Combined use of fractional exhaled nitric oxide and bronchodilator response in predicting future loss of asthma control among children with atopic asthma

Objective monitoring tools for improved management of childhood asthma

Asthma is a common chronic disease amongst children. Epidemiological studies showed that the mortality rate of asthma in children is still high worldwide. Asthma control is therefore essential to minimize asthma exacerbations, which can be fatal if the condition is poorly controlled. Frequent monitoring could help to detect asthma progression and ensure treatment effectiveness. Although subjective asthma monitoring tools are available, the results vary as they rely on patients' self-perception. Emerging evidence suggests several objective tools could have the potential for monitoring purposes. However, there is no consensus to standardise the use of objective monitoring tools. In this review, we start with the prevalence and severity of childhood asthma worldwide. Then, we detail the latest available objective monitoring tools, focusing on their effectiveness in paediatric asthma management. Publications of spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), hyperresponsiveness tests and electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) between 2016 and 2023 were included. The potential advantages and limitations of each tool were also discussed. Overall, this review provides a summary for researchers dedicated to further improving objective paediatric asthma monitoring and provides insights for clinicians to incorporate different objective monitoring tools in clinical practices.

Update on the Role of FeNO in Asthma Management

Asthma is a heterogenous disorder characterized by presence of different phenotypes and endotypes. Up to 10% of the individuals suffer from severe asthma and are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a cost-effective, point of care biomarker that is used to detect type 2 airway inflammation. Guidelines have proposed to measure FeNO as an adjunct to diagnostic evaluation in individuals with suspected asthma and to monitor airway inflammation. FeNO has lower sensitivity, suggesting that it may not be a good biomarker to rule out asthma. FeNO may also be used to predict response to inhaled corticosteroids, predict adherence and deciding on biologic therapy. Higher levels of FeNO have been associated with lower lung function and increased risk for future asthma exacerbations and its predictive value increases when combined with other standard measurements of asthma assessment.

Effects of the salbutamol bronchodilator response on measurements of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in children with asthma: a prospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

Salbutamol bronchodilator response (BDR) test and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) have been recommended for the diagnosis of asthma in children, but FeNO levels is affected by many factors. Nonetheless, data of the effect on the FeNO values throughout the bronchodilator test and the differences in FeNO values between BDR positive (BDR+) and negative (BDR-) children with asthma are still limited. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the BDR test on FeNO and the differences in FeNO levels between BDR+ and BDR- children with asthma.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study performed over a 5-month period (December 2018 to April 2019) and involved 57 children with asthma. The FeNO levels at pre-spirometry, post-spirometry, and post-salbutamol BDR testing were estimated. Finally, the children were divided into two groups i.e., BDR+ and BDR-, and differences in the FeNO levels were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The spirometry results were normal in 2 patients (3.5%). There were 53 (93%) patients with obstructive lung disease, including 40 (70.2%), 11 (19.3%), and 2 (3.5%) patients with mild, moderate, and severe obstruction, respectively. The remaining two patients had mixed lesions (3.5%), none of which were restrictive. The baseline median FeNO levels were significantly higher in the BDR+ group than in the BDR- group [33.00 (23.78, 46.73) vs. 23.00 (9.80, 37.80), (P=0.048)]. Following spirometry, there was a statistically significant decrease in median FeNO levels from baseline to post-spirometry (P=0.002). However, there was no significant difference between the median FeNO levels at baseline and following the BDR test (P=0.976). The impact of spirometry on FeNO was not statistically different in BDR+ versus BDR- children (Z=-0.186, P=0.853); however, the impact of bronchodilators on FeNO exhibited a statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z=3.160, P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed dynamic changes in the FeNO levels during the BDR test. The use of a bronchodilator results in a statistically significant difference in FeNO levels between BDR+ and BDR- children with asthma. Moreover, spirometry leads to a marked decrease in the FeNO levels. Our results will allow clinicians to better interpret FeNO, BDR and pulmonary function outcomes and better develop clinical protocols.

