Pain and disability in women with patellofemoral pain relate to kinesiophobia, but not to patellofemoral joint loading variables

Effects of pain exacerbation on postural control in women with patellofemoral pain during single leg squat: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The center of pressure (COP) excursion parameters are recognized as risk factors for the etiology and development of patellofemoral pain (PFP). The purpose of the present study measures the effect of pain exacerbation on COP excursion, and the correlation between pain intensity and COP excursion in women with PFP during single leg squat (SLS).

METHODS

Sixty patients with PFP participated in this cross-sectional study. The outcome measures were included pain intensity and COP excursion which evaluated in pre and post pain exacerbation during SLS. The COP parameters were evaluated during single leg squat in 60° of knee flexion. A paired t-test and MANOVA was used to compare pain intensity and COP excursion between the two conditions, respectively. Furthermore, A Pearson's correlation matrix was used to examine the relationship between pain intensity with COP excursion.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis showed that pain intensity (t = - 16.655, p < 0.001) and COP excursion (Wilks' Lambda = 0.225, p < 0.001) with medium effect size increased after PFJ loading. In addition, an excellent positive correlation was observed between increased in pain intensity and COP excursion (P < 0.001, r > 0.80).

CONCLUSION

After PFJ loading, women with PFP presented increases in the pain intensity, COP excursions, and sway velocity. In addition, there was an association between the increase in pain intensity and COP excursions. Clinicians aiming to improve postural control of patients with PFP could use kinesio taping as a short-term intervention and balance training to improvements in postural control at medium and long-term. Furthermore, emphasizing psychological factors to reducing kinesiophobia can be useful to restoring proper movement pattern, reducing pain and improving symptoms.

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the patellofemoral pain severity scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the Turkish validity and reliability of the Patellofemoral Pain Severity Scale (PSS) in patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and to adapt it to Turkish.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A pilot study was conducted with 10 patients. 123 patients underwent PSS test-retest at 24-48 h intervals. Construct validity, correlations of PSS with other scales Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Stair Climbing and Descending Test (SCD), Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS), Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (LDSS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The content validity index value of the scale was 0.95. The overall internal consistency (Cronbach α: 0.88) was high. Item-total correlations of the scale were between 0.51 and 0.7. In the evaluation of the convergent validity of the PSS, it was found that there was a positive correlation between the PSSS and TUG and SCD, and a negative correlation between the PSS, TAS, LDSS and KOS-ADL (p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, it was determined that the PSSS scale had good internal consistency, test-retest validity and adequate construct validity when compared with the KOS-ADL, LDSS and AKPS.

Is Adding Education to Trunk and Hip Exercises Beneficial for Patellofemoral Pain? A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of adding education to trunk and hip exercises in patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP).

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Research laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty patients with PFP (N=60) were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (education followed by trunk and hip exercises, n=30) or a control group (trunk and hip exercises, n=30).

INTERVENTIONS

Both groups received 8 weeks of trunk and hip exercises, while patients in the experimental group participated in 3 prior education sessions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was pain; secondary outcomes were pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, function, and muscle strength. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, after 8 weeks (post-intervention), and 3 months post-intervention (follow-up).

RESULTS

No significant between-group differences were observed for pain outcome post-intervention. The experimental group showed superiority over the control group in the improvement of pain catastrophizing (mean difference: -2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.059 to 0.028) and kinesiophobia (mean difference: -3.56; 95% CI -1.067 to -0.035) at post-intervention. In the experimental group, improvements were maintained at follow-up assessment for all outcomes, except muscle strength.

CONCLUSION

Adding education to trunk and hip exercises was associated with greater improvements in psychological outcomes than trunk and hip exercises alone after the intervention. Education can be incorporated when designing trunk and hip exercises for patients with PFP.

Poor Mental Health Indicators in Individuals With Patellofemoral Pain

CONTEXT

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common source of knee pain in active individuals, accounting for a large number of knee injuries examined in sports medicine clinics. As a chronic condition, PFP can affect mental health. However, this effect has not yet been studied in individuals with PFP.

