Risk factors for pleural effusion recurrence in patients with malignancy

Lymph nodes rather than pleural metabolic activity in 18F-FDG PET/CT correlates with malignant pleural effusion recurrence in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Frequently recurrent malignant pleural effusion (MPE) significantly hampers the life quality of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We aimed to explore the effects of progression patterns and local intervention on MPE recurrence and apply fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to establish a predictive model for MPE recurrence in NSCLC.

Methods

We retrospectively recruited two cohorts of patients including treatment-naïve NSCLC diagnosed with MPE at the onset and receiving PET/CT scanning, as well as those with MPE and undergoing first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Pleural maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor burden (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and uptake patterns as well as SUVmax of lymph nodes (LN) were extracted. The primary outcome was MPE recurrence defined as re-accumulation of cytologically proven ipsilateral MPE. Step-wise multivariate Cox regression was used to identify candidate variables. Cox regression analysis and random survival forest were applied to establish models.

Results

A total of 148 treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-TKI treatment and MPE were recruited during the median follow-up period of 683 days, with 69 (46.6%) and 35 (23.6%) witnessing MPE recurrence at least once and twice. Intrapleural perfusion therapy at first recurrence was a protective factor for the second MPE recurrence (P=0.006), while intrapleural perfusion therapy at baseline could not benefit the first MPE recurrence (P=0.14). Conversely, prior systemic progression indicative of the change of systemic treatment was a protective factor for time to the first MPE recurrence (P<0.001); instead, the change of systemic treatment at the first MPE recurrence was not associated with second MPE recurrence (P=0.53). In another cohort with treatment-naïve NSCLC patients with MPE and PET/CT scanning, 103 patients regardless of the actionable mutation status were recruited during the median follow-up period of 304 days. Multivariate analysis suggested that the LN SUVmax >4.50 g/mL [hazard ratio (HR), 2.54; P=0.01], female gender (HR, 0.40; P=0.01), bone metastases (HR, 3.16; P=0.001), and systemic treatment (targeted therapy vs. chemotherapy: HR, 0.32; P=0.002; immunotherapy therapy vs. chemotherapy: HR, 0.99; P=0.97) could collectively indicate MPE recurrence with an optimal 300-day area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83. For patients with actionable mutation, LN SUVmax >4.50 g/mL (P=0.02) could forecast MPE recurrence independently.

Conclusions

In summary, LN rather than pleural metabolic activity or uptake patterns could predict MPE recurrence for patients with or without targeted therapy. We should re-consider the application of intrapleural perfusion treatment for first-onset MPE and prompt it more at the moment of recurrent MPE. Promisingly, we could probably apply the non-invasive tool to identify the risk factors for MPE recurrence.

Single-cell transcriptomics reveal metastatic CLDN4+ cancer cells underlying the recurrence of malignant pleural effusion in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Recurrent malignant pleural effusion (MPE) resulting from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is easily refractory to conventional therapeutics and lacks predictive markers. The cellular or genetic signatures of recurrent MPE still remain largely uncertain.

METHODS

16 NSCLC patients with pleural effusions were recruited, followed by corresponding treatments based on primary tumours. Non-recurrent or recurrent MPE was determined after 3-6 weeks of treatments. The status of MPE was verified by computer tomography (CT) and cytopathology, and the baseline pleural fluids were collected for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Samples were then integrated and profiled. Cellular communications and trajectories were inferred by bioinformatic algorithms. Comparative analysis was conducted and the results were further validated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in a larger MPE cohort from the authors' centre (n = 64).

RESULTS

The scRNA-seq revealed that 33 590 cells were annotated as 7 major cell types and further characterized into 14 cell clusters precisely. The cell cluster C1, classified as Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EpCAM)+ metastatic cancer cell and correlated with activation of tight junction and adherence junction, was significantly enriched in the recurrent MPE group, in which Claudin-4 (CLDN4) was identified. The subset cell cluster C3 of C1, which was enriched in recurrent MPE and demonstrated a phenotype of ameboidal-type cell migration, also showed a markedly higher expression of CLDN4. Meanwhile, the expression of CLDN4 was positively correlated with E74 Like ETS Transcription Factor 3 (ELF3), EpCAM and Tumour Associated Calcium Signal Transducer 2 (TACSTD2), independent of driver-gene status. CLDN4 was also found to be associated with the expression of Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1 Subunit Alpha (HIF1A) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGFA), and the cell cluster C1 was the major mediator in cellular communication of VEGFA signalling. In the extensive MPE cohort, a notably increased expression of CLDN4 in cells from pleural effusion among patients diagnosed with recurrent MPE was observed, compared with the non-recurrent group, which was also associated with a trend towards worse overall survival (OS).

