Effects of respiratory phases on the processing of emotional and non-emotional visual stimuli

The timing of sleep spindles is modulated by the respiratory cycle in humans

OBJECTIVE

Coupling of sleep spindles with cortical slow waves and hippocampus sharp-waves ripples is crucial for sleep-related memory consolidation. Recent literature evidenced that nasal respiration modulates neural activity in large-scale brain networks. In rodents, this respiratory drive strongly varies according to vigilance states. Whether sleep oscillations are also respiration-modulated in humans remains open. In this work, we investigated the influence of breathing on sleep spindles during non-rapid-eye-movement sleep in humans.

METHODS

Full night polysomnography of twenty healthy participants were analysed. Spindles and slow waves were automatically detected during N2 and N3 stages. Spindle-related sigma power as well as spindle and slow wave events were analysed according to the respiratory phase.

RESULTS

We found a significant coupling between both slow and fast spindles and the respiration cycle, with enhanced sigma activity and occurrence probability of spindles during the middle part of the expiration phase. A different coupling was observed for slow waves negative peaks which were rather distributed around the two respiration phase transitions.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that breathing cycle influences the dynamics of brain activity during non-rapid-eye-movement sleep.

SIGNIFICANCE

This coupling may enable sleep spindles to synchronize with other sleep oscillations and facilitate information transfer between distributed brain networks.

Effects of the cardiac cycle on auditory processing: A preregistered study on mismatch negativity

The systolic and diastolic phases of the cardiac cycle are known to affect perception and cognition differently. Higher order processing tends to be facilitated at systole, whereas sensory processing of external stimuli tends to be impaired at systole compared to diastole. The current study aims to examine whether the cardiac cycle affects auditory deviance detection, as reflected in the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the event-related brain potential (ERP). We recorded the intensity deviance response to deviant tones (70 dB) presented among standard tones (60 or 80 dB, depending on blocks) and calculated the MMN by subtracting standard ERP waveforms from deviant ERP waveforms. We also assessed intensity-dependent N1 and P2 amplitude changes by subtracting ERPs elicited by soft standard tones (60 dB) from ERPs elicited by loud standard tones (80 dB). These subtraction methods were used to eliminate phase-locked cardiac-related electric artifacts that overlap auditory ERPs. The endogenous MMN was expected to be larger at systole, reflecting the facilitation of memory-based auditory deviance detection, whereas the exogenous N1 and P2 would be smaller at systole, reflecting impaired exteroceptive sensory processing. However, after the elimination of cardiac-related artifacts, there were no significant differences between systole and diastole in any ERP components. The intensity-dependent N1 and P2 amplitude changes were not obvious in either cardiac phase, probably because of the short interstimulus intervals. The lack of a cardiac phase effect on MMN amplitude suggests that preattentive auditory processing may not be affected by bodily signals from the heart.

Phase-locked breathing does not affect episodic visual recognition memory but does shape its corresponding ERPs

Recent studies have indicated that breathing shapes the underlying oscillatory brain activity critical for episodic memory, potentially impacting memory performance. However, the literature has presented conflicting results, with some studies suggesting that nasal inhalation enhances visual memory performance, while others have failed to observe any significant effects. Furthermore, the specific influence of breathing route (nasal vs. mouth) and the precise phase of the respiratory cycle during which stimuli are presented have remained elusive. To address this, we employed a visual recognition memory (VRM) and electroencephalography paradigm in which stimuli presentation was phase-locked to either inhalation or exhalation onset, using a within-subject design where participants performed the memory task while engaging in separate sessions of nose and mouth breathing. We show that neither breathing route nor breathing phase has a significant impact on VRM performance as measured by d-prime, with the data supporting the null hypothesis. However, we did find an effect of breathing phase on response bias, with participants adopting a more conservative decision criterion during exhalation. Moreover, we found that breathing phase during memory encoding shaped the late parietal effect (LPE) amplitude, while the Frontal Negative Component (FN400) and LPE during recognition were less impacted. While our study demonstrates that breathing does not shape VRM performance, it shows that it influences brain activity, reinforcing the importance of further research to elucidate the extent of respiratory influence on perception, cognition, and behavior.