JC polyomavirus nephropathy, a rare cause of transplant dysfunction: Case report and review of literature

Concurrent JCPyV-DNAemia Is Correlated With Poor Graft Outcome in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Polyomavirus-associated Nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Co-infection of JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) and BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is uncommon in kidney transplant recipients, and the prognosis is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of concurrent JCPyV-DNAemia on graft outcomes in BKPyV-infected kidney transplant recipients with polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN).

METHODS

A total of 140 kidney transplant recipients with BKPyV replication and PyVAN, 122 without concurrent JCPyV-DNAemia and 18 with JCPyV-DNAemia were included in the analysis. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to identify prognostic factors for graft survival. A nomogram for predicting graft survival was created and evaluated.

RESULTS

The median tubulitis score in the JCPyV-DNAemia-positive group was higher than in JCPyV-DNAemia-negative group (P = 0.048). At last follow-up, the graft loss rate in the JCPyV-DNAemia-positive group was higher than in the JCPyV-DNAemia-negative group (50% versus 25.4%; P = 0.031). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the graft survival rate in the JCPyV-DNAemia-positive group was lower than in the JCPyV-DNAemia-negative group (P = 0.003). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that concurrent JCPyV-DNAemia was an independent risk factor for graft survival (hazard ratio = 4.808; 95% confidence interval: 2.096-11.03; P < 0.001). The nomogram displayed favorable discrimination (C-index = 0.839), concordance, and clinical applicability in predicting graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent JCPyV-DNAemia is associated with a worse graft outcome in BKPyV-infected kidney transplant recipients with PyVAN.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in kidney transplantation: Mechanisms of action, clinical applications, adverse effects, and hyperimmune globulin

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been developed for over 40 years. The mechanisms of action of IVIG are complex and diverse, and there may be multiple mechanisms that combine to influence it. IVIG has been used in kidney transplantation for desensitization, treatment of antibody-mediated rejection, and ABO-incompatible transplantation. and treatment or prevention of some infectious diseases. Hyperimmune globulins such as cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin (CMV-IG) and hepatitis B hyperimmune globulin (HBIG) have also been used to protect against cytomegalovirus and hepatitis B virus, respectively. However, IVIG is also associated with some rare but serious adverse effects and some application risks, and clinicians need to weigh the pros and cons and develop individualized treatment programs to benefit more patients. This review will provide an overview of the multiple mechanisms of action, clinical applications, adverse effects, and prophylactic measures of IVIG, and hyperimmune globulin will also be introduced in it.

Case report: JC polyomavirus nephropathy in simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation: the role of viral-specific in situ hybridization staining

Introduction

JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) is a ubiquitous virus that can be latent in the brain and the kidney. It is the etiologic agent responsible for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, a fatal, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, and rarely causes polyomavirus nephropathy in immunocompromised kidney transplant recipients.

Case description

We present the first case of JCPyV nephropathy in a simultaneous heart-kidney transplant patient, where viral-specific in situ hybridization staining of the kidney tissue was utilized to confirm the diagnosis. The patient was diagnosed 6 years after simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation and was treated with immunosuppression reduction and intravenous immunoglobulin.

Discussion

JCPyV nephropathy should be considered in the differential diagnosis of kidney allograft injury, particularly, with suggestive light microscopy histologic features in the absence of BK polyomavirus viremia and/or viruria. In addition to obtaining JCPyV PCR in the blood, in situ hybridization staining may have a utility in confirming the diagnosis. To date, we lack effective JCPyV-specific therapies, and prompt initiation of immunosuppression reduction remains the mainstay of treatment.

Kidney Allograft Dysfunction Due to John Cunningham (JC) Virus Nephropathy

John Cunningham (JC) polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (JC-PVAN) is a rare cause of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN). Although BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a relatively proven common infection post kidney transplantation, JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) infection and its impact on graft function have been less studied. Here, we report a case of a deceased donor kidney transplant recipient who was diagnosed with allograft dysfunction due to JC-PVAN six years after transplantation. JC viremia resolved after a reduction in immunosuppression and treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG); however, she developed an acute cellular rejection with moderate fibrosis resulting in chronic kidney disease in the allograft.

