Plerixafor on demand in ten healthy family donors as a rescue strategy to achieve an adequate graft for stem cell transplantation

Correlation of Body Mass Index and Proinflammatory Cytokine Levels with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization

This study investigated the correlation of body mass index (BMI) and proinflammatory cytokine levels with hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization triggered by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Stem cell donors (n = 309) were recruited between August 2015 and January 2018 and grouped into four groups according to their BMI: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2, n = 10), normal (18.5 kg/m2 ≦ BMI < 25 kg/m2, n = 156), overweight (25 kg/m2 ≦ BMI < 30 kg/m2, n = 102), and obese (BMI ≧ 30 kg/m2, n = 41). The participants were then administered with five doses of G-CSF and categorized as good mobilizers (CD34 ≧ 180/μL, n = 15, 4.85%) and poor mobilizers (CD34 ≦ 25/μL, n = 14, 4.53%) according to the number of CD34+ cells in their peripheral blood after G-CSF administration. The correlation between BMI and HSC mobilization was then analyzed, and the levels of proinflammatory cytokines in the plasma from good and poor mobilizers were examined by ProcartaPlex Immunoassay. Results showed that BMI was highly correlated with G-CSF-triggered HSC mobilization (R2 = 0.056, p < 0.0001). Compared with poor mobilizers, good mobilizers exhibited higher BMI (p < 0.001) and proinflammatory cytokine [interferon gamma (IFN-γ) (p < 0.05), interleukin-22 (IL-22) (p < 0.05), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) levels (p < 0.05)]. This study indicated that BMI and proinflammatory cytokine levels are positively correlated with G-CSF-triggered HSC mobilization.

Addition of plerixafor in poorly mobilized allogeneic stem cell donors

Background

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are the predominant graft source for adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In poorly mobilized autologous donors, plerixafor improves collection outcomes. We examine plerixafor use in allogeneic donors who mobilize poorly with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) in those who are healthy and those with pre‐existing medical conditions, and determine the optimal threshold to add plerixafor.

Study Design/Methods

We retrospectively examined all allogeneic PBSC collections from January 2013 to October 2020 at our center. Donors received G‐CSF 10 mcg/kg daily for 4 days before undergoing apheresis collection on day 5. Plerixafor was added based on poor CD34+ cell collection yield after the first or second collection day.

Results

Of the 1008 allogeneic donors, 41 (4.1%) received one dose of plerixafor in addition to G‐CSF due to poor collection yield. After starting plerixafor there was a 0.75‐ to 7.74‐fold (median 2.94) increase in CD34+ yield from the previous day. No donors with G‐CSF‐only mobilization who collected <2.0 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg recipient weight on day one achieved the goal of ≥4.0 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg recipient weight total over 2 days but 59.2% of donors who used rescue plerixafor did.

Conclusion

Donors both healthy and those with pre‐existing disease responded well to plerixafor with minimal side effects. If the first‐day collection yield is less than ~63% of the collection goal, addition of plerixafor may be necessary to reach the collection goal and limit the number of collection days in allogeneic donors.

Efficacy and safety of a reduced dose of plerixafor in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in healthy haploidentical stem cell donors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Implementation of the technique of immunomagnetic selection requires the procurement of a large number of CD34+ cells from haploidentical donors within a single apheresis procedure. The release of stem cells with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone is unsatisfactory in a number of donors, and plerixafor, a CXCR4 chemokine receptor antagonist, could be used as an additional mobilization agent. The aim of our study was to examine whether a lower dose of plerixafor (0.12 mg/kg) can provide sufficient increase in CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood of allogeneic healthy donors in comparison with a historical control group. In addition, we assessed the risk of inability to provide the recipient with a transplant containing the optimal dose of 8-10 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg body weight of the recipient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a prospective, single-arm study, we examined the results of 105 mobilizations in healthy adult haploidentical donors with G-CSF and plerixafor at a dose of 0.12 mg/kg. The historical control group consisted of 106 mobilizations with G-CSF and plerixafor at 0.24 mg/kg.