OBJECTIVE

To determine how subjective physical and mental health measures in individuals with PFP differed from those measures in pain-free individuals.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Volunteers for the study were 30 people with PFP (19 women, 11 men; age = 20.23 ± 3.32 years, height = 166.69 ± 6.41 cm, mass = 69.55 ± 13.15 kg) and 30 matched pain-free individuals (19 women, 11 men; age = 20.33 ± 3.37 years, height = 169.31 ± 9.30 cm, mass = 64.02 ± 11.00 kg).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Current and worst pain levels in the past 24 hours were determined using a visual analog scale (VAS). The Anterior Knee Pain Scale, Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire, and Lower Extremity Functional Scale were administered. Physical and mental health measures were obtained using a modified 12-item Short Form Health Survey. Scores for 2 subscales on the modified Short Form-12 were weighted and calculated: physical component and mental component.Independent t tests were calculated to compare variables between groups. Coefficient correlations were used to measure the associations between the variables.

RESULTS

Individuals with PFP reported lower levels of physical (pain free: 56.13 ± 1.63, PFP: 50.54 ± 7.10, P < .001) and mental (pain-free: 53.32 ± 4.71, PFP: 48.64 ± 10.53, P = .03) health. In the PFP group, we found moderate negative correlations between the VAS score for current pain and mental health (r = -0.52, P < .01) and between the VAS score for worst pain in the past 24 hours and mental health (r = -0.46, P = .01) and between activity limitations in individuals with PFP and fear avoidance beliefs (r = -0.61, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results should encourage clinicians, especially musculoskeletal rehabilitation professionals, to acknowledge the importance of a whole-person approach when treating or planning rehabilitation programs for individuals with PFP.

Exploring overweight and obesity beyond body mass index: A body composition analysis in people with and without patellofemoral pain

BACKGROUND

We compared body mass index (BMI), body fat, and skeletal muscle mass between (1) a mixed-sex nonathletic cohort of people with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and pain-free people, and (2) a nonathletic cohort of people with PFP and pain-free people subgrouped by sex (i.e., men and women with PFP vs. pain-free men and women).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 114 people with PFP (71 women, 43 men) and 54 pain-free controls (32 women, 22 men). All participants attended a single testing session to assess body composition measures, which included BMI, percentage of body fat (%BFBioimpedance), and skeletal muscle mass (both assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis), and percentage of body fat (%BFSkinfold) (assessed by skinfold caliper analysis). A one-way univariate analysis of covariance (age and physical activity levels as covariates) was used to compare body composition measures between groups (i.e., PFP vs. pain-free group; women with PFP vs. pain-free women; men with PFP vs. pain-free men).

RESULTS

Women with PFP presented significantly higher BMI, %BFBioimpedance, and %BFSkinfold, and lower skeletal muscle mass compared to pain-free women (p ≤ 0.04; effect size : ‒0.47 to 0.85). Men with PFP and men and women combined had no differences in BMI, %BFBioimpedance, %BFSkinfold, and skeletal muscle mass compared to their respective pain-free groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that BMI and body composition measures should be considered as part of the evaluation and management of people with PFP, especially in women, who have demonstrated higher BMI and body fat and lower skeletal muscle mass compared to pain-free controls. Future studies should not assess body composition measures in a mixed-sex population without distinguishing men participants from women participants.

Kinesiophobia Is Associated With Poor Function and Modifiable Through Interventions in People With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review With Individual Participant Data Correlation Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and correlation meta-analysis was to identify factors associated with kinesiophobia in individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and to identify interventions that may reduce kinesiophobia in individuals with PFP.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched for articles including clinical factors associated with kinesiophobia or interventions that may reduce kinesiophobia in individuals with PFP. Two reviewers screened articles for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and quality, and extracted data from each study. A mixed-effects model was used to calculate correlations of function and pain with kinesiophobia using individual participant data. Meta-analyses were performed on interventional articles; Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation was used to evaluate certainty of evidence. Results were reported narratively when pooling was not possible.

RESULTS

Forty-one articles involving 2712 individuals were included. Correlation meta-analyses using individual participant data indicated a moderate association between self-reported function and kinesiophobia (n = 499; r = -0.440) and a weak association between pain and kinesiophobia (n = 644; r = 0.162). Low-certainty evidence from 2 articles indicated that passive treatment techniques were more effective than minimal intervention in reducing kinesiophobia (standardized mean difference = 1.11; 95% CI = 0.72 to 1.49). Very low-certainty evidence from 5 articles indicated that interventions to target kinesiophobia (psychobehavioral interventions, education, and self-managed exercise) were better in reducing kinesiophobia than physical therapist treatment approaches not specifically targeting kinesiophobia (standardized mean difference = 1.64; 95% CI = 0.14 to 3.15).

CONCLUSION

Higher levels of kinesiophobia were moderately associated with poorer function and weakly associated with higher pain in individuals with PFP. Taping and bracing may reduce kinesiophobia immediately after use, and specific kinesiophobia-targeted interventions may reduce kinesiophobia following the full intervention; however, the certainty of evidence is very low.

