Riboflavin-ultraviolet light pathogen reduction treatment does not impact the immunogenicity of murine red blood cells

Alloantigen Copy Number as a Critical Factor in RBC Alloimmunization

RBC alloimmunization remains a significant barrier to ongoing transfusion therapy leading to morbidity, and in extreme cases mortality, due to delayed or insufficient units of compatible RBCs. In addition, the monitoring and characterization of alloantibodies, often with multiple specificities in a single patient, consumes substantial health care resources. Extended phenotypic matching has mitigated, but not eliminated, RBC alloimmunization and is only logistically available for specialized populations. Thus, RBC alloimmunization remains a substantial problem. In recent decades it has become clear that mechanisms of RBC alloimmunization are distinct from other antigens and lack of mechanistic understanding likely contributes to the fact that there are no approved interventions to prevent RBC alloimmunization from transfusion. The combination of human studies and murine modeling have identified several key factors in RBC alloimmunization. In both humans and mice, immunogenicity is a function of alloantigen copy number on RBCs. Murine studies have further shown that copy number not only changes rates of immunization but the mechanisms of antibody formation. This review summarizes the current understanding of quantitative and qualitative effects of alloantigen copy number on RBC alloimmunization.

The long and winding road to pathogen reduction of platelets, red blood cells and whole blood

Pathogen reduction technologies (PRTs) have been developed to further reduce the current very low risks of acquiring transfusion-transmitted infections and promptly respond to emerging infectious threats. An entire portfolio of PRTs suitable for all blood components is not available, but the field is steadily progressing. While PRTs for plasma have been used for many years, PRTs for platelets, red blood cells (RBC) and whole blood (WB) were developed more slowly, due to difficulties in preserving cell functions during storage. Two commercial platelet PRTs use ultra violet (UV) A and UVB light in the presence of amotosalen or riboflavin to inactivate pathogens' nucleic acids, while a third experimental PRT uses UVC light only. Two PRTs for WB and RBC have been tested in experimental clinical trials with storage limited to 21 or 35 days, due to unacceptably high RBC storage lesion beyond these time limits. This review summarizes pre-clinical investigations and selected outcomes from clinical trials using the above PRTs. Further studies are warranted to decrease cell storage lesions after PRT treatment and to test PRTs in different medical and surgical conditions. Affordability remains a major administrative obstacle to PRT use, particularly so in geographical regions with higher risks of transfusion-transmissible infections.

Towards pathogen inactivation of red blood cells and whole blood targeting viral DNA/RNA: design, technologies, and future prospects for developing countries

Over 110 million units of blood are collected yearly. The need for blood products is greater in developing countries, but so is the risk of contracting a transfusion-transmitted infection. Without efficient donor screening/viral testing and validated pathogen inactivation technology, the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections correlates with the infection rate of the donor population. The World Health Organization has published guidelines on good manufacturing practices in an effort to ensure a strong global standard of transfusion and blood product safety. Sub-Saharan Africa is a high-risk region for malaria, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus and syphilis. Southeast Asia experiences high rates of hepatitis C virus. Areas with a tropical climate have an increased risk of Zika virus, Dengue virus, West Nile virus and Chikungunya, and impoverished countries face economical limitations which hinder efforts to acquire the most modern pathogen inactivation technology. These systems include Mirasol® Pathogen Reduction Technology, INTERCEPT®, and THERAFLEX®. Their procedures use a chemical and ultraviolet or visible light for pathogen inactivation and significantly decrease the threat of pathogen transmission in plasma and platelets. They are licensed for use in Europe and are used in several other countries. The current interest in the blood industry is the development of pathogen inactivation technologies that can treat whole blood (WB) and red blood cell (RBC). The Mirasol system has recently undergone phase III clinical trials for treating WB in Ghana and has demonstrated some efficacy toward malaria inactivation and low risk of adverse effects. A 2nd-generation of the INTERCEPT® S-303 system for WB is currently undergoing a phase III clinical trial. Both methodologies are applicable for WB and components derived from virally reduced WB or RBC.

An effective and potentially safe blood disinfection protocol using tetrapyrrolic photosensitizers

Aim: Conventional disinfection techniques, considered safe for plasma, are usually associated with collateral damages on concentrated platelets and erythrocytes. Alternative methods are required and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) seems promising. In this study the effectiveness of two photosensitizers (PS), a porphyrin and a phthalocyanine, to disinfect blood products was evaluated. Results: The cationic porphyrin was more effective in the photoinactivation of bacteria. Also, no significant osmotic stress was found for samples treated with PS at 5.0 µM in isotonic conditions after antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. Conclusion: Effective reduction of Gram-positive bacteria at 5.0 µM of PS provided promising indications toward its safe use to disinfect blood samples. For Gram-negative bacteria, lower PS concentrations, between 5.0 and 10 µM, must be tested.

Reduced MHC alloimmunization and partial tolerance protection with pathogen reduction of whole blood

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic blood transfusion can result in an immune response against major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens, potentially complicating future transfusions or transplants. We previously demonstrated that pathogen reduction of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with riboflavin and ultraviolet light (UV+R) can prevent alloimmunization in mice. A similar pathogen-reduction treatment is currently under development for the treatment of whole blood using riboflavin and a higher dose of UV light. We sought to determine the effectiveness of this treatment in the prevention of alloimmunization.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

BALB/cJ mice were transfused with untreated or UV+R-treated, allogeneic C57Bl/6J whole blood with or without leukoreduction. Mice were evaluated for donor-specific antibodies, ex vivo splenocyte cytokine responses, and changes in the frequency of regulatory T (T_reg ) cells.

RESULTS

UV+R treatment blocked cytokine priming and reduced anti-MHC alloantibody responses to transfused whole blood. Leukoreduction reduced alloantibody levels in both the untreated and UV+R-treated groups. Mice transfused with UV+R-treated whole blood had reduced alloantibody and cytokine responses when subsequently transfused with untreated blood from the same donor type. This reduction in responses was not associated with increased T_reg cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathogen reduction of whole blood with UV+R significantly reduces, but does not eliminate, the alloimmune response. Exposure to UV+R-treated whole blood transfusion does appear to induce tolerance to alloantigens, resulting in reduced anti-MHC alloantibody and cytokine responses to subsequent exposures to the same alloantigens. This tolerance does not appear to be driven by an increase in T_reg cells.