A Comparison of Dose Metrics to Predict Local Tumor Control for Photofrin-mediated Photodynamic Therapy

Clinical PDT dose dosimetry for pleural Photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy

Significance

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an established cancer treatment utilizing light-activated photosensitizers (PS). Effective treatment hinges on the PDT dose-dependent on PS concentration and light fluence-delivered over time. We introduce an innovative eight-channel PDT dose dosimetry system capable of concurrently measuring light fluence and PS concentration during treatment.

Aim

We aim to develop and evaluate an eight-channel PDT dose dosimetry system for simultaneous measurement of light fluence and PS concentration. By addressing uncertainties due to tissue variations, the system enhances accurate PDT dosimetry for improved treatment outcomes.

Approach

The study positions eight isotropic detectors strategically within the pleural cavity before PDT. These detectors are linked to bifurcated fibers, distributing signals to both a photodiode and a spectrometer. Calibration techniques are applied to counter tissue-related variations and improve measurement accuracy. The fluorescence signal is normalized using the measured light fluence, compensating for variations in tissue properties. Measurements were taken in 78 sites in the pleural cavities of 20 patients.

Results

Observations reveal minimal Photofrin concentration variation during PDT at each site, juxtaposed with significant intra- and inter-patient heterogeneities. Across 78 treated sites in 20 patients, the average Photofrin concentration for all 78 sites is 4.98    μ M , with a median concentration of 4.47    μ M . The average PDT dose for all 78 sites is 493.17    μ MJ / cm 2 , with a median dose of 442.79    μ MJ / cm 2 . A significant variation in PDT doses is observed, with a maximum difference of 3.1 times among all sites within one patient and a maximum difference of 9.8 times across all patients.

Conclusions

The introduced eight-channel PDT dose dosimetry system serves as a valuable real-time monitoring tool for light fluence and PS concentration during PDT. Its ability to mitigate uncertainties arising from tissue properties enhances dosimetry accuracy, thus optimizing treatment outcomes and bolstering the effectiveness of PDT in cancer therapy.

Unleashing the power of porphyrin photosensitizers: Illuminating breakthroughs in photodynamic therapy

This comprehensive review provides the current trends and recent developments of porphyrin-based photosensitizers. We discuss their evolution from first-generation to third-generation compounds, including cutting-edge nanoparticle-integrated derivatives, and explores their pivotal role in advancing photodynamic therapy (PDT) for enhanced cancer treatment. Integrating porphyrins with nanoparticles represents a promising avenue, offering improved selectivity, reduced toxicity, and heightened biocompatibility. By elucidating recent breakthroughs, innovative methodologies, and emerging applications, this review provides a panoramic snapshot of the dynamic field, addressing challenges and charting prospects. With a focus on harnessing reactive oxygen species (ROS) through light activation, PDT serves as a minimally invasive therapeutic approach. This article offers a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians, and PDT enthusiasts, highlighting the potential of porphyrin photosensitizers to improve the future of cancer therapy.

An Analysis of the Effects of In Vitro Photodynamic Therapy on Prostate Cancer Tissue by Histopathological Examination and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Prostate cancer can significantly shorten the lifetime of a patient, even if he is diagnosed at an early stage. The development of minimally-invasive focal therapies such as photodynamic therapy to reduce the number of neoplastic cells while sparing delicate structures is extremely advantageous for treating prostate cancer. This study investigates the effect of photodynamic therapy performed in prostate tissue samples in vitro, using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and histopathological analysis. Prostate tissue samples were treated with oxygenated solutions of Rose Bengal (RB) or protoporphyrin IX disodium salt (PpIX), illuminated with visible light, and then analyzed for changes in morphology by microscopy and by measurement of spin–lattice and spin–spin relaxation times at 1.5 Tesla. In the treated prostate tissue samples, histopathological images revealed chromatin condensation and swelling of the stroma, and in some cases, thrombotic necrosis and swelling of the stroma accompanied by pyknotic nuclei occurred. Several samples had protein fragments in the stroma. Magnetic resonance imaging of the treated prostate tissue samples revealed differences in the spin–lattice and spin–spin relaxation times prior to and post photodynamic action.