CONCLUSIONS

CLDN4 could be considered as a predictive marker of recurrent MPE among patients with advanced NSCLC. Further validation for its clinical value in cohorts with larger sample size and in-depth mechanism studies on its biological function are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Unraveling the Predictive Potential of Rapid Scoring in Pleural Infection: A Critical Review

Pleural infection, or pleural empyema, is a severe medical condition associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Timely and accurate prognostication is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and resource allocation. Rapid scoring systems have emerged as promising tools in pleural infection prognostication, integrating various clinical and laboratory parameters to assess disease severity and quantitatively predict short-term and long-term outcomes. This review article critically evaluates existing rapid scoring systems, including CURB-65 (confusion, uremia, respiratory rate, blood pressure, age ≥ 65 years), A-DROP (age (male >70 years, female >75 years), dehydration, respiratory failure, orientation disturbance, and low blood pressure), and APACHE II (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II), assessing their predictive accuracy and limitations. Our analysis highlights the potential clinical implications of rapid scoring, including risk stratification, treatment tailoring, and follow-up planning. We discuss practical considerations and challenges in implementing rapid scoring such as data accessibility and potential sources of bias. Furthermore, we emphasize the importance of validation, transparency, and multidisciplinary collaboration to refine and enhance the clinical applicability of these scoring systems. The prospects for rapid scoring in pleural infection management are promising, with ongoing research and data science advances offering improvement opportunities. Ultimately, the successful integration of rapid scoring into clinical practice can potentially improve patient care and outcomes in pleural infection management.

Trial Protocol: Reaccumulation rate of pleural effusions after therapeutic aspiration: An observational cohort study to determine baseline factors associated with rate of pleural fluid reaccumulation following therapeutic aspiration in patients with malignant pleural effusion attending a pleural clinic (REPEAT)

Background

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is the build-up of pleural fluid in the space between the lung and chest wall due to advanced cancer. It is treated initially by large volume drainage (therapeutic aspiration). If the fluid reaccumulates, a definitive procedure is performed. There is wide variation in rate of reaccumulation. Patients with rapid reaccumulation often attend hospital as an emergency. Conversely, patients with slow reaccumulation do not need a definitive procedure and may experience cancelled or unnecessary procedures. This study aims to create and validate a multivariable prediction model to predict how quickly pleural fluid will reaccumulate in patients with MPE following therapeutic aspiration.

Research question

Can we predict how quickly pleural fluid will reaccumulate in patients with MPEs?

Methods

A total of 200 patients with known or suspected MPE attending for therapeutic aspiration will be recruited from 5-10 UK hospitals over 20 months. Patients will be enrolled prior to undergoing aspiration. Following this, they will undergo chest X-ray, which will be repeated one week later (treatment as usual). Rate of reaccumulation will be calculated based on change of size of the effusion seen on X-ray. Data will be collected on common clinical biomarkers e.g., size of effusion on pre-aspiration chest X-ray, volume of fluid drained. This data will be analysed to create a clinical score.A further validation cohort of 40 patients will be enrolled in parallel with creation of the score.

Anticipated impact

The ability to predict rate of reaccumulation of MPE will enable patients and clinicians to make better informed treatment decisions. For patients with predicted rapid reaccumulation, a definitive procedure could be offered as first-line treatment, rather than a therapeutic aspiration. This will prevent emergency hospital admissions and decrease number of procedures. By contrast, patients whose effusions will recur slowly may avoid an unnecessary procedure.

Factors Affecting Rate of Pleural Fluid Accumulation in Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusions

Purpose of Review

Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) are initially treated with thoracocentesis but usually reaccumulate. There is wide variation in the rate of recurrence. Those with rapid recurrence could benefit from early definitive treatment, whilst those with slower recurrences may not. Here, we discuss pleural fluid homeostasis, MPE pathophysiology, and factors associated with reaccumulation.

Recent Findings

Few studies have investigated markers of MPE reaccumulation. Suggested features of rapid reaccumulation include lactate dehydrogenase, effusion size, positive cytology, and dyspnoea. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) correlates with MPE size and treatment response, but its association with reaccumulation rate is unknown. Some anti-VEGF therapies have shown promise in MPE management.

Summary

Further work is needed to validate hypothesised biomarkers of rapid recurrence and to characterise other biomarkers, such as VEGF. The Reaccumulation rate of Malignant Pleural Effusions After Therapeutic Aspiration (REPEAT) study aims to address these gaps in the literature and is currently in recruitment.

