Age-related outcomes of arteriovenous grafts for hemodialysis access

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of end-stage renal disease spans the spectrum of age. Arteriovenous grafts are viable alternatives for hemodialysis access in patients whose anatomy precludes placement of an arteriovenous fistula. This report describes the age-related outcomes after arteriovenous graft placement in a population-based cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who initiated hemodialysis in the U.S. Renal Data System (2007-2014). The χ² test, t-test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were employed to evaluate access maturation, interventions, patency, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 78,341 patients studied, 10,150 (13%) were younger than 50 years, 13,167 (16.8%) were 50 to 59 years, 19,975 (25.5%) were 60 to 69 years, 20,307 (25.9%) were 70 to 79 years, and 14,742 (18.8%) were 80+ years. There was no significant difference in access maturation time for patients in the older age categories compared to patients younger than 50 years. Primary patency at 5 years comparing <50 years vs 50 to 59 years vs 60 to 69 years vs 70 to 79 years vs 80+ years was 12% vs 12% vs 9% vs 9% vs 8% (P < .001). Primary assisted patency at 5 years was 20% vs 21% vs 18% vs 17% vs 14% (P < .001). Secondary patency at 5 years was 36% vs 39% vs 36% vs 30% vs 31% (P < .001). There was no significant difference in primary patency (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.00; P < .001), primary assisted patency (aHR, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.00; P < .001), and secondary patency (aHR, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.00; P = .029) with increasing age. However, there was a decrease in severe prosthetic graft infection requiring graft excision (aHR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-0.99; P < .001) and increase in mortality (aHR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.03-1.03; P < .001) for the older age categories compared with the younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based cohort of hemodialysis patients, there was no significant association between older age and prosthetic graft maturation or patency. However, older age was associated with a decrease in severe graft infection and the expected increase in mortality.

Should a fistula first policy be revisited in elderly haemodialysis patients?

Life-sustaining haemodialysis requires a durable vascular access (VA) to the circulatory system. The ideal permanent VA must provide longevity for use with minimal complication rate and supply sufficient blood flow to deliver the prescribed dialysis dosage. Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) have been endorsed by many professional societies as the VA of choice. However, the high prevalence of comorbidities, particularly diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease and arterial hypertension in elderly people, usually make VA creation more difficult in the elderly. Many of these patients may have an insufficient vasculature for AVF maturation. Furthermore, many AVFs created prior to the initiation of haemodialysis may never be used due to the competing risk of death before dialysis is required. As such, an arteriovenous graft and, in some cases, a central venous catheter, become a valid alternative form of VA. Consequently, there are multiple decision points that require careful reflection before an AVF is placed in the elderly. The traditional metrics of access patency, failure and infection are now being seen in a broader context that includes procedure burden, quality of life, patient preferences, morbidity, mortality and cost. This article of the European Dialysis (EUDIAL) Working Group of ERA-EDTA critically reviews the current evidence on VA in elderly haemodialysis patients and concludes that a pragmatic patient-centred approach is mandatory, thus considering the possibility that the AVF first approach should not be an absolute.

Transjugular venous approach for endovascular intervention in upper-extremity dialysis access fistulae and grafts

A transjugular venous access is an alternative approach for endovascular intervention in upper-extremity dialysis arteriovenous fistulae and grafts. The transjugular access is recommended for patients who have an unfavorable anatomy for the direct arm access approach. Ultrasound evaluation of the arteriovenous access is essential before intervention and includes evaluation of the inflow artery and outflow vein diameters, arteriovenous anastomosis, and the entire outflow vein, specifically looking into potential problem areas. Patency of the ipsilateral internal jugular vein needs to be assessed. If patency of the ipsilateral internal jugular vein is confirmed, it can be used for access. Retrograde access into the outflow vein is obtained with a reverse-curve catheter and a Glidewire. In some cases, puncture of the outflow vein is necessary along with the use of snares to direct the catheter system into the outflow vein. The techniques for intervention are described. Successful access into the outflow vein is possible in >95% of cases. The technique is useful for fistula maturation, declotting procedure, and arteriovenous fistula and graft maintenance. If intervention is unsuccessful, the transjugular access offers the possibility of placement of a dialysis catheter for temporary or long-term dialysis.

The vascular access in the elderly: a position statement of the Vascular Access Working Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology

The incident hemodialysis (HD) population is aging, and the elderly group is the one with the most rapid increase. In this context it is important to define the factors associated with outcomes in elderly patients. The high prevalence of comorbidities, particularly diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease and congestive heart failure, usually make vascular access (VA) creation more difficult. Furthermore, many of these patients may have an insufficient vasculature for fistula maturation. Finally, many fistulas may never be used due to the competing risk of death before dialysis initiation. In these cases, an arteriovenous graft and in some cases a central venous catheter become a valid alternative form of VA. Nephrologists need to know what is the most appropriate VA option in these patients. Age should not be a limiting factor when determining candidacy for arteriovenous fistula creation. The aim of this position statement, prepared by experts of the Vascular Access Working Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology, is to critically review the current evidence on VA in elderly HD patients. To this end, relevant clinical studies and recent guidelines on VA are reviewed and commented. The main advantages and potential drawbacks of the different VA modalities in the elderly patients are discussed.

Optimizing vascular access in the elderly: words we use affect patient care

Age is commonly used as guidance in a variety of life activities having extensive influence on people's lives from social to legal aspects. Health care is no exception, where treatment is often subliminally declined as a certain age is reached, mainly for economic reasons. Humans age at different and unpredicted rates, related to the development of co-morbid conditions, most notably diabetes and cardio-vascular pathology. The way we think about age and being old greatly affects how we will choose between the treatment options. Instead, if we consider the disease or diagnosis as the treatment guide, age will be cancelled out, and become a covariant in addition to all other contributing factors in a specific patient's disease state. This thinking would help the planning and likely improve the selection of renal replacement therapy in patients with kidney failure, where therapeutic options range from no treatment to renal transplant, based on clinical conditions considering risk and outcome projections, regardless of age.