Effects of patient-specific treatment planning on eligibility for photodynamic therapy of deep tissue abscess cavities: retrospective Monte Carlo simulation study

SIGNIFICANCE

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (PDT) effectively kills bacterial strains found in deep tissue abscess cavities. PDT response hinges on multiple factors, including light dose, which depends on patient optical properties.

AIM

Computed tomography images for 60 abscess drainage subjects were segmented and used for Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. We evaluated effects of optical properties and abscess morphology on PDT eligibility and generated treatment plans.

APPROACH

A range of abscess wall absorptions (μa  ,  wall) and intra-cavity Intralipid concentrations were simulated. At each combination, the threshold optical power and optimal Intralipid concentration were found for a fluence rate target, with subjects being eligible for PDT if the target was attainable with <2000  mW of source light. Further simulations were performed with absorption within the cavity (μa  ,  cavity).

RESULTS

Patient-specific treatment planning substantially increased the number of subjects expected to achieve an efficacious light dose for antimicrobial PDT, especially with Intralipid modification. The threshold optical power and optimal Intralipid concentration increased with increasing μa  ,  wall (p  <  0.001). PDT eligibility improved with patient-specific treatment planning (p  <  0.0001). With μa  ,  wall  =  0.2  cm  -  1, eligibility increased from 42% to 92%. Increasing μa  ,  cavity reduced PDT eligibility (p  <  0.0001); modifying the delivered optical power had the greatest impact in this case.

CONCLUSIONS

MC-based treatment planning greatly increases eligibility for PDT of abscess cavities.

Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment and Diagnosis of Cancer-A Review of the Current Clinical Status

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been used as an anti-tumor treatment method for a long time and photosensitizers (PS) can be used in various types of tumors. Originally, light is an effective tool that has been used in the treatment of diseases for ages. The effects of combination of specific dyes with light illumination was demonstrated at the beginning of 20th century and novel PDT approaches have been developed ever since. Main strategies of current studies are to reduce off-target effects and improve pharmacokinetic properties. Given the high interest and vast literature about the topic, approval of PDT as the first drug/device combination by the FDA should come as no surprise. PDT consists of two stages of treatment, combining light energy with a PS in order to destruct tumor cells after activation by light. In general, PDT has fewer side effects and toxicity than chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. In addition to the purpose of treatment, several types of PSs can be used for diagnostic purposes for tumors. Such approaches are called photodynamic diagnosis (PDD). In this Review, we provide a general overview of the clinical applications of PDT in cancer, including the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Assessment of PDT therapeutic efficacy in the clinic will be discussed, since identifying predictors to determine the response to treatment is crucial. In addition, examples of PDT in various types of tumors will be discussed. Furthermore, combination of PDT with other therapy modalities such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery and immunotherapy will be emphasized, since such approaches seem to be promising in terms of enhancing effectiveness against tumor. The combination of PDT with other treatments may yield better results than by single treatments. Moreover, the utilization of lower doses in a combination therapy setting may cause less side effects and better results than single therapy. A better understanding of the effectiveness of PDT in a combination setting in the clinic as well as the optimization of such complex multimodal treatments may expand the clinical applications of PDT.

Insights on the polypyrrole based nanoformulations for photodynamic therapy

This review is written to endow updated information on polypyrrole based photosensitizers for the treatment of deadly diseases such as cancer and microbial infection. Tetrapyrrolic macromolecules such as porphyrins and phthalocyanines hold unique photophysical properties which make them very useful compounds for various biomedical applications. Besides their properties, they also have some limitations such as low water solubility, bioavailability, biocompatibility and lack of specificity, etc. Researchers are trying to overcome these limitations by incorporating photosensitizers into the different types of nanoparticles and improve the quality of photodynamic therapy. We have contributed to this field by synthesizing and developing polypyrrolic photosensitizer based nanoparticles for potential applications in antimicrobial and anticancer photodynamic activity. Throughout this review, newly synthesized and existing PSs conjugated/encapsulated/doped/incorporated with nanoparticles are emphasized, which are essential for current and future research themes. Also in this review, we briefly summarized the research work carried over the past few years by considering the porphyrin based photosensitizers as alternative therapeutic entities for the treatment of microbial infections, cancers, and many other diseases.

Can Cerenkov Light Really Induce an Effective Photodynamic Therapy?