Association of comorbidities and medications with risk of asthma exacerbation in pediatric patients: a retrospective study using Japanese claims data

Asthma exacerbation impairs the quality of life of pediatric patients and negatively impacts future respiratory function and health economics. Several risk factors associated with exacerbations have been identified; however, most studies report the risk of each factor. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the risk of each factor and a combination of factors. We performed a retrospective cohort study using Japanese claims data and extracted factors associated with exacerbations using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and stepwise method. Risk scores were then calculated from the extracted factors and validated by tenfold cross validation. Of the 1,748,111 asthma patients in the database, the data of 14,980 were extracted, and 1988 (13.3%) had exacerbation. Factors associated with asthma exacerbation were age of 3–5 years, exacerbation history before cohort entry date, allergic rhinitis, chronic sinusitis, otitis externa, blepharitis, upper respiratory infections, urticaria, LTRA prescription, were determined. A four-level risk score was calculated from 9-factors and the AUC derived from cross validation was 0.700. Most factors extracted in our study are consistent with those of previous studies. We showed that combining each factor is more helpful in assessing the increased risk of asthma exacerbation than assessing each factor alone.

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide as a determinant for the clinical course of asthma: a systematic review

Background: Precision medicine means linking the right patient to the right management strategy including best possible pharmacological therapy, considering the individual variability of the disease characteristics, type of inflammation, genes, environment, and lifestyle. For heterogenous diseases such as asthma, reliable biomarkers are needed to facilitate the best possible disease control and reduce the risk of side effects. The present review examines fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) as a guide for the management strategy of asthma and predictor of its clinical course.

Method: The literature included was identified by searching the PubMed database using specific key words and MeSH terms. Studies were not excluded based on their design alone. The search resulted in 212 hits, of which 35 articles were included in this review.

Results: Several studies support a potential role for high FeNO levels as a prognostic biomarker for accelerated lung function decline in adults with newly diagnosed asthma. Furthermore, studies report an association between high FeNO levels and excess decline in FEV₁ in adults with long-standing moderate to severe asthma despite optimised therapy, whereas the findings for patients with less severe disease are conflicting. Applying a FeNO-based management algorithm reduces the exacerbation rate in adults with asthma. Similar observations are seen in children, though based on fewer studies. The available studies provide evidence that the level of FeNO may be useful as a predictor of subsequent loss of asthma control in adults, though the evidence is somewhat conflicting in children and young adults.

Conclusion: The present review provides evidence of the prognostic value of FeNO as a surrogate biomarker for type 2 inflammation in the airways. FeNO is likely to emerge as an important biomarker in monitoring and tailoring modern asthma treatment, either alone or in combination with other biomarkers.

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FENO) in the management of asthma: a position paper of the Italian Respiratory Society (SIP/IRS) and Italian Society of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC)

Asthma prevalence in Italy is on the rise and is estimated to be over 6% of the general population. The diagnosis of asthma can be challenging and elusive, especially in children and the last two decades has brought evidences that asthma is not a single disease but consists of various phenotypes. Symptoms can be underestimated by the patient or underreported to the clinician and physical signs can be scanty. Usual objective measures, like spirometry, are necessary but sometimes not significant. Despite proper treatment, asthma can be a very severe condition (even leading to death), however new drugs have recently become available which can be very effective in its control. Since asthma is currently thought to be caused by inflammation, a direct measure of the latter can be of paramount importance. For this purpose, the measurement of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FE_NO) has been used since the early years of the current century as a non-invasive, easy-to-assess tool useful for diagnosing and managing asthma. This SIP-IRS/SIAAIC Position Paper is a narrative review which summarizes the evidence behind the usefulness of FE_NO in the diagnosis, management and phenotypization of asthma.

Bronchodilator Response Assessed by the Forced Oscillation Technique Identifies Poor Asthma Control With Greater Sensitivity Than Spirometry

BACKGROUND

Persistent bronchodilator response (BDR) following diagnosis of asthma is an underrecognized treatable trait, associated with worse lung function and asthma control. The forced oscillation technique (FOT) measures respiratory system impedance, and BDR cutoffs have been proposed for healthy adults; however, the relevance in asthma is unknown. We compared BDR cutoffs, using FOT and spirometry, in asthma and the relationship with asthma control.

