What Is the Evidence that Neuropathic Pain Is Present in Chronic Low Back Pain and Soft Tissue Syndromes? An Evidence-Based Structured Review

Twelve-Month Clinical Trial Results of a Novel, Dorsal Horn Dendrite Stimulation Waveform for Chronic Neuropathic Low Back Pain

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a novel subperception spinal cord stimulation (SCS) waveform paradigm designed to target the dorsal horn dendrites for treating chronic neuropathic low back pain (LBP). The final 12-month results are reported here.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven participants were implanted with a commercial SCS system. Devices were programmed to deliver the waveform (frequency 100 Hz, pulse width 1000 μsec, T9-T10 disk bipole) at decreasing stimulation perception threshold amplitudes (80%, 60%, then 40%) over a 14-week period. Participants were blinded to the program settings. Participants then received their preferred program for further evaluation at 26 and 52 weeks after activation. Outcome measures included back pain score (visual analogue scale [VAS]), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), treatment satisfaction, and clinician global impression of change (CGIC).

RESULTS

At 52 weeks (n = 24), the responder rate (≥50% pain relief) was 65.6%, and the high-responder rate (≥80% pain relief) was 56.5%. The mean change from baseline in pain VAS was -43.94 mm (95% CI -57.89, -30.00; p < 0.001) and mean pain relief was 64.69% ± 39.43%. BPI and SF-36 scores remained significantly improved (p ≤ 0.001). EQ-5D-5L index and EuroQoL-VAS further improved, and 87.0% of participants met the minimum clinically important difference for the EQ-5D-5L index. Treatment satisfaction was 83%, and 91% of participants had a CGIC rating of "much improved" or above. No serious study-related adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The 12-month trial results show sustained improvements in pain, quality of life, and health-related outcomes. This novel subperception dorsal horn dendrite SCS approach seems a safe and promising treatment option for patients with chronic neuropathic LBP. The open-source availability of this waveform on commercial SCS platforms allows widespread patient access. Further evaluation seems warranted.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is ACTRN12618000647235 (anzctr.org.au).

Knowledge Graph of Endoscopic Techniques Applied to the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Bibliometric Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Bibliometric analysis.

OBJECTIVE

This study explored the current research status, hotspots, and trends in the application of endoscopic techniques for treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic techniques are widely used to treat LDH, but there are no bibliometric studies on endoscopic technology and LDH.

METHODS

The Web of Science Core Collection database was used as the data source. Based on the principles of bibliometrics, we apply VOSviewer and CiteSpace software to conduct the data statistics and visual analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 965 studies were included, with 11893 citations (12.32 per study). The top 3 countries with the largest number of papers published are China (529), South Korea (164), and the United States (108). Yong Ahn and Jin-Sung Kim are prolific authors in this field. Representative academic journals are World Neuroscience, Pain Physician, and BioMed Research International. The results of keyword cooccurrence analysis indicate that the research topics in this field in the past decade have mainly focused on microdiscectomy, complications, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, decompression, and the learning curve. Keyword burst analysis suggested that endoscopic drug injection and the identification of risk factors for LDH are the frontiers and trends for future research.

CONCLUSION

The application of endoscopic techniques for LDH has received widespread attention from researchers, and research in this field has focused on percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, endoscopic decompression, complications, and the learning curve of endoscopic techniques. Future research trends will focus on the efficacy of endoscopic drug injection therapy for LDH and the identification of risk factors for LDH treatment failure.

Chronic pain for rheumatological disorders: Pathophysiology, therapeutics and evidence

Pain is the leading reason people seek orthopedic and rheumatological care. By definition, most pain can be classified as nociceptive, or pain resulting from non-neural tissue injury or potential injury, with between 15% and 50% of individuals suffering from concomitant neuropathic pain or the newest category of pain, nociplastic pain, defined as "pain arising from altered nociception despite no clear evidence of actual or threatened tissue damage, or of a disease or lesion affecting the somatosensory system." Pain classification is important because it affects treatment decisions at all levels of care. Although several instruments can assist with classifying treatment, physician designation is the reference standard. The appropriate treatment of pain should ideally involve multidisciplinary care including physical therapy, psychotherapy and integrative therapies when appropriate, and pharmacotherapy with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute, mechanical pain, membrane stabilizers for neuropathic and nociplastic pain, and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants for all types of pain. For nonsurgical interventions, there is evidence to support a small effect for epidural steroid injections for an intermediate-term duration, and conflicting evidence for radiofrequency ablation to provide at least 6months of benefit for facet joint pain, knee osteoarthritis, and sacroiliac joint pain. Since pain and disability represent the top reason for elective surgery, it should be reserved for patients who fail conservative interventions. Risk factors for procedural failure are the same as risk factors for conservative treatment failure and include greater disease burden, psychopathology, opioid use, central sensitization and multiple comorbid pain conditions, poorly controlled preoperative and postoperative pain, and secondary gain.

A Meta-analysis Exploring the Efficacy of Neuropathic Pain Medication for Low Back Pain or Spine-Related Leg Pain: Is Efficacy Dependent on the Presence of Neuropathic Pain?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Highly variable pain mechanisms in people with low back pain or spine-related leg pain might contribute to inefficacy of neuropathic pain medication. This meta-analysis aimed to determine how neuropathic pain is identified in clinical trials for people taking neuropathic pain medication for low back pain or spine-related leg pain and whether subgrouping based on the presence of neuropathic pain influences efficacy.

METHODS

EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, CINAHL [EBSCO], APA PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry were searched from inception to 14 May, 2024. Randomized and crossover trials comparing first-line neuropathic pain medication for people with low back pain or spine-related leg pain to placebo or usual care were included. Two independent authors extracted data. Random-effects meta-analyses of all studies combined, and pre-planned subgroup meta-analyses based on the certainty of neuropathic pain (according to the neuropathic pain Special Interest Group [NeuPSIG] neuropathic pain grading criteria) were completed. Certainty of evidence was judged using the grading of recommendations assessment development and evaluation [GRADE] framework.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven included studies reported on 3619 participants. Overall, 33% of studies were judged unlikely to include people with neuropathic pain, 26% remained unclear. Only 41% identified people with possible, probable, or definite neuropathic pain. For pain, general analyses revealed only small effects at short term (mean difference [MD] - 9.30 [95% confidence interval [CI] - 13.71, - 4.88], I2 = 87%) and medium term (MD - 5.49 [95% CI - 7.24, - 3.74], I2 = 0%). Subgrouping at short term revealed studies including people with definite or probable neuropathic pain showed larger effects on pain (definite; MD - 16.65 [95% CI - 35.95, 2.65], I2 = 84%; probable; MD - 10.45 [95% CI - 14.79, - 6.12], I2 = 20%) than studies including people with possible (MD - 5.50 [95% CI - 20.52, 9.52], I2 = 78%), unlikely (MD - 6.67 [95% CI - 10.58, 2.76], I2 = 0%), or unclear neuropathic pain (MD - 8.93 [95% CI - 20.57, 2.71], I2 = 96%). Similarly, general analyses revealed negligible effects on disability at short term (MD - 3.35 [95% CI - 9.00, 2.29], I2 = 93%) and medium term (MD - 4.06 [95% CI - 5.63, - 2.48], I2 = 0%). Sub-grouping at short term revealed larger effects in studies including people with definite/probable neuropathic pain (MD - 9.25 [95% CI - 12.59, - 5.90], I2 = 2%) compared with those with possible/unclear/unlikely neuropathic pain (MD -1.57 [95% CI - 8.96, 5.82] I2 = 95%). Medium-term outcomes showed a similar trend, but were limited by low numbers of studies. Certainty of evidence was low to very low for all outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies using neuropathic pain medication for low back pain or spine-related leg pain fail to adequately consider the presence of neuropathic pain. Meta-analyses suggest neuropathic pain medication may be most effective in people with low back pain or spine-related leg pain with a definite/probable neuropathic pain component. However, the low to very low certainty of evidence and poor identification of neuropathic pain in most studies prevent firm recommendations.

Magnetic resonance imaging classification in a percutaneous needle injury rat model of intervertebral disc degeneration

BACKGROUND

During the development of disease-modifying intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) drugs, the rat model of IDD is frequently used for disease progression assessment. The aim of this study was to describe a magnetic resonance (MRI) scoring system for the assessment of different disc conditions in puncture-induced IDD, allowing standardization and comparison of results obtained by different investigators.

METHODS

A total of 36 Sprague-Dawley rats were utilized in the present study. The animals were divided into two groups: a sham group and an IDD group caused by puncture. The rats in the IDD group were subsequently divided into six categories based on time frames, with five rats in each category. The sham group was divided into two sub-groups (n = 3) for 28 and 56 days, respectively. T2-weighted images of rats consecutively studied with MRI of the coccygeal discs were classified according to the time course using the corresponding histological data. Additional scoring of the micro-CT was employed to identify the progression of bone destruction of the rat model of IDD.