RESULTS

The median increase in the number of CD34+ cells from day 4 to day 5 of mobilization was 69 cells/μl (range, 28-240) versus 77 cells/μl (24-217) in the groups of 0.12 and 0.24 mg/kg of plerixafor, respectively (p-value 0.255). The apheresis products contained a median of 14.4 × 10⁶ /kg recipient body weight CD34+ cells versus 12.9 × 10⁶ /kg in the groups that received 0.12 and 0.24 mg/kg of plerixafor, respectively (p-value 0.118). The obtained differences were not significant, which means the application of a decreased dose of plerixafor did not affect the results of mobilization.

CONCLUSION

The obtained differences in collection were not significant, and thus the application of a decreased dose of plerixafor did not affect the results of mobilization.

Stem-cell mobilization of healthy sibling donors with pegfilgrastim-A prospective open-label phase II trial (EudraCT no: 2005-004971-39)

BACKGROUND

Pegfilgrastim is a covalently bound conjugate of filgrastim and mono-methoxypolyethylene glycol with a longer half-life.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We report on phase II prospective monocentric trial examining the feasibility of stem cell mobilization with 12 mg single dose pegfilgrastim in related donors. The objectives were to determine the optimal collection day, defined as CD34+ concentration in peripheral blood (PB) >50 cells/μl, the number of donors collected with single leukapheresis, and the peak level of pegfilgrastim in donor-serum. Furthermore, the cell composition of grafts was assessed and compared to published data.

RESULTS

The results included about 28 matched related donors. The median pegfilgrastim serum level remained >200 ng/mL for 48 hours before declining, with the maximal measured concentration of 259.49 ng/ml 24 h after application. The median white blood cell count and CD34 count in PB peaked on day four with 52.6 (range 22.8-85.0) Gpt/l and 66.25 (range 22.9-136.6) cells/μl, respectively. A CD34+ count >50 cells/μl on day four was detected in 75% of donors. 79% of the donors underwent a single collection. Conventional filgrastim was administered additionally in two donors, due to insufficient CD 34+ concentration in PB. 89% of donors showed CD34+ yields ≥4 (median 6.5, range 4.6-14.5) × 10/kg body weight of the recipient. All grafts were administered without rejections.

DISCUSSION

The results of this trial showed that stem cell mobilization with pegfilgrastim is a feasible, and attractive option. This is the first trial presenting the kinetics of pegfilgrastim serum levels in healthy donors.

Use of plerixafor to mobilize haematopoietic progenitor cells in healthy donors

Increased transplant activity calls for improved stem cell collection, especially when peripheral blood is the preferred source of haematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). Plerixafor is a bicyclam molecule that mobilizes CD34+ cells by reversibly disrupting CXCR4-CXCL12-supported HPC retention. Plerixafor is given with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to help harvest autologous CD34+ cells for transplantation when mobilization with G-CSF fails. Mobilization protocols with the same doses of plerixafor and G-CSF have been used off-label in healthy allogeneic donors, with equal success and scarce side effects, both in adult and paediatric patients. Plerixafor has also been used as a sole mobilization agent. Plerixafor alone or coupled with G-CSF might lead to harvesting distinct cellular populations conferring improved engraftment properties and increased survival. Those characteristics might make plerixafor an especially attractive mobilization agent, particularly for non-related donations. However, available data are limited, and long-term follow-up is needed to clarify the best scenario for using plerixafor with or without G-CSF in healthy donors. In this review, we will summarize the evidence supporting this practice, highlighting the practical aspects and providing clues for an expanded use of plerixafor.

Use of Plerixafor for Stem Cell Mobilization in the Setting of Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantations: An Update

Mobilization failure is an important issue in stem cell transplantations. Stem cells are yielded from the peripheral blood via apheresis. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the most commonly used mobilization agent among patients and donors. G-CSF is administered subcutaneously for multiple days. However, patients with mobilization failure cannot receive autologous stem cell transplantation and, therefore, cannot be treated adequately. The incidence rate of mobilization failure among patients is about 6–23%. Plerixafor is a molecule that inhibits the binding of chemokine receptor-4 with stromal-cell-derived factor-1, thereby resulting in the release of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood. Currently, plerixafor is used in patients with mobilization failure with G-CSF and is administered subcutaneously. Several studies conducted on different clinical settings have shown that plerixafor is effective and well tolerated by patients. However, more studies should be conducted to explore the optimal approach for plerixafor in patients with mobilization failure. The incidence of mobilization failure among donors is lower. However, plerixafor is not approved among donors with mobilization failure. Moreover, several clinical studies in donors have shown a beneficial effect of plerixafor. In addition, the adverse events of plerixafor are mild and transient, which can overcome the adverse events due to G-CSF. This review assessed the current role and effects of plerixafor in stem cell mobilization for autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantations.

