PtdIns(4,5)P2 is not required for secretory granule docking

Syntaxin clusters and cholesterol affect the mobility of Syntaxin1a

Syntaxin1a (Syx1a) is essential for stimulated exocytosis in neuroendocrine cells. The vesicle docking process involves the formation of nanoscale Syx1a domains on the plasma membrane and the Syx1a clusters disintegrate during the fusion process. Syx1a nanodomains are static yet Syx1a molecules dynamically enter and leave the domains; the process by which these clusters maintain this balance is unclear. In this work, the dynamics of the Syx1a molecules is elucidated relative to the cluster position through a labeling strategy that allows both the bulk position of the Syx clusters to be visualized concurrent with the trajectories of single Syx1a molecules on the surface of PC12 cells. Single Syx1a molecules were tracked in time relative to cluster positions to decipher how Syx1a moves within a cluster and when clusters are not present. Syx1a is mobile on the plasma membrane, more mobile at the center of clusters, and less mobile near the edges of clusters; this depends on the presence of the N-terminal Habc domain and cholesterol, which are essential for proper exocytosis. Simulations of the dynamics observed at clusters support a model where clusters are maintained by a large cage (r = 100 nm) within which Syx1a remains highly mobile within the cluster (r = 50 nm). The depletion of cholesterol dramatically reduces the mobility of Syx1a within clusters and less so over the rest of the plasma membrane. This suggests that fluidity of Syx1a supramolecular clusters is needed for function.

Local PI(4,5)P2 signaling inhibits fusion pore expansion during exocytosis

Phosphatidylinositol(4,5)bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) is an important signaling phospholipid that is required for regulated exocytosis and some forms of endocytosis. The two processes share a topologically similar pore structure that connects the vesicle lumen with the outside. Widening of the fusion pore during exocytosis leads to cargo release, while its closure initiates kiss&run or cavicapture endocytosis. We show here, using live-cell total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy of insulin granule exocytosis, that transient accumulation of PI(4,5)P2 at the release site recruits components of the endocytic fission machinery and stalls the late fusion pore expansion that is required for peptide release. The absence of clathrin differentiates this mechanism from clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Knockdown of phosphatidylinositol-phosphate-5-kinase-1c or optogenetic recruitment of 5-phosphatase reduces PI(4,5)P2 transients and accelerates fusion pore expansion, suggesting that acute PI(4,5)P2 synthesis is involved. Thus, local phospholipid signaling inhibits fusion pore expansion and peptide release through an unconventional endocytic mechanism.

PI(4,5)P2: signaling the plasma membrane

In the almost 70 years since the first hints of its existence, the phosphoinositide, phosphatidyl-D-myo-inositol 4,5-bisphosphate has been found to be central in the biological regulation of plasma membrane (PM) function. Here, we provide an overview of the signaling, transport and structural roles the lipid plays at the cell surface in animal cells. These include being substrate for second messenger generation, direct modulation of receptors, control of membrane traffic, regulation of ion channels and transporters, and modulation of the cytoskeleton and cell polarity. We conclude by re-evaluating PI(4,5)P2's designation as a signaling molecule, instead proposing a cofactor role, enabling PM-selective function for many proteins.

Munc18-dependent and -independent clustering of syntaxin in the plasma membrane of cultured endocrine cells

Syntaxin helps in catalyzing membrane fusion during exocytosis. It also forms clusters in the plasma membrane, where both its transmembrane and SNARE domains are thought to homo-oligomerize. To study syntaxin clustering in live PC12 cells, we labeled granules with neuropeptide-Y-mCherry and syntaxin clusters with syntaxin-1a green fluorescent protein (GFP). Abundant clusters appeared under total internal reflection (TIRF) illumination, and some of them associated with granules ("on-granule clusters"). Syntaxin-1a-GFP or its mutants were expressed at low levels and competed with an excess of endogenous syntaxin for inclusion into clusters. On-granule inclusion was diminished by mutations known to inhibit binding to Munc18-1 in vitro. Knock-down of Munc18-1 revealed Munc18-dependent and -independent on-granule clustering. Clustering was inhibited by mutations expected to break salt bridges between syntaxin's Hb and SNARE domains and was rescued by additional mutations expected to restore them. Most likely, syntaxin is in a closed conformation when it clusters on granules, and its SNARE and Hb domains approach to within atomic distances. Pairwise replacements of Munc18-contacting residues with alanines had only modest effects, except that the pair R114A/I115A essentially abolished on-granule clustering. In summary, an on-granule cluster arises from the specific interaction between a granule and a dense cluster of syntaxin-Munc18-1 complexes. Off-granule clusters, by contrast, were resistant to even the strongest mutations we tried and required neither Munc18-1 nor the presence of a SNARE domain. They may well form through the nonstoichiometric interactions with membrane lipids that others have observed in cell-free systems.