RESULTS

A comparison of the MRI results between the sham group and the IDD group revealed a significant reduction in NP height, area, T2WI value, and DHI in the latter group (P < 0.05). The micro-CT results demonstrated that following acupuncture, there was a notable decline in the BV, Tb.N, and height of the coccygeal vertebra, while the BS/BV and Tb.Sp exhibited a significant increase (P < 0.05). The histological results were analogous to the MRI results, indicating a progressive exacerbation of IDD and a corresponding increase in NP score (P < 0.05). The results of the MRI were found to be consistent with those of the micro-CT and histological analyses (P < 0.05). The results of the study demonstrate a robust correlation between MRI analysis and histological findings. Live animals are employed for MRI analysis to improve experiment comparability. The reliability of the MRI scoring system ensures assessment of disease progression in live animals, while promoting cost savings and animal welfare by avoiding the sacrifice of animals at different times.

CONCLUSIONS

The described scoring paradigm has quantitatively been found to differentiate IDD disease progression in an in vivo rat model. Hence, we suggest employing it to evaluate the rat IDD model and assess the effects of treatments in this model.

Lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections with particulate vs. nonparticulate steroid: an evidence-informed review on shifting gear to a personalized medicine paradigm

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an evidence-informed review weighing the pros and cons of particulate vs. nonparticulate steroids for lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI).

RECENT FINDINGS

The relative use of nonparticulate vs. particulate steroids for lumbar TFESI has risen recently in light of catastrophic consequences reported for the latter during cervical TFESI. Among various causes of spinal cord infarct, an exceedingly rare event in the lower lumbar spine, embolization of particulate steroid is among the least likely. Case reports have documented cases of spinal cord infarct during lower lumbar TFESI with both particulate and nonparticulate steroids, with database reviews finding no difference in complication rates. There is some evidence for superiority of particulate over nonparticulate steroids in well-designed studies, which could lead to increase steroid exposure (i.e. more injections) and treatment failure resulting in surgical and/or opioid management when nonparticulate steroids are utilized.

SUMMARY

Similar to a paradigm shift in medicine, a personalized approach based on a shared decision model and the consequences of treatment failure, should be utilized in deciding which steroid to utilize. Alternatives to ESI include high-volume injections with nonsteroid solutions, and the use of hypertonic saline, which possesses anti-inflammatory properties and has been shown to be superior to isotonic saline in preliminary clinical studies.

Neuropathic pain is a feature in patients with symptomatic femoral acetabular impingement

Femoral acetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a cause of hip pain thought to be nociceptive, although pain phenotypes e.g., burning, pain attacks, prickling, numbness etc., are reported, mimicking neuropathic pain. Although no lesion to the somatosensory system is identified, neuropathic pain (NeP) may explain why nociceptive-focussed treatments are not always successful.

OBJECTIVE

To identify NeP in patients with FAIS and investigate if related to poorer outcomes.

DESIGN

A secondary analysis of the Femoral Acetabular Impingement Trial (FAIT). Outcome of interest: PainDETECT questionnaire; secondary outcomes of interest; International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT33), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and VAS 'average pain over a month', at baseline and 8 months follow-up. Intervention (surgery or physiotherapy) were pooled.

RESULTS

173 data sets at baseline; 123 at 8 months follow-up. Baseline painDETECT identified three groups: 69% nociceptive, 19% unclear and 12% neuropathic pain phenotypes. Baseline, median scores were higher for the neuropathic group compared to the nociceptive group demonstrating borderline anxiety (9.5(5.3 to 14.2), 5(3 to 8), higher normal values for depression (7.5(2.3 to 11.8), (4(2 to 9), higher average pain (7 (6 to 8), 5(4 to 6) and lower iHOT33 14.2(9 to 21.1), 38.4(26.2 to 55.7). Post treatment, there was a median change in the neuropathic score in both iHOT33 (40.8 (25 to 76.5) with a median difference of 24.13 (CI 95% 10.46 to 45.92) and average pain 4.5(1.5 to 7) with a median difference of 2 (CI 95% 1 to 5) but to a lesser amount than the nociceptive group, iHOT33 (64(38.2 to 86.6) with a median difference of 15.50 (CI 95% 6.41 to 21.82) and average pain 3(1 to 5.7) with a median difference of 1 (CI 95% 0.5 to 1).

CONCLUSION

NeP exists in symptomatic FAIS patients and is associated with increased average pain, and functional limitations. Nociceptive-targeted treatment improves hip function and pain but with less improvement in the NeP group when compared to the nociceptive group. Pain phenotyping before intervention may improve outcomes. CONTRIBUTION OF PAPER.

The usage of a modified straight-leg raise neurodynamic test and hamstring flexibility for diagnosis of non-specific low back pain: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

The main purpose of this research study was to compare mean modified straight-leg raise test (mSLR) and hamstring muscle length (HL) between chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP) and healthy subjects to understand the possibility of neuropathic causes in LBP population as it may impact the diagnosis and treatment of LBP. Another purpose was to compare mean mSLR between those with lumbar nerve root impingement and those without as determine by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

The design of the study is cross sectional and included 32 subjects with ages ranging from 18-50 years old. Clinical exam objective measures were collected such as patient questionnaires, somatosensory tests, HL range of motion, and a mSLR test, and were compared to the findings from a structural lumbar spine MRI.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in mean HL angulation and mSLR angulation between LBP and healthy subjects (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in mean HL by impingement by versus no impingement (38.3±15.6 versus 44.8±9.4, p = 0.08, Cohen's d = 0.50). On the other hand, there was a significant difference in mean mSLR angulation by impingement (57.6.3±8.7 versus 63.8±11.6, p = 0.05, Cohen's d = 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

The mSLR test was found to be associated with lumbar nerve root compression, regardless of the existence of radiating leg symptoms, and showed no association solely with the report of LBP. The findings highlight the diagnostic dilemma facing clinicians in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP with uncorrelated neuroanatomical image findings. Clinically, it may be necessary to reevaluate the common practice of exclusively using the mSLR test for patients with leg symptoms. This study may impact the way chronic LBP and neuropathic symptoms are diagnosed, potentially improving treatment methods, reducing persistent symptoms, and ultimately improving disabling effects.

Cooled radiofrequency ablation versus standard medical management for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a multicenter, randomized comparative effectiveness study

INTRODUCTION

Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide, with sacroiliac joint pain comprising up to 30% of cases of axial lower back pain. Conservative therapies provide only modest relief. Although placebo-controlled trials show efficacy for sacral lateral branch cooled radiofrequency ablation, there are no comparative effectiveness studies.

METHODS

In this randomized, multicenter comparative effectiveness study, 210 patients with clinically suspected sacroiliac joint pain who obtained short-term benefit from diagnostic sacroiliac joint injections and prognostic lateral branch blocks were randomly assigned to receive cooled radiofrequency ablation of the L5 dorsal ramus and S1-S3 lateral branches or standard medical management consisting of pharmacotherapy, injections and integrative therapies. The primary outcome measure was mean reduction in low back pain score on a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included measures of quality of life and function.

RESULTS

3 months post-treatment, the mean Numeric Rating Scale pain score for the cooled radiofrequency ablation group was 3.8±2.4 (mean reduction 2.5±2.5) compared with 5.9±1.7 (mean reduction 0.4±1.7) in the standard medical management group (p<0.0001). 52.3% of subjects in the cooled radiofrequency ablation group experienced >2 points or 30% pain relief and were deemed responders versus 4.3% of standard medical management patients (p<0.0001). Comparable improvements favoring cooled radiofrequency ablation were noted in Oswestry Disability Index score (mean 29.7±15.2 vs 41.5+13.6; p<0.0001) and quality of life (mean EuroQoL-5 score 0.68±0.22 vs 0.47±0.29; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with sacroiliac joint pain, cooled radiofrequency ablation provided statistically superior improvements across the spectrum of patient outcomes compared with standard medical management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03601949.

Exploring the terminological validity of 'chronic pain' nursing diagnosis: A retrospective descriptive study using nursing diaries

AIM

The aim of this study is to generate empirical evidence, drawing from clinical records, with the goal of elevating the level of evidence supporting the nursing diagnosis (ND) of 'chronic pain'.

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain is a prevalent condition that affects all age groups. Patients often feel disbelieved about their pain perception, leading to adverse psychological effects, difficulty accessing healthcare and poor rehabilitation outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective descriptive study. Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies guidelines were followed in this study.

METHODS

Data were extracted from Electronic Health Records (EHR) of patients admitted to the University Hospital of Perugia, Italy, between March 2016 and December 2022. The study sample comprised individuals without a specific medical diagnosis or high-risk population. Out of 1,048,565 EHR, 43,341 clinical-nursing diaries with the keyword 'pain' were identified, from which 283 clinical-nursing notes were selected based on a keyword-based retrieval technique and diagnostic definition for further analysis.