METHODS

Data from patients with asthma who withheld bronchodilator medication for at least 8 h before a tertiary airway clinic visit were reviewed. All subjects performed FOT and spirometry before and after salbutamol administration, and completed the Asthma Control Test. FOT parameters examined included respiratory system resistance (R5) and reactance (X5) at 5 Hz, and area under the reactance curve (AX). BDR was defined by standard recommendations for spirometry and based on the 95th percentile of BDR in healthy adults for FOT.

RESULTS

Fifty-two subjects (18 men; mean age, 53 ± 18 years) were included. BDR was identified more frequently by FOT than spirometry (54% vs 27% of subjects). BDR assessed by X5 and AX, but not R5, was associated with spirometric BDR (χ², P < .01) and correlated with asthma control (X5: r_s = -0.36, P < .01; AX: r_s = 0.34, P = .01). BDR measured by reactance parameters identified more subjects with poor asthma control than did spirometry (AX, 69% vs spirometry, 41%).

CONCLUSIONS

BDR assessed by FOT can identify poor asthma control. Reactance parameters were more sensitive in identifying poor asthma control than spirometry, supporting the use of FOT to complement spirometry in the clinical management of asthma.

Comparison of fractional exhaled nitric oxide, spirometry, and Asthma Control Test, in predicting asthma exacerbations: A prospective cohort study

Context

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a noninvasive test for airway inflammation in asthma. The usefulness of FeNO in predicting exacerbations is uncertain.

Aims

The study aims to assess and compare the ability of FeNO, spirometry, and asthma control test (ACT) in predicting future exacerbations of asthma and their correlation with each other.

Settings and Design

This prospective, cohort study was conducted at the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal.

Materials and Methods

Adult asthma patients of age 18-65 years were included. Patients with a smoking history of >10 pack-years and those in whom spirometry was contraindicated were excluded. Patients who consented underwent FeNO and spirometry. The control of asthma was assessed using the ACT questionnaire. We captured the number of exacerbations in the follow-up period of 4 months.

Statistical Analysis Used

Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the utility of FeNO, spirometry, ACT in predicting exacerbations and Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to ascertain the correlation among them.

Results

Of 154 study patients, 28% had exacerbations. We found that there was no significant difference in FeNO in patients with and without exacerbations. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) FEV1% in the patients with and without exacerbations were 68 (55-79) and 75 (65-88), respectively (P = 0.013). The median (IQR) ACT score in patients with exacerbations was 12 (10-16) which was significantly lower than in those without exacerbation in whom it was 16 (14-18) (P = 0.003). There was a negative correlation of ACT with FeNO (Correlation coefficient: -0.167, P = 0.038). The median (IQR) FeNO level (ppb) was lower in patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) than in the other group values being 22 (14-38) and 30 (17-58), respectively (P = 0.05).

Conclusions

In our study, FEV1% and ACT score could predict exacerbations of asthma whereas FeNO could not. FeNO level correlated inversely with ACT score. FeNO level decreased with inhaled corticosteroid usage.

Clinical significance of the bronchodilator response in children with severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to determine those characteristics associated with reversibility of airflow obstruction and response to maximal bronchodilation in children with severe asthma through the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP).

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis evaluating children ages 6 to 17 years with nonsevere asthma (NSA) and severe asthma (SA). Participants underwent spirometry before and after 180 µg of albuterol to determine reversibility (≥12% increase in FEV₁ ). Participants were then given escalating doses up to 720 µg of albuterol to determine their maximum reversibility.