Plerixafor added to G-CSF allows mobilization of a sufficient number of hematopoietic progenitors without impacting the efficacy of TCR-alpha/beta depletion in pediatric haploidentical and genoidentical donors failing to mobilize with G-CSF alone

BACKGROUND

Collection of a large number of early hematopoietic progenitors is essential for allogeneic apheresis products intended for TCR-alpha/beta depletion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We added plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg body weight (bw) on day 4 of high-dose filgrastim mobilization 10 hours prior to apheresis in 16 (30.5%) pediatric allogeneic donors who failed to recover a sufficient number of CD34+ cells.

RESULTS

On day 4 of G-CSF, the median CD34+ cell count in peripheral blood was 6 per μL (range 4-9 per μL) in 6 poor mobilizers and 16 per μL (range 12-19 per μL) in insufficient mobilizers. In all donors, the threshold of 50 CD34+ cells/μL was achieved, and the median increase was 14.8-fold in poor mobilizers and 6.5-fold in insufficient mobilizers, whereas it was 3.45-fold increase in those mobilized with G-CSF alone.

DISCUSSION

In all donors, a predefined number of >10 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg of recipient bw before depletion was reached in the apheresis product. The use of plerixafor did not affect the purity of further TCR-alpha/beta depletion. Side effects were mild to moderate and consisted of nausea and vomiting.

CONCLUSION

Thus, the safety and high efficacy of plerixafor was proven in healthy pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell donors.

Addition of plerixafor to G-CSF in poor mobilizing healthy related donors overcame mobilization failure: An observational case series on behalf of the Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyético (GETH)

Plerixafor (Mozobil, Sanofi) is approved for using in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma when steady-state mobilization strategies fail. Although off-label use of plerixafor in healthy related donors (HRD) is known, limited data are available and no recommendations exist to guide its use in this setting. With the aim of collecting data from HRDs who received plerixafor in our country, we designed an observational case series study within the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Transplant and Cell Therapy (GETH). Plerixafor was administered subcutaneously to 30 HRDs at a median dose of 0.24 mg/Kg (interquartile range (IQR): 0.23-0.25) because mobilization failure after using mobilization with G-CSF (mobilization failure was defined as collection of <4.0 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/Kg recipient). All HRDs received G-CSF at a median dose of 11 μg/Kg/day (IQR: 10-12) for 4-5 days. Leukocytapheresis after G-CSF mobilization was performed in 23 (77 %) HRDs collecting a median of 1.6 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/Kg recipient weight (IQR: 0.9-2.5). Addition of plerixafor allowed the collection of a higher median number of CD34 cells (4.98 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/Kg recipient weight (IQR: 3.5-5.8)) when compared with the collection of CD34+ cells with G-CSF alone (p < 0.01). The final median total number of CD34+ cells collected was 6.1 × 10⁶/Kg recipient weight (IQR: 4.8-7.3). Mild adverse events related with plerixafor administration were reported in 8 (27 %) donors. In conclusion, addition of plerixafor after G-CSF mobilization failure in HRDs allowed collecting higher number of CD34+ cells in comparison with steady-state mobilization.

Getting blood out of a stone: Identification and management of patients with poor hematopoietic cell mobilization

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has become a primary treatment for many cancers. Nowadays, the primary source of hematopoietic cells is by leukapheresis collection of these cells from peripheral blood, after a forced egress of hematopoietic cells from marrow into blood circulation, a process known as "mobilization". In this process, mobilizing agents disrupt binding interactions between hematopoietic cells and marrow microenvironment to facilitate collection. As the first essential step of HCT, poor mobilization, i.e. failure to obtain a desired or required number of hematopoietic cell, is one of the major factors affecting engraftment or even precluding transplantation. This review summarizes the available mobilization regimens using granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor, as well as the current understanding of the factors that are associated with poor mobilization. Strategies to mobilize patients or healthy donors who failed previous mobilization are discussed. Multiple novel agents are under investigation and some of them have shown the potential to enhance the mobilization response to G-CSF and/or plerixafor. Further investigation of the risk factors including genetic factors will offer an opportunity to better understand the molecular mechanism of mobilization and help develop new therapeutic strategies for successful mobilizations.