Virus-Associated Nephropathies: A Narrative Review

While most viral infections cause mild symptoms and a spontaneous favorable resolution, some can lead to severe or protracted manifestations, specifically in immunocompromised hosts. Kidney injuries related to viral infections may have multiple causes related to the infection severity, drug toxicity or direct or indirect viral-associated nephropathy. We review here the described virus-associated nephropathies in order to guide diagnosis strategies and treatments in cases of acute kidney injury (AKI) occurring concomitantly with a viral infection. The occurrence of virus-associated nephropathy depends on multiple factors: the local epidemiology of the virus, its ability to infect renal cells and the patient's underlying immune response, which varies with the state of immunosuppression. Clear comprehension of pathophysiological mechanisms associated with a summary of described direct and indirect injuries should help physicians to diagnose and treat viral associated nephropathies.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics of JC Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The vast majority of polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) is due to BK virus, but rare cases result from JC virus reactivation. To date, only a handful of biopsy-proven JC-PVN cases have been reported. Here, we describe the clinical and pathologic findings in 7 patients with biopsy-proven JC-PVN.

METHODS

Search of the pathology archives at 2 institutions found 7 cases of JC-PVN. Clinical data were extracted from the electronic medical records, and the biopsies were reviewed.

RESULTS

Four cases were diagnosed at 6 y posttransplant or later. The remaining 3 cases presented within approximately 2 y posttransplant, of which 2 showed subclinical JC-PVN on surveillance biopsy. Two early presenting patients were treated for acute rejection just before acquiring JC-PVN. Late presenting patients had higher chronicity, which correlated to worse outcome. All but 1 biopsy showed nonspecific inflammation within areas of interstitial fibrosis without significant inflammation in unscarred cortex. The earliest presenting patient was the exception and showed active inflammation with tubulitis. Viral cytopathic changes were detected in all cases with moderate or high-histologic viral load (pvl), showing preference for the distal tubules and medulla. The 2 cases with low pvl did not demonstrate cytopathic changes but were SV40 positive.

CONCLUSIONS

JC-PVN can be insidious in presentation, which may cause delayed or missed diagnosis. Unlike BK-PVN, which typically occurs early in the posttransplant period, JC-PVN can occur both early and late following transplant. Overreliance on negative plasma and urine BK viral loads to exclude PVN can be a pitfall.

HPyV6 and HPyV7 in urine from immunocompromised patients

Background

Human polyomavirus 6 (HPyV6) and HPyV7 are two of the novel polyomaviruses that were originally detected in non-diseased skin. Serological studies have shown that these viruses are ubiquitous in the healthy adult population with seroprevalence up to 88% for HPyV6 and 72% for HPyV7. Both viruses are associated with pruritic skin eruption in immunocompromised patients, but a role with other diseases in immunoincompetent patients or malignancies has not been established.

Methods

PCR was used to determine the presence of HPyV6 and HPyV7 DNA in urine samples from systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 73), multiple sclerosis (n = 50), psoriasis vulgaris (n = 15), arthritic psoriasis (n = 15) and HIV-positive patients (n = 66). In addition, urine from pregnant women (n = 47) and healthy blood donors (n = 20) was investigated.

Results

HPyV6 DNA was detected in 21 (28.8%) of the urine specimens from SLE patients, in 6 (9.1%) of the urine samples from the HIV-positive cohort, and in 19 (40.4%) samples from pregnant women. HPyV7 DNA was only found in 6 (8.2%) of the urine specimens from SLE patients and in 4 (8.5%) samples from pregnant women. No HPyV6 and HPyV7 viruria was detected in the urine samples from the other patients.

Conclusions

HPyV6, and to a lesser extend HPyV7, viruria seems to be common in SLE and HIV-positive patients, and pregnant women. Whether these viruses are of clinical relevance in these patients is not known.

JC virus-associated nephropathy in a post-heart and -kidney transplantation patient

JC virus-associated nephropathy is rare in kidney transplant recipients, and even rarer in recipients of other solid organ transplants. We present a case of JC virus-associated nephropathy in a heart-kidney transplant recipient, which to our knowledge is the first case reported in the literature. We discuss the findings on renal biopsy for JC virus nephropathy and our management approach to this rare complication.