RESULTS

We evaluated 230 children (n = 129 SA, n = 101 NSA) from five centers across the United States in the SARP I and II cohorts. SA (odds ratio [OR], 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-4.13), second-hand smoke exposure (OR, 2.81, 95%CI, 1.23-6.43), and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO; OR, 1.97, 95%CI, 1.35-2.87) were associated with increased odds of airway reversibility after maximal bronchodilation, while higher prebronchodilator (BD) FEV₁ % predicted (OR, 0.91, 95%CI, 0.88-0.94) was associated with decreased odds. In an analysis using the SARP III cohort (n = 186), blood neutrophils, immunoglobulin E (IgE), and FEV₁ % predicted were significantly associated with BD reversibility. In addition, children with BD response have greater healthcare utilization. BD reversibility was associated with reduced lung function at enrollment and 1-year follow-up though less decline in lung function over 1 year compared to those without reversibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung function, that is FEV₁ % predicted, is a predictor of BD response in children with asthma. Additionally, smoke exposure, higher FeNO or IgE level, and low peripheral blood neutrophils are associated with a greater likelihood of BD reversibility. BD response can identify a phenotype of pediatric asthma associated with low lung function and poor asthma control.

Asthma control in children: Body plethysmography in addition to spirometry

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of agreement among measures of asthma control in children. In Central Europe, body plethysmography is additionally used for asthma monitoring. However, its value is still unclear.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the possible additional value of body plethysmographic measures (specific resistance, residual volume-total lung capacity ratio [RV/TLC]) compared with spirometric measures forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV ₁ ), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV ₁ /FVC, forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF _25-75 ), and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) for assessment of asthma control.

METHODS

One hundred and forty-five asthmatic children aged 5 to 17 were included. All children performed measurements of FeNO, spirometry, and body plethymography. Asthma control was assessed by the asthma control test (c-ACT/ACT) and a doctor's assessment of asthma control.

RESULTS

Investigating single lung function parameters, FEV₁ , FEV ₁ /FVC, FEF _25-75 and RV/TLC differed between controlled and partly controlled asthma. However, we found no differences between controlled and uncontrolled asthma with regard to single lung function parameters or for any parameter if investigated in a multivariable approach. This was also true if we combined obtained parameters from spirometry (comparing pathologic vs normal spirometry). Investigating the combination of body plethysmography and doctor's assessment of asthma control a significant association was found ( P = 0.02). Furthermore, combined spirometry and body plethysmography showed a significant association with both doctor's assessed asthma control ( P = 0.009) and the c-ACT/ACT ( P = 0.04). The addition of FeNO did not improve the results.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of body plethysmography and spirometry shows best agreement with asthma control in children compared with spirometry or body plethysmography alone. Further studies are needed to find out whether additional measurements of body plethysmography improve the outcome of children in asthma monitoring.

Exhaled and nasal nitric oxide measurement in the evaluation of chronic cough

Chronic cough is one of the most common and troublesome nonspecific respiratory symptom for which patients seek a general practitioner and specialist advice. It is conventionally defined as a cough lasting for more than 8 weeks. Exhaled nitric oxide has proven to be a specific biomarker capable to discriminate between differential diagnoses of chronic cough and simultaneously provide information about the response to specific treatment. In this review, we will discuss the potential use of exhaled and nasal nitric oxide in the diagnosis of chronic chough.

A Review of Pulmonary Toxicity of Electronic Cigarettes in the Context of Smoking: A Focus on Inflammation

The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) is increasing rapidly, but their effects on lung toxicity are largely unknown. Smoking is a well-established cause of lung cancer and respiratory disease, in part through inflammation. It is plausible that e-cig use might affect similar inflammatory pathways. E-cigs are used by some smokers as an aid for quitting or smoking reduction, and by never smokers (e.g., adolescents and young adults). The relative effects for impacting disease risk may differ for these groups. Cell culture and experimental animal data indicate that e-cigs have the potential for inducing inflammation, albeit much less than smoking. Human studies show that e-cig use in smokers is associated with substantial reductions in blood or urinary biomarkers of tobacco toxicants when completely switching and somewhat for dual use. However, the extent to which these biomarkers are surrogates for potential lung toxicity remains unclear. The FDA now has regulatory authority over e-cigs and can regulate product and e-liquid design features, such as nicotine content and delivery, voltage, e-liquid formulations, and flavors. All of these factors may impact pulmonary toxicity. This review summarizes current data on pulmonary inflammation related to both smoking and e-cig use, with a focus on human lung biomarkers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(8); 1175-91. ©2017 AACR.