Salvage treatment with plerixafor in poor mobilizing allogeneic stem cell donors: results of a prospective phase II-trial

We conducted a prospective clinical trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of plerixafor (P) in allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) donors with poor mobilization response to standard-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), defined by <2 × 10⁶ CD34 + cells/kg recipient body-weight (CD34+/kg RBW) after 1st apheresis. A single dose of 240 µg/kg P was injected subcutaneously at 10 p.m. on the day of the 1st apheresis. Thirty-seven allogeneic PBSC donors underwent study treatment. The median CD34+ count in peripheral blood was 15/µl on Day 1 after G-CSF alone, versus 44/µl on Day 2 after G-CSF plus P (p < 0.001). The median yield of CD34+ cells was 1.1 × 10⁸ on Day 1 and 2.8 × 10⁸ on Day 2. In contrast to a median yield of only 1.31 × 10⁶ CD CD34+/kg RBW on Day 1, triggering study inclusion, a median of 3.74 × 10⁶ CD CD34+/kg RBW were collected with G-CSF plus P on Day 2. Of 37 donors, 21 reached the target cell count of >4.5 × 10⁶ CD34+/kg RBW (57%, 95%CI 40-73%). No donor experienced a severe adverse event requiring treatment. In conclusion, P might be considered on a case-by-case basis for healthy allogeneic donors with very poor stem cell mobilization success after G-CSF.

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in microenvironment transform into cancer-associated fibroblasts to promote the progression of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Bone marrow microenvironment is essential for leukemia cells to survive and escape the killing effect of chemotherapeutics. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are the dominant stromal cells in tumor microenvironment (TME), but their role in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) remains unclear. Here, RT-PCR and Western blotting in bone marrow mononuclear cells revealed higher proportions of CAFs markers α-SMA and FAP in the newly diagnosed and relapsed B-ALL patients. In vitro experiments, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) acquired a CAFs phenotype after co-culture with leukemia cells, which produced high level of tumor-promoting growth factors and reduced the daunorubicin (DNR)-induced damage to B-ALL cells. As for its mechanism, CAFs activation was mediated by TGF-β up-regulation in the co-culture system, and TGF-β triggered MSCs conversion into CAFs relying on the SDF-1/CXCR4 pathway. Further LY2109761 and AMD3100 effectively decreased the activation of CAFs through inhibiting TGF-β receptor and CXCR4. Comparative experiments with MSCs and transformed CAFs prompted that CAFs had more obvious effect than MSCs on stimulating leukemia progression through accelerating leukemia cell migration and invasion. These results clarified the important role of CAFs in B-ALL progression and the possible mechanisms of CAFs activation in leukemia microenvironment, which might provide a theoretical basis for B-ALL patients to find more effective targeted therapies targeting the bone marrow microenvironment.

Increased collection efficiency of CD34+ cells after mobilization with preemptive use of plerixafor followed by leukocytapheresis on the same day

BACKGROUND

Plerixafor should be administered 6 to 11 hours before starting leukocytapheresis. However, we have been using plerixafor followed by leukocytapheresis according to different time schedules since 2007. Our objective was to compare the CD34+ cell collection efficiency (CE1) of the first leukocytapheresis performed after using plerixafor at different time intervals.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Same-day schedule refers to the administration of plerixafor at 10:00 AM and starting the leukocytapheresis on the same day at 4:00 PM (6 hours interval). Next-day schedule refers to the administration of plerixafor at 8:00 PM and starting the leukocytapheresis on the next day (10:00 AM or 4:00 PM; either a 14- or 20-hr interval). Variables that might influence the CE1 of CD34+ cells were analyzed by longitudinal linear regression with a random effects model derived by generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

The median CE1 of CD34+ cells was higher in the group of 30 patients who underwent leukocytapheresis on the same day when compared with the group of 62 patients who underwent leukocytapheresis on the next day (65.8% vs. 56.7%; p < 0.01). In the longitudinal linear regression analysis, only the time from plerixafor administration to leukocytapheresis start was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the CE1 of CD34+ cells (CE1 change -0.034%; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Higher CE1 of CD34+ cells was observed when patients underwent leukocytapheresis on the same day after receiving plerixafor in comparison with administering plerixafor and underwent leukocytapheresis on the next day. Larger studies are necessary to confirm present results.

