Epidural analgesia in labour and risk of caesarean delivery

Subcutaneous vs intravenous fentanyl for labor pain management: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Labor pain is the most intense pain a woman will experience during her lifetime. Epidural anesthesia is recommended as the most effective method for pain relief, but it has several limitations. Fentanyl has high analgesic potency with short-acting duration, but the large-scale trials that assessed the effectiveness and safety of it for labor pain management are still limited.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and harm and maternal satisfaction of subcutaneous vs intravenous fentanyl for labor pain management.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial. A total of 226 women were randomized to receive intravenous or subcutaneous fentanyl for labor pain management. Pain scores were evaluated before and after fentanyl administration at 5, 30, and 60 minutes and then every 60 minutes until delivery. The data were analyzed based on the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

Both intravenous and subcutaneous fentanyl significantly decreased labor pain from baseline to delivery (overall mean change, -1.39; 95% confidence interval, -1.62 to -1.17; and -0.89; 95% confidence interval, -1.24 to -0.05, respectively). The reduction in the pain score between the 2 groups was not different (overall mean difference, -0.35; 95% confidence interval, -0.76 to 0.05). Maternal satisfaction was high for both intravenous and subcutaneous fentanyl (89.4% and 93.8%, respectively). There was no difference in the maternal satisfaction rate between the 2 groups (relative risk, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.03). No serious maternal and neonatal adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Both intravenously and subcutaneously administered fentanyl were safe and significantly reduced pain from baseline to delivery among low-risk pregnancies. Maternal satisfaction with the childbirth experience was high regardless of the route of administration of fentanyl. No serious adverse effects of fentanyl were observed in either the mothers or the neonates.

Side effects from epidural analgesia in laboring women and risk of cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

Epidural analgesia may cause maternal hypotension and changes in the fetal heart rate. The implications of such side effects on the course of labor and delivery are incompletely understood.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess whether the occurrence of maternal or fetal side effects associated with labor epidural analgesia increased the risk for cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cohort study of all women who underwent epidural analgesia during labor for the period October 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. Excluded were cases of multiples, fetal death, noncephalic presentation, and gestational age at birth <37.0 weeks. Maternal vital signs and fetal heart rate tracings for the 1 hour before and 1 hour after epidural analgesia was administered were reviewed. The occurrence of maternal hypotension, defined as a continuous variable and dichotomized into a decrease in maternal systolic blood pressure to <90 mm Hg or a drop in systolic blood pressure by >20% below the last value before epidural analgesia was administered, was related to changes in the fetal heart rate category. The principal outcome was cesarean delivery rate; binary logistic regression analysis was used to control for confounders, and mediation model analysis was used to quantify the extent to which significant variables participated in the causation pathway to cesarean delivery (SPSS version 28 was used for the analyses).

RESULTS

A total of 439 women met the study criteria. Significant adverse reactions owing to epidural occurred in 184 of 439 women (41.9%) and included severe maternal hypotension in 159 of 439 participants (36.2%) and worsening fetal heart rate category in 50 of 439 participants (11.4%). The logistic regression analysis revealed that cervical dilation at epidural (P=.03), the duration of labor after epidural (P<.001), and worsening fetal heart rate category within 60 minutes of epidural administration (P=.01) were independently associated with recourse to cesarean delivery. The mediation analysis showed that both cervical dilatation at epidural administration and worsening fetal heart rate category had significant direct and indirect effects in the pathway to cesarean delivery.

CONCLUSION

Worsening fetal heart rate category related to labor epidural independently increased the risk for cesarean delivery.

Association of labor epidural analgesia exposure with long-term risk of autism spectrum disorder in offspring: A meta-analysis of observational studies

LAY ABSTRACT

A previous meta-analysis has demonstrated a superior analgesic efficacy of epidural analgesia (e.g. labor epidural analgesia) in comparison with non-epidural approaches. The widely accepted safety of labor epidural analgesia also endorses its current popularity in obstetric practice. However, the results of a recent large-scale longitudinal study that demonstrated a significant increase in risk of autism spectrum disorder in offspring from mothers with labor epidural analgesia exposure have raised some concerns over the safety of its use. The current meta-analysis aimed at examining the strength of evidence regarding this issue based on updated clinical data. Through systematically reviewing seven eligible observational studies involving 4,021,406 children from electronic databases, our results showed a slight but statistically significant increase in risk of autism spectrum disorder in children with exposure to labor epidural analgesia compared with those without. The finding was consistent in subgroup analysis focusing on siblings and children delivered vaginally. Nevertheless, despite the tendency of an increased risk of autism spectrum disorder in children exposed to labor epidural analgesia <4 h, this effect was not observed in those exposed to labor epidural analgesia >8 h (data from two studies). In conclusion, the level of evidence linking labor epidural analgesia to autism spectrum disorder development in offspring was very low based on the latest data because of the small effect size and the finding of a lack of cumulative dose-response effect in the current analysis. Further studies are warranted to provide an insight into this issue.

