Storage characteristics of multiple-donor pooled red blood cells compared to single-donor red blood cell units

Molecular communication between red blood cells of different phenotypes during blood storage in mice

BACKGROUND

The cellular and molecular changes during red blood cell (RBC) storage that affect posttransfusion recovery (PTR) remain incompletely understood. We have previously reported that RBCs of different storage biology cross-regulate each other when stored together (co-storage cross-regulation [CSCR]). However, the mechanism of CSCR is unclear. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that CSCR involves acquisition of molecular signatures associated with PTR.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The whole blood compartment of either B6 or FVB mice was biotinylated in vivo prior to blood collection and storage. Bio-B6 or Bio.FVB were stored with RBCs from B6 mice transgenic for green florescent protein (GFP) (B6.GFP). After storage, avidin-magnetic beads were used to simultaneous purify Bio-RBCs (positive selection) and B6.GFPs (negative selection). Isolated populations were analyzed by transfusion to establish PTR, and subjected to metabolomic and proteomic analysis.

RESULTS

B6 RBCs acquired molecular signatures associated with stored FVB RBCs at both the metabolomic and proteomic level including metabolites associated with energy metabolism, oxidative stress regulation, and oxidative damage. Mitochondrial signatures were also acquired by B6 RBCs. Protein signatures acquired by B6 RBCs include proteins associated with vesiculation.

CONCLUSION

The data presented herein demonstrate the appearance of multiple molecular changes from poor-storing RBCs in good-storing RBCs during co-storage. Whether this is a result of damage causing intrinsic molecular changes in B6 RBCs or if molecules of FVB RBC origin are transferred to B6 RBCs remains unclear. These studies broaden our mechanistic understanding of RBC storage (in particular) and potentially RBC biology (in general).

Murine red blood cells from genetically distinct donors cross-regulate when stored together

BACKGROUND

Donor variability of red blood cell (RBC) storage has been observed in both humans and animal models. We utilized a strain of mice with RBCs known to store well (B6) and a strain known to store poorly (FVB) to test the hypothesis that RBCs affected the storage of other RBCs.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Five strains of mice were used: 1) transgenic B6 mice expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) in their RBCs (GFP.B6), 2) wild-type B6 mice, 3) wild-type FVB mice, 4) F1 crosses between GFP.B6 and FVB mice (GFP.F1), and 5) the analogous wild-type (B6xFVB) F1 cross. GFP.B6 or GFP.F1 RBCs were mixed with wild-type (non-GFP) RBCs from B6 or FVB strains before storage. Twenty-four-hour RBC recoveries were determined for stored RBCs by enumerating circulating GFP+ RBCs by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Twenty-four-hour recoveries of GFP.F1 RBCs was increased by co-storage with B6 RBCs but decreased by co-storage with FVB RBCs. This effect was dose dependent when tested with GFP.B6 RBCs; the more FVB blood added, the worse the 24-hour recoveries became. RBC cross-regulation did not occur when B6 and FVB RBCs were separated by a semipermeable membrane with a 0.4-µm size cutoff.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate that RBCs affect the storage of other RBCs, in both positive and negative directions, indicating not only that RBC storage is intrinsic to the RBC but that RBC-RBC communication occurs. Additional studies will be required to determine the nature of this effect and if these findings translate into human RBC storage.