Malignant pleural effusion survival prognostication in an Asian population

Tumor markers determination in malignant pleural effusion: pearls and pitfalls

Serum and pleural fluid tumor markers are well-recognized auxiliary diagnostic tools for malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Here, we discuss some pearls and pitfalls regarding the role of tumor markers in MPE management. The following issues are discussed in this article: What is the appropriate clinical scenario for evaluating pleural tumor markers? Which tumor markers should be advocated for diagnosing MPE? Can extremely high levels of tumor markers be employed to establish a diagnosis of MPE? Does the serum-to-pleural fluid ratio of a tumor marker have the same diagnostic efficacy as the measurement of that marker alone in the pleural fluid? Can tumor markers be used to estimate the risk of specific cancers? What should be considered when interpreting the diagnostic accuracy of tumor markers? How should tumor marker studies be performed? We addressed these issues with published works, particularly systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Malignant pleural effusion: current understanding and therapeutic approach

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common complication of thoracic and extrathoracic malignancies and is associated with high mortality and elevated costs to healthcare systems. Over the last decades the understanding of pathophysiology mechanisms, diagnostic techniques and optimal treatment intervention in MPE have been greatly advanced by recent high-quality research, leading to an ever less invasive diagnostic approach and more personalized management. Despite a number of management options, including talc pleurodesis, indwelling pleural catheters and combinations of the two, treatment for MPE remains symptom directed and centered around drainage strategy. In the next future, because of a better understanding of underlying tumor biology together with more sensitive molecular diagnostic techniques, it is likely that combined diagnostic and therapeutic procedures allowing near total outpatient management of MPE will become popular. This article provides a review of the current advances, new discoveries and future directions in the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of MPE.

Efficacy of hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy for initially diagnosed lung cancer with symptomatic malignant pleural effusion

Initially diagnosed malignant pleural effusion (MPE) has different systematic treatments, and defining the best drainage regimen according to the responsiveness of MPE to different systematic treatments is important. This study compared the efficacy of hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) and pleural catheter drainage (IPCD) for initially diagnosed lung cancer with symptomatic MPE. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of initially diagnosed lung cancer patients with symptomatic MPE between January 2018 and May 2022. The patients were treated with IPCD or HITHOC for local control of MPE after diagnosis. Systematic regimens were conducted during 1 month according to guidelines after local treatment. Intrathoracic MPE progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated, Univariate and multivariable Cox-regression were used to identify factors associated with iPFS and OS. A total of 33 patients were evaluated; 10 (30.3%) patients received IPCD, and 23 (69.7%) patients received HITHOC. No difference in the MPE control rate at 1 month was found between the IPCD group (90%) and HITHOC group (95.7%). However, this control rate was significantly higher in the HITHOC group (69.6%) than in the IPCD group (30%) at 3 months (P = 0.035). Multivariate analysis showed that receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or chemotherapy was a significant protective factor for iPFS (HR = 0.376, 95% CI 0.214-0.659, P = 0.007) and OS (HR = 0.321, 95% CI 0.174-0.594, P < 0.001). According to subgroup analysis, among patients treated with TKIs, those who received HITHOC had longer iPFS and OS than those who received IPCD (P = 0.011 and P = 0.002, respectively), but this difference was not found in the palliative care subgroup. Moreover, no patients treated with chemotherapy showed reaccumulation of MPE. Systematic TKIs or chemotherapy prolonged iPFS and OS for those initially diagnosed with lung cancer with symptomatic MPE. HITHOC prolonged iPFS and OS for those treated with systematic TKIs.

Value of human epididymis secretory protein 4 in differentiating malignant from benign pleural effusion: an analysis of two cohorts

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the most common cause of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Serum human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4) is a useful diagnostic marker for lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid HE4 for MPE.

DESIGN

A prospective, double-blind diagnostic test accuracy study.

METHODS

Patients with undiagnosed pleural effusion were enrolled in two cohorts (Hohhot and Changshu). Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay was used to detect pleural fluid HE4. The diagnostic accuracy of HE4 was evaluated by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the net benefit of HE4 was assessed by a decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

A total of 66 MPEs and 86 benign pleural effusions (BPEs) were enrolled in the Hohhot cohort. In the Changshu cohort, 26 MPEs and 32 BPEs were enrolled. In both cohorts, MPEs had significantly higher pleural fluid HE4 than BPEs. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of HE4 was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.64-0.81) in the Hohhot cohort and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.67-0.91) in the Changshu cohort. At a threshold of 1300 pmol/L, HE4 had sensitivities of 0.44 (95% CI: 0.33-0.56) in the Hohhot cohort and 0.54 (95% CI: 0.35-0.73) in the Changshu cohort. The corresponding specificities were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83-0.95) in the Hohhot cohort and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84-1.00) in the Changshu cohort. In subgroup analyses, HE4 had an AUC (95% CI) of 0.78 (0.71-0.85) in exudates and an AUC of 0.69 (0.57-0.81) in patients with negative effusion cytology. The DCA revealed that HE4 determination had a net benefit in both cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Pleural fluid HE4 has moderate diagnostic accuracy for MPE and has net benefit in pleural effusion patients with unknown etiology.