RESULTS

Our study findings support the diagnostic descriptors of the 'chronic pain' ND in clinical-nursing diaries. We observed the presence of 9 out of 11 defining characteristics, 7 out of 10 related factors, 4 out of 8 at-risk populations and 11 out of 17 associated conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The study validated diagnostic criteria for chronic pain and proposed 'haematological pathology' as a new associated condition. The findings were presented to the Diagnosis Development Committee of NANDA-International for further review. However, limitations of the study prompted the need for further analysis using natural language processing and artificial neural network techniques. As a result, a new research direction using artificial intelligence (AI) tools was initiated.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The study validates diagnostic descriptors for chronic pain and proposes future directions in semantic analysis and AI tools, aiming to enhance clinical practice and decision-making in nursing care.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Combined Efficacy of Systemically Acting Diclofenac Sodium Patch and Alpha-2-Delta Calcium Channel Ligand in Chronic Low Back Pain: Subanalysis of a Phase III Study

INTRODUCTION

Chronic low back pain often comprises mixed pain types and involves multiple factors. Therefore, we hypothesized that the systemic transdermal formulation of diclofenac sodium (DF systemic patch), which is effective for nociceptive pain, and an α2δ Ca2+ channel ligand, which is effective for neuropathic pain, would have additive effects in the treatment of chronic low back pain.

METHODS

From among participants in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of DF systemic patch (75 or 150 mg) applied once daily for 2 weeks in patients with chronic low back pain, we performed a subpopulation analysis of those who were concomitantly treated with an α2δ Ca2+ channel ligand during the study period. The efficacy endpoint was pain intensity score on a visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

The difference (95% confidence interval) in the least square mean pain VAS score between patients in the 150-mg combination group, who were treated with 150-mg DF systemic patch and an α2δ Ca2+ channel ligand (n = 11), and those in the non-combination group, who were treated with placebo patch and α2δ Ca2+ channel ligand (n = 22), was - 15.09 mm (- 26.45, - 3.73). Because the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval was less than zero, this result indicates that the pain VAS score improved more in the 150-mg combination group than in the non-combination group (placebo group).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of the DF systemic patch and an α2δ Ca2+ channel ligand may be more effective than α2δ Ca2+ channel ligand monotherapy for controlling chronic low back pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

JPRN-JapicCTI-205134 and jRCT2080225040.

A Novel, Paresthesia-Free Spinal Cord Stimulation Waveform for Chronic Neuropathic Low Back Pain: Six-Month Results of a Prospective, Single-Arm, Dose-Response Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this prospective, single-blinded, dose-response study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel, paresthesia-free (subperception) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) waveform designed to target dorsal horn dendrites for the treatment of chronic neuropathic low back pain (LBP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven participants with chronic neuropathic LBP were implanted with a commercial SCS system after a successful trial of SCS therapy. Devices were programmed to deliver the investigative waveform (100 Hz, 1000 μs, T9/T10 bipole) at descending stimulation perception threshold amplitudes (80%, 60%, 40%). Programs were evaluated at six, ten, and 14 weeks, after which participants selected their preferred program, with more follow-up at 26 weeks (primary outcomes). Participants were blinded to the nature of the programming. Pain score (visual analog scale [VAS]), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), and health status (36-Item Short Form [SF-36]) were measured at baseline and follow-ups. Responder rate, treatment satisfaction, clinician global impression of change, and adverse events (AEs) also were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean (± SD) baseline VAS was 72.5 ± 11.2 mm. At 26 weeks (n = 26), mean change from baseline in VAS was -51.7 mm (95% CI, -60.7 to -42.7; p < 0.001), with 76.9% of participants reporting ≥50% VAS reduction, and 46.2% reporting ≥80% VAS reduction. BPI, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-36 scores were all statistically significantly improved at 26 weeks (p < 0.001), and 100% of participants were satisfied with their treatment. There were no unanticipated AEs related to the study intervention, device, or procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel, paresthesia-free stimulation waveform may be a safe and effective option for patients with chronic neuropathic LBP eligible for SCS therapy and is deliverable by all current commercial SCS systems.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered on anzctr.org.au with identifier ACTRN12618000647235.

Theoretical Schemas to Guide Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) Chronic Low Back Pain Clinical Research

BACKGROUND

Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a complex with a heterogenous clinical presentation. A better understanding of the factors that contribute to cLBP is needed for accurate diagnosis, optimal treatment, and identification of mechanistic targets for new therapies. The Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) Research Program provides a unique opportunity in this regard, as it will generate large clinical datasets, including a diverse set of harmonized measurements. The Theoretical Model Working Group was established to guide BACPAC research and to organize new knowledge within a mechanistic framework. This article summarizes the initial work of the Theoretical Model Working Group. It includes a three-stage integration of expert opinion and an umbrella literature review of factors that affect cLBP severity and chronicity.

METHODS

During Stage 1, experts from across BACPAC established a taxonomy for risk and prognostic factors (RPFs) and preliminary graphical depictions. During Stage 2, a separate team conducted a literature review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to establish working definitions, associated data elements, and overall strength of evidence for identified RPFs. These were subsequently integrated with expert opinion during Stage 3.

RESULTS

The majority (∼80%) of RPFs had little strength-of-evidence confidence, whereas seven factors had substantial confidence for either a positive association with cLBP (pain-related anxiety, serum C-reactive protein, diabetes, and anticipatory/compensatory postural adjustments) or no association with cLBP (serum interleukin 1-beta / interleukin 6, transversus muscle morphology/activity, and quantitative sensory testing).

CONCLUSION

This theoretical perspective will evolve over time as BACPAC investigators link empirical results to theory, challenge current ideas of the biopsychosocial model, and use a systems approach to develop tools and algorithms that disentangle the dynamic interactions among cLBP factors.

The Cross-Sectional Area Assessment of Pelvic Muscles Using the MRI Manual Segmentation among Patients with Low Back Pain and Healthy Subjects

The pain pathomechanism of chronic low back pain (LBP) is complex and the available diagnostic methods are insufficient. Patients present morphological changes in volume and cross-sectional area (CSA) of lumbosacral region. The main objective of this study was to assess if CSA measurements of pelvic muscle will indicate muscle atrophy between asymptomatic and symptomatic sides in chronic LBP patients, as well as between right and left sides in healthy volunteers. In addition, inter-rater reliability for CSA measurements was examined. The study involved 71 chronic LBP patients and 29 healthy volunteers. The CSA of gluteus maximus, medius, minimus and piriformis were measured using the MRI manual segmentation method. Muscle atrophy was confirmed in gluteus maximus, gluteus minimus and piriformis muscle for over 50% of chronic LBP patients (p < 0.05). Gluteus medius showed atrophy in patients with left side pain occurrence (p < 0.001). Muscle atrophy occurred on the symptomatic side for all inspected muscles, except gluteus maximus in rater one assessment. The reliability of CSA measurements between raters calculated using CCC and ICC presented great inter-rater reproducibility for each muscle both in patients and healthy volunteers (p < 0.95). Therefore, there is the possibility of using CSA assessment in the diagnosis of patients with symptoms of chronic LBP.

Somnolence and Dizziness During Mirogabalin Treatment in Patients With Neuropathic Pain Related to Lumbar Disease Who Switched From Pregabalin: A Retrospective Study

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate adverse events (AEs) in patients with neuropathic pain related to lumbar disease who switched to mirogabalin from pregabalin.

METHODS

This study surveyed the records of 82 patients with peripheral neuropathic leg pain related to lumbar disease who switched to mirogabalin from pregabalin. We evaluated AEs associated with pregabalin and mirogabalin, the continuation rate of mirogabalin, and the pain-relieving effect at 4 weeks after switching from pregabalin to mirogabalin. We compared patients who switched due to lack of efficacy (LoE group) and patients who switched due to AEs (AE group).

RESULTS

The incidence rates of somnolence and dizziness with pregabalin were 12.2% and 14.6%, respectively, while the incidence rates with mirogabalin were reduced to 7.3% for somnolence and 4.9% for dizziness. The incidence of AEs with pregabalin was significantly higher in the AE group (LoE group: 11.1%, AE group 100%), especially for somnolence (LoE group: 3.2%, AE group: 47.1%) and dizziness (LoE group: 4.8%, AE: 52.9%). After switching, the incidences of AEs with mirogabalin were not significantly different between the 2 groups (LoE group: 15.9%, AE group: 23.5%), including for somnolence (LoE group: 7.9%, AE group: 5.9%) and dizziness (LoE group: 4.8%, AE group: 5.9%). There were no significant differences in continuation rate of mirogabalin or the pain-relieving effect between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients who experience somnolence and dizziness with pregabalin might be able to continue safely receiving treatment for their pain by switching to mirogabalin.

Pregabalin and gabapentin for chronic low back pain without radiculopathy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

 Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a global health problem, and gabapentin and pregabalin are often used in the treatment of patients without associated radiculopathy or neuropathy. Therefore, determining their efficacy and safety is of enormous value.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy and safety of using gabapentin and pregabalin for CLBP without radiculopathy or neuropathy.

