Early surveillance biopsy utilization and management of pediatric renal allograft acute T cell-mediated rejection in Canadian centers: Observations from the PROBE multicenter cohort study

Detection of Subclinical Rejection in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: Current and Future Practices

INTRODUCTION

The successes in the field of pediatric kidney transplantation over the past 60 years have been extraordinary. Year over year, there have been significant improvements in short-term graft survival. However, improvements in longer-term outcomes have been much less apparent. One important contributor has been the phenomenon of low-level rejection in the absence of clinical manifestations-so-called subclinical rejection (SCR).

METHODS

Traditionally, rejection has been diagnosed by changes in clinical parameters, including but not limited to serum creatinine and proteinuria. This review examines the shortcomings of this approach, the effects of SCR on kidney allograft outcome, the benefits and drawbacks of surveillance biopsies to identify SCR, and new urine and blood biomarkers that define the presence or absence of SCR.

RESULTS

Serum creatinine is an unreliable index of SCR. Surveillance biopsies are the method most utilized to detect SCR. However, these have significant drawbacks. New biomarkers show promise. These biomarkers include blood gene expression profiles and donor derived-cell free DNA; urine gene expression profiles; urinary cytokines, chemokines, and metabolomics; and other promising blood and urine tests.

CONCLUSION

Specific emphasis is placed on studies carried out in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03719339.

Optimizing the approach to monitoring allograft inflammation using serial urinary CXCL10/creatinine testing in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Urinary CXCL10/creatinine (uCXCL10/Cr) is proposed as an effective biomarker of subclinical rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. This study objective was to model implementation in the clinical setting.

METHODS

Banked urine samples at a single center were tested for uCXCL10/Cr to validate published thresholds for rejection diagnosis (>80% specificity). The positive predictive value (PPV) for rejection diagnosis for uCXCL10/Cr-indicated biopsy was modeled with first-positive versus two-test-positive approaches, with accounting for changes associated with urinary tract infection (UTI), BK and CMV viremia, and subsequent recovery.

RESULTS

Seventy patients aged 10.5 ± 5.6 years at transplant (60% male) had n = 726 urine samples with n = 236 associated biopsies (no rejection = 167, borderline = 51, and Banff 1A = 18). A threshold of 12 ng/mmol was validated for Banff 1A versus no-rejection diagnosis (AUC = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.57-0.92). The first-positive test approach (n = 69) did not resolve a clinical diagnosis in 38 cases (55%), whereas the two-test approach resolved a clinical diagnosis in the majority as BK (n = 17/60, 28%), CMV (n = 4/60, 7%), UTI (n = 8/60, 13%), clinical rejection (n = 5/60, 8%), and transient elevation (n = 18, 30%). In those without a resolved clinical diagnosis, PPV from biopsy for subclinical rejection is 24% and 71% (p = .017), for first-test versus two-test models, respectively. After rejection treatment, uCXCL10/Cr level changes were all concordant with change in it-score. Sustained uCXCL10/Cr after CMV and BK viremia resolution was associated with later acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary CXCL10/Cr reliably identifies kidney allograft inflammation. These data support a two-test approach to reliably exclude other clinically identifiable sources of inflammation, for kidney biopsy indication to rule out subclinical rejection.

Follow-up biopsies identify high rates of persistent rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients after treatment of T cell-mediated rejection

BACKGROUND

Incomplete resolution of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) after treatment may not be detected with serum creatinine monitoring and is associated with donor-specific antibodies and chronic rejection. We evaluate the utility of follow-up biopsies (FUB) to identify and characterize rates of persistent TCMR after treatment in pediatric kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

Patients from two pediatric transplant centers performing standard of care FUB at 1.5-2 months after treatment for TCMR were included. FUB were evaluated for extent of rejection resolution (complete vs. incomplete) and grade. Clinical data at time of FUB and later were reported, where available.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients underwent FUB, at mean of 1.7 months (SD 0.7) post-index biopsy. Rejection grade on index biopsy was Banff borderline (≥i1t1 and

CONCLUSIONS

FUB were effective at detecting persistent rejection, which was common among pediatric transplant patients after standard TCMR treatment. Until more effective rejection treatments or sensitive biomarkers are available, FUB may be effectively utilized to identify patients with ongoing rejection who would benefit from further treatment.

Collapse

Key Words

• biopsy
• pediatric
• rejection

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Child
• Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects
• T-Lymphocytes
• Follow-Up Studies
• Biopsy
• Treatment Outcome
• Transplant Recipients
• Graft Rejection
• Kidney/pathology

Collapse

Grants

• R01 DK126807 NIDDK NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Adina Landsberg Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
S. Sikandar Raza Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, United States
Michael E. Seifert Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, United States
Tom D. Blydt-Hansen BC Children’s Hospital, Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Collapse

Rejection markers in kidney transplantation: do new technologies help children?

