Am I going to die now? Experiences of hospitalisation and subsequent life after being diagnosed with aortic dissection

Quality of Life, Anxiety and Depression after Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is an acute cardiovascular emergency but also a condition warranting life-long surveillance. The long-term consequences on physical and mental well-being are largely unknown. The primary aim was to analyze self-reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients with chronic TBAD. The secondary aim was to describe changes in physical and sexual activity following TBAD.

METHODS

This is a population-based cross-sectional survey study. All patients hospitalised with acute TBAD in Stockholm County 2017-2021, and alive on March 31, 2023, were invited to answer questionnaires on HRQoL (EQ-5D-5L, EQ VAS), anxiety (HADS-A), depression (HADS-D), physical activity (SED-GIH) and sexual activity (men: IIEF-5, women: FSFI-6).

RESULTS

Out of 88 invited TBAD patients, 49 (56%) participated. Median age was 72 years (IQR 62-81) and 41% were women. The median time from the acute event to the questionnaire response was 42 months (IQR 27-60). The mean EQ VAS score was 62. The largest negative impacts on the participants health status were seen in the "pain/discomfort" (66% of participants), "anxiety/depression" (53%) and "Mobility" (45%) domains. Based on the HADS questionnaire, 20% had a score indicating symptoms of depression, whereas 14% had a score indicating symptoms of anxiety. Overall, 69% reported a change in physical activity and 42% reported a change in sexual activity.

CONCLUSIONS

TBAD patients reported substantially reduced mental and physical well-being several years after the acute event. This new and important finding should be considered by health-care providers and in future follow-up protocols.

Patient Reported Outcome Measures Used to Assess Quality of Life in Aortic Dissection: a Systematic Scoping Review using COSMIN Methodology

OBJECTIVE

To systematically identify all patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) (quality of life [QOL] instruments or other instrument/methodology) that have been used to date in aortic dissection (AD) and to explore how well these instruments evaluate QOL according to the Consensus based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology or guideline.

DATA SOURCES

Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were search on 1st July 2022.

REVIEW METHODS

This scoping review was undertaken according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the COSMIN guidelines for performing systematic reviews of validated PROMs. Studies that reported on any aspect or domain of QOL using a PROM or other instrument or methodology on AD were included. Data synthesis, including psychometric property analysis and risk of bias assessment were performed according to COSMIN guidelines.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies, published between 1994 and 2021 reporting on 5 874 patients (mean age 63 years, 70.6% male), were included. A total of 39 PROMs were used, and three studies used semi-structured interviews. The majority (69%) of studies were in patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD). The most common PROM used was the SF-36 (51%). Six studies evaluated one or more psychometric properties of a PROM. Only one of these studies was specifically designed as a validation study. No study reported on content validity. Internal consistency was the most evaluated psychometric property. No study evaluated all the psychometric properties according to COSMIN methodology. The methodological quality used to assess these PROMs was judged to be adequate or very good.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the heterogeneity of PROMs or methods used to determine QOL in AD patients. The lack of research regarding a comprehensive evaluation of the psychometric properties of a PROM used in AD highlights the need for the development and validation of a dissection specific PROM. [PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022310477].

Treatment and referral experiences of patients with type A aortic dissection and their families: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyse the experiences and feelings of patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD) and their families during the medical treatment and referral process, investigate the entire process's needs and problems and provide evidence for improving the aortic dissection treatment system.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive design using a phenomenological study. Face-to-face semistructured interviews were conducted. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the interview data, which was transcribed verbatim.

SETTING

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of Shanxi Bethune Hospital in China.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen family groups, consisting of patients with TAAD who underwent surgical treatment and their families, were selected.

RESULTS

Three primary themes were discussed and developed. Theme 1: the experiences of medical treatment and referral (confusion at the onset; complex inner feelings and emotional expressions of the medical treatment and referral; preoperative inner conflict); theme 2: problems with the TAAD medical treatment system (the quality of diagnosis and medical treatment needs to be improved; deficiency of medical system policies and procedures); and theme 3: real demands (demands for TAAD-related knowledge and access to the disease; economic-related demands).

CONCLUSION

Patients with TAAD and their families encounter complex inner experiences, multiple requirements and numerous challenges during the medical treatment and referral process. It is advised that the treatment and referral system of TAAD in China needs to be improved. Future research and clinical practice should standardise diagnosis and treatment training, establish a fast channel for TAAD to prioritise treatment, popularise aortic dissection-related knowledge and improve the funding system.

Current Understanding of Aortic Dissection

The aorta is the largest artery in the body, delivering oxygenated blood from the left ventricle to all organs. Dissection of the aorta is a lethal condition caused by a tear in the intimal layer of the aorta, followed by blood loss within the aortic wall and separation of the layers to full dissection. The aorta can be affected by a wide range of causes including acute conditions such as trauma and mechanical damage; and genetic conditions such as arterial hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and connective tissue disorders; all increasing the risk of dissection. Both rapid diagnostic recognition and advanced multidisciplinary treatment are critical in managing aortic dissection patients. The treatment depends on the severity and location of the dissection. Open surgical repair is the gold standard of treatment for dissections located to the proximal part of the aorta and the arch, while endovascular interventions are recommended for most distal or type B aortic dissections. In this review article, we examine the epidemiology, pathophysiology, contemporary diagnoses, and management of aortic dissection.