A Novel Clinical Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusion: Avoiding Chemotherapy in Low-Risk Groups?

Purpose

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a severe complication in patients with advanced cancer that is associated with a poor prognosis. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of MPE after lung cancer. We therefore aim to describe clinical characteristics of the patients with MPE combined with breast cancer and construct a machine learning-based model for predicting the prognosis of such patients.

Methods

This study is a retrospective and observational study. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and univariate Cox regression analyses were applied to identify eight key clinical variables, and a nomogram model was established. Model performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses.

Results

196 patients with both MPE and breast cancer (143 in the training group and 53 in the ex-ternal validation group) were analyzed in this study. The median overall survival in two cohorts was 16.20 months and 11.37 months. Based on the ROC curves for 3-, 6-, and 12-month survival, the areas under the curves were 0.824, 0.824, and 0.818 in the training set and 0.777, 0.790, and 0.715 in the validation set, respectively. In the follow-up analysis, both systemic and intrapleural chemotherapy significantly increased survival in the high-risk group compared to the low-risk group.

Conclusion

Collectively, MPE confers a poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. We have developed a first-ever survival prediction model for breast cancer patients with newly diagnosed MPE and validated the model using an independent cohort.

Malignant Pleural Effusions: Updates in Diagnosis and Management

Malignant pleural effusions remain a significant clinical problem resulting in greater than 125,000 hospitalizations per year and leading to over 5 billion dollars in healthcare utilization costs. Not only are health care expenditures related to malignant pleural effusion significant, but malignant pleural effusions also often result in significant patient discomfort and distress, largely at the end of life. Advances in management over the past several years have provided patients with greater autonomy as they are able to provide self-aid at home either alone or with family assistance. Additionally, practice changes have allowed for fewer interventions allowing patients to spend more time out of the clinic or inpatient wards.

Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion: Where Are We Now?

Pleural malignancies are among the most common causes of pleural disease and form the basis of our daily pleural practice. There has been significant research and increase in both diagnostic and therapeutic management of malignant pleural diseases in the last decade. Good-quality data have led to a paradigm shift in the management options of pleural malignancies, and indwelling pleural catheter is now recommended and widely used as first-line intervention. Several trials compared different treatment modalities for pleural malignancies and continue to emphasize the need to reduce hospital length of stay and unnecessary pleural intervention, and the importance of patient choice in clinical decision making. This practical review aims to summarize the current knowledge for the management of pleural malignancies, and the understanding of the steps that we still have to climb to optimize management and reduce morbidity.

Prognostic biomarkers of malignant patients with pleural effusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Pleural effusion is a common clinical problem in patients with cancer. We aimed to summarize all the known prognostic indicators of malignant pleural effusion.

Methods

We did a systematic review and meta-analysis with a systematic literature search. All prospective or retrospective cohort studies that estimated the prognostic factors of malignant pleural effusion were enrolled. Mantel–Haenszel method was used to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Eventually, we identified 82 studies with a total of 10,748 patients that met our inclusion criteria. The LENT score showed a good prognostic value (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.67–2.31) so did the LENT score item. In addition, clinical parameters like stage (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.25–2.25), distant metastasis (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.38–1.89), EGFR mutation (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56–0.74), serum biological parameters like hemoglobin (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.17–2.06), albumin (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.25–2.34), C-reaction protein (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.49–2.29), VEGF (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.18–2.43) and pleural effusion biological parameters like PH (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.46–2.60), glucose (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.18–2.61), VEGF (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.67–2.37), and survivin (HR 2.90, 95% CI 1.17–7.20) are also prognostic factors for malignant pleural effusion.

Conclusions

For malignant pleural effusion, LENT score and its items are valuable prognostic biomarkers, so do the clinical parameters like stage, distant metastasis, EGFR mutation, the serum biological parameters like hemoglobin, albumin, C-reaction protein, VEGF and the pleural effusion biological parameters like PH, glucose, VEGF and survivin.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-022-02518-w.

Malignant pleural effusion: Updates in diagnosis, management and current challenges

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common condition which often causes significant symptoms to patients and costs to healthcare systems. Over the past decade, the management of MPE has progressed enormously with large scale, randomised trials answering key questions regarding optimal diagnostic strategies and effective management strategies. Despite a number of management options, including talc pleurodesis, indwelling pleural catheters and combinations of the two, treatment for MPE remains symptom directed and centered around drainage strategy. The future goals for providing improved care for patients lies in changing the treatment paradigm from a generic pathway to personalised care, based on probability of malignancy type and survival. This article reviews the current evidence base, new discoveries and future directions in the diagnosis and management of MPE.