Diagnosis and Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Decade in Review

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common complication of thoracic and extrathoracic malignancies and is associated with high mortality. Treatment is mainly palliative, with symptomatic management achieved via effusion drainage and pleurodesis. Pleurodesis may be hastened by administering a sclerosing agent through a thoracostomy tube, thoracoscopy, or an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC). Over the last decade, several randomized controlled studies shaped the current management of MPE in favor of an outpatient-based approach with a notable increase in IPC usage. Patient preferences remain essential in choosing optimal therapy, especially when the lung is expandable. In this article, we reviewed the last 10 to 15 years of MPE literature with a particular focus on the diagnosis and evolving management.

Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase Is a Sensitive Predictor of Systemic Complications of Acute Pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common and potentially life-threatening inflammatory disease that can cause various complications, including systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), pleural effusion, ascitic fluid, myocardial infarction, and acute kidney injury (AKI). However, there is still a lack of rapid and effective indicators to assess the disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of high serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels with AP severity and systemic complications.

METHODS

AP patients treated from July 2014 to December 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. They were divided into elevated (n = 93) and normal (n = 143) LDH groups. Their demographic data, clinical data, hospital duration, and hospital expenses were analyzed. Linear and binary logistic regression analyses were used to determine whether elevated LDH is a risk factor for AP severity and complications after adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in AP severity scores (Ranson, MODS, BISAP, APACHE II, and CTSI), hospital duration, hospital expenses, and the incidences of complications (SIRS, pleural effusion, ascitic fluid, myocardial infarction, and AKI) between the elevated and normal LDH groups. After adjusting for confounders, elevated LDH was associated with AP severity scores and hospital duration and expenses (based on linear regression analyses) and was a risk factor for the occurrence of AP complications and interventions, that is, diuretic and vasoactive agent use (based on binary logistic regression analyses).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated LDH is associated with high AP severity scores and high incidences of complications (SIRS, pleural effusion, ascitic fluid, myocardial infarction, and AKI).

Breast and Lung Effusion Survival Score Models: Improving Survival Prediction in Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusion and Metastasis

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based guidelines recommend management strategies for malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) based on life expectancy. Existent risk-prediction rules do not provide precise individualized survival estimates.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can a newly developed continuous risk-prediction survival model for patients with MPE and known metastatic disease provide precise survival estimates?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with proven malignancy, pleural effusion, and known metastatic disease undergoing thoracentesis from 2014 through 2017. The outcome was time from thoracentesis to death. Risk factors were identified using Cox proportional hazards models. Effect-measure modification (EMM) was tested using the Mantel-Cox test and was addressed by using disease-specific models (DSMs) or interaction terms. Three DSMs and a combined model using interactions were generated. Discrimination was evaluated using Harrell's C-statistic. Calibration was assessed by observed-minus-predicted probability graphs at specific time points. Models were validated using patients treated from 2010 through 2013. Using LENT (pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and tumor type) variables, we generated both discrete (LENT-D) and continuous (LENT-C) models, assessing discrete vs continuous predictors' performances.

RESULTS

The development and validation cohort included 562 and 727 patients, respectively. The Mantel-Cox test demonstrated interactions between cancer type and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (P < .0001), pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase (P = .029), and bilateral effusion (P = .002). DSMs for lung, breast, and hematologic malignancies showed C-statistics of 0.72, 0.72, and 0.62, respectively; the combined model's C-statistics was 0.67. LENT-D (C-statistic, 0.60) and LENT-C (C-statistic, 0.65) models underperformed.

INTERPRETATION

EMM is present between cancer type and other predictors; thus, DSMs outperformed the models that failed to account for this. Discrete risk-prediction models lacked enough precision to be useful for individual-level predictions.

Risk Factors for and Time to Recurrence of Symptomatic Malignant Pleural Effusion in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR or ALK Mutations

BACKGROUND

The main goal of management in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is palliation. Patients with MPE and actionable mutations, because their disease is expected to respond quickly and markedly to targeted therapy, are less likely than those without actionable mutations to receive definitive MPE management. Whether such management is indicated in these patients is unclear.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

What is the time to ipsilateral MPE recurrence requiring intervention in patients with metastatic NSCLC by mutation status? What are the risk factors for MPE recurrence?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent initial thoracentesis for MPE. We used a Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model to calculate the time to ipsilateral MPE recurrence requiring intervention within 100 days of initial thoracentesis and to identify variables associated with time to pleural fluid recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 396 patients, comprising 295 (74.5%) without and 101 (25.5%) with actionable mutations, were included. Most patients with actionable mutations (90%) were receiving targeted treatment within 30 days of initial thoracentesis. On univariate analysis, patients with actionable mutations showed a significantly higher hazard of MPE recurrence. On multivariate analysis, this difference was not significant. Larger pleural effusion size on chest radiography (P < .001), higher pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase (P < .001), and positive cytologic examination results (P = .008) were associated with an increased hazard of recurrence.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings indicate that patients with actionable mutations have a similar risk of MPE recurrence when compared with patients without mutations and would benefit from a similar definitive management approach to MPE.