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising therapeutic strategy for cancers where surgery and radiotherapy cannot be effective. PDT relies on the photoactivation of photosensitizers, most of the time by lasers to produced reactive oxygen species and notably singlet oxygen. The major drawback of this strategy is the weak light penetration in the tissues. To overcome this issue, recent studies proposed to generate visible light in situ with radioactive isotopes emitting charged particles able to produce Cerenkov radiation. In vitro and preclinical results are appealing, but the existence of a true, lethal phototherapeutic effect is still controversial. In this article, we have reviewed previous original works dealing with Cerenkov-induced PDT (CR-PDT). Moreover, we propose a simple analytical equation resolution to demonstrate that Cerenkov light can potentially generate a photo-therapeutic effect, although most of the Cerenkov photons are emitted in the UV-B and UV-C domains. We suggest that CR-PDT and direct UV-tissue interaction act synergistically to yield the therapeutic effect observed in the literature. Moreover, adding a nanoscintillator in the photosensitizer vicinity would increase the PDT efficacy, as it will convert Cerenkov UV photons to light absorbed by the photosensitizer.

Reactive oxygen species explicit dosimetry to predict local tumor growth for Photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy

Although photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an established modality for cancer treatment, current dosimetric quantities, such as light fluence and PDT dose, do not account for the differences in PDT oxygen consumption for different fluence rates (ϕ). A macroscopic model was adopted to calculate reactive oxygen species concentration ([ROS]_rx) to predict Photofrin-PDT outcome in mice bearing radiation-induced fibrosarcoma (RIF) tumors. Singlet oxygen is the primary cytotoxic species for ROS, which is responsible for cell death in type II PDT, although other type I ROS is included in the parameters used in our model. Using a combination of fluences (50-250 J∕cm²) and ϕ (75 or 150 mW∕cm²), tumor regrowth rate, k, was determined for each condition by fitting the tumor volume versus time to V₀ *exp(k*t). Treatment was delivered with a collimated laser beam of 1 cm diameter at 630 nm. Explicit dosimetry of light fluence rate on tissue surface, tissue oxygen concentration, tissue optical properties, and Photofrin concentration were performed. Light fluence rate at 3 mm depth (ϕ _3mm) was determined for the treatment volume based on Monte-Carlo simulations and measured tissue optical properties. Initial tissue oxygenation [³ O ₂]₀ was measured by an Oxylite oxygen probe before PDT and used to calculate [ROS]_rx,calc. This value was compared to [ROS]_rx,meas as calculated with the entire tissue oxygen spectrum [³ O ₂](t), measured over the duration of light delivery for PDT. Cure index, CI = 1-k/k_ctr , for tumor growth up to 14 days after PDT was predicted by four dose metrics: light fluence, PDT dose, and [ROS]_rx,calc, and [ROS]_rx,meas. PDT dose was defined as the product of the time-integral of photosensitizer concentration and ϕ at a 3 mm tumor depth. These studies show that [ROS]_rx,meas best correlates with CI and is an effective dosimetric quantity that can predict treatment outcome.

Recent Advances in Porphyrin-Based Inorganic Nanoparticles for Cancer Treatment

The application of porphyrins and their derivatives have been investigated extensively over the past years for phototherapy cancer treatment. Phototherapeutic Porphyrins have the ability to generate high levels of reactive oxygen with a low dark toxicity and these properties have made them robust photosensitizing agents. In recent years, Porphyrins have been combined with various nanomaterials in order to improve their bio-distribution. These combinations allow for nanoparticles to enhance photodynamic therapy (PDT) cancer treatment and adding additional nanotheranostics (photothermal therapy-PTT) as well as enhance photodiagnosis (PDD) to the reaction. This review examines various porphyrin-based inorganic nanoparticles developed for phototherapy nanotheranostic cancer treatment over the last three years (2017 to 2020). Furthermore, current challenges in the development and future perspectives of porphyrin-based nanomedicines for cancer treatment are also highlighted.

