Sperm preparation through Sephadex™ filtration improves in vitro fertilization rate of buffalo oocytes

Filtration techniques are advantageous over colloidal centrifugation in improving freezability of low-quality buffalo bull (Bubalus bubalis) ejaculates

The study compared efficacy of three sperm selection techniques in improving freezability of low-quality Murrah buffalo bull ejaculates. Sephadex (SEP), Sephadex ion-exchange filtration (SIE), and 40/80% BoviPure™ (BP) gradient centrifugation protocols were standardized (ejaculates, n = 24). In Experiment-I, Sephadex G-75, G-100, and combined Sephadex G (75-100) column filtrates were compared. In Experiment-II, BP protocols: 200 g-10 min, 250 g-5, and 10 min, 300 g-10, and 15 min were compared. In fresh semen, Sephadex G (75-100) filtration and 250 g-5 min BP protocol improved sperm functions and were used in Experiment-III, where SEP G (75-100), SIE G (75-100), and 250 g-5 min BP processed ejaculates (n = 48) were cryopreserved and compared at post-thaw stage. The mean recovery rate differed in order: SEP > SIE > BP. SIE filtration significantly improved progressive motility, livability, membrane integrity, bovine cervical mucus penetration and live non-apoptotic sperm. Compared with control, all three techniques equally reduced post-dilution and post-thaw lipid peroxidation (LPO) rate. SEP post-thaw filtrates observed lower cryocapacitation-like changes, LPO (C11-BODIPY581/591), and higher active mitochondria than other treatments. SIE and SEP equally improved post-thaw acrosome-intact sperm over BP. Filtration techniques, preferably, Sephadex ion-exchange filtration can most efficiently process low-quality buffalo bull ejaculates for cryopreservation and improve freezability.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of spermatozoa cryopreservation, in vitro and in vivo fertility practices in water buffalo

We explored different aspects of buffalo spermatozoa during cryopreservation. The meta-data comprised of 285 studies, published from January 2008 to March 2020. A free web tool CADIMA as well as PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram were used for carrying out this study. The inter-reviewer agreement among studies allocated was satisfactory for criteria A (selection bias), B (performance bias), C (detection bias) and D (attrition bias), respectively. India led the percent (%) research ladder with 34.4, followed by Pakistan (29.5), Egypt (12.3), Iran (7.7), Italy (5.6), Indonesia (3.2), China (2.1), Brazil (1.4), Thailand (1.1), Philippines and Bulgaria (0.7 each), Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Vietnam, and USA (0.4 each). Among four categories of studies, Group-1 evaluated only supplements/additives/media in the freezing semen extender (n = 191/285; 67.02%); Group-2 conducted in vivo fertilization (n = 62/285; 21.75%) and Group-3 conducted in vitro fertilization/ cleavage rate/penetration rate/ blastocyst yields (n = 28/285; 9.82%) with their specific cryodiluents/media, respectively. Group-4 conducted different experimental supplements/additives/media and carried out both in vitro and in vivo fertilization simultaneously (n = 4/285; 1.40%). Conventional spermatozoa cryopreservation was reported by 51.9% studies followed by programmable fast freezing by 20.7% studies. A few leading extender types included BioXcell (3.9%); Soyamilk-skim (3.5%); and Andromed (2.1%). The study also describes French straws for semen filling, cooling temperatures, extension time, equilibration time, cryopreservation stages, thawing temperatures, seasons, thawing time, and stains used during semen evaluation assays. The study concludes that the research on spermatozoa cryopreservation of buffalo is largely conducted at quality level and a need of applying these findings for evaluation of fertility potential (in vivo and in vitro) is indispensable for effective genetic improvement.

Advances and challenges in genetic technologies to produce single-sex litters

There is currently a requirement for single-sex litters for many applications, including agriculture, pest control, and reducing animal culling in line with the 3Rs principles: Reduction, Replacement, and Refinement. The advent of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing presents a new opportunity with which to potentially generate all-female or all-male litters. We review some of the historical nongenetic strategies employed to generate single-sex litters and investigate how genetic and genome editing techniques are currently being used to produce all-male or all-female progeny. Lastly, we speculate on future technologies for generating single-sex litters and the possible associated challenges.