Emotional factors, medical interventions and mode of birth among low-risk primiparous women in Poland

Background and objectives

Birth is a critical event in women's lives. Since humans have evolved to give birth in the context of social support, not having it in modern settings might lead to more complications during birth. Our aim was to model how emotional factors and medical interventions related to birth outcomes in hospital settings in Poland, where c-section rates have doubled in the last decade.

Methodology

We analysed data from 2363 low-risk primiparous women who went into labor with the intention of giving birth vaginally. We used a model comparison approach to examine the relationship between emotional and medical variables and birth outcome (vaginal or c-section), including sociodemographic control variables in all models.

Results

A model with emotional factors better explained the data than a control model (Δ_AIC = 470.8); women with continuous personal support during labor had lower odds of a c-section compared to those attended by hospital staff only (OR = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.09 - 0.16). A model that included medical interventions also better explained the data than a control model (Δ_AIC = 133.6); women given epidurals, in particular, had increased odds of a c-section over those who were not (OR = 3.55, 95% CI = 2.95 - 4.27). The best model included variables for both the level of personal support and the use of epidural (Δ_AIC = 598.0).

Conclusions and implications

Continuous personal support during childbirth may be an evolutionarily informed strategy for reducing complications, including one of the most common obstetrical complications in modern hospital settings, the c-section.

The Effect of Epidural Analgesia on Labour and Neonatal and Maternal Outcomes in 1, 2a, 3, and 4a Robson's Classes: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Background: Lumbar epidural analgesia (EA) is the most commonly used method for reducing labour pain, but its impact on the duration of the second stage of labour and on neonatal and maternal outcomes remains a matter of debate. Our aim was to examine whether EA affected the course and the outcomes of labour among patients divided according to the Robson-10 group classification system. Methods: Patients of Robson’s classes 1, 2a, 3, and 4a were divided into either the EA group or the non-epidural analgesia (NEA) group. A propensity score-matching analysis was performed to balance the intergroup differences. The primary goal was to analyse the duration of the second stage of labour. The secondary goals were to evaluate neonatal and maternal outcomes. Results: In total, 21,808 cases were analysed. The second stage of labour for all groups was prolonged using EA (p < 0.05) without statistically significant differences in neonatal outcomes. EA resulted in a lower rate of episiotomies in nulliparous patients, with a higher rate of operative vaginal deliveries (OVD) (p < 0.05) and Caesarean sections (CS) (p < 0.05) in some classes. Conclusions: EA prolonged the duration of labour without affecting neonatal outcomes and reduced the rate of episiotomies, but also increased the rate of OVDs.

Effect of aerobic water exercise during pregnancy on epidural use and pain: A multi-centre, randomised, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The physical and psychological benefits of exercise during pregnancy are well established. However, the impact of exercise on pain during labour and the use of epidural analgesia has been less explored. The main aim of this study was to analyse the effectiveness and safety of moderate aerobic water exercise by pregnant women on the subsequent use of epidural analgesia during labour, induction of labour, mode of delivery, and pain perception.

DESIGN

A multi-centre, parallel, randomised, evaluator blinded, controlled trial in a primary care setting.

SETTING

Primary care centres in a health district of a tertiary obstetric metropolitan hospital in Mallorca, Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

Pregnant women (14 to 20 weeks' gestation) who had low risk of complications.

METHODS

Three hundred and twenty pregnant women were randomly assigned to two groups: women who practiced moderate aquatic aerobic exercise with usual antenatal care, and those who received usual prenatal care alone. The gynaecologist, anaesthesiologist and midwife who assisted the women during labour were blinded to group allocations. Principal outcome: use of epidural analgesia during labour. Other outcomes: use of epidural analgesia before 6 cm cervical dilation, labour pain, type of delivery, time of active labour, episiotomy or perineal tear, and induction of labour.

