Iron man pentathlon or “we have met the enemy and they is us!”

The association between frequency of blood donation and the occurrence of low birthweight, preterm delivery, and stillbirth: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Women who donate blood on a regular basis are at high risk of becoming iron depleted. Iron deficiency anemia has been shown to increase the risk of low birthweight and possibly preterm birth. Therefore, there is a concern that regular blood donation by female donors might adversely impact the well-being of their offspring. This retrospective cohort study examined the association between blood donation and the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The study sample included 18,483 female blood donors in their childbearing years (age 18 to 45 years) who delivered during the period 2001 to 2011 in the province of Québec (Canada). The occurrence of low birthweight (<2500 g), preterm delivery (<37 weeks of gestation), and stillbirth was ascertained by linking the donor information with provincial birth and stillbirth registries.

RESULTS

There was no association between the frequency of donation in the 2-year period before pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes; compared to women who did not donate during that period, those who donated three or more donations (mean, 3.9 donations) had a relative risk of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.06) for low birthweight, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.75-1.11) for preterm birth, and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.18-2.12) for stillbirth. These associations remained unchanged after adjusting for baseline characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Women who donate blood on a regular but moderate basis do not appear to be at higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings, while reassuring, will need to be replicated in different settings.

Impact of informing donors of low ferritin results

BACKGROUND

Informing donors of their ferritin status is one possible mitigating strategy to reduce iron deficiency in donors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We evaluated the impact of informing donors of their ferritin status on their donation frequency, understanding of iron needs, and actions to improve iron intake 2 years after their inclusion in a prospective observational cohort study.

RESULTS

Informing donors of low ferritin results decreased return rate in first-time and repeat donors, and the median number of donations declined from three to two donations/year in returning donors with low ferritin on index donation compared to an increase from 1.5 to 2.5 donations/year in donors with normal ferritin. An electronic questionnaire demonstrated that approximately 60% of low ferritin donors saw their primary medical practitioner, and half of this group started iron. Qualitative interviews revealed suboptimal understanding of iron needs and poor compliance with iron supplementation.

CONCLUSION

Providing donors with results of ferritin testing may reduce return rates and donation frequency in the 2 years after testing. Simply providing donors with ferritin results and an information sheet is often inadequate to improve donors' understanding of iron needs and may not lead to a substantive increase in iron intake over time.

Blood donor selection in European Union directives: room for improvement

BACKGROUND

Transfusion-transmissible infections have made both blood bankers and health authorities overly cautious. The general public expects and hence reinforces this policy. To obtain a high level of blood product safety, blood and plasma donors have to meet increasingly stringent eligibility criteria; however, it is not known whether this policy translates into improved outcomes for patients. There is a risk that the management of donors does not match the ambition of greater safety for patients. European directives related to the collection process and donor selection will probably be reconsidered in the next few years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The development of European directives on donor selection and their basis in the literature were reviewed with an emphasis on the background and considerations for eligibility criteria to be included in the directives.

RESULTS

The precautionary principle appears to be the predominant reason behind the set of eligibility criteria. However, the formal eligibility criteria, put into force in 2004, do not balance with the developments of the past decade in laboratory tests and measures that have substantially reduced actual infection risks. In no cases were the effects of eligibility criteria on the donor pool and donor well-being quantified. Regional differences in the epidemiology of transfusion-transmissible infections were not taken into consideration either.

DISCUSSION

First, the Authors promote the collection of epidemiological data on the incidence and prevalence of conditions in the general population and in blood and plasma donors which could pose a risk for transfused patients, in order to use these data as a basis for decision-making in donor-selection policies. Second, the Authors suggest including allowance for differential deferral criteria throughout Europe, based on factual risk levels. There should be an accepted balance between donor and patient welfare, and also between risk to transfusion safety and risk of compromising the blood supply.

Laboratory and genetic assessment of iron deficiency in blood donors

More than 9 million individuals donate blood annually in the United States. Between 200 and 250 mg of iron is removed with each whole blood donation, reflecting losses from the hemoglobin in red blood cells. Replenishment of iron stores takes many months, leading to a high rate of iron depletion. In an effort to better identify and prevent iron deficiency, blood collection centers are now considering various strategies to manage donor iron loss. This article highlights laboratory and genetic tests to assess the iron status of blood donors and their applicability as screening tests for blood donation.