DNA repair variants, indoor tanning, and risk of melanoma

Reasons for indoor tanning use and the acceptability of alternatives: A qualitative study

RATIONALE

Using indoor tanning devices is associated with substantial health consequences, such as an increased risk of melanoma and other skin cancers. Many people including minors and some at high risk of skin cancer continue to use these devices. In the absence of effective restrictions on use, it is important that behaviour change interventions are designed to reduce indoor tanning.

OBJECTIVE

To explore reasons for use of indoor tanning devices and the acceptability of alternatives in adult users residing in North-West England.

METHODS

Participants were required to be current indoor tanners aged 18 years and above and were recruited online. Twenty-one participants took part in either a focus group or semi-structured interview. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Six themes were identified: psychological benefits; improving physical health; denial of health risks; alternatives do not meet psychological needs; alternatives do not meet physical needs; and perceived side-effects. Participants used indoor tanning devices to improve their self-esteem and to prevent sun damage to their skin (by gaining a 'base tan'). Participants appeared to justify their usage by responding defensively to avoid accepting they were at risk, exaggerating the benefits of indoor tanning, and discounting alternatives to indoor tanning. Alternatives to indoor tanning were perceived as risky for health, inadequate to provide the desired aesthetic, and incapable of meeting their self-esteem needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions to reduce indoor tanning behaviour should increase sources of self-esteem other than appearance, increase media literacy and address defensive responses to information around indoor tanning and alternatives. Further research is needed to develop these interventions and assess their feasibility.

Association of XPC Polymorphisms with Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma Risk: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

A number of studies have reported that the xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C (XPC) polymorphisms are associated with cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) susceptibility. But the results of those studies were inconsistent. Here, we performed a study to obtain a more conclusive result on the association of XPC polymorphisms with risk of CMM.

METHODS

The XPC Lys939Gln and Ala499Val polymorphisms were genotyped in 150 CMM cases and 150 controls by PCR-RFLP assay. Subsequently, all published relevant studies were identified through a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, and CNKI databases. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the strength of correlation.

RESULTS

There was no significant association between XPC Lys939Gln and Ala499Val polymorphisms and CMM risk in our population. A total of 15 case-control studies including ten studies with 5,990 cases and 7,697 controls on XPC Lys939Gln and five studies with 3,139 cases and 3,721 controls on XPC Ala499Val polymorphism were selected. Pooled data revealed that XPC Lys939Gln (C vs. A: OR = 1.108, 95% CI 1.008- 1.217; P = 0.033) and Ala499Val (C vs. A: OR = 0.918, 95% CI 0.850-0.992; p = 0.031; CC+CA vs. AA: OR = 0.904, 95% CI 0.819-0.997; p = 0.043) polymorphisms were significantly associated with an increased risk of CMM. Moreover, stratified analyses by ethnicity revealed that the XPC Ala499Val and Lys939Gln polymorphisms were significantly associated with risk of CMM in Caucasians and mixed populations, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis result suggested that XPC Lys939Gln and Ala499Val polymorphisms were significantly associated with risk of CMM.

DNA methylation changes in infants between 6 and 52 weeks

Infants undergo extensive developments during their first year of life. Although the biological mechanisms involved are not yet fully understood, changes in the DNA methylation in mammals are believed to play a key role. This study was designed to investigate changes in infant DNA methylation that occurs between 6 and 52 weeks. A total of 214 infant saliva samples from 6 or 52 weeks were assessed using principal component analyses and t-distributed stochastic neighbor-embedding algorithms. Between the two time points, there were clear differences in DNA methylation. To further investigate these findings, paired two-sided student’s t-tests were performed. Differently methylated regions were defined as at least two consecutive probes that showed significant differences, with a q-value < 0.01 and a mean difference > 0.2. After correcting for false discovery rates, changes in the DNA methylation levels were found in 42 genes. Of these, 36 genes showed increased and six decreased DNA methylation. The overall DNA methylation changes indicated decreased gene expression. This was surprising because infants undergo such profound developments during their first year of life. The results were evaluated by taking into consideration the extensive development that occurs during pregnancy. During the first year of life, infants have an overall three-fold increase in weight, while the fetus develops from a single cell into a viable infant in 9 months, with an 875-million-fold increase in weight. It is possible that the findings represent a biological slowing mechanism in response to extensive fetal development. In conclusion, our study provides evidence of DNA methylation changes during the first year of life, representing a possible biological slowing mechanism. We encourage future studies of DNA methylation changes in infants to replicate the findings by using a repeated measures model and less stringent criteria to see if the same genes can be found, as well as investigating whether other genes are involved in development during this period.