Development and Validation of a Scoring System for Early Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Effusion Based on a Nomogram

Background

The diagnostic value of clinical and laboratory features to differentiate between malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and benign pleural effusion (BPE) has not yet been established.

Objectives

The present study aimed to develop and validate the diagnostic accuracy of a scoring system based on a nomogram to distinguish MPE from BPE.

Methods

A total of 1,239 eligible patients with PE were recruited in this study and randomly divided into a training set and an internal validation set at a ratio of 7:3. Logistic regression analysis was performed in the training set, and a nomogram was developed using selected predictors. The diagnostic accuracy of an innovative scoring system based on the nomogram was established and validated in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets (n = 217). The discriminatory power and the calibration and clinical values of the prediction model were evaluated.

Results

Seven variables [effusion carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), effusion adenosine deaminase (ADA), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), PE/serum CEA ratio (CEA ratio), effusion carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), effusion cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1), and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)/effusion ADA ratio (cancer ratio, CR)] were validated and used to develop a nomogram. The prediction model showed both good discrimination and calibration capabilities for all sets. A scoring system was established based on the nomogram scores to distinguish MPE from BPE. The scoring system showed favorable diagnostic performance in the training set [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.955, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.942-0.968], the internal validation set (AUC = 0.952, 95% CI = 0.932-0.973), and the external validation set (AUC = 0.973, 95% CI = 0.956-0.990). In addition, the scoring system achieved satisfactory discriminative abilities at separating lung cancer-associated MPE from tuberculous pleurisy effusion (TPE) in the combined training and validation sets.

Conclusions

The present study developed and validated a scoring system based on seven parameters. The scoring system exhibited a reliable diagnostic performance in distinguishing MPE from BPE and might guide clinical decision-making.

Pleural effusions associated with squamous cell lung carcinoma have a low diagnostic yield and a poor prognosis

Background

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) portends a poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the yield of pleural fluid cytology as well as survival of patients with MPE associated with squamous cell carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma is not well understood. We conducted this study to assess the diagnostic yield of pleural cytology and survival of patients with NSCLC related MPE.

Methods

We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients with NSCLC related MPE between 2010 and 2017. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival and Cox proportional hazards analysis to assess if squamous cell cytopathology was associated with mortality.

Results

We identified 277 patients, 29 with squamous cell and 248 with adenocarcinoma MPE. Pleural fluid cytology from initial thoracentesis was diagnostic in 13.8% (4/29) patients with squamous cell and 80.2% (199/248) with adenocarcinoma (P<0.001). Cytology from second thoracentesis was diagnostic in 13.3% (2/15) patients with squamous cell carcinoma, compared to 37.5% (12/32) with adenocarcinoma (P=0.17). There was no statistically significant difference in the pleural biopsy yield from medical pleuroscopy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in the two groups. The median survival of patients with squamous cell MPE was 112 [interquartile range (IQR): 44-220] days versus 194 (IQR: 54-523) days in adenocarcinoma (Log-rank test P=0.04). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that squamous cell cytopathology was independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio for death of 1.73, 95% CI: 1.1-2.6; P=0.01).

Conclusions

Pleural fluid cytology has a low diagnostic yield in squamous cell carcinoma MPE, and these patients have a poor survival compared to lung adenocarcinoma.

Breathlessness Predicts Survival in Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusions: Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data From Five Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Patients with malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) experience breathlessness and poor survival. Breathlessness is associated with poor survival in other conditions.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is breathlessness, measured using a visual analog scale for dyspnea (VASD), associated with survival in patients with MPE?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Individual patient data from five randomized controlled trials of 553 patients undergoing interventions for MPE were analyzed. VASD was recorded at baseline and daily after intervention. Patients were followed up until death or end of trial. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression were used to identify factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

Baseline VASD was significantly associated with worse survival, with a hazard ratio of 1.10 (95% CI, 1.06-1.15) for a 10-mm increase in VASD. On multivariable regression, it remained a significant predictor of survival. Mean 7-day VASD and mean total VASD were also predictors of survival (mean 7-day VASD: hazard ratio [HR], 1.26 [95% CI, 1.19-1.34]; total VASD: HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.15-1.37]). Other predictors of survival were serum C-reactive protein level and tumor type. Previous treatment with chemotherapy, performance status, pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase, serum albumin, hemoglobin, serum neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio, and size of effusion were associated with survival on univariate but not multivariable analysis.

INTERPRETATION

Breathlessness, measured using VASD at baseline and postprocedure, is a predictor of survival in patients with MPE.