Efficiency of day 4 compared to day 6 stem cell mobilization in allogeneic stem cell donors

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) given for 4-6 days is commonly used for mobilization of allogeneic stem cell donors. The primary objective of this study is to compare the yield of stem cell mobilization, assessed using a surrogate endpoint of CD34⁺ cell count, between Day 4 and Day 6.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this retrospective study we included all allogeneic stem cell donors mobilized with G-CSF for 6 days from January 2003 until October 2015 in the bone marrow transplantation unit at a tertiary academic center. Of 106 donor records reviewed, 84 were with available data and selected for the study.

RESULTS

We included 84 donors with median age and weight of 19 years and 60 kg respectively. The median Day 4 WBC and CD34⁺ cell count were 37.4 × 10⁹/L and 54 × 10⁶/L respectively; while the median Day 6 WBC and CD34⁺ cell count were 44.4 × 10⁹/L and 86 × 10⁶/L respectively with a statistically significant difference from Day 4 (P < 0.001). In the multivariable model, there were no significant impact of donor's age (P = 0.215), weight (P = 0.108), height (P = 0.428) and mean corpuscular volume (P = 0.263) on the difference in CD34⁺ cell yield. However, the donor's blood group AB predicated a significantly higher difference (P = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Six days of G-CSF mobilization achieves higher CD34⁺ cell count than 4 days in allogeneic stem cell donors especially in donors with blood group AB, albeit both approaches give count higher than the successful collection threshold.

Validation of a formula predictive of peripheral blood stem cell yield and successful collection in healthy allogeneic donors

BACKGROUND

An efficient mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are crucial to optimize engraftment in the recipient. We aim to validate a formula that predicted CD34⁺ cell yield and to describe variables that correlated with high yield mobilization and collection in healthy donors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory data from healthy donors who underwent PBSC collection from 2006 to 2015. The predicted number of collected cells was calculated using the following formula: Total number of CD34⁺ (cells×10⁶/kg) yield=[(peripheral CD34⁺ cells/μL)×(0.43)/recipient body weight (kg)]×total liters processed.

RESULTS

We evaluated 338 collections from 307 allogeneic PBSC donors. The predicted versus the observed number of CD34⁺ cells/kg collected yielded an r-value of 0.775 (0.726-0.816; p<0.0001). Overall, 55.7% donors had an acceptable mobilization level. Donors with a body weight <67kg were less likely to yield a satisfactory CD34⁺ cell count (OR=0.44; 95% CI 0.24-0.81), while a white blood cell (WBC) count >40×10⁹/L (OR=3.69; 2.11-6.46) and platelet count ≥200×10⁹/L (OR=2.09; 1.26-3.47) on the day of collection predicted a good level of mobilization. Predictors of a CD34⁺ cell yield/kg of ≥4×10⁶ with only one apheresis session were: circulating CD34⁺ cells/μL >40 (OR=16; 6.94-36.93), hemoglobin ≥14g/dL (OR=3.40; 1.53-7.57), WBC >40×10⁹/L (OR=4.61; 2.10-10.10) on the first collection day, and a positive delta weight between donor and recipient (OR=3.10; 1.36-7.06).

CONCLUSION

The formula for predicting CD34⁺ cell yield is accurate and suggests the optimal length of time for successful leukapheresis. Validation of the predictors of successful mobilization will help to further refine PBSC leukapheresis procedures.

The feasibility and efficacy of subcutaneous plerixafor for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in allogeneic HLA-identical sibling donors: results of the HOVON-107 study

Background

Plerixafor (PFX) mobilizes CD34+ cells into circulation by disrupting the CXCR4 binding of the hematopoietic stem cell in its bone marrow niche.

