Posttransfusion platelet increments after different platelet products in neonates: a retrospective cohort study

Impact of restrictive platelet transfusion strategies on transfusion rates: A cohort study in very preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Evidence supports a restrictive platelet transfusion threshold in preterm neonates. We aimed to describe the effect of implementing this threshold on transfusion rates.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study included all very preterm infants (born <32 weeks' gestation) admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit between 2004 and 2022, divided into three epochs. Platelet transfusion thresholds changed from 30 × 109/L for stable neonates and 50 × 109/L for unstable neonates (January 2004 to December 2009) to 20 × 109/L for stable neonates and 50 × 109/L for unstable neonates (January 2010 to June 2019) to 25 × 109/L for non-bleeding neonates and 50 × 109/L for neonates with major bleeding (July 2019 to July 2022). The primary outcome was the percentage of transfused neonates in each epoch. Secondary outcomes included the median number of transfusions per neonate, the percentage of transfusions given above 25 or 50 × 109/L, and major bleeding and mortality rates.

RESULTS

The percentage of neonates transfused was 12.2% (115/939), 5.8% (96/1660), and 4.8% (25/525) in Epoch I, II, and III, respectively (p < .001), a relative reduction of 61%. The median number of transfusions per transfused neonate was 2.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.0-3.0) in Epoch I, and 1.0 (IQR: 1.0-2.0) in subsequent Epochs (p = .04). The percentage of infants receiving at least one transfusion above 50 × 109/L in Epoch I, II, and III was 51.3% (59/115), 17.7% (17/96), and 20.0% (5/25; p < .001). Mortality and bleeding rates did not significantly differ between epochs.

DISCUSSION

Implementation of restrictive platelet guidelines led to reduction of the rate and number of platelet transfusions.

Neonatal and pediatric transfusion practices and policies in India: A survey-based cross-sectional assessment of blood centers

BACKGROUND

Blood centers play a critical role in supporting neonatal and pediatric transfusions. We aim to study the variation in pediatric/neonatal transfusion policies and practices for blood centers in India.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a survey-based (45 question) cross-sectional assessment of blood centers in India supporting pediatric/neonatal transfusions.

RESULTS

One hundred three centers responded to the survey (response rate 51.2%; 103/201). As a part of pretransfusion testing, use of "microtainers" was reported by 58.4% (59/101) centers and only 57.4% (58/101) centers provide antibody screening. In case of absence of maternal sample, type O negative blood is most commonly used (48.5%; 49/101), and in case of ABO incompatibility, 68.3% (69/101) use units compatible with both mother and newborn. Leukoreduced RBCs are provided by 89% (90/101) centers and irradiated products are provided by 48.5% (49/101). 82% (83/101) of centers reported not receiving requests for CMV negative units considering the high incidence of CMV-seropositivity in donors. Fresh units are defined as <7 days old by 44.5% (45/101) and <5 days old by 31.6% (32/101) centers. 97% centers reported SAGM suspended RBCs in inventory but only 67.3% (68/101) use them for top-up transfusions to neonates. Overall >80% centers use the buffy-coat method for platelet concentrates preparation. Volume-based (ml/kg) aliquots preparation is done by 88% (89/101), mainly using the sterile connecting device (84.6%; 83/98).

CONCLUSION

This survey shows heterogeneity and lack of standardization in practices across blood centers in India and highlights the need for more studies to establish best practices for this vulnerable age group.

What Laboratory Tests and Physiologic Triggers Should Guide the Decision to Administer a Platelet or Plasma Transfusion in Critically Ill Children and What Product Attributes Are Optimal to Guide Specific Product Selection? From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding

OBJECTIVES

To present consensus statements and supporting literature for plasma and platelet product variables and related laboratory testing for transfusions in general critically ill children from the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding.

DESIGN

Systematic review and consensus conference of international, multidisciplinary experts in platelet and plasma transfusion management of critically ill children.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENTS

Critically ill pediatric patients at risk of bleeding and receiving plasma and/or platelet transfusions.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A panel of 10 experts developed evidence-based and, when evidence was insufficient, expert-based statements for laboratory testing and blood product attributes for platelet and plasma transfusions. These statements were reviewed and ratified by the 29 Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative - Control/Avoidance of Bleeding experts. A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, from inception to December 2020. Consensus was obtained using the Research and Development/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Method. Results were summarized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. We developed five expert consensus statements and two recommendations in answer to two questions: what laboratory tests and physiologic triggers should guide the decision to administer a platelet or plasma transfusion in critically ill children; and what product attributes are optimal to guide specific product selection?

CONCLUSIONS

The Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding program provides some guidance and expert consensus for the laboratory and blood product attributes used for decision-making for plasma and platelet transfusions in critically ill pediatric patients.

New Approaches and Trials in Pediatric Transfusion Medicine

Blood transfusions are frequently lifesaving, but there is growing awareness of their associated infectious and noninfectious adverse events. Patient blood management advocates for judicious use of transfusions and considerations of alternatives to correct anemia or achieve hemostasis. Several transfusion practices, either already implemented or under investigation, aim to further improve the safety of transfusions. An enduring challenge in pediatric and neonatal transfusion practice is that studies typically focus on adults, and findings are extrapolated to younger patients. This article aims to summarize some of the newer developments in transfusion medicine with a focus on the neonatal and pediatric population.

Neonatal thrombocytopenia: etiology, management and outcome

Thrombocytopenia is a very common hematological abnormality found in newborns, especially in preterm neonates. Two subgroups can be distinguished: early thrombocytopenia, occurring within the first 72 hours of life, and late thrombocytopenia, occurring after the first 72 hours of life. Early thrombocytopenia is associated with intrauterine growth restriction, whereas late thrombocytopenia is caused mainly by sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Platelet transfusions are the hallmark of the treatment of neonatal thrombocytopenia. Most of these transfusions are prophylactic, which means they are given in the absence of bleeding. However, the efficacy of these transfusions in preventing bleeding has never been proven. In addition, risks of platelet transfusion seem to be more pronounced in preterm neonates. Because of lack of data, platelet transfusion guidelines differ widely between countries. This review summarizes the current understanding of etiology and management of neonatal thrombocytopenia.