Efficacy of stimulus intensity increases and decreases as inhibitors of the acoustic startle response

In the spotlight: How the brainstem modulates information flow

OBJECTIVE

The blink reflex (BR) to supraorbital nerve (SON) stimulation is reduced by either a low-intensity prepulse stimulus to digital nerves (prepulse inhibition, PPI) or a conditioning SON stimulus (SON_-1) of the same intensity as the test (SON_-2) stimulus (paired-pulse paradigm). We studied how PPI affects BR excitability recovery (BRER) to paired SON stimulation.

METHODS

Electrical prepulses were applied to the index finger 100 ms before SON_-1, which was followed by SON_-2 at interstimulus intervals (ISI) of 100, 300, or 500 ms.

RESULTS

BRs to SON_-1 showed PPI proportional to prepulse intensity, but this did not affect BRER at any ISI. PPI was observed on the BR to SON_-2 only when additional prepulses were applied 100 ms before SON_-2, regardless of the size of BRs to SON_-1.

CONCLUSIONS

In BR paired-pulse paradigms, the size of the response to SON_-2 is not determined by the size of the response to SON_-1. PPI does not leave any trace of inhibitory activity after it is enacted.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our data demonstrate that BR response size to SON_-2 depends on SON_-1 stimulus intensity and not SON_-1 response size, an observation that calls for further physiological studies and cautions against unanimous clinical applicability of BRER curves.

The gap prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle (GPIAS) paradigm to assess auditory temporal processing: Monaural versus binaural presentation

The Gap Prepulse Inhibition of the Acoustic Startle Reflex (GPIAS) is a paradigm used to assess auditory temporal processing in both animals and humans. It consists of the presentation of a silent gap embedded in noise and presented a few milliseconds before a startle sound. The silent gap produces the inhibition of the startle reflex, a phenomenon called gap-prepulse inhibition (GPI). This paradigm is also used to detect tinnitus in animal models. The lack of inhibition by the silent gaps is suggested to be indicative of the presence of tinnitus "filling-in" the gaps. The current research aims at improving the GPIAS technique by comparing the GPI produced by monaural versus binaural silent gaps in 29 normal-hearing subjects. Two gap durations (5 or 50 ms), each embedded in two different frequency backgrounds (centered around 500 or 4 kHz). Both low- and high- frequency narrowband noises had a bandwidth of half an octave. Overall, the startle magnitude was greater for the binaural versus the monaural presentation, which might reflect binaural loudness summation. In addition, the GPI was similar between the monaural and the binaural presentations for the high-frequency background noise. However, the GPI was greater for the low-frequency background noise for the binaural, compared to the monaural, presentation. These findings suggest that monaural GPIAS might be more suited to detect tinnitus compared to the binaural presentation.

Multi-sensory (auditory and somatosensory) pre-pulse inhibition in mice

We investigated the perception of two mechanoreceptive modalities alone and in combination: main effects and interaction between auditory and somatosensory stimulation in mice. Fifteen C57BL/6J mice between the ages of 1 and 6 months were tested three times each. Experimental design roughly followed published procedures using pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response, except pre-pulses included vibration of the test chamber as well as soft sounds. Auditory pre-pulses were 80 dB broadband noises of 4, 9, 25, or 45 ms duration. Vibrations were of the same duration but of different frequencies (500, 460, 360, and 220 Hz). Pre-pulse inhibition increased with duration of the auditory pre-pulses, as expected. There was significant PPI to some but not all vibrotactile pre-pulses. Multimodal PPI was approximately additive (no significant auditory-by-somatosensory interaction). PPI increased more with age to somatosensory than to auditory pre-pulses. Future studies of multi-modal psychophysics in various mouse mutants could lend support to more mechanistic studies of neural specificity and possibly autism, tinnitus, and PTSD.