Preliminary evaluation of the Chinese version of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system 29-item profile in patients with aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-item Profile (PROMIS-29) has been widely used to measure health outcomes from the patient's perspective. It has not been validated in adults with aortic disease. The aim of this study was to explore the reliability and validity of the Chinese PROMIS-29 among patients undergoing surgery for aortic dissection (AD).

METHODS

A cross-sectional design was applied. Eligible patients completed a questionnaire that contained the PROMIS-29 and legacy measures, including the Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12), 8-item Somatic Symptom Scale (SSS-8), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 (GAD-2), and Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2). The structural validity of the PROMIS-29 was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was evaluated with Cronbach's α. Construct validity was assessed by calculating Spearman's rank correlations and comparing known-group differences.

RESULTS

In total, a sample of 327 AD patients was included in the final analysis. Most of them were male (89%) with a mean age of 52.7 (± 10.3). CFA revealed good model fit of the seven-factor structure within PROMIS-29, as well as most domains in single-factor analysis. Reliability was confirmed with Cronbach's α > 0.90. Correlations between comparable domains of the PROMIS-29 and those of legacy questionnaires and most know-group comparisons were observed as hypothesized.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found evidence for acceptable structural validity, construct validity and internal consistency of the PROMIS-29 in a sample of AD patients. It can be applied to AD survivors by researchers or clinicians, measuring outcomes after surgery and identifying those with worse health status.

Aortic dissection in pregnancy and the postpartum period

Pregnancy-associated aortic dissection (AD) is a rare event, with an incidence of 0.0004% per pregnancy. The work of the Aortic Dissection Collaborative identified pregnancy-associated AD as a high-priority topic, despite its rarity. The Pregnancy Working Group, which included physicians and patient stakeholders, performed a systematic literature review of pregnancy-associated AD from 1960 to 2021 and identified 6,333 articles through PubMed, OVID MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. The inclusion criterion was AD in pregnant populations and exclusion criteria were case reports, conference abstracts, and languages other than English. Assessment of full-text articles for eligibility after removal of duplicates from all databases yielded 68 articles to be included in the final review. Topics included were timing of AD in pregnancy, type of AD, and management considerations of pregnancy-associated AD. The Pregnancy Working Group identified gaps in knowledge and future areas of research for pregnancy-associated AD, including clinical management, mental health outcomes post AD, reproductive and genetic counseling, and contraception after AD. Future collaborative projects could be a multicenter, international registry for all pregnancy-associated AD to refine the risk factors, best practice and management of AD in pregnancy. In addition, future mixed methodology studies may be useful to explore social, mental, and emotional factors related to pregnancy-associated AD and to determine support groups' effect on anxiety and depression related to these events in the pregnancy and postpartum period.

Effectiveness of early rehabilitation following aortic surgery: a nationwide inpatient database study

OBJECTIVE

Exercise immediately after aortic surgery is controversial with limited evidence. The present study aimed to assess whether early rehabilitation commencing within 3 days of aortic surgery improves physical functions at discharge more than usual care in patients after aortic surgery.

METHODS

We used the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a nationwide inpatient database from more than 1600 acute care hospitals that covers approximately 75% of all intensive care unit (ICU) beds in Japan. We identified patients who underwent open or endovascular aortic surgery and were admitted to the ICU between July 2010 and March 2018. Patients beginning rehabilitation within 3 days of aortic surgery were defined as the early rehabilitation group and the remaining patients as the usual care group. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses to compare outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS

Among 121,024 eligible patients, there were 44,746 (37.0%) in the early rehabilitation group and 76,278 (63.0%) in the usual care group. In inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses, Barthel index scores at discharge were significantly higher in the early rehabilitation group than in the usual care group (difference, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.8-5.2). The early rehabilitation group had significantly lower in-hospital mortality, lower total hospitalization costs, shorter ICU stay, and shorter hospital stay than the usual care group.

CONCLUSION

Early rehabilitation within 3 days of aortic surgery was associated with improved physical functions at discharge, shorter ICU and hospital stays, and lower hospitalization costs without increased mortality.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiovascular Trials

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are reports of a person's health status that provide a global perspective of patient well-being. PROs can be classified into 4 primary domains: global, mental, physical, and social health. In this descriptive review, we focus on how PROs can be used in cardiac clinical trials, with an emphasis on cardiac surgical trials for patients with coronary heart disease and heart failure. We also highlight ongoing challenges and provide specific suggestions and novel opportunities to advance cardiac clinical trials. Current challenges include the long-term measurement of PROs in clinical trials beyond 1 year, inconsistency in the choice of the outcome measures among studies, and the lack of measurement of PROs across multiple domains. Opportunities for advancement include measuring PROs using consumer health informatics tools, including returning information back to participants in formats that they can understand using visualization. Future opportunities include quantifying cohort-specific minimal clinically important differences for PROs.

Epidemiology of aortic dissection

Aortic dissection remains a highly morbid diagnosis. The treatment of aortic dissection has undergone several paradigm shifts since it was first understood. However, despite the robust research in treatment, the epidemiology of aortic dissection is limited. In this review, we discuss the historical perspectives of aortic dissection with a review of risk factors and presentation. We review the trends in incidence during the past 40 years, with consideration for sex, race, and ethnicity in admission. We further focus our discussion of the classically described Type B aortic dissection treatment. Lastly, we review the impact of long-term events, readmissions, cost assessments, and quality of life studies of patients with aortic dissection. Care for those with aortic dissection remains a long-term challenge for providers and a multispecialty approach is needed for complete patient management.