IMPACT

Assessment of kinesiophobia in clinical practice is recommended, on the basis of the relationships identified between kinesiophobia and other important factors that predict outcomes in individuals with PFP.

The association between kinesiophobia and functional limitations in service members with knee pain

BACKGROUND

Knee diagnoses account for more than 50% of lower extremity musculoskeletal conditions in non-deployed US Service members. However, there is limited information regarding kinesiophobia in Service members with non-operative knee diagnoses.

HYPOTHESES

The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of high levels of kinesiophobia in US military Service members with knee pain across different knee diagnoses, and to determine the relationships between kinesiophobia and lower extremity function and/or specific functional limitations in Service members with knee pain. It was hypothesized Service members with knee pain would exhibit high levels of kinesiophobia across all knee diagnoses examined, and higher levels of both kinesiophobia and pain would be associated with worse self-reported function in this population. It was also hypothesized higher levels of kinesiophobia would be associated with functional activities with high knee loading.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

METHODS

Sixty-five US Service members presenting to an outpatient physical therapy clinic were included in this study (20 females; age = 30.8 ± 7.7 years; height = 1.74 ± 0.9 m; mass = 80.7 ± 16.2 kg). Inclusion criterion was the presence of knee pain (duration = 50 ± 59 months); exclusion criterion was knee pain as a sequela of knee surgery. Data regarding demographic, pain chronicity, pain by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) were retrospectively obtained from patients' medical records. A high level of kinesiophobia was defined as a TSK score of greater than 37 points. Patient diagnoses included: osteoarthritis (n = 16); patellofemoral pain syndrome (n = 23); and other non-operative knee diagnoses (n = 26). Commonality analysis was utilized to determine the effects of age, height, mass, NRS, and TSK on LEFS score. Predictor values were interpreted as <1% = negligible, >1% = small; >9% = moderate, >25% = large. Additionally, exploratory item-specific analyses examined the strength of the relationships between kinesiophobia and LEFS item responses. Binary logistic regression determined if difficulty with an individual LEFS item could be predicted from either NRS or TSK score. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

High levels of kinesiophobia were identified in 43 individuals (66%). NRS and TSK explained 19.4% and 8.6% of the unique variance in LEFS, and 38.5% and 20.5% of total variance, respectively. Age, height, and mass explained negligible to small proportions of the unique variance in LEFS. TSK and NRS were independent predictors for 13/20 individual LEFS items, with odds ratios ranging from 1.12 to 3.05 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The majority of US Service members in this study exhibited high levels of kinesiophobia. Kinesiophobia was significantly related to self-reported functional scores and performance on individual functional tasks in Service members with knee pain.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Treatment strategies addressing both fear of movement and pain reduction in patients with knee pain may help optimize functional outcomes.

Do biomechanical foot-based interventions reduce patellofemoral joint loads in adults with and without patellofemoral pain or osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of biomechanical foot-based interventions (eg, footwear, insoles, taping and bracing on the foot) on patellofemoral loads during walking, running or walking and running combined in adults with and without patellofemoral pain or osteoarthritis.

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTdiscus, Embase and CENTRAL.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

English-language studies that assessed effects of biomechanical foot-based interventions on peak patellofemoral joint loads, quantified by patellofemoral joint pressure, reaction force or knee flexion moment during gait, in people with or without patellofemoral pain or osteoarthritis.

RESULTS

We identified 22 footwear and 11 insole studies (participant n=578). Pooled analyses indicated low-certainty evidence that minimalist footwear leads to a small reduction in peak patellofemoral joint loads compared with conventional footwear during running only (standardised mean difference (SMD) (95% CI) = -0.40 (-0.68 to -0.11)). Low-certainty evidence indicated that medial support insoles do not alter patellofemoral joint loads during walking (SMD (95% CI) = -0.08 (-0.42 to 0.27)) or running (SMD (95% CI) = 0.11 (-0.17 to 0.39)). Very low-certainty evidence indicated rocker-soled shoes have no effect on patellofemoral joint loads during walking and running combined (SMD (95% CI) = 0.37) (-0.06 to 0.79)).

CONCLUSION

Minimalist footwear may reduce peak patellofemoral joint loads slightly compared with conventional footwear during running only. Medial support insoles may not alter patellofemoral joint loads during walking or running and the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of rocker-soled shoes during walking and running combined. Clinicians aiming to reduce patellofemoral joint loads during running in people with patellofemoral pain or osteoarthritis may consider minimalist footwear.