RESULTS

The exercise program did not affect the use of epidural analgesia (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.44 to 1.40), vaginal delivery (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.73 to 2.41), or caesarean section (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.47 to 1.89). However, women in the exercise group reported less pain during labour (mean difference: -0.6, 95% CI = -1.11 to -0.09). The two groups (moderate aquatic aerobic exercise versus usual antenatal care) showed no significant differences in maternal or newborn adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Aquatic aerobic exercise during pregnancy had no effect on the use of epidural analgesia during labour, whereas pain perception was lower after aquatic exercise compared to usual care in pregnancy. The intervention was safe for pregnant women and their newborns.

A systematic review of quantitative bias analysis applied to epidemiological research

BACKGROUND

Quantitative bias analysis (QBA) measures study errors in terms of direction, magnitude and uncertainty. This systematic review aimed to describe how QBA has been applied in epidemiological research in 2006-19.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for English peer-reviewed studies applying QBA to real-data applications. We also included studies citing selected sources or which were identified in a previous QBA review in pharmacoepidemiology. For each study, we extracted the rationale, methodology, bias-adjusted results and interpretation and assessed factors associated with reproducibility.

RESULTS

Of the 238 studies, the majority were embedded within papers whose main inferences were drawn from conventional approaches as secondary (sensitivity) analyses to quantity-specific biases (52%) or to assess the extent of bias required to shift the point estimate to the null (25%); 10% were standalone papers. The most common approach was probabilistic (57%). Misclassification was modelled in 57%, uncontrolled confounder(s) in 40% and selection bias in 17%. Most did not consider multiple biases or correlations between errors. When specified, bias parameters came from the literature (48%) more often than internal validation studies (29%). The majority (60%) of analyses resulted in >10% change from the conventional point estimate; however, most investigators (63%) did not alter their original interpretation. Degree of reproducibility related to inclusion of code, formulas, sensitivity analyses and supplementary materials, as well as the QBA rationale.

CONCLUSIONS

QBA applications were rare though increased over time. Future investigators should reference good practices and include details to promote transparency and to serve as a reference for other researchers.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes from a comparison of spontaneous and directed pushing in second stage

AIM

To compare the effect of directed or spontaneous maternal pushing effort on duration of second stage labour, perineal injury and neonatal condition at birth.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional design provided data for term women with singleton, cephalic presentation experiencing a non-operative vaginal birth without regional analgesia from January 2011 to December 2017 (n=69,066) Participants matching the inclusion criteria (n=19,212) were grouped based upon spontaneous or directed pushing. Propensity score matching was used to select equally sized cohorts of similar characteristics (n=10,000). The associations with outcomes of interest were estimated using odds ratios obtained by multivariate analysis.

FINDINGS

Directed pushing was associated with a longer duration of second stage labour for nulliparous (mean 14.4min [12.0-16.8]) and multiparous (mean 8.0min [6.8-9.2]) women, and an increased risk of prolonged 2nd stage of labour in multiparous women. The use of episiotomy in the directed pushing group was significantly higher both prior to and following PS matching and adjustment. Directed pushing was also associated with an significantly increased risk of neonatal resuscitation and nursery admission. There was no difference in rates of Apgar <7 recorded at 5min of age.

CONCLUSION

Directed pushing is associated with an increased duration of second stage labour and risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Our study suggests that in the absence of regional analgesia women should be supported to follow their own expulsive urges.

Barriers and facilitators to birth without epidural in a tertiary obstetric referral center: Perspectives of health care professionals and patients

BACKGROUND

Epidural rates are high in tertiary obstetric referral centers, even though many patients in tertiary settings might not want or need epidural analgesia. Epidural rates are influenced by factors including labor support and routine medical intervention. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to birth without epidural in a Canadian tertiary center, from the perspectives of doctors, nurses, and patients.

METHODS

In this qualitative exploratory study, individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2016 with 5 doctors, 5 nurses, and 4 patients who intended to birth without epidural. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive qualitative thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Several contextual factors in the tertiary center facilitated or were barriers to birth without epidural. The following themes emerged: (1) differing perceptions of pain, (2) being ready for things to go wrong, (3) labor support is more labor intensive, and (4) having insufficient resources for birth without epidural.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconciling patient birth goals with staff focus on patient safety is challenging in the tertiary context. Discrepancies between health care professional and patient attitudes about childbirth pain may influence decision-making about epidural use. Maintaining labor support skills is challenging for health care professionals who have limited exposure to birth without epidural. There is a need to allocate dedicated resources to better support birth without epidural. Specifically, support could be improved through the implementation of guidelines for assessment and management of labor pain, provision of a variety of pain management options, and labor support training for health care professionals.