Melanoma - role of the environment and genetics

Melanoma rates have increased in populations that are mainly European. The main etiologic factor is ultraviolet radiation, from the sun as well as artificial tanning devices. Host factors such as skin color, number of nevi, hair and eye color and tanning ability are critical factors in modifying an individual's response to the sun. Genetic factors interact with host factors and environmental factors to increase risk. This review summarizes our current knowledge of environment and genetics on melanoma risk and on gene-environment interaction.

A meta-analysis of XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism and melanoma susceptibility

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that polymorphisms of XPC Lys939Gln may affect the risk of melanom. However, the results have been inconsistent.We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to determine the association between XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism and melanoma susceptibility.

METHODS

Based on comprehensive searches of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and ISI Web of knowledge, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Database, we identified eligible studies about the association between XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism and melanoma risk.

RESULTS

A total of 4631 cases and 5111 controls in studies were included in this meta-analysis. All studies were conducted in Caucasian populations. Allele model (Gln vs. Lys: P = 0.22; OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.96-1.18), and homozygous model (Gln/Gln vs. Lys/Lys: P = 0.66; OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.91-1.17) did not show increased risk of developing melanoma. Similarly, dominant model Gln/Gln and Gln/Lys vs. Lys/Lys: P = 0.07; OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.99-1.40) and recessive model (Gln/Gln vs. Gln/Lys and Lys/Lys: P = 0.67; OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.90-1.19) failed to show increased risk of developing melanoma.

CONCLUSION

Our pooled data suggest that there was no evidence for a major role of XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism in the pathogenesis of melanoma.

Quantitative assessment of the association between XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism and cutaneous melanoma risk

Previous studies evaluating the association between XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism and cutaneous melanoma risk reported conflicting findings. We searched PubMed and Embase databases up to May 16, 2013 to identify eligible studies on the association between XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism and cutaneous melanoma risk. Finally, a total of seven case-control studies including 3,971 cases of cutaneous melanoma and 5,873 controls were included in the meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with STATA version 11.0. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. Overall, there was no association between XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism and cutaneous melanoma risk under all five genetic models (Gln vs. Lys: OR = 1.11, 95 % CI = 0.98-1.26, P = 0.10; GlnGln vs. LysLys: OR = 1.26, 95 % CI = 0.98-1.61, P = 0.07; LysGln vs. LysLys: OR = 1.04, 95 % CI = 0.88-1.22, P = 0.64; GlnGln/LysGln vs. LysLys: OR = 1.10, 95 % CI = 0.92-1.31, P = 0.29; GlnGln vs. LysLys/LysGln: OR = 1.19, 95 % CI = 0.99-1.43, P = 0.06). Subgroup analysis in Caucasians showed that there was an obvious association between XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism and cutaneous melanoma risk in Caucasians (GlnGln vs. LysLys/LysGln: OR = 1.12, 95 % CI = 1.00-1.25, P = 0.05). Sensitivity analysis by omitting one study in turns showed that the significance of the pooled ORs was not stable. In addition, there was some evidence of publication bias in the meta-analysis, and meta-analyses of the studies with large sample size did not find the obvious association between XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism and cutaneous melanoma risk in Caucasians. Therefore, there is little evidence for the association between XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism and cutaneous melanoma risk.