Recent insights in allorecognition and graft rejection mechanisms revealed a more complex picture than originally considered, involving multiple pathways of both adaptive and innate immune response, supplied by efficient inflammatory synergies. Current pillars of transplant monitoring are serum creatinine, proteinuria, and drug blood levels, which are considered as traditional markers, due to consolidated experience, low cost, and widespread availability. The most diffuse immunological biomarkers are donor-specific antibodies, which are included in routine post-transplant monitoring in many centers, although with some reproducibility issues and interpretation difficulties. Confirmed abnormalities in these traditional biomarkers raise the suspicion for rejection and guide the indication for graft biopsy, which is still considered the gold standard for rejection monitoring. Rapidly evolving new "omic" technologies have led to the identification of several novel biomarkers, which may change the landscape of transplant monitoring should their potential be confirmed. Among them, urinary chemokines and measurement of cell-free DNA of donor origin are perhaps the most promising. However, at the moment, these approaches remain highly expensive and cost-prohibitive in most settings, with limited clinical applicability; approachable costs upon technology investments would speed their integration. In addition, transcriptomics, metabolomics, proteomics, and the study of blood and urinary extracellular vesicles have the potential for early identification of subclinical rejection with high sensitivity and specificity, good reproducibility, and for gaining predictive value in an affordable cost setting. In the near future, information derived from these new biomarkers is expected to integrate traditional tools in routine use, allowing identification of rejection prior to clinical manifestations and timely therapeutic intervention. This review will discuss traditional, novel, and invasive and non-invasive biomarkers, underlining their strengths, limitations, and present or future applications in children.

High urinary CXCL10/Cr with onset of Burkitt lymphoma in a pediatric kidney transplant recipient

BACKGROUND

Urinary CXCL10/Cr is a promising diagnostic tool for early detection of TCMR in pediatric transplant recipients, and most studies focus on its utility in the context of localized allograft inflammation thus far. Other sources of inflammation that may be detected by CXCL10 are less clear.

METHODS

We present a case review of a patient with BL, who was enrolled in a prospective trial of urinary CXCL10 monitoring. To evaluate the potential confounding, we tested for association of CXCL10/Cr and EBV viral load in a prospective cohort of pediatric transplant recipients with serial testing for urinary CXCL10/Cr.

RESULTS

This report describes a 15-year-old boy, 3.5 years post-transplant with chronic EBV viremia, stable kidney function and no history of rejection. Urinary CXCL10/Cr level increased acutely to 79.43 ng/mmol, 0.8 months prior to onset of BL, identified by a surge in EBV viral load. In a national cohort of 97 pediatric kidney transplant recipients, there was no association between urinary CXCL10/Cr with EBV viral loads when comparing periods of pre-viremia (5.8 ± 9.2 ng/mmol) to active viremia (4.0 ± 5.3 ng/mmol) and periods of active viremia (7.1 ± 8.9 ng/mmol) to post-viremia (4.4 ± 9.8 ng/mmol).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute rise in urinary CXCL10/Cr was associated with onset of graft-associated BL. We were not able to confirm a general association of EBV viral load and urinary CXCL10. As non-invasive monitoring is implemented using biomarkers like CXCL10 in the clinic, attention will be needed to identify other uncommon, potential sources of CXCL10 elevation.

Effectiveness of T cell-mediated rejection therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The effectiveness of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) therapy for achieving histological remission remains undefined in patients on modern immunosuppression. We systematically identified, critically appraised, and summarized the incidence and histological outcomes after TCMR treatment in patients on tacrolimus (Tac) and mycophenolic acid (MPA). English-language publications were searched in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Central (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Clinicaltrials.gov (NLM) up to January 2021. Study quality was assessed with the National Institutes of Health Study Quality Tool. We pooled results using an inverse variance, random-effects model and report the binomial proportions with associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Statistical heterogeneity was explored using the I²  statistic. From 2875 screened citations, we included 12 studies (1255 participants). Fifty-eight percent were good/high quality while the rest were moderate quality. Thirty-nine percent of patients (95% CI 0.26-0.53, I² 77%) had persistent ≥Banff Borderline TCMR 2-9 months after anti-rejection therapy. Pulse steroids and augmented maintenance immunosuppression were mainstays of therapy, but considerable practice heterogeneity was present. A high proportion of biopsy-proven rejection exists after treatment emphasizing the importance of histology to characterize remission. Anti-rejection therapy is foundational to transplant management but well-designed clinical trials in patients on Tac/MPA immunosuppression are lacking to define the optimal therapeutic approach.