METHODS

 We performed a search on the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and Web of Science data bases for clinical trials, cohorts, and case-control studies that evaluated patients with CLBP without radiculopathy or neuropathy for at least eight weeks. The data were extracted and inserted into a previously-prepared Microsoft Excel spreadsheet; the outcomes were evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and the quality of evidence, using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

 Of the 2,230 articles identified, only 5 were included, totaling 242 participants. In them, pregabalin was slightly less efficacious than amitriptyline, the combination of tramadol/acetaminophen, and celecoxib, and pregabalin added to celecoxib showed no benefit when compared to celecoxib alone (very low evidence for all). On the other hand, although one study with gabapentin did not support its use in a general sample of patients with low back pain, another found a reduction in the pain scale and improved mobility (moderate evidence). No serious adverse events were observed in any of the studies.

CONCLUSION

 Quality information to support the use of pregabalin or gabapentin in the treatment of CLBP without radiculopathy or neuropathy is lacking, although results may suggest gabapentin as a viable option. More data is needed to fill this current gap in knowledge.

Sonic Hedgehog Signaling Pathway: A Role in Pain Processing

Pain, as one of the most prevalent clinical symptoms, is a complex physiological and psychological activity. Long-term severe pain can become unbearable to the body. However, existing treatments do not provide satisfactory results. Therefore, new mechanisms and therapeutic targets need to be urgently explored for pain management. The Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling pathway is crucial in embryonic development, cell differentiation and proliferation, and nervous system regulation. Here, we review the recent studies on the Shh signaling pathway and its action in multiple pain-related diseases. The Shh signaling pathway is dysregulated under various pain conditions, such as pancreatic cancer pain, bone cancer pain, chronic post-thoracotomy pain, pain caused by degenerative lumbar disc disease, and toothache. Further studies on the Shh signaling pathway may provide new therapeutic options for pain patients.

Use of QR Codes for Promoting a Home-Based Therapeutic Exercise in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Randomized Study

Purpose

In the current study, we investigated the usefulness of the quick response (QR) code linked to the source of a video of home-based therapeutic exercise to promote home-based therapeutic exercise in patients with LDH and LSS.

Patients and Methods

Forty patients with LDH and LSS were included in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: QR codes or control groups (20 patients per group). The QR code group received QR code stickers linked with a video that includes a demonstration on how to exercise for the back muscles. We instructed the patients to perform home-based therapeutic exercises three or more days a week. Patients in the control group were asked to perform the therapeutic exercise without providing a QR code to them. The primary outcome was the number of exercises per week. The scores of the numeric rating scale (NRS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were investigated as secondary outcomes.

Results

The patients in the QR code group exercised for the lower back muscles on average about two times a week, and 40% of the patients in the QR code group performed the exercise three or more days a week. However, almost no patients in the control group performed therapeutic exercises. Patients in the QR code group showed significantly lower ODI scores at the 1-month and 2-month follow-ups compared with the control group. In addition, the patients who exercised ≥3 times per week showed more improvement in the disability than those who exercised <3 times per week. The NRS scores for lower back pain and radicular leg pain were not significantly different between the QR code and control groups.

Conclusion

We found that QR codes can be useful for encouraging patients with LDH or LSS to perform home-based therapeutic exercises.

Neurobiological substrates of chronic low back pain (CLBP): a brain [99mTc]Tc-ECD SPECT study

BACKGROUND

Recent neuroimaging studies have demonstrated pathological mechanisms related to cerebral neuroplasticity in chronic low back pain (CLBP). Few studies have compared cerebral changes between patients with and without pain in the absence of an experimentally induced stimulus. We investigated the neurobiological substrates associated with chronic low back pain using [^99mTc]Tc-ECD brain SPECT and correlated rCBF findings with the numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain and douleur neuropathique en 4 questions (DN4). Ten healthy control volunteers and fourteen patients with neuropathic CLBP due to lumbar disc herniation underwent cerebral SPECT scans. A quantitative comparison of rCBF findings between patients and controls was made using the Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM), revealing clusters of voxels with a significant increase or decrease in rCBF. The intensity of CLBP was assessed by NRS and by DN4.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated an rCBF increase in clusters A (occipital and posterior cingulate cortex) and B (right frontal) and a decrease in cluster C (superior parietal lobe and middle cingulate cortex). NRS scores were inversely and moderately correlated with the intensity of rCBF increase in cluster B, but not to rCBF changes in clusters A and C. DN4 scores did not correlate with rCBF changes in all three clusters.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will be important for future therapeutic studies that aim to validate the association of rCBF findings with the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of therapeutic challenges in pain.

The Effect of a Stretch and Strength-Based Yoga Exercise Program on Patients with Neuropathic Pain due to Lumbar Disc Herniation

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of a stretch and strengthbased yoga exercise program on neuropathic pain due to LDH.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

LDH with neuropathic pain influences treatment outcomes negatively. Most yoga poses include the parameters of spinal training and help reduce pain and disability in patients with low back injuries. We hypothesized that yoga positively affects both LDH and neuropathic pain by increasing mobilization, core muscle strength, and spinal and hamstring flexibility.

METHODS

In total, 48 patients with neuropathic pain due to LDH were randomly assigned to a control group and a yoga group. All patients underwent a patient education program. In addition, the selected yoga exercise was taught and performed to the yoga group for one hour twice weekly for 12 weeks. Neuropathic pain (Douleur Neuropathique 4 for diagnosis; Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs for severity), low back pain (the short-form of McGill Pain Questionnaire), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and function (modified Schober and passive knee extension test) were measured blind before and at the one-, three-, and six-month follow-ups. The patient global assessment was applied at the six-month followup. The intention-to-treat analysis was performed in this study.

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat analysis showed a statistically significant difference in neuropathic pain, patient global assess ment, low back pain, disability, and function in favor of the yoga group at post-treatment. The between-group effect sizes were moderate at six-months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

It was determined that the selected stretch and strength-based yoga exercise could be a promising treatment option for neuropathic pain due to LDH.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Impact of dyslipidemia on the severity of symptomatic lumbar spine degeneration: A retrospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is an important cause of low back pain or sciatica, and metabolic factors play an important role. However, little is known about the relationship of dyslipidemia to the risk of intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD). This study aimed to assess the impact of serum lipid levels on the severity of lumbar disc degeneration and to investigate its association with endplate inflammation.

METHODS

We conducted a case retrospective study in which a total of 302 hospitalized Chinese patients were recruited, of whom 188 (112 males and 76 females; mean age: 51.66 years) were without underlying disease, while the remaining 114 patients (51 males and 63 females; mean age: 62.75 years) had underlying diseases. We examined fasting serum lipid levels for total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to determine endplate inflammation. Pfirrmann grading and Weishaupt grading were used to evaluate the severity of intervertebral disc degeneration and facet joint degeneration, respectively.

RESULTS

There was no difference in age, gender, and general BMI between the two groups (P > 0.05), but there were significantly high levels in TC, LDL-C, and LDL-C/HDL-C (P = 0.04, P = 0.013, P = 0.01, respectively). TG and HDL-C showed no significant difference (P = 0.064, P = 0.336, respectively). The multivariate logistic regression model showed that age was a risk factor for the occurrence of endplate inflammation. In the group without underlying diseases, age, but not other indicators, was a risk factor for the occurrence of endplate inflammation (P < 0.01), In the group with underlying diseases, none of the patient indicators was directly related to the occurrence of endplate inflammation (P > 0.05). A nonlinear machine learning model was used to measure the contribution of each factor to the disease outcome and to analyze the effect between the top three contributing factors and the outcome variables. In patients without underlying diseases, the top three factors contributing to the severity grading of intervertebral disc degeneration were age (32.9%), high-density lipoproteins (20.7%), and triglycerides (11.8%). For the severity grading of facet joint degeneration, the top three contributing factors were age (27.7%), high-density lipoproteins (19.4%), and triglycerides (14.6%). For patients with underlying diseases, the top three factors contributing to intervertebral disc degeneration were age (25.4%), BMI (15.3%), and low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein ratio (13.9%). In terms of degree classification for facet joint degeneration, the top three contributing factors were age (17.5%), BMI (17.2%), and total cholesterol (16.7%).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that age, high-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides affect the degree of degeneration in patients with symptomatic lumbar degeneration without underlying diseases. Age and BMI are two major factors affecting the severity of degeneration in patients with underlying diseases, and dyslipidemia is a secondary factor. However, there is no clear association between dyslipidemia and the occurrence of endplate inflammation in either group.

Formulation of Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guideline for the management of low back pain- the revised 2019 edition

BACKGROUND

The latest clinical guidelines are mandatory for physicians to follow when practicing evidence-based medicine in the treatment of low back pain. Those guidelines should target not only Japanese board-certified orthopaedic surgeons, but also primary physicians, and they should be prepared based entirely on evidence-based medicine. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Low Back Pain guideline committee decided to update the guideline and launched the formulation committee. The purpose of this study was to describe the formulation we implemented for the revision of the guideline with the latest data of evidence-based medicine.

METHODS

The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Low Back Pain guideline formulation committee revised the previous guideline based on a method for preparing clinical guidelines in Japan proposed by Medical Information Network Distribution Service Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2014. Two key phrases, "body of evidence" and "benefit and harm balance" were focused on in the revised version. Background and clinical questions were determined, followed by literature search related to each question. Appropriate articles were selected from all the searched literature. Structured abstracts were prepared, and then meta-analyses were performed. The strength of both the body of evidence and the recommendation was decided by the committee members.