Effectiveness and safety of moderate-intensity aerobic water exercise during pregnancy for reducing use of epidural analgesia during labor: protocol for a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Epidural analgesia during labor can provide effective pain relief, but can also lead to adverse effects. The practice of moderate exercise during pregnancy is associated with an increased level of endorphins in the blood, and this could also provide pain relief during labor. Aerobic water exercises, rather than other forms of exercise, do not negatively impact articulations, reduce edema, blood pressure, and back pain, and increase diuresis. We propose a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a moderate water exercise program during pregnancy on the need for epidural analgesia during labor.

METHODS

A multi-center, parallel, randomized, evaluator blinded, controlled trial in a primary care setting. We will randomised 320 pregnant women (14 to 20 weeks gestation) who have low risk of complications to a moderate water exercise program or usual care.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this research will contribute toward understanding of the effects of a physical exercise program on pain and the need for analgesia during labor.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN Registry identifier: 14097513 register on 04 September 2017. Retrospectively registered.

The Effect of Epidural-Spinal Anesthesia on Labor Outcome and Satisfaction in Parturient Mothers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction: One of the health system concerns is the use of medications for pain relief during labor and its side effects. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of epiduralspinal anesthesia (combined anesthesia [CA]) on labor outcome and satisfaction in pregnant women. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial study, we included 80 nulliparous women who had been admitted to Fatemieh hospital (Hamadan, Iran) during 2015-2016 due to spontaneous onset of labor. They were randomly assigned into 2 groups of 40, one group with CA versus normal vaginal delivery (NVD) group. Data were collected by using of demographic questionnaire, satisfaction questionnaire, and baby truck scales. Data were analyzed by descriptive and analytical statistics in SPSS version 16.0. Results: Average maternal age (mean ± SD) in the CA group was 26.94 ± 4.34 and in the NVD group was 25.89 ±5.18, respectively. There was a significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of length of second stage of labor (P=0.001), headache (P=0.04), and Apgar score (first minute) (P=0.001). Chi-square test showed a significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of satisfaction with childbirth (P=0.004). Conclusion: In this study, labor pain relief by using the spinal-epidural anesthesia (CA) increased the labor satisfaction. Nevertheless, this approach was associated with some maternal and neonatal complications such as: headaches, length of third stage of labor, and low Apgar score. It seems that the use of this method for painless delivery requires further studies.

Maternal Body Mass Index and Regional Anaesthesia Use at Term: Prevalence and Complications

BACKGROUND

There is an evidence gap regarding the use of regional anaesthesia (epidural, spinal, or combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia) and associated complications by maternal body mass index (BMI). We examine associations between regional anaesthesia, mode of delivery, and regional anaesthesia complications by pre-pregnancy BMI categories among term deliveries.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of births in California, 2007-2010, utilizing linked birth certificate data and patient discharge data. Outcomes were mode of delivery (among laboured deliveries) and select regional anaesthesia complications. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to adjust for maternal characteristics.

RESULTS

In women undergoing labour (i.e. laboured delivery), women with higher BMI categories were more likely to receive regional analgesia in a dose-response fashion (adjusted risk ratio [RR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10, 1.11 for primiparous women with category I obesity), and in those receiving regional anaesthesia, were less likely to deliver vaginally (e.g. RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.84, 0.85 for the same category of women). Regional anaesthesia complications displayed a complex relationship with maternal BMI, with women in intermediate obesity categories having decreased odds as compared to normal-weight women, and women in the highest BMI category having a twofold increased risk of complications (RR 2.34, 95% CI 1.37, 4.02 for primiparous women).

CONCLUSION

Labouring women in higher BMI categories were more likely to receive regional anaesthesia and more likely to deliver via caesarean compared to normal weight women and women without regional anaesthesia. Rates of anaesthesia complications were highest among women in the highest BMI category.

O uso de analgesia farmacológica influencia no desfecho de parto?