Trajectory of knee health in runners with and without heightened osteoarthritis risk: the TRAIL prospective cohort study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Running is one of the most popular recreational activities worldwide, due to its low cost and accessibility. However, little is known about the impact of running on knee joint health in runners with and without a history of knee surgery. The primary aim of this longitudinal cohort study is to compare knee joint structural features on MRI and knee symptoms at baseline and 4-year follow-up in runners with and without a history of knee surgery. Secondary aims are to explore the relationships between training load exposures (volume and/or intensity) and changes in knee joint structure and symptoms over 4 years; explore the relationship between baseline running biomechanics, and changes in knee joint structure and symptoms over 4 years. In addition, we will explore whether additional variables confound, modify or mediate these associations, including sex, baseline lower-limb functional performance, knee muscle strength, psychological and sociodemographic factors.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A convenience sample of at least 200 runners (sex/gender balanced) with (n=100) and without (n=100) a history of knee surgery will be recruited. Primary outcomes will be knee joint health (MRI) and knee symptoms (baseline; 4 years). Exposure variables for secondary outcomes include training load exposure, obtained daily throughout the study from wearable devices and three-dimensional running biomechanics (baseline). Additional variables include lower limb functional performance, knee extensor and flexor muscle strength, biomarkers, psychological and sociodemographic factors (baseline). Knowledge and beliefs about osteoarthritis will be obtained through predefined questions and semi-structured interviews with a subset of participants. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models, adjusting for potential confounding factors, will explore changes in knee joint structural features and symptoms, and the influence of potential modifiers and mediators.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approved by the La Trobe University Ethics Committee (HEC-19524). Findings will be disseminated to stakeholders, peer-review journals and conferences.

Kinematic and Kinetic Gait Characteristics in People with Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a prevalent knee condition with many proposed biomechanically orientated etiological factors and treatments.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to systematically review and synthesize the evidence for biomechanical variables (spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic) during walking and running in people with PFP compared with pain-free controls, and determine if biomechanical variables contribute to the development of PFP.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

We searched Medline, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to October 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

All study designs (prospective, case-control [± interventional component, provided pre-intervention data were reported for both groups], cross-sectional) comparing spatiotemporal, kinematic, and/or kinetic variables during walking and/or running between people with and without PFP.

RESULTS

We identified 55 studies involving 1300 people with PFP and 1393 pain-free controls. Overall pooled analysis identified that people with PFP had slower gait velocity [moderate evidence, standardized mean difference (SMD) - 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.72, - 0.27], lower cadence (limited evidence, SMD - 0.43, 95% CI - 0.74, - 0.12), and shorter stride length (limited evidence, SMD - 0.46, 95% CI - 0.80, - 0.12). People with PFP also had greater peak contralateral pelvic drop (moderate evidence, SMD - 0.46, 95% CI - 0.90, - 0.03), smaller peak knee flexion angles (moderate evidence, SMD - 0.30, 95% CI - 0.52, - 0.08), and smaller peak knee extension moments (limited evidence, SMD - 0.41, 95% CI - 0.75, - 0.07) compared with controls. Females with PFP had greater peak hip flexion (moderate evidence, SMD 0.83, 95% CI 0.30, 1.36) and rearfoot eversion (limited evidence, SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.03, 1.14) angles compared to pain-free females. No significant between-group differences were identified for all other biomechanical variables. Data pooling was not possible for prospective studies.

CONCLUSION

A limited number of biomechanical differences exist when comparing people with and without PFP, mostly characterized by small-to-moderate effect sizes. People with PFP ambulate slower, with lower cadence and a shortened stride length, greater contralateral pelvic drop, and lower knee flexion angles and knee extension moments. It is unclear whether these features are present prior to PFP onset or occur as pain-compensatory movement strategies given the lack of prospective data.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO # CRD42019080241.