JC polyomavirus-specific antibody responses in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BKPyV is widely recognized in KTRs, but little is known about rates of primary and secondary JCPyV exposure in pediatric KTRs. We evaluated JCPyV exposure in pediatric KTRs using antibody responses in the first 12 months post-transplant. Of 46 children transplanted between 2009 and 2014, 6 lacked any samples for serologic testing, leaving 40 KTRs for study. JCPyV-specific IgG and IgM antibodies were measured using a normalized VLP ELISA. Significant JCPyV exposure was defined as IgG seroconversion, increasing IgG levels of >0.5 nOD units, or IgM detection. Of 40 recipients (median age 3.2 years), 11 (27.5%) were seropositive, 20 (50%) seronegative for JCPyV-IgG, while 9 (22.5%) had no specimen at the time of transplantation, but were confirmed as seronegative in post-transplant samples. Of 29 (72.5%) at risk, JCPyV-IgG seroconversion occurred in 15/29 (51.7%) including JCPyV-IgM in 6 patients (20.7%). Two patients (6.9%) developed only JCPyV-IgM. Among JCPyV-IgG-positive KTRs, six (12.5%) had significant IgG increases. Altogether 23 of 40 patients (57.5%) had serological evidence of primary or secondary JCPyV exposure. In these patients, kidney function tended to be lower during the 2 years of follow-up, but only one patient lost the graft due to JCPyV nephropathy. Thus, JCPyV exposure is common in pediatric KTR and may present serologically as primary or secondary infection. Although only one case of JC-PyVAN occurred, a trend toward lower renal function was seen. Dedicated studies of larger cohorts are warranted to define impact of JCPyV in pediatric KTR.

Next-generation sequencing shows marked rearrangements of BK polyomavirus that favor but are not required for polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

BACKGROUND

BKPyV is associated with polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN), a major cause of graft rejection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Mutations occur in the transcriptional control region (TCR) of BKPyV, but whether they are required for the development of PVAN is not completely understood. To this end, we characterized BKPyV TCRs from KTRs to assess whether TCR mutations are associated with PVAN.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed urine and plasma samples of fifteen KTRs with biopsy-confirmed PVAN, presumptive PVAN, or probable PVAN in order to explore the contents of the BKPyV virome. BKPyV TCRs were amplified and deep sequenced to characterize the viral strains. Alterations in block structures and transcription factor binding sites were investigated.

RESULTS

The majority of sequences in both urine and plasma samples represented archetype BKPyV TCR. Minor populations harboring rearranged TCRs were detected in all patient groups. In one biopsy-confirmed PVAN patient rearranged TCRs predominated, and in another patient half of all reads represented rearranged sequences.

CONCLUSIONS

Although archetype BKPyV predominated in most patients, highest proportions and highest numbers of rearranged strains were detected in association with PVAN. TCR mutations seem not necessary for the development of PVAN, but immunosuppression may allow increased viral replication giving rise to TCR variants with enhanced replication efficiency.

JC polyoma viruria associates with protection from chronic kidney disease independently from apolipoprotein L1 genotype in African Americans

Background

Viral infections can trigger chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the urine virome may inform risk. The Natural History of APOL1-Associated Nephropathy Study (NHAANS) reported that urine JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) associated with a lower risk of APOL1-associated nephropathy in African Americans. Herein, association was assessed between urine JCPyV with CKD in African Americans independent from the APOL1 genotype.

Methods

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed for urinary detection of JCPyV and BK polyoma virus (BKPyV) in 200 newly recruited nondiabetic African Americans. A combined analysis was performed in these individuals plus 300 NHAANS participants.

Results

In the 200 new participants, urine JCPyV was present in 8.8% of CKD cases and 45.8% of nonnephropathy controls (P = 3.0 × 10-8). In those with APOL1 renal-risk genotypes, JCPyV was detected in 5.1% of cases and 40.0% of controls (P = 0.0002). In those lacking APOL1 renal-risk genotypes, JCPyV was detected in 12.2% of cases and 48.8% of controls (P = 8.5 × 10-5). BKPyV was detected in 1.3% of cases and 0.8% of controls (P  =  0.77). In a combined analysis with 300 NHAANS participants (n = 500), individuals with urine JCPyV had a 63% lower risk of CKD compared with those without urine JCPyV (odds ratio 0.37; P = 4.6 × 10-6). RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed the presence of JCPyV genomic DNA and JCPyV messenger RNA (mRNA) in nondiseased kidney.

Conclusions

Inverse relationships exist between JCPyV viruria and non-diabetic CKD. Future studies should determine whether renal inflammation associated with CKD is less permissive for JCPyV reactivation/replication or whether JCPyV is a marker of reduced host immune responsiveness that diminishes immune pathologic contributions to CKD.

BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

The present AST-IDCOP guidelines update information on BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection, replication, and disease, which impact kidney transplantation (KT), but rarely non-kidney solid organ transplantation (SOT). As pretransplant risk factors in KT donors and recipients presently do not translate into clinically validated measures regarding organ allocation, antiviral prophylaxis, or screening, all KT recipients should be screened for BKPyV-DNAemia monthly until month 9, and then every 3 months until 2 years posttransplant. Extended screening after 2 years may be considered in pediatric KT. Stepwise immunosuppression reduction is recommended for KT patients with plasma BKPyV-DNAemia of >1000 copies/mL sustained for 3 weeks or increasing to >10 000 copies/mL reflecting probable and presumptive BKPyV-associated nephropathy, respectively. Reducing immunosuppression is also the primary intervention for biopsy-proven BKPyV-associated nephropathy. Hence, allograft biopsy is not required for treating BKPyV-DNAemic patients with baseline renal function. Despite virological rationales, proper randomized clinical trials are lacking to generally recommend treatment by switching from tacrolimus to cyclosporine-A, from mycophenolate to mTOR inhibitors or leflunomide or by the adjunct use of intravenous immunoglobulins, leflunomide, or cidofovir. Fluoroquinolones are not recommended for prophylaxis or therapy. Retransplantation after allograft loss due to BKPyV nephropathy can be successful if BKPyV-DNAemia is definitively cleared, independent of failed allograft nephrectomy.

Granulomatous inflammation in BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

Evolving BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is characterized by tubulointerstitial inflammation that closely resembles acute T-cell-mediated allograft rejection if tubulitis is significant. The cellular composition of the inflammation varies during the course of BKPyVAN, and clusters of plasma cells may herald resolution of the infection. Less commonly, BKPyVAN can present with a predominance of histiocytes and granuloma formation. Granulomatous interstitial nephritis is uncommon in biopsies of either native or transplant kidneys. In both settings, this distinctive type of inflammatory response requires a systematic approach with careful clinicopathological assessment to determine its etiology. We present three patients with granulomatous BKPyVAN in the first year post-transplantation. These allograft biopsies at 4, 6, and 12 months post-transplant exemplify spontaneously resolving BKPyVAN, resolving infection after immunosuppression reduction, and early BKPyVAN, respectively. In immunosuppressed patients, BKPyVAN should be added to the relatively broad differential diagnosis of granulomatous tubulointerstitial nephritis.

Archetype JC Polyomavirus (JCPyV) Prevails in a Rare Case of JCPyV Nephropathy and in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients With JCPyV Viruria

Background

JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) is reactivated in approximately 20% of renal transplant recipients, and it may rarely cause JCPyV-associated nephropathy (JCPyVAN). Whereas progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy of the brain is caused by rearranged neurotropic JCPyV, little is known about viral sequence variation in JCPyVAN owing to the rarity of this condition.

Methods

Using single-molecule real-time sequencing, characterization of full-length JCPyV genomes in urine and plasma samples from 1 patient with JCPyVAN and 20 stable renal transplant recipients with JCPyV viruria was attempted. Sequence analysis of JCPyV strains was performed, with emphasis on the noncoding control region, the major capsid protein gene VP1, and the large T antigen gene.

Results

Exclusively archetype strains were identified in urine from the patient with JCPyVAN. Full-length JCPyV sequences were not retrieved from plasma. Archetype strains were found in urine samples from 19 stable renal transplant recipients, with JCPyV quasispecies detected in 5 samples. In a patient with minor graft dysfunction, a strain with an archetype-like noncoding cont rol region was discovered. Individual point mutations were detected in both VP1 and large T antigen genes.

Conclusions

Archetype JCPyV was dominant in the patient with JCPyVAN and in stable renal transplant recipients. Archetype rather than rearranged JCPyV seems to drive the pathogenesis of JCPyVAN.

Absence of JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) viremia in early post-transplant JCPyV nephropathy: A case report

JC polyomavirus (JCPyV)-associated nephropathy (JCPyVAN) occurs in <3% of PVAN cases after renal transplantation. We report the first confirmed case to our knowledge of JCPyVAN diagnosed by kidney biopsy in the early 6 months post transplant in Thailand. In this case report, recovery of renal allograft function was not observed after reduction of immunosuppressive agents and administration of intravenous immunoglobulin and cidofovir. Despite persistent JCPyV viruria, no significant further decline in allograft function was documented at 15 months post transplant.