Epidemiology of blood component recipients in hospitals of Yazd, Iran

Role of Using a Thromboelastometry-Based Protocol for Transfusion Management in Combined Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Valve Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trail

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of using a thromboelastometry-based protocol on transfusion requirements in patients undergoing combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve surgery. 80 adult patients scheduled for elective combined CABG and valve surgery were included in this clinical trial study. Patients were randomly allocated to the thromboelastometry (ROTEM) (n = 40) or control groups (n = 40). In the ROTEM group, transfusion was directed according to a thromboelastometry-based protocol. In the control group, transfusion was conducted according to the routine practices including conventional coagulation testing and clinical judgments. Finally, transfusion requirements were compared between groups. Use of thromboelastometry- based protocol resulted in 67% reduction in blood products units' consumption as well as 23% in the percentage of patients transfused. This reduction was especially evident in relation to fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelet consumption. No significant differences were found both in the percentage of patients receiving RBC and number of transfused RBC units. Using thromboelastometry tests incorporated a protocol results in reduction of transfusion requirements in patients undergoing elective combined CABG and valve surgery.

A review of blood usage and wastage in a tertiary heart center

Background/Objectives: Blood is a vital resource that its utilization is ever increasing throughout the world and blood wastage is a global challenge that needs to be controlled. Most blood resources are used during complications of pregnancy, trauma, severe childhood anemia, gynecology, cancers, surgery, hematology disorders, and chronic diseases. Units that are expired, broken bags, returning the blood unit after 30 min, blood clotted units, etc., which are due to lack of awareness may result in the wastage of blood products. The objective of this study is to analyze the usage and wastage of blood and its products in Mazandaran heart center.Methods: In this retrospective study, the survey was carried out on the data that were obtained from Mazandaran heart center of Sari, Iran during 2012-2017. Data included details of usage and wastage on blood and its product units. MS Excel 2016 and SPSS 16.0 were used in analysis and diagrams.Results: A total of 35,686 blood units were consumed, which included 55.7% packed red blood cells (PRBCs), 33.9% platelets (Plts), 8.9% fresh-frozen-plasma (FFP), and 8.9% cryoprecipitates. Moreover, 823 blood units including 41.4% FFP, 37.2% PRBCs, and 21.4% Plts were wasted mostly because of inappropriate order (70.6%). Cross-match to transfusion ratio was 1.13. The intensive care unit reported the highest level of blood intake by 45.0%. The blood group O+ was the most frequent by 34.8%. In addition, blood wastage has decreased over study period by approximately 10.0%.Conclusion: Our study showed not only the increasing pattern of blood usage but also the dropping pattern of blood wastage due to hemovigilance performance and additional training in our healthcare center. We found that the main reason for the blood wastage in this center is an excessive order of blood units.

Trends and outcomes in multicomponent blood transfusion: an 11-year cohort study of a large multisite academic center

BACKGROUND

Most studies reporting on blood component utilization overlook patients transfused with more than one type of blood product (multicomponent transfusion). These patients are of importance, as they are large consumers of blood products and likely have different characteristics and outcomes than nontransfused patients and patients transfused with only one blood component type. Our study aimed to determine the prevalence of multicomponent transfusion at a large multisite academic center, as well as the patient characteristics and outcomes associated with multicomponent transfusion.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of transfused adult inpatients at the Ottawa Hospital between 2007 and 2017 was performed. Eligible transfusions were red blood cells (RBCs), platelets, plasma, cryoprecipitate, and/or fibrinogen concentrate. Descriptive analyses were done to determine multicomponent transfusion prevalence. Patient characteristics and outcomes associated with multicomponent transfusion were assessed using multivariable regressions.

RESULTS

Of 55,719 adult transfused inpatient admissions, 25% received a multicomponent transfusion. Multicomponent transfusion prevalence was highest in hematology (51%), cardiac surgery (45%), and critical care (40%) patients. Multivariable regression analysis showed that compared to RBC-only transfusion, multicomponent transfusion was associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 3.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.26-3.73), greater odds of institutional discharge as opposed to discharge home (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15-1.30), and a 1.58 time increase in duration of hospitalization (95% CI, 1.54-1.62).

CONCLUSION

Multicomponent transfusion recipients make up a large proportion of transfused patients and have poorer outcomes. It is necessary to continue studying these patients, including outcomes and transfusion appropriateness, to inform best practices.

Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without haematopoietic stem cell support

BACKGROUND

Many people diagnosed with haematological malignancies experience anaemia, and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion plays an essential supportive role in their management. Different strategies have been developed for RBC transfusions. A restrictive transfusion strategy seeks to maintain a lower haemoglobin level (usually between 70 g/L to 90 g/L) with a trigger for transfusion when the haemoglobin drops below 70 g/L), whereas a liberal transfusion strategy aims to maintain a higher haemoglobin (usually between 100 g/L to 120 g/L, with a threshold for transfusion when haemoglobin drops below 100 g/L). In people undergoing surgery or who have been admitted to intensive care a restrictive transfusion strategy has been shown to be safe and in some cases safer than a liberal transfusion strategy. However, it is not known whether it is safe in people with haematological malignancies.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of restrictive versus liberal RBC transfusion strategies for people diagnosed with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without a haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised trials (NRS) in MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), CINAHL (from 1982), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library 2016, Issue 6), and 10 other databases (including four trial registries) to 15 June 2016. We also searched grey literature and contacted experts in transfusion for additional trials. There was no restriction on language, date or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs and prospective NRS that evaluated a restrictive compared with a liberal RBC transfusion strategy in children or adults with malignant haematological disorders or undergoing HSCT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified six studies eligible for inclusion in this review; five RCTs and one NRS. Three completed RCTs (156 participants), one completed NRS (84 participants), and two ongoing RCTs. We identified one additional RCT awaiting classification. The completed studies were conducted between 1997 and 2015 and had a mean follow-up from 31 days to 2 years. One study included children receiving a HSCT (six participants), the other three studies only included adults: 218 participants with acute leukaemia receiving chemotherapy, and 16 with a haematological malignancy receiving a HSCT. The restrictive strategies varied from 70 g/L to 90 g/L. The liberal strategies also varied from 80 g/L to 120 g/L.Based on the GRADE rating methodology the overall quality of the included studies was very low to low across different outcomes. None of the included studies were free from bias for all 'Risk of bias' domains. One of the three RCTs was discontinued early for safety concerns after recruiting only six children, all three participants in the liberal group developed veno-occlusive disease (VOD). Evidence from RCTsA restrictive RBC transfusion policy may make little or no difference to: the number of participants who died within 100 days (two trials, 95 participants (RR: 0.25, 95% CI 0.02 to 2.69, low-quality evidence); the number of participants who experienced any bleeding (two studies, 149 participants; RR:0.93, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.18, low-quality evidence), or clinically significant bleeding (two studies, 149 participants, RR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.43, low-quality evidence); the number of participants who required RBC transfusions (three trials; 155 participants: RR: 0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.05, low-quality evidence); or the length of hospital stay (restrictive median 35.5 days (interquartile range (IQR): 31.2 to 43.8); liberal 36 days (IQR: 29.2 to 44), low-quality evidence).We are uncertain whether the restrictive RBC transfusion strategy: decreases quality of life (one trial, 89 participants, fatigue score: restrictive median 4.8 (IQR 4 to 5.2); liberal median 4.5 (IQR 3.6 to 5) (very low-quality evidence); or reduces the risk of developing any serious infection (one study, 89 participants, RR: 1.23, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.04, very low-quality evidence).A restrictive RBC transfusion policy may reduce the number of RBC transfusions per participant (two trials; 95 participants; mean difference (MD) -3.58, 95% CI -5.66 to -1.49, low-quality evidence). Evidence from NRSWe are uncertain whether the restrictive RBC transfusion strategy: reduces the risk of death within 100 days (one study, 84 participants, restrictive 1 death; liberal 1 death; very low-quality evidence); decreases the risk of clinically significant bleeding (one study, 84 participants, restrictive 3; liberal 8; very low-quality evidence); or decreases the number of RBC transfusions (adjusted for age, sex and acute myeloid leukaemia type geometric mean 1.25; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.47 - data analysis performed by the study authors)No NRS were found that looked at: quality of life; number of participants with any bleeding; serious infection; or length of hospital stay.No studies were found that looked at: adverse transfusion reactions; arterial or venous thromboembolic events; length of intensive care admission; or readmission to hospital.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this review were based on four studies and 240 participants.There is low-quality evidence that a restrictive RBC transfusion policy reduces the number of RBC transfusions per participant. There is low-quality evidence that a restrictive RBC transfusion policy has little or no effect on: mortality at 30 to 100 days, bleeding, or hospital stay. This evidence is mainly based on adults with acute leukaemia who are having chemotherapy. Although, the two ongoing studies (530 participants) are due to be completed by January 2018 and will provide additional information for adults with haematological malignancies, we will not be able to answer this review's primary outcome. If we assume a mortality rate of 3% within 100 days we would need 1492 participants to have a 80% chance of detecting, as significant at the 5% level, an increase in all-cause mortality from 3% to 6%. Further RCTs are required in children.