Prospective Evaluation of the Fungitell® (1→3) Beta-D-Glucan Assay as a Diagnostic Tool for Invasive Fungal Disease in Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group

A comprehensive assessment of the prolonged febrile neutropenia evaluation in pediatric oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Pediatric oncology patients with prolonged (≥96 hours) febrile neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 500/μL) often undergo an evaluation for invasive fungal disease (IFD) and other infections. Current literature suggests that beta-D-glucan (BDG), galactomannan, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and computed tomography (CT) scans (sinus, chest, and abdomen/pelvis) may help determine a diagnosis in this population.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study of all cancer/stem cell transplant patients (diagnosed 2005-2019) from one pediatric hospital, all episodes with prolonged febrile neutropenia or IFD evaluations (defined as sending a fungal biomarker or performing a CT scan to assess for infection) were identified.

RESULTS

In total, 503 episodes met inclusion criteria and 64% underwent IFD evaluations. In total, 36.4% of episodes documented an infection after initiation of prolonged febrile evaluation, most commonly Clostridioides difficile colitis (6.4%) followed by a true bacterial bloodstream infection (BSI) (5.2%), proven/probable IFD (4.8%), and positive respiratory pathogen panel (3.6%). There was no difference in sinus CTs showing sinusitis (74% vs 63%, p = 0.46), whereas 32% of abdomen/pelvis CTs led to a non-IFD diagnosis, and 25% of chest CTs showed possible pneumonia. On chest CT, the positive predictive value (PPV) for IFD was 19% for nodules and 14% for tree and bud lesions. BDG had a PPV of 25% for IFD and GM 50%. BAL diagnosed IFD once and pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia twice.

CONCLUSIONS

Chest CTs and abdomen/pelvis CTs provide clinically relevant information during the prolonged febrile neutropenia evaluation, whereas BDG, galactomannan, BAL, and sinus CTs have less certain utility.

Children's Oncology Group's 2023 blueprint for research: Cancer control and supportive care

The objective of the Cancer Control and Supportive Care (CCL) Committee in the Children's Oncology Group (COG) is to reduce the overall morbidity and mortality of therapy-related toxicities in children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer. We have targeted five major domains that cause clinically important toxicity: (i) infections and inflammation; (ii) malnutrition and metabolic dysfunction; (iii) chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting; (iv) neuro- and oto-toxicty; and (v) patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life. Subcommittees for each domain prioritize randomized controlled trials and biology aims to determine which strategies best mitigate the toxicities. The findings of these trials are impactful, informing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and directly leading to changes in the standard of care for oncology practice. With the development of new therapies, there will be new toxicities, and the COG CCL Committee is dedicated to developing interventions to minimize acute and delayed toxicities, lessen morbidity and mortality, and improve quality of life in pediatric and young adult patients with cancer.

Children's Oncology Group's 2023 blueprint for research: Cellular therapy and stem cell transplantation

Since the publication of the last Cellular Therapy and Stem Cell Transplant blueprint in 2013, Children's Oncology Group cellular therapy-based trials advanced the field and created new standards of care across a wide spectrum of pediatric cancer diagnoses. Key findings include that tandem autologous transplant improved survival for patients with neuroblastoma and atypical teratoid/rhabdoid brain tumors, one umbilical cord blood (UCB) donor was safer than two UCB donors, killer immunoglobulin receptor (KIR) mismatched donors did not improve survival for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia when in vivo T-cell depletion is used, and the depth of remission as measured by next-generation sequencing-based minimal residual disease assessment pretransplant was the best predictor of relapse for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Plans for the next decade include optimizing donor selection for transplants for acute leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome, using novel engineered cellular therapies to target a wide array of malignancies, and developing better treatments for cellular therapy toxicities such as viral infections and graft-vs-host disease.