The relative reliability of pain extent analysis was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient, while absolute reliability was evaluated through the standard error of measurement and minimum detectable change. The reliability of pain location analysis was computed using the Jaccard similarity index. RESULTS The reliability analysis of pain extent consistently yielded intraclass correlation coefficient values above 0.90 for all scanning procedures, with standard error of measurement ranging from 0.03% to 0.13% and minimum detectable change from 0.08% to 0.38%. The mean Jaccard index scores across all dataset comparisons exceeded 0.90. CONCLUSIONS The analysis of pen-on-paper pain drawings demonstrated excellent reliability, suggesting that the automated pain-spot recognition algorithm is unaffected by scanning procedures. These findings support the algorithm's applicability in both research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Barbero
- Rehabilitation Research Laboratory 2rLab, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Manno, Switzerland (M.B., C.C., A.S.).
| | - Corrado Cescon
- Rehabilitation Research Laboratory 2rLab, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Manno, Switzerland (M.B., C.C., A.S.)
| | - Alessandro Schneebeli
- Rehabilitation Research Laboratory 2rLab, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Manno, Switzerland (M.B., C.C., A.S.)
| | - Deborah Falla
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom (D.F.)
| | - Giuseppe Landolfi
- Institute of Systems and Technologies for Sustainable Production, ISTePS, SUPSI, Lugano, Switzerland (G.L.)
| | - Marco Derboni
- Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence, IDSIA, USI-SUPSI, Lugano, Switzerland (M.D., V.G., A.E.R.)
| | - Vincenzo Giuffrida
- Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence, IDSIA, USI-SUPSI, Lugano, Switzerland (M.D., V.G., A.E.R.)
| | - Andrea Emilio Rizzoli
- Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence, IDSIA, USI-SUPSI, Lugano, Switzerland (M.D., V.G., A.E.R.)
| | - Paolo Maino
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland (P.M., E.K.); Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland (P.M.,E.K.)
| | - Eva Koetsier
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland (P.M., E.K.); Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland (P.M.,E.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abudawood K, Yoon SL, Garg R, Yao Y, Molokie RE, Wilkie DJ. Quantification of Patient-Reported Pain Locations: Development of an Automated Measurement Method. Comput Inform Nurs 2023; 41:346-355. [PMID: 36067491 PMCID: PMC9981814 DOI: 10.1097/cin.0000000000000875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Patient-reported pain locations are critical for comprehensive pain assessment. Our study aim was to introduce an automated process for measuring the location and distribution of pain collected during a routine outpatient clinic visit. In a cross-sectional study, 116 adults with sickle cell disease-associated pain completed PAIN Report It Ⓡ . This computer-based instrument includes a two-dimensional, digital body outline on which patients mark their pain location. Using the ImageJ software, we calculated the percentage of the body surface area marked as painful and summarized data with descriptive statistics and a pain frequency map. The painful body areas most frequently marked were the left leg-front (73%), right leg-front (72%), upper back (72%), and lower back (70%). The frequency of pain marks in each of the 48 body segments ranged from 3 to 79 (mean, 33.2 ± 21.9). The mean percentage of painful body surface area per segment was 10.8% ± 7.5% (ranging from 1.3% to 33.1%). Patient-reported pain locations can be easily analyzed from digital drawings using an algorithm created via the free ImageJ software. This method may enhance comprehensive pain assessment, facilitating research and personalized care over time for patients with various pain conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khulud Abudawood
- College of Nursing, King Saudi bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saunjoo L. Yoon
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science,College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Rishabh Garg
- Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Yingwei Yao
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science,College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Robert E. Molokie
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago and Jesse Brown Veterans Administration Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Diana J. Wilkie
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science,College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rodrigues JC, Avila MA, dos Reis FJJ, Carlessi RM, Godoy AG, Arruda GT, Driusso P. ‘Painting my pain’: the use of pain drawings to assess multisite pain in women with primary dysmenorrhea. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22:370. [PMID: 36071417 PMCID: PMC9449259 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01945-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To verify the use of pain drawing to assess multisite pain in with primary dysmenorrhea (PD) and to assess its divergent validity, test–retest reliability, intra- and inter-rater reliability and measurement errors.
Methods Cross-sectional study. Adult women with self-reported PD three months prior to the study. Women answered the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the pain drawing during two consecutive menstruations. The pain drawings were digitalized and assessed for the calculation of total pain area (%). Intra- and inter-rater reliability and the test–retest reliability between the first and the second menstruations were assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Measurement errors were calculated with the standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC) and the Bland–Altman plot. Spearman correlation (rho) was used to check the correlation between the total pain area and pain intensity of the two menstruations.