Glutamine Uptake via SNAT6 and Caveolin Regulates Glutamine-Glutamate Cycle

SLC38A6 (SNAT6) is the only known member of the SLC38 family that is expressed exclusively in the excitatory neurons of the brain. It has been described as an orphan transporter with an unknown substrate profile, therefore very little is known about SNAT6. In this study, we addressed the substrate specificity, mechanisms for internalization of SNAT6, and the regulatory role of SNAT6 with specific insights into the glutamate-glutamine cycle. We used tritium-labeled amino acids in order to demonstrate that SNAT6 is functioning as a glutamine and glutamate transporter. SNAT6 revealed seven predicted transmembrane segments in a homology model and was localized to caveolin rich sites at the plasma membrane. SNAT6 has high degree of specificity for glutamine and glutamate. Presence of these substrates enables formation of SNAT6-caveolin complexes that aids in sodium dependent trafficking of SNAT6 off the plasma membrane. To further understand its mode of action, several potential interacting partners of SNAT6 were identified using bioinformatics. Among them where CTP synthase 2 (CTPs2), phosphate activated glutaminase (Pag), and glutamate metabotropic receptor 2 (Grm2). Co-expression analysis, immunolabeling with co-localization analysis and proximity ligation assays of these three proteins with SNAT6 were performed to investigate possible interactions. SNAT6 can cycle between cytoplasm and plasma membrane depending on availability of substrates and interact with Pag, synaptophysin, CTPs2, and Grm2. Our data suggest a potential role of SNAT6 in glutamine uptake at the pre-synaptic terminal of excitatory neurons. We propose here a mechanistic model of SNAT6 trafficking that once internalized influences the glutamate-glutamine cycle in presence of its potential interacting partners.

Insulin granule biogenesis and exocytosis

Insulin is produced by pancreatic β-cells, and once released to the blood, the hormone stimulates glucose uptake and suppresses glucose production. Defects in both the availability and action of insulin lead to elevated plasma glucose levels and are major hallmarks of type-2 diabetes. Insulin is stored in secretory granules that form at the trans-Golgi network. The granules undergo extensive modifications en route to their release sites at the plasma membrane, including changes in both protein and lipid composition of the granule membrane and lumen. In parallel, the insulin molecules also undergo extensive modifications that render the hormone biologically active. In this review, we summarize current understanding of insulin secretory granule biogenesis, maturation, transport, docking, priming and eventual fusion with the plasma membrane. We discuss how different pools of granules form and how these pools contribute to insulin secretion under different conditions. We also highlight the role of the β-cell in the development of type-2 diabetes and discuss how dysregulation of one or several steps in the insulin granule life cycle may contribute to disease development or progression.

Phosphatidylinositol(4,5)bisphosphate: diverse functions at the plasma membrane

Phosphatidylinositol(4,5) bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) has become a major focus in biochemistry, cell biology and physiology owing to its diverse functions at the plasma membrane. As a result, the functions of PI(4,5)P2 can be explored in two separate and distinct roles - as a substrate for phospholipase C (PLC) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and as a primary messenger, each having unique properties. Thus PI(4,5)P2 makes contributions in both signal transduction and cellular processes including actin cytoskeleton dynamics, membrane dynamics and ion channel regulation. Signalling through plasma membrane G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and immune receptors all use PI(4,5)P2 as a substrate to make second messengers. Activation of PI3K generates PI(3,4,5)P3 (phosphatidylinositol(3,4,5)trisphosphate), a lipid that recruits a plethora of proteins with pleckstrin homology (PH) domains to the plasma membrane to regulate multiple aspects of cellular function. In contrast, PLC activation results in the hydrolysis of PI(4,5)P2 to generate the second messengers, diacylglycerol (DAG), an activator of protein kinase C and inositol(1,4,5)trisphosphate (IP3/I(1,4,5)P3) which facilitates an increase in intracellular Ca2+. Decreases in PI(4,5)P2 by PLC also impact on functions that are dependent on the intact lipid and therefore endocytosis, actin dynamics and ion channel regulation are subject to control. Spatial organisation of PI(4,5)P2 in nanodomains at the membrane allows for these multiple processes to occur concurrently.

Syntaxin Clustering and Optogenetic Control for Synaptic Membrane Fusion

Membrane fusion during synaptic transmission mediates the trafficking of chemical signals and neuronal communication. The fast kinetics of membrane fusion on the order of millisecond is precisely regulated by the assembly of SNAREs and accessory proteins. It is believed that the formation of the SNARE complex is a key step during membrane fusion. Little is known, however, about the molecular machinery that mediates the formation of a large pre-fusion complex, including multiple SNAREs and accessory proteins. Syntaxin, a transmembrane protein on the plasma membrane, has been observed to undergo oligomerization to form clusters. Whether this clustering plays a critical role in membrane fusion is poorly understood in live cells. Optogenetics is an emerging biotechnology armed with the capacity to precisely modulate protein-protein interaction in time and space. Here, we propose an experimental scheme that combines optogenetics with single-vesicle membrane fusion, aiming to gain a better understanding of the molecular mechanism by which the syntaxin cluster regulates membrane fusion. We envision that newly developed optogenetic tools could facilitate the mechanistic understanding of synaptic transmission in live cells and animals.

The fusion pore, 60 years after the first cartoon

Neurotransmitter release occurs in the form of quantal events by fusion of secretory vesicles with the plasma membrane, and begins with the formation of a fusion pore that has a conductance similar to that of a large ion channel or gap junction. In this review, we propose mechanisms of fusion pore formation and discuss their implications for fusion pore structure and function. Accumulating evidence indicates a direct role of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment receptor proteins in the opening of fusion pores. Fusion pores are likely neither protein channels nor purely lipid, but are of proteolipidic composition. Future perspectives to gain better insight into the molecular structure of fusion pores are discussed.