RESULTS

Nine background and nine clinical qvuestions were determined. For each clinical question, outcomes from the literature were collected and meta-analysis was performed. Answers and explanations were described for each clinical question, and the strength of the recommendation was decided. For background questions, the recommendations were described based on previous literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2019 clinical practice guideline for the management of low back pain was completed according to the latest evidence-based medicine. We strongly hope that this guideline serves as a benchmark for all physicians, as well as patients, in the management of low back pain.

Safety of Epidural Steroid Injections for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: Unmet Medical Need

OBJECTIVE

Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are a commonly utilized treatment for lumbosacral radicular pain caused by intervertebral disc herniation or stenosis. Although effective in certain patient populations, ESIs have been associated with serious complications, including paralysis and death. In 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a safety warning on the risk of injecting corticosteroids into the epidural space. The aims of this article were to review the neurological complications associated with ESIs and to compare the formulations, safety, and effectiveness of commercially available corticosteroids given by transforaminal, interlaminar, or caudal injection.

METHODS

Serious adverse events associated with ESIs were identified by a search of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. A MEDLINE search of the literature was conducted to identify clinical trials comparing the safety and effectiveness of nonparticulate and particulate corticosteroid formulations.

RESULTS

Neurological complications with ESIs were rare and more often associated with the use of particulate corticosteroids administered by transforaminal injection. Among the 10 comparative-effectiveness studies reviewed, 7 found nonparticulate steroids had comparable efficacy to particulate steroids, and 3 studies suggested reduced efficacy or shorter duration of effect for nonparticulate steroids.

DISCUSSION

The risk of complications for transforaminal ESI is greater with particulate corticosteroids. Nonparticulate corticosteroids, which are often recommended as first-line therapy, may have a short duration of effect, and many commercial formulations contain neurotoxic preservatives. The safety profile of ESIs may continue to improve with the development of safer, sterile formulations that reduce the risk of complications while maintaining efficacy.

Low back pain

Low back pain covers a spectrum of different types of pain (eg, nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic, or non-specific) that frequently overlap. The elements comprising the lumbar spine (eg, soft tissue, vertebrae, zygapophyseal and sacroiliac joints, intervertebral discs, and neurovascular structures) are prone to different stressors, and each of these, alone or in combination, can contribute to low back pain. Due to numerous factors related to low back pain, and the low specificity of imaging and diagnostic injections, diagnostic methods for this condition continue to be a subject of controversy. The biopsychosocial model posits low back pain to be a dynamic interaction between social, psychological, and biological factors that can both predispose to and result from injury, and should be considered when devising interdisciplinary treatment plans. Prevention of low back pain is recognised as a pivotal challenge in high-risk populations to help tackle high health-care costs related to therapy and rehabilitation. To a large extent, therapy depends on pain classification, and usually starts with self-care and pharmacotherapy in combination with non-pharmacological methods, such as physical therapies and psychological treatments in appropriate patients. For refractory low back pain, a wide range of non-surgical (eg, epidural steroid injections and spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain, and radiofrequency ablation and intra-articular steroid injections for mechanical pain) and surgical (eg, decompression for neuropathic pain, disc replacement, and fusion for mechanical causes) treatment options are available in carefully selected patients. Most treatment options address only single, solitary causes and given the complex nature of low back pain, a multimodal interdisciplinary approach is necessary. Although globally recognised as an important health and socioeconomic challenge with an expected increase in prevalence, low back pain continues to have tremendous potential for improvement in both diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. Future research on low back pain should focus on improving the accuracy and objectivity of diagnostic assessments, and devising treatment algorithms that consider unique biological, psychological, and social factors. High-quality comparative-effectiveness and randomised controlled trials with longer follow-up periods that aim to establish the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of low back pain management are warranted.

Impact of background factors on outcomes of pharmacological therapy for chronic low back pain: A nationwide multicenter prospective study

BACKGROUND

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a major cause of chronic pain with nociceptive, neuropathic or both pain components, and a leading cause of disability. The objectives of this study were to determine the impact of background factors including previous use of drugs on outcomes of pharmacological therapy for CLBP in a nationwide multicenter prospective study.

METHODS

The subjects were 474 patients (male: 41.9%, median age: 73.0) with CLBP. Background factors that could influence outcomes after pharmacological treatment for 6 months were examined: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), duration of CLBP, osteoporosis, history of spinal surgery, history of malignant tumor, smoking habit, employment status (yes or no), exercise habit (frequency), number of live-in family members, having something to do for pleasure, Center for Epidemiologic Studies depression scale (CES-D) score, and medication at baseline. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) for LBP, JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), Short-form 8-item health survey (SF-8), and EQ-5D were used for evaluation at baseline and after 6 months. Multivariate linear regression models were used in statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Drugs for neuropathic pain at baseline (p < 0.001), Tramacet® at baseline (p < 0.05), weak opioids at baseline (p < 0.05), older age (p < 0.001), long disease duration (p < 0.005), history of spinal surgery (p < 0.001), and smoking habit (p < 0.001) had significant negative effects on outcomes. Employment (p < 0.05), exercise habit (p < 0.05), and CED-D at baseline (p < 0.001) had positive effects on outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to identify significant prognostic factors for outcomes of pharmacological treatment of CLBP. The neuropathic pain component of CLBP at baseline is a major significant negative factor for most outcomes involving improved pain, activities of daily life, and quality of life. Treatment strategies developed with consideration of these factors may be advantageous for recovery from CLBP.

Female Overrepresentation in Low Back-Related Leg Pain: A Retrospective Study of the Autonomic Response to a Minimally Invasive Procedure

Background

The newly proposed low back pain treatment requires case classification according to the pain mechanism (nociceptive, neuropathic or nociplastic) to determine the most effective therapeutic approach. However, there is a lack of objective tools for distinguishing these pain mechanisms. The aim of the study was to identify which symptoms, signs, and standard diagnostic parameters would allow predicting the nociplastic pain (NP) subtype among low back leg pain (LBLP) patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of an LBLP case–control study database was carried out. The presence of NP was assumed if the patient presented with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) and developed a short-term intensive vasodilatation reaction in the perceived lower leg pain area after provocation by a minimally invasive procedure. Clinical data and standard LBLP diagnostic parameters were analyzed to classify patients as NP (+) vs NP (-). Next, to predict NP probability, logistic regression analysis and a diagnostic classification tree were constructed.

Results

NP was confirmed in 43.75% of LBLP patients. Women represented 95.24% of all NP (+) patients. The diagnostic classification tree indicated that NP was highly probable if the LBLP subject was female and the result of a positive straight leg raise (SLR) test was lower than 45 degrees. If the SLR test result was greater than or equal to 45 degrees, a negative result on the Bragard test would have diagnostic value. This classification tree was approved to a certain extent in the logistic regression model (deviance residuals, min: −1.8519; 1Q: −0.5551; median: −0.1907; 3Q: 0.6565 and max: 2.1058) but should be verified in a larger group of subjects.

Conclusion

Female sex, but not clinical data or standard diagnostic parameters, is indicative of nociplastic pain in LBLP patients. More sophisticated statistical methods, based on directly measurable parameters, should be proposed to distinguish NP involvement in LBLP.

Therapeutic Effect of Mirogabalin on Peripheral Neuropathic Pain due to Lumbar Spine Disease

Study Design

Retrospective study.

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of mirogabalin in treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain due to lumbar spine disease.

Overview of Literature

Mirogabalin is a novel selective ligand for the α2δ subunit of voltage-gated Ca channels.

Methods

Between April and December 2019, we used mirogabalin to treat 60 consecutive patients (mean age, 67.6 years) with leg symptoms due to lumbar disease. The treatment outcome after 8 weeks of mirogabalin therapy was evaluated by comparing the preand post-administration Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for leg symptoms and sleep disturbance, the NRS and Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire for low back pain (LBP), and the quality of life (QOL) score (based on EuroQol five-dimension five-level scale).

Results

Mirogabalin treatment was stopped at less than eight weeks in eight patients. The remaining 52 patients for evaluation were divided as group 1 (17 patients who presented with leg symptoms that lasted for less than 3 months) and group 2 (35 patients with leg symptoms that lasted longer than 3 months). The leg symptoms and LBP in both groups significantly improved at 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, and sleep disturbance and QOL were improved at 8 weeks as well. Compared to group 2, the pretreatment leg symptoms and QOL were significantly worse in group 1, and their improvement after 8 weeks of mirogabalin treatment was significantly better (p<0.05). Of the 60 original patients, 17 suffered adverse effects, which were mild in 16 patients and required treatment cessation due to excessive weight gain in one patient.

Conclusions

We have validated the effect of mirogabalin on neuropathic pain due to lumbar spine disease, which has effectively addressed the associated leg symptoms, LBP, and sleep disturbance.

Frequency of Adverse Drug Reactions and Analgesic Effects of Mirogabalin during Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Retrospective Clinical Investigation

Introduction

Mirogabalin should be equivalent to pregabalin, but with fewer incidences of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). To verify these benefits in actual clinical trials, our study investigated the frequency of ADRs and mirogabalin's analgesic effects during treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain.