Necrosis Depth and Photodynamic Threshold Dose with Redaporfin-PDT

Predicting the extent of necrosis in photodynamic therapy (PDT) is critical to ensure that the whole tumor is treated but vital structures, such as major blood vessels in the vicinity of the tumor, are spared. The models developed for clinical planning rely on empirical parameters that change with the nature of the photosensitizer and the target tissue. This work presents an in vivo study of the necrosis in the livers of rats due to PDT with a bacteriochlorin photosensitizer named redaporfin using both frontal illumination and interstitial illumination. Various doses of light at 750 nm were delivered 15 min postintravenous administration of redaporfin. Sharp boundaries between necrotic and healthy tissues were found. Frontal illumination allowed for the determination of the photodynamic threshold dose-1.5 × 10¹⁹  photons cm^-3 -which means that the regions of the tissues exposed to more than 11 mm of ROS evolved to necrosis. Interstitial illumination produced a necrotic radius of 0.7 cm for a light dose of 100 J cm^-1 and a redaporfin dose of 0.75 mg kg^-1 . The experimental data obtained can be used to inform and improve clinical planning with frontal and interstitial illumination protocols.

Light Sources and Dosimetry Techniques for Photodynamic Therapy

Effective treatment delivery in photodynamic therapy (PDT) requires coordination of the light source, the photosensitizer, and the delivery device appropriate to the target tissue. Lasers, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and lamps are the main types of light sources utilized for PDT applications. The choice of light source depends on the target location, photosensitizer used, and light dose to be delivered. Geometry of minimally accessible areas also plays a role in deciding light applicator type. Typically, optical fiber-based devices are used to deliver the treatment light close to the target. The optical properties of tissue also affect the distribution of the treatment light. Treatment light undergoes scattering and absorption in tissue. Most tissue will scatter light, but highly pigmented areas will absorb light, especially at short wavelengths. This review will summarize the basic physics of light sources, and describe methods for determining the dose delivered to the patient.

In vivo Tissue Evaluation Reveals Improvements in Explicit PDT Dosimetry

Progress is needed before explicit photodynamic therapy (PDT) dosimetry can treat peritoneal carcinomatosis and yet spare all healthy tissue. A report by Cengel et al. in this issue of Photochemistry & Photobiology on tissue evaluation in a canine model may bring that goal a step closer and may even be dogma-changing.

1O2 determined from the measured PDT dose and 3O2 predicts long-term response to Photofrin-mediated PDT

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) that employs the photochemical interaction of light, photosensitizer and oxygen is an established modality for the treatment of cancer. However, dosimetry for PDT is becoming increasingly complex due to the heterogeneous photosensitizer uptake by the tumor, and complicated relationship between the tissue oxygenation ([³O₂]), interstitial light distribution, photosensitizer photobleaching and PDT effect. As a result, experts argue that the failure to realize PDT's true potential is, at least partly due to the complexity of the dosimetry problem. In this study, we examine the efficacy of singlet oxygen explicit dosimetry (SOED) based on the measurements of the interstitial light fluence rate distribution, changes of [³O₂] and photosensitizer concentration during Photofrin-mediated PDT to predict long-term control rates of radiation-induced fibrosarcoma tumors. We further show how variation in tissue [³O₂] between animals induces variation in the treatment response for the same PDT protocol. PDT was performed with 5 mg kg^-1 Photofrin (a drug-light interval of 24 h), in-air fluence rates (ϕ _air) of 50 and 75 mW cm^-2 and in-air fluences from 225 to 540 J cm^-2. The tumor regrowth was tracked for 90 d after the treatment and Kaplan-Meier analyses for local control rate were performed based on a tumor volume  ⩽100 mm³ for the two dosimetry quantities of PDT dose and SOED. Based on the results, SOED allowed for reduced subject variation and improved treatment evaluation as compared to the PDT dose.

Reactive Oxygen Species Explicit Dosimetry for Photofrin-mediated Pleural Photodynamic Therapy

Explicit dosimetry of treatment light fluence and implicit dosimetry of photosensitizer photobleaching are commonly used methods to guide dose delivery during clinical PDT. Tissue oxygen, however, is not routinely monitored intraoperatively even though it is one of the three major components of treatment. Quantitative information about in vivo tissue oxygenation during PDT is desirable, because it enables reactive oxygen species explicit dosimetry (ROSED) for prediction of treatment outcome based on PDT-induced changes in tumor oxygen level. Here, we demonstrate ROSED in a clinical setting, Photofrin-mediated pleural photodynamic therapy, by utilizing tumor blood flow information measured by diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS). A DCS contact probe was sutured to the pleural cavity wall after surgical resection of pleural mesothelioma tumor to monitor tissue blood flow (blood flow index) during intraoperative PDT treatment. Isotropic detectors were used to measure treatment light fluence and photosensitizer concentration. Blood-flow-derived tumor oxygen concentration, estimated by applying a preclinically determined conversion factor of 1.5 × 10⁹ μMs cm^-2 to the blood flow index, was used in the ROSED model to calculate the total reacted reactive oxygen species [ROS]rx. Seven patients and 12 different pleural sites were assessed and large inter- and intrapatient heterogeneities in [ROS]rx were observed although an identical light dose of 60 J cm^-2 was prescribed to all patients.

