Tendinopathies around the Elbow Part 1: Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy

An Investigation of Maximal Strength of the Upper Limb Bilaterally in Individuals With Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is evidence of bilateral upper limb strength deficits in individuals with unilateral lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET).

METHODS

The electronic databases Medline via Ovid, PubMed, and Scopus were searched from inception to March 2020. Included studies encompassed maximal strength outcomes of any upper limb and appendicular musculature in individuals with LET and an asymptomatic comparator. Study quality was rated using a modified version of the Epidemiological Appraisal Instrument. Hedges g effect sizes (ES) and 95% CIs were calculated for comparisons of maximal strength in the LET group and an asymptomatic control group. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed when possible.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included. Quality appraisal resulted in a mean Epidemiological Appraisal Instrument score of 46% (SD = 10%). Meta-analysis revealed strength deficits in shoulder abduction (pooled ES = -0.37 [95% CI = -0.62 to -0.12]) and shoulder external rotation (pooled ES = -0.55 [95% CI = -0.83 to -0.28]) of the symptomatic limb compared with an asymptomatic control group. Meta-analysis also revealed maximal strength deficits in the upper trapezius (pooled ES = -0.26 [95% CI = -0.49 to -0.02]) of the asymptomatic limb compared with an asymptomatic control group. There was also consistent evidence for strength deficits in the serratus anterior, lower trapezius, and wrist extensor muscles and deficits in grip strength of the symptomatic limb as well as strength deficits in the wrist extensor muscles of the asymptomatic limb in individuals with unilateral LET.

CONCLUSION

In individuals with LET, there were maximal strength deficits in shoulder abduction, shoulder external rotation, serratus anterior and lower trapezius muscles, and wrist extension, as well as deficits in grip strength of the symptomatic limb compared with an asymptomatic control group. In addition, there appeared to be strength deficits in the upper trapezius muscle, wrist extension, and metacarpophalangeal joint flexion and extension, as well as deficits in grip strength of the asymptomatic limb in individuals with LET compared with an asymptomatic control group. These results suggest bilateral strength deficits.

IMPACT

These findings highlight the importance of a thorough physical examination and appropriate strengthening intervention for the upper limb with a focus on shoulder and scapular stabilizers, in addition to forearm muscles, in individuals with LET.

LAY SUMMARY

In people with tennis elbow, widespread strength deficits, including weakness of the shoulder, forearm, and wrist muscles, may exist. Interestingly, some of these weaknesses appear on both the affected and the unaffected sides in people with tennis elbow. A physical therapist can help strengthen these areas.

Effectiveness of eccentric strengthening in the treatment of lateral elbow tendinopathy: A systematic review with meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION

Lateral elbow tendinopathy is a common condition with an annual incidence of up to 3% of the population. Eccentric strengthening has shown promise as a method to treat lateral elbow tendinopathy, but is unclear if it is superior to other forms of treatment.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of eccentric strengthening compared with other forms of strengthening and pain-relieving modalities on pain, strength, and function in people with lateral elbow tendinopathy.

METHODS

Five electronic databases were searched. Reference lists of selected articles were hand-searched. Outcomes were defined a priori. Meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model with standardized mean differences, test of heterogeneity, and sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Eight articles were included in this review. When comparing eccentric strengthening to other forms of strengthening and pain-relieving modalities, there were significant large effect size of 1.12 (CI: 0.31-1.93) and 1.22 (CI: 0.25-2.18) in reducing pain and improving function in the short-term, respectively. In long-term, results were inconclusive on all outcomes.

DISCUSSION

A treatment program using eccentric strengthening of adequate intensity and duration seemed to be most effective for treating lateral elbow tendinopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

The state of science of best care for lateral elbow tendinopathy is still in its infancy. Large, high-quality randomized controlled trials with clearly defined strengthening regime are needed to determine optimal dosage to maximize treatment effects. Recommendations were provided based on careful synthesis of findings from this review and current evidence in literature.