Methods

This study included 74 patients with lower limb pain. We surveyed patient reports of ADRs during the follow-up period as the primary endpoint and examined the visual analog scale (VAS) reported for lower limb pain as the secondary endpoint (before administration, and two and four weeks after administration).

Results

The occurrence of ADR was 27.0%, like the frequency of ADRs in the clinical trials for other disorders. However, the discontinuation rate of administration was 10.8%, which was significantly lower than the frequency of ADR occurrences. When the analgesic effect was assessed, a significant decrease in the temporal change of VAS for lower limb pain was observed before administration, and two and four weeks after administration.

Conclusions

In this study, the occurrence of ADRs reported by the patients was like the frequency of ADRs reported in the clinical trials for other disorders. When assessing the analgesic effect, the temporal change of VAS for lower limb pain was found to decrease significantly before administration, and two and four weeks after administration.

Soft Tissue: A Possible Source of Pain Pre and Post Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Case studies.

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate that muscle generated pain (MGP) may be a cause of pain in patients who have undergone minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS).

METHODS

A physical examination including electrical stimulation of putative pain generating muscles to identify the presence of lowered thresholds for depolarization of muscle nociceptors, and an examination of strength and flexibility of key muscles in the upper and lower body, may identify multiple etiologies of MGP. Treatment of identified muscles consisted of muscle/tendon injections to identified sensitized muscles followed by exercises incorporating relaxation limbering and stretching.

RESULTS

Postsurgical pain was eliminated and mobility restored in both presented cases replicating success in prior published studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms of muscle pain may facilitate the evaluation and treatment of MGP in MISS patients diagnosed with failed back surgery syndrome.

Psychological factors can cause false pain classification on painDETECT

Background and aims The painDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) has been widely used as a screening tool for the identification of neuropathic pain (NeP) as well as a tool for the characterization of patients' pain profile. In contrast to other NeP screening tools, the PD-Q is the only screening tool with weighted sensory descriptors. It is possible that responses to the PD-Q sensory descriptors are influenced by psychological factors, such as catastrophizing or anxiety, which potentially might contribute to an overall higher score of PD-Q and a false positive identification of NeP. This study aimed to explore (i) the relationship between psychological factors (catastrophizing, anxiety, depression and stress) and the total PD-Q score and (ii) if psychological factors are associated with false positive identifications of NeP on the PD-Q compared to clinically diagnosed NeP. Methods The study was a retrospective review of 1,101 patients attending an outpatient pain centre. Patients were asked to complete the PD-Q, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). For patients who were identified by PD-Q as having NeP, their medical records were reviewed to establish if they had a clinical diagnosis of NeP. Results Accounting for missing data, complete datasets of 652 patients (mean age 51 (SD14) years, range 18-88; 57% females) were available for analysis. Based on PD-Q scoring, NeP was likely present in 285 (44%) patients. Depression, anxiety, stress, catastrophizing, BPI pain and BPI interference were all significantly related to each other (p < 0.0001) and patients displaying these traits were significantly more likely to have a positive PD-Q score (p < 0.0001). For patients classified by PD-Q as having NeP, only 50% of patients had a clinical diagnosis of NeP. Anxiety was significantly associated with a false positive classification of NeP on PD-Q (p = 0.0036). Conclusions Our retrospective study showed that psychological factors including catastrophizing, depression, anxiety, and stress were all influential in producing a higher score on the PD-Q. We observed a high rate of false positive NeP classification which was associated with the presence of anxiety. Implications Clinicians and researchers should be aware that a patient's psychological state may influence the responses to PD-Q and consequently the final PD-Q score and its NeP classification.

Evaluation of the Neuropathic Component of Chronic Low Back Pain

OBJECTIVES

Assessment of neuropathic pain in chronic low back syndromes is important. However, there is currently no gold standard for its diagnosis. The aim of this observational cross-sectional study was to assess the neuropathic component of pain in various chronic low back pain syndromes using a range of diagnostic tests.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Included in this study were 63 patients with chronic axial low back pain (ALBP), 48 patients with chronic radicular syndromes (CRS) comprising 23 with discogenic compression (CDRS) and 25 with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), and 74 controls. PainDETECT questionnaire (PDQ), quantitative sensory testing (QST), and skin biopsy with evaluation of intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) were used to assess the neuropathic pain component.

RESULTS

Positive PDQ (≥19) was obtained more frequently in patients with CDRS and LSS (26.1% and 12.0%, respectively) compared with patients with ALBP (1.6%, P<0.001). The proportion of patients with sensory loss confirmed by QST was lowest in the ALBP subgroup (23.8%) compared with CDRS (47.8%), and LSS (68.0%) subgroups (P<0.001). A reduction in IENFD was disclosed in a proportion of up to 52.0% of affected roots in patients with CRS.

DISCUSSION

Neuropathic pain is quite frequent in CRS, and QST reveals sensory loss as a frequent abnormality in patients with CRS. Using a cut-off value of 19, PDQ identified a neuropathic component in a relatively low proportion of patients with CRS. CRS may be associated with a reduction in IENFD.

Neuropathic Pain Component in Axial Spondyloarthritis and the Influence on Disease Burden

OBJECTIVES

Patients with nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) and radiographic axSpA/ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have similar burden of disease; however, the potential influence of pain characteristics including the neuropathic pain (NeP) component has not been assessed yet. The aim of this study was first to assess frequency of NeP component in patients with axSpA and second to assess the potential influence of NeP on burden of disease.

METHODS

Adult patients who met the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for axSpA were consecutively recruited. Patients were evaluated using the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions interview and painDETECT questionnaire and subgrouped as patients with and without NeP.

RESULTS

Neuropathic pain component was present in 31.4% of patients with axSpA categorized according to Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (31.6% in nr-axSpA vs 31.3% in AS, P = 0.964) and in 33.5% of patients categorized according to painDETECT (35.1% in nr-axSpA vs 32.8% in AS, P = 0.762). Pain characteristics were quite similar between patients with nr-axSpA and AS. Women tented to have more frequent NeP. Patients with NeP component had significantly higher scores in visual analog scale of pain, patient and physician global, fatigue, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein, depression, anxiety scores, and physical functions; poorer quality of life (QoL); and similar frequency of fibromyalgia compared with patients without NeP component. In multivariable analysis, having NeP was associated with QoL measures (Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life and Short-Form 36 physical component score) and visual analog scale of fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly one third of patients with axSpA may have NeP component regardless of having nr-axSpA or AS. Neuropathic pain component may contribute worsened QoL and poorer patient-reported outcome data and should be kept in mind during patient evaluation.

Tapentadol for neuropathic pain: a review of clinical studies

Neuropathic pain (NP) is an enormous burden for patients, caregivers and society. NP is a pain state that may develop after injury of the peripheral or central nervous system because of a wide range of diseases and traumas. A NP symptom component can be found also in several types of chronic pain. Many NP patients are substantially disabled for years. Due to its chronicity, severity and unpredictability, NP is difficult to treat. Tapentadol is a central-acting oral analgesic with combined opioid and noradrenergic properties, which make it potentially suitable for a wide range of pain conditions, particularly whenever a NP component is present or cannot be excluded. In randomized controlled trials, tapentadol has proved to be effective in relieving NP in diabetic peripheral neuropathy and in chronic low back pain. In observational studies, tapentadol reduced NP in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathies, blood and solid cancers, and the NP component in neck pain and Parkinson's disease. This narrative review aims to provide clinicians with a broad overview of tapentadol effects on NP.

Are painDETECT scores in musculoskeletal disorders associated with duration of daily pain and time elapsed since current pain onset?

Objectives:

We aimed to compare painDETECT scores in outpatients seen in a rheumatology department over a 1-month period and search for correlations between painDETECT scores and the estimated duration of daily pain and time elapsed since the onset of current pain.

Patients and Methods:

A total of 529 of 738 outpatients agreed to complete a set of questionnaires, including painDETECT.

Results:

The mean painDETECT score was 14.14 ± 7.59, and 31% of the patients had painDETECT scores of >18. Fibromyalgia ranked first (21.2 ± 6.0), followed by osteoarthritis of the lower limbs (17.8 ± 8.2), back pain and radiculopathies (16.1 ± 6.8), osteoarthritis of the upper limbs (15.7 ± 8.1), spondylarthrosis (15.1 ± 7.2), entrapment neuropathies (14.1 ± 2.4), rheumatoid arthritis (13.8 ± 7.1), miscellaneous conditions (13.8 ± 8.2), tendinitis (13.4 ± 7.9), connectivitis (11.5 ± 6.7), and osteoporosis (8.5 ± 6.9). The duration of daily pain was much longer in patients with painDETECT scores of >18 (12.41 ± 8.45 vs 6.53 ± 7.45 hours) (t = 0.0000), but very similar painDETECT scores were observed for patients suffering from pain for less than 1 week (13.7 ± 8.2; 38% > 18), for 1 month (14.5 ± 8.2; 25% > 18), several months (12.7 ± 7.3; 23% > 18), 1 year (13.8 ± 7.7; 29% > 18), or several years (14.7 ± 7.4; 33% > 18).