Predicting the survival in patients with malignant pleural effusion undergoing indwelling pleural catheter insertion

CONTEXT

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common comorbid condition in advanced malignancies with variable survival.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to predict the survival in patients with MPE undergoing indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) insertion.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan.

METHODS

One hundred and ten patients with MPE who underwent IPC insertion from January 2011 to December 2019 were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine the overall survival (OS) of the patient's cohort with respect to LENT score.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

The IBM SPSS version 20 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed 110 patients who underwent IPC insertion for MPE, with a mean age of 49 ± 15 years. 76 (69.1%) patients were females, of which majority 59 (53.6%) had a primary diagnosis of breast cancer. The LENT score was used for risk stratification, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to predict the OS. The proportion of patients with low-risk LENT score had 91%, 58%, and 29% survival, the moderate-risk group had 76%, 52%, and 14% survival, and in the high-risk group, 61%, 15%, and 0% patients survived at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. In addition, there was a statistically significant survival difference (P = 0.05) in patients who received chemotherapy pre- and post-IPC insertion.

CONCLUSIONS

LENT score seems to be an easy and attainable tool, capable of predicting the survival of the patients with MPE quite accurately. It can be helpful in palliating the symptoms of patients with advanced malignancies by modifying the treatment strategies.

Thoracic ultrasound as a predictor of pleurodesis success at the time of indwelling pleural catheter removal

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

IPC in patients with MPE are removed within 3 months in 30-58% of cases, usually due to decreased pleural fluid output as a result of pleurodesis. Disease control can also account for the lack of fluid output, potentially explaining why 4-14% of patients undergo repeat pleural intervention for fluid re-accumulation (at the time of disease recurrence or progression). The aim of our pilot study is to determine the accuracy of thoracic ultrasound (TUS) in predicting pleurodesis success in patients with MPE at the time of IPC removal.

METHODS

This is a single-centre, prospective observational cohort study that enrolled consecutive patients with confirmed MPE treated with IPC at the time of IPC removal. TUS was performed to calculate a PAS. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 months. Failure was defined as pleural fluid recurrence within 3 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were screened and 25 were included in the final analysis. Pleurodesis success was observed in 88% (n = 22) and failure in 12% (n = 3) of patients. The mean PAS was higher in patients with pleurodesis success (22.0 vs 9.3, P = 0.01). A PAS greater than 10 predicted pleurodesis success with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 86%.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study suggests that TUS at the time of IPC removal accurately identifies patients who have achieved pleurodesis and therefore will not have re-accumulation of pleural effusion or require an ipsilateral pleural intervention for at least 3 months post-IPC removal.

Pleural effusions and pneumothorax: Beyond simple plumbing: Expert opinions on knowledge gaps and essential next steps

Pleural diseases affect millions of people worldwide. Pleural infection, malignant pleural diseases and pneumothorax are common clinical challenges. A large number of recent clinical trials have provided an evidence-based platform to evaluate conventional and novel methods to drain pleural effusions/air which reduce morbidity and unnecessary interventions. These successes have generated significant enthusiasm and raised the profile of pleural medicine as a new subspecialty. The ultimate goal of pleural research is to prevent/stop development of pleural effusions/pneumothorax. Current research studies mainly focus on the technical aspects of pleural drainage. Significant knowledge gaps exist in many aspects such as understanding of the pathobiology of the underlying pleural diseases, pharmacokinetics of pleural drug delivery, etc. Answers to these important questions are needed to move the field forward. This article collates opinions of leading experts in the field in highlighting major knowledge gaps in common pleural diseases to provoke thinking beyond pleural drainage. Recognizing the key barriers will help prioritize future research in the quest to ultimately cure (rather than just drain) these pleural conditions.

Multimodal approach to the management of malignant pleural effusions: role of thoracoscopy with pleurodesis and tunneled indwelling pleural catheters

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is associated with a median survival of 3–6 months and causes significant symptoms affecting the overall quality of life in patients with advanced malignancies. Despite the high incidence of recurrent MPE, less than 25% of patients undergo a definitive pleural intervention as recommended by guidelines. In this review, we summarize the latest guidelines for management of MPE by various societies and discuss a multimodal approach in these patients using thoracoscopy with pleurodesis using talc insufflation and placement of tunneled indwelling pleural catheters (TIPC). We also address the role of diagnostic thoracoscopy for histologic and molecular diagnosis and outline our approach to patients with known or suspected MPE.