Reactive oxygen species explicit dosimetry to predict local tumor control for Photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy

Although photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an established modality for cancer treatment, current dosimetric quantities, such as light fluence and PDT dose, do not account for the differences in PDT oxygen consumption for different fluence rates (ϕ). A macroscopic model was adopted to calculate reactive oxygen species concentration ([ROS]_rx) to predict Photofrin-PDT outcome in mice bearing radiation-induced fibrosarcoma (RIF) tumors. Singlet oxygen is the primary cytotoxic species for ROS, which is responsible for cell death in type II PDT, although other type I ROS is included in the parameters used in our model. Using a combination of fluences (50-250 J/cm²) and ϕ (50 - 150 mW/cm²), tumor regrowth rate, k, was determined for each condition by fitting the tumor volume vs. time to V₀*exp(k*t). Treatment was delivered with a collimated laser beam of 1 cm diameter at 630 nm. Explicit dosimetry of initial tissue oxygen concentration, tissue optical properties, and Photofrin concentration was used to calculate [ROS]_rx,cal. ϕ was determined for the treatment volume based on Monte-Carlo simulations and measured tissue optical properties. Tissue oxygenation is measured using an oxylite oxygen probe to throughout the treatment to calculate the measured [ROS]_rx,mea. Cure index, CI = 1-k/k _ctr , for tumor gowth up to 14 days were determined as an endpoint using five dose metrics: light fluence, PDT dose, and [ROS]_rx,cal, and [ROS]_rx,mea. PDT dose was defined as the product of the time-integral of photosensitizer concentration and ϕ at a 3 mm tumor depth. Preliminary studies show that [ROS]_rx,mea best correlates with CI and is an effective dosimetric quantity that can predict treatment outcome.

PDT dose dosimetry for Photofrin-mediated pleural photodynamic therapy (pPDT)

Photosensitizer fluorescence excited by photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment light can be used to monitor the in vivo concentration of the photosensitizer and its photobleaching. The temporal integral of the product of in vivo photosensitizer concentration and light fluence is called PDT dose, which is an important dosimetry quantity for PDT. However, the detected photosensitizer fluorescence may be distorted by variations in the absorption and scattering of both excitation and fluorescence light in tissue. Therefore, correction of the measured fluorescence for distortion due to variable optical properties is required for absolute quantification of photosensitizer concentration. In this study, we have developed a four-channel PDT dose dosimetry system to simultaneously acquire light dosimetry and photosensitizer fluorescence data. We measured PDT dose at four sites in the pleural cavity during pleural PDT. We have determined an empirical optical property correction function using Monte Carlo simulations of fluorescence for a range of physiologically relevant tissue optical properties. Parameters of the optical property correction function for Photofrin fluorescence were determined experimentally using tissue-simulating phantoms. In vivo measurements of photosensitizer fluorescence showed negligible photobleaching of Photofrin during the PDT treatment, but large intra- and inter-patient heterogeneities of in vivo Photofrin concentration are observed. PDT doses delivered to 22 sites in the pleural cavity of 8 patients were different by 2.9 times intra-patient and 8.3 times inter-patient.

Porphyrin photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy and its applications

In 1841, the extraction of hematoporphyrin from dried blood by removing iron marked the birth of the photosensitizer. The last twenty years has witnessed extensive research in the application of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in tumor-bearing (or other diseases) animal models and patients. The period has seen development of photosensitizers from the first to the third generation, and their evolution from simple to more complex entities. This review focuses on porphyrin photosensitizers and their effect on tumors, mediated via several pathways involved in cell necrosis, apoptosis or autophagic cell death, and the preventive and therapeutic application of PDT against atherosclerosis.