Conclusion:

PainDETECT scores differed little depending on the musculoskeletal condition, strongly correlated with the duration of daily pain, and appeared to be as high in patients with recent pain as in those suffering for years.

Prognostic value of hypersensitivity reactions on epidural steroid injection outcomes: a phenotypic signature? A prospective cohort study

Background

Studies have found that diffuse pain, indicative of central sensitization, portends poor interventional outcomes. Multiple chemical sensitivities are associated with signs of central sensitization. We sought to prospectively determine whether hypersensitivity reactions (HR) were associated with epidural steroid injection (ESI) outcomes.

Methods

HR were classified as immune-related or non-immune-related and categorized by number (0=low, 1 or 2=intermediate, ≥3=high). The primary outcome measure was mean reduction in average leg pain score 1 month post-procedure. A positive outcome was defined as a two-point or greater decrease in average leg pain accompanied by satisfaction 1 month post-procedure.

Results

The mean number of immune-mediated and non-immune-mediated HR were 0.6±1.2 and 0.8±1.4, respectively. Individuals in the high (n=24) total HR group had a mean reduction in average leg pain of 0.1±2.7, compared with those in the low (n=61; 1.8±2.1, p=0.025) and intermediate groups (n=52; 1.6±3.1, p=0.060). For back pain and categorical successful outcome, those with fewer HR experienced greater benefit. There were no differences in outcomes when patients were stratified by immune-related HR. Among participants in the low, intermediate and high non-immune-mediated HR groups, the mean reductions in average leg pain scores were 1.7±2.5, 1.6±3.0, and −0.2±2.3, respectively (p = 0.002). 51%, 35%, and 12% of people with low, intermediate and high numbers of non-immune-mediated HR experienced a positive categorical outcome, respectively (p=0.007).

Conclusions

Non-immune-related HR were inversely correlated with some ESI outcome measures.

Intense Focused Ultrasound Preferentially Stimulates Transected Nerves Within Residual Limbs: Pilot Study

Objective

Identifying pain generators in tissue deep in the skin can require uncomfortable, complicated, and invasive tests. We describe pilot studies testing the hypothesis that ultrasound image-guided, intense focused ultrasound (ig-iFU) can noninvasively and differentially stimulate the end of transected nerves in the residual limbs of amputee patients.

Design

We applied iFU to the transected nerve ending as individual pulses with a length of 0.1 seconds using a carrier frequency of 2.0 MHz. After targeting, we gradually increased the iFU intensity to reach consistent patient-reported stimulation of the transected nerve ending. We also stimulated the proximal nerve, tissue near the nerve ending, and the intact contralateral nerve. We described the resulting sensations and correlated the results of the study participant's pre-iFU study responses to phantom and residual limb pain questionnaires.

Results

iFU spatial and temporal average intensity values between 16 W/cm2 and 433 W/cm2 that were applied to the transected nerve ending and proximal nerve elicited sensations, including phantom limb sensations, while the same intensity applied to control tissue centimeters away from the nerve ending, or to the intact nerve on the contralateral limb, did not. Two out of 11 study participants reported only mild and transient pain created by iFU stimulation. Successful iFU intensity values correlated with neither phantom nor residual limb pain scores.

Conclusions

Transected nerves had greater sensitivity to iFU stimulation than ipsilateral and contralateral control tissue, including intact nerve. These results support the view that ig-iFU may one day help physicians identify deep, tender tissue in patients who report experiencing pain.

Gabapentin versus Transdermal Fentanyl Matrix for the Alleviation of Chronic Neuropathic Pain of Radicular Origin: A Randomized Blind Multicentered Parallel-Group Noninferiority Trial

A number of studies have been published proposing various approaches to the treatment of neuropathic pain; however, to our knowledge, no attempts have been made to compare gabapentin and fentanyl in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. We evaluated the relative efficacy and safety of fentanyl matrix and gabapentin for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain of radicular origin. The study was designed as a randomized blind multicentered parallel-group noninferiority trial. A total of 108 patients with moderate-to-severe pain (≥4 intensity on an 11-point numeric rating scale) were randomly prescribed either fentanyl matrix or gabapentin over a period of 56 days. In the primary analysis, the noninferiority of fentanyl matrix treatment was evaluated in relation to the efficacy of gabapentin based on the pain intensity difference (PID) at 56 days after the first dose of the drugs. Secondary endpoints included pain relief, improvement in functional status (the Korean-Oswestry Disability Index (K-ODI)), improvement in depressive symptoms (Korean-Beck Depression Index (K-BDI)) between the 28th and 56th day, and adverse events (AEs). Analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint established the noninferiority of fentanyl matrix compared with gabapentin, with no statistically significant difference observed in the PID after 56 days for the two treatment groups. Similarly, analysis of pain relief revealed no significant differences between the groups on days 28 and 56. There was no difference in the K-ODI and K-BDI between the groups during the study period. The overall incidence of at least one AE was similar for fentanyl matrix (67.3%) and gabapentin (69.6%). The most commonly reported AEs for patients treated with fentanyl matrix and gabapentin included dizziness (30.8% vs. 44.6%, respectively), somnolence (26.9% vs. 35.7%), and constipation (15.4% vs. 17.9%). This study demonstrated that the analgesic effect of fentanyl matrix is noninferior in comparison with gabapentin and supports the use of fentanyl matrix as an effective and safe treatment for moderate-to-severe chronic neuropathic pain. This trial is registered with NCT01127100.

Proportion of neuropathic pain in the back region in chronic low back pain patients -a multicenter investigation

Neuropathy can contribute to low back pain (LBP) in the region of the back. Our study investigated the proportion of neuropathic pain (NP) in low back region in chronic LBP patients from multicenter and clinics in China and identified associated factors. Assessment was made using a questionnaire and the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS, only tested in low back region), as well as Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST, merely applied to the low back region), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Our questionnaire collected demographic information, behavioral habits and medical records. 2116 outpatients over 18 years old complaining of LBP lasting more than 3 months were enrolled in this study. The NP proportion in low back region in chronic LBP patients was 2.8%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that histories of lumbar surgery, abdominal or pelvic surgery, and drinking alcohol were independent positive predictors for LBP of predominantly neuropathic origin (LBNPO), while history of low back sprain and frequently carrying weight as independent negative predictor. Using these parameters may help the identification of patients with chronic LBP likely to develop NP leading to improved treatment outcomes.

Difference between subjects in early chronic phase of low back pain with and without neuropathic component: observational cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Neuropathic pain in early chronic low back pain is insufficiently recognized and treated.

AIM

The aim of this study was to establish if there is a difference among chronic low back pain subjects with and without neuropathic pain and healthy subjects, in clinical characteristic and the level of trunk muscle activation.

DESIGN

Cross sectional observational study.

SETTING

Rehabilitation clinic, inpatient and outpatient.

POPULATION

Thirty-three subjects in early chronic phase of low back pain and 26 healthy subjects were included in this research.

METHODS

Clinical characteristics and relative thickness change of lumbar multifidus and transversal abdominal muscle, measured by ultrasound, in neuropathic, non-neuropathic chronic low back pain and healthy subjects were analyzed.

RESULTS

Chronic low back pain subjects with neuropathic pain reported higher level of pain on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (back pain P=0.016, leg pain P=0.006), had higher Oswestry Disability Score (P=0.029), had lower motor (P=0.001) and sensory leg scores (P=0.000), and decreased level of activation of transversal abdominal muscle (P=0.000) comparing to chronic low back pain group without neuropathic pain. Low back pain subjects with leg pain ≥5 on VAS were 11.2 times more prone to develop neuropathic pain. Motor leg score ≤47 increases this chance 35 times. Sensory leg score ≤25 increases this chance 14 times. Reduced activation of transversal abdominal muscle for 40-50% increases this chance 7-24 times.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic low back pain subjects with neuropathic pain were more painful and disabled, had lower motor and sensory scores, and lower relative thickness change of transversal abdominal muscle comparing to the low back pain group without neuropathic pain. Self -reported leg pain intensity of 5 or more on VAS, motor score of 47 and less, sensory scores of 25 and less and diminished activation of transversal abdominal muscle significantly increase the chance that chronic low back pain subject has neuropathic component of pain.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

Neuropathic pain in early chronic low back pain subjects might be more readily recognized if patients with radiculopathy and diminished activation of transversal abdominal muscle were regularly screened for neuropathic pain.

SCN11A Arg225Cys mutation causes nociceptive pain without detectable peripheral nerve pathology

Objective

The SCN11A gene encodes the Na_V1.9 sodium channel found exclusively in peripheral nociceptive neurons.

Methods

All enrolled participants were evaluated clinically by electrophysiologic studies, DNA sequencing, and punch skin biopsies.

Results

All affected family members are afflicted by episodes of pain. Pain was predominantly nociceptive, but not neuropathic in nature, which led a diagnosis of fibromyalgia in some patients. All patients had normal findings in nerve conduction studies for detecting large nerve fiber neuropathies and skin biopsies for detecting small nerve fiber pathology.