Resumo Objetivo: Investigar associação entre analgesia farmacológica e desfechos do parto. Métodos: Estudo transversal que utilizou amostra representativa dos partos realizados em 2013, em uma maternidade de Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais. Foram incluídos dados de 978 partos, excluindo-se as cesarianas eletivas. A exposição principal foi o uso de analgesia farmacológica durante o trabalho de parto e o desfecho classificado como parto vaginal, vaginal instrumentalizado e cesariana. Verificou-se a associação entre analgesia e os desfechos do parto por meio de regressão logística multinominal para obter as estimativas de Odds Ratio (OR) com seus respectivos intervalos de 95% de confiança, e o modelo final foi ajustado por idade da mulher, número de partos anteriores, presença de acompanhante ou doula e dilatação cervical no momento da analgesia. Resultados: Do total de nascimentos, 87,1% foram vaginais e 12,9% cesariana. A prevalência do uso de analgesia farmacológica foi 34,2% e do parto instrumentalizado de 8,4%. Cerca de 70% das mulheres tiveram gestação de risco habitual. Mesmo após ajuste por confundidores, o uso da analgesia aumentou em 3,5 vezes a chance de parto instrumentalizado (p<0,0001) e para as mulheres com gestação de alto risco esse aumento foi ainda superior (OR=4,62; p<0,0001). Não houve associação do uso da analgesia com a cesariana (p=0,320). Conclusão: O uso de analgesia farmacológica modifica o desfecho do parto, aumentando as chances de parto instrumentalizado, principalmente em mulheres com gravidez de alto risco. Nesse contexto considera-se importante orientar as mulheres quanto aos potenciais riscos e benefícios da analgesia para uma escolha segura.

Factors influencing midwives' use of an evidenced based Normal Birth Guideline

Problem or issue

Rates of elective and unplanned caesarean section continue to increase in high income countries. Evidence-based clinical guidelines aim to promote and support normal birth but are rarely evaluated.

What is already known

The Queensland Normal Birth Guideline was developed in consultation with stakeholders and disseminated to public and private hospitals and released in 2012. Impact of the Guideline on practice has not been investigated.

What this paper adds

Although most midwives (90%) were aware of the guideline, only 71% reported that it routinely guided practice.

Probabilistic bias analysis in pharmacoepidemiology and comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review

PURPOSE

We systematically reviewed pharmacoepidemiologic and comparative effectiveness studies that use probabilistic bias analysis to quantify the effects of systematic error including confounding, misclassification, and selection bias on study results.

METHODS

We found articles published between 2010 and October 2015 through a citation search using Web of Science and Google Scholar and a keyword search using PubMed and Scopus. Eligibility of studies was assessed by one reviewer. Three reviewers independently abstracted data from eligible studies.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies used probabilistic bias analysis and were eligible for data abstraction-nine simulated an unmeasured confounder and six simulated misclassification. The majority of studies simulating an unmeasured confounder did not specify the range of plausible estimates for the bias parameters. Studies simulating misclassification were in general clearer when reporting the plausible distribution of bias parameters. Regardless of the bias simulated, the probability distributions assigned to bias parameters, number of simulated iterations, sensitivity analyses, and diagnostics were not discussed in the majority of studies.

CONCLUSION

Despite the prevalence and concern of bias in pharmacoepidemiologic and comparative effectiveness studies, probabilistic bias analysis to quantitatively model the effect of bias was not widely used. The quality of reporting and use of this technique varied and was often unclear. Further discussion and dissemination of the technique are warranted. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Effect of antenatal education in small classes versus standard auditorium-based lectures on use of pain relief during labour and of obstetric interventions: results from the randomised NEWBORN trial

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of an antenatal education programme in small classes versus standard auditorium-based lectures.

DESIGN

Randomised trial using random-generated web-based 1:1 allocation.

SETTING

The largest birth site in the Capital Region of Denmark, from August 2012 to May 2014.

PARTICIPANTS

1766 pregnant women. Inclusion criteria ≥18 years, pregnant with a single child, and able to speak and understand Danish. Women were enrolled in the trial from 10+0 to 20+0 weeks of gestation.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention programme consisted of three times 2.5 hours of antenatal education in small classes (n=6-8 women), and focused on improving information and problem-solving skills for expectant parents in order to ease birth and the transition to parenthood. The control group received standard auditorium-based lectures consisting of two times 2 hours in an auditorium with participation of ∼250 people.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary trial outcome was use of epidural analgesia. Other types of pain relief and obstetric interventions were analysed as explorative outcomes.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in use of epidural analgesia between participants in the intervention group (30.9%) versus the control group (29.1%), adjusted OR 1.10 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.34). Also, the two groups did not differ regarding other types of pain relief or obstetric interventions. Concomitant birth preparation was common in both groups and highest in the control group, but did not seem to influence our results noticeably.

CONCLUSIONS

Antenatal education in small groups versus standard auditorium-based lectures did not differ regarding use of epidural analgesia, other pain relief, or obstetric interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01672437; Results.

Epidurals: Do They or Don't They Increase Cesareans?

The controversy over whether epidurals increase the risk of cesarean has raged since the 1970s. This article provides a history of of the early observational research designed to answer this question and an in-depth analysis of the most recent randomized control trials. Based on the research, the author concludes that we cannot assure women that epidurals do not increase the risk of cesarean.