Anterior Knee Pain Following Primary Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty With Posterior-Stabilized Prosthesis and Patellar Resurfacing: Prevalence and Clinical Implications

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with patient dissatisfaction. Factors related to postoperative anterior knee pain and its impact on patient outcomes are poorly understood. The following are the aims of this study: (1) to report the prevalence of anterior knee pain before and after TKA using a posterior-stabilized prosthesis with routine patellar resurfacing; (2) to investigate the association of preoperative clinical factors with the presence of anterior knee pain after TKA; and (3) to explore the association of postoperative anterior knee pain with postoperative self-reported function and quality of life.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 506 patients who had undergone elective primary unilateral TKA with a posterior-stabilized prosthesis and patellar resurfacing. Outcome measures prior to and 12 months after TKA included self-reported anterior knee pain, knee function, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Prevalence of anterior knee pain was 72% prior to and 15% following TKA. Patients who had preoperative anterior knee pain had twice the risk of experiencing anterior knee pain after TKA than patients who did not have preoperative anterior knee pain (risk ratio: 2.37, 95% CI 1.73-2.96). Greater severity of preoperative anterior knee pain and worse self-reported function were associated with the presence of postoperative anterior knee pain (rho = 0.15, P < .01; rho = 0.13, P < .01, respectively). Preoperative age, gender, and quality of life were not associated with postoperative anterior knee pain. Greater severity of postoperative anterior knee pain was associated with worse knee function at 12 months postoperative (rho = 0.49, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

One in 7 patients reported anterior knee pain 12 months following posterior-stabilized and patella-resurfaced TKA. The presence of preoperative anterior knee pain and worse self-reported function are associated with postoperative anterior knee pain.

Patellofemoral pain over time: Protocol for a prospective, longitudinal study investigating physical and non-physical features

Background

This is a protocol for a prospective longitudinal study that aims to investigate: (1) group-by-time changes over a minimum of 15 months follow-up in patellofemoral pain (PFP) symptoms, biomechanical, muscle function, pain processing, and psychological features; (2) the extent to which changes in biomechanical, muscle function, pain processing, and psychological features are associated with changes in self-reported pain, physical performance measures, self-reported function, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and physical activity level.

Methods

Individuals with PFP (n = 144) and control individuals (n = 85) without PFP were assessed at baseline. Outcomes assessed included: 3D kinematics and kinetics during single leg squat, step-down and single leg hop; maximal torque and rate of torque development of hip abductors and knee extensors/flexors; force steadiness of hip abductors and knee extensors; anterior and lateral trunk endurance; pressure pain thresholds at the center of patella and contralateral shoulder; kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia); pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale); worst self-reported pain (Visual Analogue Scale); physical performance measures (Single Leg Hop Test and Forward Step-Down Test); self-reported function (Anterior Knee Pain Scale); HRQOL (Medical Outcome Short-Form 36), and physical activity level (Baecke's Questionnaire). Follow-up assessments will be identical to the baseline and will be performed after a minimum of 15 months. Generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) will be used to investigate group-by-time differences. Linear regression models will be used to determine the extent to which changes in biomechanical, muscle function, pain processing, and psychological features are associated with changes in self-reported pain, physical performance measures, self-reported function, HRQOL, and physical activity level.

Discussion

Physical and non-physical features have been previously associated with PFP. However, the present study will be the first to investigate their integrated evolution as part of the natural history of PFP and its progression. In doing so, we will be able to determine their behavior in the long-term, as well as how they prospectively associate with each other and with clinical outcomes. Ultimately, this will provide a greater understanding of predictors of long-term outcome and possible targets for interventions.

Computational biomechanics of human knee joint in stair ascent: Muscle-ligament-contact forces and comparison with level walking

About a third of knee joint disorders originate from the patellofemoral (PF) site that makes stair ascent a difficult activity for patients. A detailed finite element model of the knee joint is coupled to a lower extremity musculoskeletal model to simulate the stance phase of stair ascent. It is driven by the mean of measurements on the hip-knee-ankle moments-angles as well as ground reaction forces reported in healthy individuals. Predicted muscle activities compare well to the recorded electromyography data. Peak forces in quadriceps (3.87 BW, body weight, at 20% instance in our 607 N subject), medial hamstrings (0.77 BW at 20%), and gastrocnemii (1.21 BW at 80%) are estimated. Due to much greater flexion angles-moments in the first half of stance, large PF contact forces (peak of 3.1 BW at 20% stance) and stresses (peak of 4.83 MPa at 20% stance) are estimated that exceed their peaks in level walking by fourfold and twofold, respectively. Compared with level walking, ACL forces diminish in the first half of stance but substantially increase later in the second half (peak of 0.76 BW at 75% stance). Under nearly similar contact forces at 20% of stance, the contact stress on the tibiofemoral (TF) medial plateau reaches a peak (9.68 MPa) twice that on the PF joint suggesting the vulnerability of both joints. Compared with walking, stair ascent increases peak ACL force and both peak TF and PF contact stresses. Reductions in the knee flexion moment and/or angle appear as a viable strategy to mitigate internal loads and pain.