Study design and Methods

in the prospective HOVON‐107 study (www.hovon.nl) 23 allogeneic HLA–identical sibling donors received one or two subcutaneous (sc) injections of plerixafor 0.320 mg/kg.The primary endpoint, was defined as feasibility to mobilize a minimum of 2.0 x10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg recipient weight obtained by leukopheresis in at least 90% of the donors.

Results

median 3.3 x 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg (1.9‐6.5) were collected after 1 (n=12) or 2 (n=10) sc injections of PFX. Side effects occurred in 15/23 (65%) donors: most were grade 1‐2; in 5 donors grade 3 and all resolved. All grafts were directly transplanted. Compared to 10 grafts obtained with G‐CSF the number of CD34+ cells was 2.4 fold lower but the percentage of phenotypically most immature CD34+ subset was higher (31% vs 15%). The total number of CD3+ cells in the graft seemed higher after PFX‐mobilization, but CD4/CD 8 ratios, and frequencies of Th2, Th17 and regulatory T‐cells or NK cells were comparable. All patients engrafted and no increase in incidence or severity of acute or chronic graft versus host disease was observed.

Conclusion

stem cell mobilization with sc PFX 0.320 mg/kg in allogeneic sibling donors is feasible with limited toxicity for donors. 14 allogeneic donors were mobilized with PFX 0.320 mg intravenously according to the same protocol. Due to the limited numbers, these results are in the supplementary section.

Differences in Cellular Composition of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts from Healthy Stem Cell Donors Mobilized with Either Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Alone or G-CSF and Plerixafor

This study was conducted to characterize and compare peripheral blood stem cell grafts from healthy donors who underwent granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization and subsequently received 1 dose of plerixafor after insufficient stem cell yields were achieved at the first apheresis. Aliquots from 35 donors were collected from the first apheresis after mobilization with G-CSF alone and from the second apheresis after additional plerixafor administration. Samples were freshly analyzed for cellular subsets by 8-color flow cytometry. Leukapheresis samples mobilized with additional plerixafor showed a significant increase of total nucleated cells, including B cells, CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, and CD34⁺ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Absolute numbers of plasmacytoid dendritic cells were also significantly increased, whereas no changes were detected for myeloid dendritic cells. Furthermore, absolute numbers of regulatory T cells increased, with naive CD45RA⁺ regulatory T cells showing the highest rise. Finally, strikingly higher numbers of myeloid-derived suppressor cells were detected in the plerixafor and G-CSF-mobilized graft. The mobilization of peripheral stem cells in healthy donors with G-CSF and plerixafor led to a significant difference in cellular graft composition compared with G-CSF alone. The clinical impact of the different cell composition for the graft recipient warrants further clinical investigation.

Impact of Single-Dose Plerixafor as an Adjunct to Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor-Based Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization on the Graft Composition and Outcome for T Cell-Replete Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide: A Comparative Study

We conducted a prospective study on T and natural killer (NK) cell subset composition of graft and transplant outcomes in T cell-replete haploidentical transplantation with a single dose of subcutaneous plerixafor (Px) added to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-based mobilization in allogeneic donors to collect 10 × 10⁶/kg CD34⁺ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) at single apheresis. Twnety-six donors received G-CSF + Px and 25 G-CSF alone for mobilization. Despite significantly lower peripheral blood (PB) CD34⁺ HSCs on day 4 in the G-CSF + Px group (33 [range, 6-47] cells/µL versus 81 [range, 50-168] cells/µL in the G-CSF group; P = .0001), PB CD34⁺ HSC count (median 136 versus 139 cells/µL) on day 5 as well as that in the graft (2.7 versus 2.3 × 10⁶/mL, P = .1) were comparable between the 2 groups. The total nucleated cell count was higher (3.4 versus 3.1 × 10⁸/mL, P = .05), but CD4⁺ T cells (2.3 versus 2.7 × 10⁷/mL, P = .09) were lower in the G-CSF group with mobilization of regulatory T cells being similar. NK cells were skewed toward the CD56⁺/16^- subset in both groups, varying significantly from the steady-state NK subset ratio in PB. The time to engraftment, incidences of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, nonrelapse mortality, and overall survival were also similar. Addition of single-dose Px to G-CSF mobilization improves CD34 recovery and does not significantly alter the T and NK cell composition of the graft, including regulatory T cells, with no adverse impact on transplant outcomes.