Conclusions

Unlike those patients with missense mutations in SCN11A, small fiber sensory neuropathy, and neuropathic pain, the Arg225Cys SCN11A in the present study causes predominantly nociceptive pain with minimal features of neuropathic pain and undetectable pathophysiologic changes of peripheral neuropathy. This finding is consistent with dysfunction of nociceptive neurons. In addition, since nociceptive pain in patients has led to the diagnosis of fibromyalgia, this justifies a future search of mutations of SCN11A in patients with additional pain phenotypes such as fibromyalgia to expand the clinical spectrum beyond painful small fiber sensory neuropathy.

Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Intravenous Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain From the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists

BACKGROUND

Over the past 2 decades, the use of intravenous ketamine infusions as a treatment for chronic pain has increased dramatically, with wide variation in patient selection, dosing, and monitoring. This has led to a chorus of calls from various sources for the development of consensus guidelines.

METHODS

In November 2016, the charge for developing consensus guidelines was approved by the boards of directors of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and, shortly thereafter, the American Academy of Pain Medicine. In late 2017, the completed document was sent to the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committees on Pain Medicine and Standards and Practice Parameters, after which additional modifications were made. Panel members were selected by the committee chair and both boards of directors based on their expertise in evaluating clinical trials, past research experience, and clinical experience in developing protocols and treating patients with ketamine. Questions were developed and refined by the committee, and the groups responsible for addressing each question consisted of modules composed of 3 to 5 panel members in addition to the committee chair. Once a preliminary consensus was achieved, sections were sent to the entire panel, and further revisions were made. In addition to consensus guidelines, a comprehensive narrative review was performed, which formed part of the basis for guidelines.

RESULTS

Guidelines were prepared for the following areas: indications; contraindications; whether there was evidence for a dose-response relationship, or a minimum or therapeutic dose range; whether oral ketamine or another N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist was a reasonable treatment option as a follow-up to infusions; preinfusion testing requirements; settings and personnel necessary to administer and monitor treatment; the use of preemptive and rescue medications to address adverse effects; and what constitutes a positive treatment response. The group was able to reach consensus on all questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supports the use of ketamine for chronic pain, but the level of evidence varies by condition and dose range. Most studies evaluating the efficacy of ketamine were small and uncontrolled and were either unblinded or ineffectively blinded. Adverse effects were few and the rate of serious adverse effects was similar to placebo in most studies, with higher dosages and more frequent infusions associated with greater risks. Larger studies, evaluating a wider variety of conditions, are needed to better quantify efficacy, improve patient selection, refine the therapeutic dose range, determine the effectiveness of nonintravenous ketamine alternatives, and develop a greater understanding of the long-term risks of repeated treatments.

Effect of duloxetine on neuropathic pain in patients intolerant to continuous administration of pregabalin

Purpose: We examined duloxetine's effectiveness in the treatment of neuropathic pain in patients who were intolerant to continuous pregabalin administration. Materials and Methods: The present study is a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with neuropathic pain with neuropathic leg pain as the chief complaint. We analyzed 20 cases in which pregabalin was changed to duloxetine because of adverse effects (16 cases) or treatment failure (4 cases). The incidence of adverse events after duloxetine administration was used as the primary endpoint, with the secondary endpoint being the leg pain level based on a numerical rating scale (NRS). Results: The incidence of adverse events after starting duloxetine was 40%. Average leg pain scores measured on the NRS were 8.4±1.4, 6.4±1.4, and 4.1±2.0 at the time of the patients' first visit, pregabalin discontinuation, and after switching to duloxetine, respectively. A significant difference in NRS scores was found between the first visit and pregabalin discontinuation and also between pregabalin discontinuation and after the switch to duloxetine (p<0.05), indicating that pain decreases over time. Furthermore, NRS scores significantly declined between the patients' first visit and after the switch to duloxetine (p<0.05). The improvement in NRS score was 20±12.8% after pregabalin administration and 23±12.0% after duloxetine administration compared with baseline scores (no significant difference between pregabalin and duloxetine; p>0.05). Conclusion: When patients with neuropathic pain are unable to tolerate pregabalin because of adverse effects, changing the medication to duloxetine may be an option.

Neuropathic Pain in Low Back-Related Leg Pain Patients: What Is the Evidence of Prevalence, Characteristics, and Prognosis in Primary Care? A Systematic Review of the Literature

This systematic review synthesizes literature describing prevalence, characteristics, and prognosis of low back-related leg pain (LBLP) patients with neuropathic pain in primary care and/or similar settings. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed and used by independent reviewers to screen citations for eligibility. The initial search yielded 24,948 citations; after screening 12 studies were included. Neuropathic pain was identified using case ascertainment tools (n = 5), clinical history with examination (n = 4), and using LBLP samples assumed neuropathic (n = 3). Neuropathic pain prevalence varied from 19% to 80%. There was consistent evidence for higher back-related disability (n = 3), poorer health-related quality of life (n = 2), and some evidence for more severe depression (n = 2), anxiety (n = 3), and pain intensity (n = 4) in patients with neuropathic pain. Results were less consistent when cases were identified through clinical history with examination than those identified using case ascertainment tools. Prognosis (n = 1) of LBLP patients with neuropathic pain was worse compared with those without, in all outcomes (leg pain intensity, leg and back-related disability, self-reported general health) except back pain intensity. No studies described prognostic factors. This systematic review highlights the evidence gap in neuropathic pain in LBLP in primary care, especially with respect to prognosis.

PERSPECTIVE

Patients with LBLP may have neuropathic pain. This systematic review emphasizes the paucity of evidence describing the characteristics and prognosis of neuropathic pain in this patient population. Future research investigating prognosis of these patients with neuropathic pain is likely to contribute to better understanding and management.

The prevalence of probable neuropathic pain in the US: results from a multimodal general-population health survey

Background

The prevalence of neuropathic pain (NeP) has been estimated within specific health conditions; however, there are no published data on its broad prevalence in the US. The current exploratory study addresses this gap using the validated PainDetect questionnaire as a screener for probable NeP in a general-population health survey conducted with a multimodal recruitment strategy to maximize demographic representativeness.

Materials and methods

Adult respondents were recruited from a combination of Internet panels, telephone lists, address lists, mall-based interviews, and store-receipt invitations using a random stratified-sampling framework, with strata defined by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Older persons and minorities were oversampled to improve prevalence estimates. Results were weighted to match the total adult US population using US Census data. Demographic information was collected, and respondents who experienced physical pain in the past 12 months completed the PainDetect and provided additional pain history. A cutoff score of 19 or greater on the PainDetect was used to define probable NeP.

Results

A total of 24,925 respondents (average response rate 2.5%) provided demographic data (52.2% female, mean age 51.5 years); 15,751 respondents reported pain (63.7%), of which 2,548 (15.7%, 95% confidence interval 14.9%-16.5%) had probable NeP based on the PainDetect, which was 10% (95% confidence interval 9.5%-10.5%) of all respondents. Among those reporting pain, the prevalence of probable NeP among Blacks and Hispanics was consistently higher than Whites in each age- and sex group. The highest prevalence among those with pain was among male Hispanics 35-44 years (32.4%) and 45-54 years (24.2%) old. The most commonly used medications reported by those with probable NeP were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (44.2%), followed by weak opioids (31.7%), antiepileptics (10.9%), and strong opioids (10.9%).

Conclusion

This is the first study to provide an estimate of the prevalence of probable NeP in the US, showing significant variation by age and ethnicity.

Classification and Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neck pain exerts a steep personal and socioeconomic toll, ranking as the fourth leading cause of disability. The principal determinant in treatment decisions is whether pain is neuropathic or nonneuropathic, as this affects treatment at all levels. Yet, no study has sought to classify neck pain in this manner.

METHODS

One hundred participants referred to an urban, academic military treatment facility with a primary diagnosis of neck pain were enrolled and followed up for 6 months. Pain was classified as neuropathic, possible neuropathic, or nonneuropathic using painDETECT and as neuropathic, mixed, or nociceptive by s-LANSS (self-completed Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs pain scale) and physician designation. Based on previous studies, the intermediate possible neuropathic pain category was considered to be a mixed condition. The final classification was based on a metric combining all 3 systems, slightly weighted toward physician's judgment, which is considered the reference standard.

RESULTS

Fifty percent of participants were classified as having possible neuropathic pain, 43% as having nonneuropathic pain, and 7% with primarily neuropathic pain. Concordance was high between the various classification schemes, ranging from a low of 62% between painDETECT and physician designation for possible neuropathic pain, to 83% concordance between s-LANSS and the 2 other systems for neuropathic pain. Individuals with neuropathic pain reported higher levels of baseline disability, were more likely to have a coexisting psychiatric illness, and underwent surgery more frequently than other pain categories, but were also more likely to report greater reductions in disability after 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although pure neuropathic pain comprised a small percentage of our cohort, 50% of our population consisted of mixed pain conditions containing a possible neuropathic component. There was significant overlap between the various classification schemes.