The relationships of kinesiophobia and physical function and physical activity level in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Kinesiophobia may hinder physical performance measures and functional quality of life in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). This study aims to quantify differences in physical function in patients with JIA compared to healthy controls, and determine the effects of kinesiophobia on physical function and physical activity.

METHODS

This was a comparative study of participants with JIA and healthy controls (JIA n = 26, control n = 17). All children with JIA had lower extremity joint involvement. Performance-based measures included gait speed, chair and stair navigation performance. Self-reported measures included Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Physical Function Mobility, and Pain Interference and the Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (Pedi-FABS). The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) assessed patient fear of movement due to pain. Linear regression models were used to determine the contribution of TSK-11 scores on performance test and Pedi-FABS scores.

RESULTS

Gait speeds were 11-15% slower, chair rise repetitions were 28% fewer, and stair ascent and descent times were 26-31% slower in JIA than controls (p < .05). PROMIS® Physical Function Mobility scores were 10% lower and Pain Interference scores were 2.6 times higher in JIA than healthy controls (p = .003). TSK-11 scores were higher in JIA than controls (p < .0001). After controlling for covariates, TSK-11 scores explained 11.7-26.5% of the variance of regression models for stair climb time, chair rise performance and Pedi-FABS scores (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with JIA experience difficulty with tasks related to body transfers. Kinesiophobia is a significant contributor to the functional task performance and may impact clinical outcomes.

Body fat and skeletal muscle mass, but not body mass index, are associated with pressure hyperalgesia in young adults with patellofemoral pain

BACKGROUND

Young adults with patellofemoral pain (PFP) have a high prevalence of being overweight or obese, which is associated with impaired lower limb function and muscle weakness. However, the impact of being overweight or obese on pain sensitivity has not been explored.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the association between body fat, skeletal muscle mass, and body mass index (BMI) with pressure hyperalgesia and self-reported pain in young adults with PFP.

METHODS

114 adults with PFP (24 ± 5 years old, 62% women) were recruited. Demographics and self-reported pain (current and worst knee pain intensity in the previous month - 0-100 mm visual analog scale) were recorded. Body fat and skeletal muscle mass were measured using bioelectrical impedance. Pressure hyperalgesia was measured using a handheld algometer (pressure pain threshold) at three sites: center of patella of the painful knee, ipsilateral tibialis anterior, and contralateral upper limb. The association between body fat, skeletal muscle mass, and BMI with pressure hyperalgesia and self-reported pain were investigated using partial correlations and hierarchical regression models (adjusted for sex, bilateral pain, and symptoms duration).

RESULTS

Higher body fat and lower skeletal muscle mass were associated with local, spread, and widespread pressure hyperalgesia (ΔR²=0.09 to 0.17, p ≤ 0.001; ΔR²=0.14 to 0.26, p<0.001, respectively), and higher current self-reported pain (ΔR²=0.10, p<0.001; ΔR²=0.06, p = 0.007, respectively). Higher BMI was associated with higher current self-reported pain (ΔR²=0.10, p = 0.001), but not with any measures of pressure hyperalgesia (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Higher body fat and lower skeletal muscle mass help to explain local, spread, and widespread pressure hyperalgesia, and self-reported pain in people with PFP. BMI only helps to explain self-reported pain. These factors should be considered when assessing people with PFP and developing their management plan, but caution should be taken as the strength of association was generally low.

Self-efficacy and Emotional Distress in a Cohort With Patellofemoral Pain

Background:

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is commonly described and approached in biomechanical terms despite strong evidence that psychosocial factors such as kinesiophobia, emotional distress, and self-efficacy are important in long-standing musculoskeletal pain.

Purpose:

To describe levels of self-efficacy, emotional distress, kinesiophobia, and widespread pain in a cohort with long-standing PFP and determine their association with measures of pain, function, and health-related quality of life.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Included were 112 patients with PFP (age range, 16-40 years) who had been recruited to a randomized controlled trial. Seven baseline factors (patient sex, pain duration, number of pain sites throughout the body, kinesiophobia [Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia], emotional distress [Hopkins Symptom Checklist], self-efficacy, and knee extension strength) were investigated for associations with the following outcomes: symptoms of PFP (Anterior Knee Pain Scale), pain (worst and usual), and health-related quality of life (5-level EuroQol-5 Dimensions [EQ-5D-5L]). We used bivariate models and multivariable linear regression models with a stepwise backward removal method to find associations with the outcomes. Internal validation was conducted, and adjusted coefficients after shrinkage are presented.