Role of αβ T Cell Depletion in Prevention of Graft versus Host Disease

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) represents a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo HCT). Graft cellular manipulation has been used to mitigate the risk of GVHD. The αβ T cells are considered the primary culprit for causing GVHD therefore depletion of this T cell subset emerged as a promising cellular manipulation strategy to overcome the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) barrier of haploidentical (haplo) HCT. This approach is also being investigated in HLA-matched HCT. In several studies, αβ T cell depletion HCT has been performed without pharmacologic GVHD prophylaxis, thus unleashing favorable effect of donor’s natural killer cells (NK) and γδ T cells. This article will discuss the evolution of this method in clinical practice and the clinical outcome as described in different clinical trials.

Collection of hematopoietic CD34 stem cells in rhesus macaques using Spectra Optia

BACKGROUND

Nonhuman primates, particularly rhesus macaques, are ideal preclinical large animal models to investigate organ tolerance induction protocols using donor hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to induce chimerism. Their relatively small size poses some challenges for the safe and effective collection of peripheral blood HSCs through apheresis procedures. We describe our experiences using the Spectra Optia apheresis unit to successfully obtain HSCs from mobilized peripheral blood of rhesus macaques.

METHOD

Mobilization of peripheral blood HSCs was induced using granulocyte stimulating factor (G-CSF) and Mozobil. The Spectra Optia unit was used in 18 apheresis procedures in 13 animals (4.9-10 kg). Animal health was carefully monitored during and after the procedure. Changes in peripheral blood cells before, during and after procedure were determined by complete blood count and flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The automatic settings of the Spectra Optia unit were applied successfully to the procedures on the rhesus macaque. All animals tolerated the procedure well with no mortality. Mobilization of HSCs were most consistently achieved using 50 μg/kg of G-CSF for 5 days and a single dose of Mozobil on the 5th day, followed by collection of cells 3 h after Mozobil injection. The final apheresis product contained an average of 23 billion total nucleated cells with 47% granulocytes, 3,871 million total CD3 cells and 77 million CD34 cells which resulted in an average of 10 million CD34+ cells/kg of donor weight.

CONCLUSION

Apheresis of peripheral blood mobilized HSCs in rhesus macaques using Spectra Optia is a safe and effective procedure.

Sixty as the new forty: considerations on older related stem cell donors

The era of reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation, with its emphasis on older patients, has created new challenges in the management of what is now an older related stem cell donor population. These donors are now on average no less than 10 years older than in the mid-1990s. Donors over 70 years of age are no longer isolated or exceptional cases. They may still be considered eligible for donation but many of them, based on the older age and their medical history, may no longer fully qualify as 'healthy' or 'normal'. The older the donor, the more likely that hematologic abnormalities, comorbidities and treated malignancies will complicate the picture. Assessing the risk-benefit ratio for both donor and recipient can now be more challenging than ever.

How do I perform hematopoietic progenitor cell selection?

Graft-versus-host disease remains the most important source of morbidity and mortality associated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The implementation of hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) selection is employed by some stem cell processing facilities to mitigate this complication. Current cell selection methods include reducing the number of unwanted T cells (negative selection) and/or enriching CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitors (positive selection) using immunomagnetic beads subjected to magnetic fields within columns to separate out targeted cells. Unwanted side effects of cell selection as a result of T-cell reduction are primary graft failure, increased infection rates, delayed immune reconstitution, possible disease relapse, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. The Miltenyi CliniMACS cell isolation system is the only device currently approved for clinical use by the Food and Drug Administration. It uses magnetic microbeads conjugated with a high-affinity anti-CD34 monoclonal antibody capable of binding to HPCs in marrow, peripheral blood, or umbilical cord blood products. The system results in significantly improved CD34+ cell recoveries (50%-100%) and consistent 3-log CD3+ T-cell reductions compared to previous generations of CD34+ cell selection procedures. In this article, the CliniMACS procedure is described in greater detail and the authors provide useful insight into modifications of the system. Successful implementation of cell selection procedures can have a significant positive clinical effect by greatly increasing the pool of donors for recipients requiring transplants. However, before a program implements cell selection techniques, it is important to consider the time and financial resources required to properly and safely perform these procedures.