Results Fifty-six women (24.1 ± 3.1 years old) participated of the study. Their average pain was 6.2 points and they presented pain in the abdomen (100%), low back (78.6%), head (55.4%) and lower limbs (50%). All reliability measures were considered excellent (ICC > 0.75) for the total pain area; test–retest SEM and SDC were 5.7% and 15.7%, respectively. Inter-rater SEM and SDC were 8% and 22.1%, respectively. Correlation between total pain area and pain intensity was moderate in the first (rho = 0.30; p = 0.021) and in the second menstruations (rho = 0.40; p = 0.002). Conclusion Women with PD presented multisite pain, which could be assessed with the pain drawing, considered a reliable measurement.
Collapse
|
5
|
Dixit A, Lee M. Quantification of Digital Body Maps for Pain: Development and Application of an Algorithm for Generating Pain Frequency Maps. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e36687. [PMID: 35749160 PMCID: PMC9232214 DOI: 10.2196/36687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain is an unpleasant sensation that signals potential or actual bodily injury. The locations of bodily pain can be communicated and recorded by freehand drawing on 2D or 3D (manikin) surface maps. Freehand pain drawings are often part of validated pain questionnaires (eg, the Brief Pain Inventory) and use 2D templates with undemarcated body outlines. The simultaneous analysis of drawings allows the generation of pain frequency maps that are clinically useful for identifying areas of common pain in a disease. The grid-based approach (dividing a template into cells) allows easy generation of pain frequency maps, but the grid's granularity influences data capture accuracy and end-user usability. The grid-free templates circumvent the problem related to grid creation and selection and provide an unbiased basis for drawings that most resemble paper drawings. However, the precise capture of drawn areas poses considerable challenges in producing pain frequency maps. While web-based applications and mobile-based apps for freehand digital drawings are widely available, tools for generating pain frequency maps from grid-free drawings are lacking. OBJECTIVE We sought to provide an algorithm that can process any number of freehand drawings on any grid-free 2D body template to generate a pain frequency map. We envisage the use of the algorithm in clinical or research settings to facilitate fine-grain comparisons of human pain anatomy between disease diagnosis or disorders or as an outcome metric to guide monitoring or discovery of treatments. METHODS We designed a web-based tool to capture freehand pain drawings using a grid-free 2D body template. Each drawing consisted of overlapping rectangles (Scalable Vector Graphics <rect> elements) created by scribbling in the same area of the body template. An algorithm was developed and implemented in Python to compute the overlap of rectangles and generate a pain frequency map. The utility of the algorithm was demonstrated on drawings obtained from 2 clinical data sets, one of which was a clinical drug trial (ISRCTN68734605). We also used simulated data sets of overlapping rectangles to evaluate the performance of the algorithm. RESULTS The algorithm produced nonoverlapping rectangles representing unique locations on the body template. Each rectangle carries an overlap frequency that denotes the number of participants with pain at that location. When transformed into an HTML file, the output is feasibly rendered as a pain frequency map on web browsers. The layout (vertical-horizontal) of the output rectangles can be specified based on the dimensions of the body regions. The output can also be exported to a CSV file for further analysis. CONCLUSIONS Although further validation in much larger clinical data sets is required, the algorithm in its current form allows for the generation of pain frequency maps from any number of freehand drawings on any 2D body template.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Dixit
- Division of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Lee
- Division of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Clinical Significance and Diagnostic Value of Pain Extent Extracted from Pain Drawings: A Scoping Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:diagnostics10080604. [PMID: 32824746 PMCID: PMC7460462 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10080604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The current scoping review aimed to map current literature investigating the relationship between pain extent extracted from pain drawings with clinical, psychological, and psycho-physiological patient-reported outcome measures in people with pain. Electronic databases were searched for cross-sectional cohort studies that collected pain drawings using digital technology or a pen-on-paper approach and assessed for correlations between pain extent and clinical, psychological or psycho-physical outcomes. Data were extracted by two different reviewers. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Mapping of the results included: 1, description of included studies; 2, summary of results; and 3, identification of gaps in the existing literature. Eleven cross-sectional cohort studies were included. The pain disorders considered were heterogeneous, ranging from musculoskeletal to neuropathic conditions, and from localized to generalized pain conditions. All studies included pain and/or pain-related disability as clinical outcomes. Psychological outcomes included depression and anxiety, kinesiophobia and catastrophism. Psycho-physical measures included pressure or thermal pain thresholds. Ten studies were considered of high methodological quality. There was heterogeneity in the associations between pain extent and patient-reported outcome measures depending on the pain condition. This scoping review found that pain extent is associated with patient-reported outcome measures more so in patients presenting with musculoskeletal pain, e.g., neck pain or osteoarthritis, rather than for those with neuropathic pain or headache.
Collapse
|