Results:

Of the study patients, 28% reported emotional distress (Hopkins Symptom Checklist ≥1.75), 69% reported multiple pain sites, and 33% had widespread pain. The kinesiophobia score was elevated, with a mean score of 35.4 ± 8.2. Self-efficacy was strongly associated with better function (Anterior Knee Pain Scale) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) as well as lower pain scores in bivariate and multivariable models. Self-efficacy and emotional distress explained 50% of the variance in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L).

Conclusion:

Our findings support other studies of PFP suggesting elevated levels of kinesiophobia and emotional distress and higher rates of widespread pain compared with the general population or pain-free controls. Higher self-efficacy was associated with better function and health-related quality of life. Together with emotional distress, it explained half the variance of health-related life quality. The results underline the importance of approaching these patients in a biopsychosocial model.

Registration:

NCT02114294 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Altered neural control of gait and its association with pain and joint impairment in adults with haemophilic arthropathy: Clinical and methodological implications

INTRODUCTION

It is unknown whether altered neural control is associated with clinical outcomes in people with haemophilic arthropathy (PWHA). The dynamic motor control index during walking (Walk-DMC) is a summary metric of neural control.

AIMS

The primary aim of this study was to apply the Walk-DMC to assess if people diagnosed with haemophilic arthropathy have impaired neural control of gait and investigate the association of Walk-DMC with pain and joint impairment.

METHOD

The Walk-DMC was assessed using surface electromyography in 11 leg muscles. Twenty-two PWHA and 15 healthy subjects walked on a 30-m walkway at 1 m/s. In addition, pain (visual analogue scale), knee flexion contracture (degrees) and joint impairment (Haemophilia Joint Health Score, HJHS) were assessed. The clinical outcomes were correlated with the Walk-DMC. Multiple regression analysis was performed to predict the Walk-DMC using the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

In 13 PWHA the Walk-DMC was beyond the normal range (80-120 pts). PWHA with an altered Walk-DMC showed more years with arthropathy, more pain, higher knee flexion contracture and a higher HJHS score (P < .05, effect size > .8). Significant negative moderate associations between Walk-DMC and pain, knee flexion contracture and HJHS were found (P < .05). The model that best predicted the Walk-DMC was the pain with knee flexion contracture (R²  = .44; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

PWHA with abnormal neural control of gait also has more years with arthropathy, more pain, and more impaired joints. Our results indicate an association between the Walk-DMC index and joint damage, specifically with pain in combination with knee flexion contracture.

May the force be with you: understanding how patellofemoral joint reaction force compares across different activities and physical interventions-a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and synthesise patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF) in healthy individuals and those with patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis (OA), during everyday activities, therapeutic exercises and with physical interventions (eg, foot orthotics, footwear, taping, bracing).

DESIGN

A systematic review with meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, SportDiscus and Cochrane Library databases were searched.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Observational and interventional studies reporting PFJRF during everyday activities, therapeutic exercises, and physical interventions.

RESULTS

In healthy individuals, the weighted average of mean (±SD) peak PFJRF for everyday activities were: walking 0.9±0.4 body weight (BW), stair ascent 3.2±0.7 BW, stair descent 2.8±0.5 BW and running 5.2±1.2 BW. In those with patellofemoral pain, peak PFJRF were: walking 0.8±0.2 BW, stair ascent 2.5±0.5 BW, stair descent 2.6±0.5 BW, running 4.1±0.9 BW. Only single studies reported peak PFJRF during everyday activities in individuals with patellofemoral OA/articular cartilage defects (walking 1.3±0.5 BW, stair ascent 1.6±0.4 BW, stair descent 1.0±0.5 BW). The PFJRF was reported for many different exercises and physical interventions; however, considerable variability precluded any pooled estimates.

SUMMARY

Everyday activities and exercises involving larger knee flexion (eg, squatting) expose the patellofemoral joint to higher PFJRF than those involving smaller knee flexion (eg, walking). There were no discernable differences in peak PFJRF during everyday activities between healthy individuals and those with patellofemoral pain/OA. The information on PFJRF may be used to select appropriate variations of exercises and physical interventions.

