1
|
Ralphs AS, Anderson ST, Langlais BT, D'Cunha J, Reck Dos Santos PA. Lung Transplantation for People Living With HIV: Promising Mid-term Outcomes. Transplantation 2024; 108:1015-1020. [PMID: 38049940 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With increasing life expectancy, patients with HIV are more commonly acquiring other chronic diseases, such as end-stage lung disease, for which transplant may be the only effective solution. Until recently, HIV infection was considered a contraindication to lung transplant (LTx). As LTx in people living with HIV (PLWH) becomes more common, there remain limited data on outcomes in this population. METHODS Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file, we identified LTx recipients with HIV by either serostatus or nucleic acid testing. A control group of confirmed HIV-negative LTx recipients was propensity score matched on age, body mass index, primary diagnosis, and year of transplant. Patient characteristics, transplant parameters, survival, and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS Fifty-nine LTx recipients with HIV were identified and compared with 236 HIV-negative controls. Among PLWH, cytomegalovirus status was more frequently positive (76.3% versus 58.9%, P = 0.014), and the median Lung Allocation Score at match was higher (44 versus 39, P = 0.004). PLWH were more likely to undergo dialysis postoperatively (18.6% versus 8.9%, P = 0.033), although other complication rates were similar. Fifty-three percent of LTx for PLWH occurred since 2020. One-year survival for PLWH was 91.2% versus 88.6% for controls ( P = 0.620). Three-year survival for a smaller subset was also not statistically significant (HIV versus control: 82.6% versus 77.8%, respectively, P = 0.687). CONCLUSIONS There was no difference in 1-y survival for LTx recipients living with HIV compared with a matched control group, supporting this group of patients as viable candidates for LTx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asher S Ralphs
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Scott T Anderson
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Blake T Langlais
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Jonathan D'Cunha
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yarlagadda K, Werne R, Sinha N. Lung transplant in chronic HIV infection. BMJ Case Rep 2023; 16:e253855. [PMID: 37963662 PMCID: PMC10649389 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2022-253855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung transplantation is the treatment of choice for many end-stage chronic lung conditions. Chronic Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection is considered a relative contraindication for lung transplantation. In the era of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART), there has been an increase in the number of HIV-positive patients living with chronic lung conditions. In this paper, we aim to summarise the available literature in the field of lung transplantation in HIV-positive patients. We also present our experience of an HIV-positive woman who underwent lung transplantation for chronic interstitial lung disease from an HIV-negative donor.Careful candidate selection, along with management focused on closer monitoring, may result in favourable outcomes, including improved longevity among HIV-positive patients with chronic lung disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keerthi Yarlagadda
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Rachel Werne
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Neeraj Sinha
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami, Jackson Health System, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leard LE, Holm AM, Valapour M, Glanville AR, Attawar S, Aversa M, Campos SV, Christon LM, Cypel M, Dellgren G, Hartwig MG, Kapnadak SG, Kolaitis NA, Kotloff RM, Patterson CM, Shlobin OA, Smith PJ, Solé A, Solomon M, Weill D, Wijsenbeek MS, Willemse BWM, Arcasoy SM, Ramos KJ. Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2021; 40:1349-1379. [PMID: 34419372 PMCID: PMC8979471 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 409] [Impact Index Per Article: 102.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Tens of thousands of patients with advanced lung diseases may be eligible to be considered as potential candidates for lung transplant around the world each year. The timing of referral, evaluation, determination of candidacy, and listing of candidates continues to pose challenges and even ethical dilemmas. To address these challenges, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation appointed an international group of members to review the literature, to consider recent advances in the management of advanced lung diseases, and to update prior consensus documents on the selection of lung transplant candidates. The purpose of this updated consensus document is to assist providers throughout the world who are caring for patients with pulmonary disease to identify potential candidates for lung transplant, to optimize the timing of the referral of these patients to lung transplant centers, and to provide transplant centers with a framework for evaluating and selecting candidates. In addition to addressing general considerations and providing disease specific recommendations for referral and listing, this updated consensus document includes an ethical framework, a recognition of the variability in acceptance of risk between transplant centers, and establishes a system to account for how a combination of risk factors may be taken into consideration in candidate selection for lung transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Sandeep Attawar
- Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Institute for Heart and Lung Transplantation, Hyderabad, India
| | | | - Silvia V Campos
- Heart Institute (InCor) University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Göran Dellgren
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital and University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Melinda Solomon
- Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Weill
- Weill Consulting Group, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | | | - Brigitte W M Willemse
- Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Friedman DZP, Doucette K. Mycobacteria: Selection of Transplant Candidates and Post-lung Transplant Outcomes. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 42:460-470. [PMID: 34030207 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Mycobacterium is a large, clinically relevant bacterial genus made up of the agents of tuberculosis and leprosy and hundreds of species of saprophytic nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Pathogenicity, clinical presentation, epidemiology, and antimicrobial susceptibilities are exceptionally diverse between species. Patients with end-stage lung disease and recipients of lung transplants are at a higher risk of developing NTM colonization and disease and of severe manifestations and outcomes of tuberculosis. Data from the past three decades have increased our knowledge of these infections in lung transplant recipients. Still, there are knowledge gaps to be addressed to further our understanding of risk factors and optimal treatments for mycobacterial infections in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Z P Friedman
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Karen Doucette
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beeckmans H, Bos S, Vos R. Selection Criteria for Lung Transplantation: Controversies and New Developments. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 42:329-345. [PMID: 34030197 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Lung transplantation is an accepted therapeutic option for end-stage lung diseases. The imbalance between limited availability and vast need of donor organs necessitates careful selection of recipient candidates, ensuring the best possible utilization of the scarce resource of organs. Nonetheless, possible lung transplant candidates who could experience a meaningful improvement in survival and quality of life should not be excluded solely based on the complexity of their case. In this review, controversial issues or difficult limitations for lung transplantation, and new developments in recipient selection criteria, are discussed, which may help broaden recipient eligibility for lung transplantation without compromising long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanne Beeckmans
- Division of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Saskia Bos
- Division of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robin Vos
- Division of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), BREATHE, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are emerging pathogens of concern especially in solid organ transplant candidates and recipients. This review aims to address diagnostic challenges, new and emerging treatment options, and infection prevention. RECENT FINDINGS The incidence of NTM infections in transplant candidates and recipients is rising. The infection prevalence of these environmental pathogens varies geographically by species with a coastal predominance. Although existing guidelines from the American Thoracic Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and British Thoracic Society provide recommendations for diagnosis and management, they do not fully address the subtle nuances and challenges faced in managing infections in immunocompromised transplant recipients. Evolving data on new therapeutic agents and their use in combination therapy will help individualize treatment regimens while limiting adverse effects and improving compliance. Use of combination β-lactams, avibactam, tedizolid, clofazimine, bedaquiline, liposomal amikacin, and ciprofloxacin for commonly isolated species such as Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium avium complex have proven effective. SUMMARY Further studies are needed to determine the incidence of NTM infection in a prospective, multicentric manner and evaluate the most promising synergistic treatment combinations in transplant recipients.
Collapse
|
7
|
Screening of donors and recipients for infections prior to solid organ transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2020; 24:456-464. [PMID: 31290846 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review is a brief overview of current guidelines on screening donors and candidates for bacterial, fungal, parasitic and viral infections prior to solid organ transplantation. The pretransplant period is an important time to evaluate infection exposure risk based on social history as well as to offer vaccinations. RECENT FINDINGS One of the major changes in the past few years has been increased utilization of increased Public Health Service risk, HIV positive, and hepatitis C-positive donors. There has also been increased attention to donor and recipient risks for geographically associated infections, such as endemic fungal infections and flaviviruses. SUMMARY Screening for donors and candidates prior to organ transplantation can identify and address infection risks. Diagnosing infections in a timely manner can help guide treatment and additional testing. Use of necessary prophylactic treatment in organ recipients can prevent reactivation of latent infections and improve posttransplant outcomes.
Collapse
|