REPORT-PFP: a consensus from the International Patellofemoral Research Network to improve REPORTing of quantitative PatelloFemoral Pain studies

Patellofemoral pain is a common and often debilitating musculoskeletal condition. Clinical translation and evidence synthesis of patellofemoral pain research are compromised by heterogenous and often inadequately reported study details. This consensus statement and associated checklist provides standards for REPORTing of quantitative PatelloFemoral Pain (REPORT-PFP) research to enhance clinical translation and evidence synthesis, and support clinician engagement with research and data collection. A three-stage Delphi process was initiated at the 2015 International Patellofemoral Research Network (iPFRN) retreat. An initial e-Delphi activity (n=24) generated topics and items, which were refined at the 2017 iPFRN retreat, and voted on prior to and following the 2019 iPFRN retreat (n=51 current and past retreat participants). Voting criteria included 'strongly recommended' (essential), 'recommended' (encouraged) and uncertain/unsure. An item was included in the checklist if ≥70% respondents voted 'recommended'. Items receiving ≥70% votes for 'strongly recommended' were labelled as such. The final REPORT-PFP checklist includes 31 items (11 strongly recommended, 20 recommended), covering (i) demographics (n=2,4); (ii) baseline symptoms and previous treatments (n=3,7); (iii) outcome measures (2,4); (iv) outcomes measure description (n=1,2); (v) clinical trial methodology (0,3) and (vi) reporting study results (n=3,0). The REPORT-PFP checklist is ready to be used by researchers and clinicians. Strong stakeholder engagement from clinical academics during development means consistent application by the international patellofemoral pain research community is likely. Checklist adherence will improve research accessibility for clinicians and enhance future evidence synthesis.

The relationship between injury-related fear and physical activity in people with a history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between fear-avoidance beliefs and physical activity (PA) in people with a history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

DESIGN

Modified cross-sectional.

SETTING

Research laboratory Participants: A total of 19 participants with a history of unilateral ACLR.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants completed the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), a valid and reliable measure of FAB measured across two subscales (FABQ-Sport and FABQ-Physical Activity (PA)). Higher scores indicated greater FAB. The participants were provided a wearable accelerometer to wear on the wrist for one-week to capture PA outcomes (vertical counts per minute and average steps/day).

RESULTS

Weak, non-statistically significant positive correlations were identified between average daily steps per day (11,237.7 ± 5667.7), FABQ-PA (6 ± 8; r = 0.12, p = .63) and FABQ-S (8 ± 15; r = 0.26, p = .35). Weak, non-statistically significant negative correlations were identified between vertical counts per minute (131.4 ± 141.4) and FABQ-PA (r = -0.13, p = .59) and no relationship was observed with FABQ-Sports (r = 0.00, p = .98).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant relationships between FABs and PA. The ability for individuals to remain physically active, with measurable levels of FABs (greater than 0), may be due to other psychological variables that should be further examined.

Eccentric exercise in the prevention of patellofemoral pain in high-volume runners: A rationale for integration

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common overuse condition seen in high-volume runners, such as military recruits. Exercise is commonly prescribed, with benefit, for the rehabilitation of individuals with PFP. However, a substantial number of individuals with the condition do not achieve an optimal outcome, suggesting the condition can be difficult and complex. Given the challenging nature of the condition, and the risk of developing PFP in high-volume runners, it seems logical to investigate options for injury prevention. Eccentric exercise has been useful in the prevention of some pathologies so its utility in preventing PFP should be explored. Current evidence regarding prevention programs for PFP are limited. Preventative exercise programs for PFP have not been well described or reported, and questions remain regarding their effectiveness. Based on available evidence or lack thereof, and known physiological and clinical effects of eccentric exercise, suggestions for integration of eccentric exercise into PFP prevention programs are offered. Eccentric exercise may be useful for PFP prevention from a theoretical framework however additional longitudinal cohort studies would be useful in determining its utility.

Patellofemoral joint loading during the forward and backward lunge

OBJECTIVE

To examine patellofemoral joint (PFJ) loading in two lunge movements: Forward Lunge (FL) and Backward Lunge (BL).

DESIGN

Repeated Measures.

SETTING

University Biomechanics Laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

20 asymptomatic females.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Six trials of two lunge movements (FL and BL) to a depth of 75% of leg length were performed. 3-D motion capture and force platforms were used to collect data as input into a musculoskeletal model to determine quadriceps force, PFJ reaction force, PFJ stress, and knee flexion angle.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis indicated differences in PFJ loading variables and joint angles between the lunge movements (Forward vs. Backward) and phases (Down vs. Up). Quadriceps force, PFJ reaction force, and knee flexion angle were larger in the FL movement and Up phases. PFJ loading rate was greater in the FL movement along with a lower forward trunk tilt.

CONCLUSION

The FL produced greater PFJ loading variables compared to the BL. Further research is needed to examine a population of individuals who have patellofemoral pain (PFP) to see if their symptoms may be reduced when using the BL.