Patients' and health care professionals' perceptions of blood transfusion: a systematic review

Successful implementation of a patient blood management programme in a lower middle-income state

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Transfusions are common, but their use is decreasing in some countries as a result of increased risk awareness and the implementation of patient blood management (PBM), an evidence-based approach to optimize patient outcomes. This study aimed to detail the implementation of PBM in a Brazilian state and its impact on transfusion rates and associated costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PBM implementation involved several strategies: medical education, haematology consultation services, provision of intravenous iron and other medications, establishment of PBM and perioperative anaemia clinics, cell salvage and acute normovolaemic haemodilution, anaemia reference laboratories and rotational thromboelastometry. The program's implementation was assessed through quality indicators and cost analysis.

RESULTS

Since 2016, there have been reductions in transfusion rates, mainly in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Quality indicators showed an increase in single-RBC transfusions from 53% in December 2015 to 85.9% in June 2024 and a decrease in transfusions for patients with Hb ≥7 g/dL from 5.9% in March 2021 to 2.7% in May 2024. The PBM programme led to an estimated annual cost saving of R$2.63 million (US $487,000), if considered RBC direct costs, and from R$9.69 million to R$16.145 million (US $1.79-$2.99 million) in activity-based costs, considering only the reduction in RBC transfusions.

CONCLUSION

The PBM programme in Ceará successfully reduced transfusion rates and associated costs through a multidisciplinary approach, medical education and government support. This model demonstrates the potential for significant healthcare improvements and cost savings and can serve as a benchmark for other regions and countries, especially in low- and middle-income settings.

Patient perspectives on intraoperative blood transfusion: A qualitative interview study with perioperative patients

BACKGROUND

While red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are frequently administered during surgery, little is known about patient perspectives regarding intraoperative transfusion. The aim of this study was to understand patient perspectives about intraoperative RBC transfusion and explore their willingness to engage in transfusion prevention strategies.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This descriptive qualitative study used semi-structured patient interviews before and after surgery. Purposive sampling was used to select adult patients with varying perioperative courses, including having perioperative transfusion or postoperative anemia. Inductive and deductive thematic analyses were conducted to identify themes.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (nine preoperative and 11 postoperative patients) were interviewed. The following themes were identified: Risk-benefit perception of transfusion, transfusion acceptance, trust, patient involvement in transfusion decisions, acceptance of transfusion prevention interventions, and communication. Patients perceived transfusions as low-risk compared to the surgery itself. Factors influencing transfusion acceptance included trust in the healthcare system and the perception of the treatability of transfusion-related complications. Some patients preferred to defer transfusion decision making to the perioperative team, citing trust in professional judgment and building a positive relationship with their surgeon. Others wished for their preferences to be incorporated into transfusion decisions. Some desired detailed blood consent conversations and most were willing to participate in strategies to reduce intraoperative transfusion.

CONCLUSION

In our sample, patients consider intraoperative transfusions as low-risk high-reward interventions and trust the healthcare system and perioperative team to guide intraoperative transfusion decision making. However, preoperative transfusion consent discussions were recalled as being superficial and lacking nuance. Targeted strategies are required to improve blood consent discussions to better integrate patient preferences.

Blood transfusion in haematology: A qualitative exploration of patients' and healthcare professionals' perceptions

OBJECTIVES

Repeated blood transfusions are indicated for the management of patients with cancer or blood disorders. Patients' perceptions about transfusions may be associated with decision-making and coping, which has been under-explored in the haematology context. This study therefore aimed to explore haematology transfusion patients' and HCPs' perceptions of blood transfusion, drawing on theory and previously identified themes of transfusion perceptions.

DESIGN

Semi-structured interview study with 14 adult blood transfusion patients and 14 HCPs (consultants, registrars, nurses) at two UK haematology units.

METHODS

Patient- and HCP-tailored topic guides were developed based on themes of blood transfusion perceptions identified in a systematic review: 'Health benefits', 'Safety/risk', 'Negative emotions', 'Alternatives' 'Decision making' and 'Necessity'. Transcripts were analysed using deductive and thematic analysis. Patient and HCP themes were compared using triangulation methods. Conceptual models (one for patients, one for HCPs) specific to haematology portraying the association between themes were developed.

RESULTS

Findings for patients and HCPs converged with transfusion reported as beneficial for patients, who were largely involved in the decision-making. Both groups also reported concerns about transfusion, including iron-overload, allergic reactions and challenges to deliver transfusions in time-pressurized services. Themes in the conceptual models included patient 'Burden' of receiving repeated transfusions and 'Supportive relationships', reflective of patients' positive interactions with other patients and HCPs in the haematology unit.

CONCLUSION

Despite the challenges for patients receiving repeated transfusions, convergent perceptions suggest a shared understanding of patients' transfusion experiences. Identified challenges could inform ways to improve transfusion services and patients' experiences.

Perceptions About Blood Transfusion Therapy Among the General Public and Healthcare Professionals in the Qassim Region of Saudi Arabia

Purpose

Blood transfusion is a conventional therapeutic procedure; however, the perceptions of general public and healthcare professionals (HCPs), especially physicians and nurses, remain unclear, although the insights of HSPs may affect the treatment decision. This study aimed to assess the awareness of HCPs and the public about blood transfusion risks and consent in Qassim region of Saudi Arabia, to uncover the factors that may influence such perceptions.

Patients and Methods

This study used two different closed questionnaires that were distributed electronically between February and March 2018 among the population and HCPs in Qassim region.

Results

A total of 400 general public participants and 135 HCPs completed the survey. Among the surveyed participants, 70% believed that blood transfusion therapy was safe. The perceived risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) was the highest among all complications (74%). Furthermore, 88.2% of respondents were willing to accept a blood transfusion as a therapeutic measure, primarily from a first-degree relative, although the remaining 11.8% rejected the idea of a transfusion due to fear of medical error. From the HCP survey, 80% were previously involved in a blood transfusion therapy consent process. HCPs typically reported explaining the benefits, risks, and alternatives described in the consent form (74.1%, 67.4%, and 53.3%, respectively).

Conclusion

Our results indicated that despite the current high level of acceptance and knowledge regarding blood transfusions, additional educational efforts remain necessary to increase public awareness of blood transfusion therapy.

RENORMALIZATION OF THE NURSES’ WORK IN HEMOTHERAPY: BETWEEN PRESCRIPTION AND REALITY

ABSTRACT Objective: to characterize the work process of nurses in hemotherapy in terms of prescribed procedures, antecedent norms and real work. Method: a qualitative study, carried out from February to December 2017, in a blood center in the North of the country, involving a sample of twenty-two nurses. Methodological triangulation with data collected through semi-structured interviews, institutional documents and protocols, participant observation and notes in a field diary were used. For data treatment and analysis, the resources of the Atlas.ti 8.2.1 software (Qualitative Research and Solutions) and the fundamentals of Historical Dialectical Materialism and Ergology were used. Results: the results showed that nurses work in different activities, recreating work according to the needs of the service. The assistance, educational and managerial work permeates the activities developed and is carried out in accordance with the legislation, seeking to guarantee the donor's health, the quality of the products and transfusion safety. Conclusion: the work situations of these professionals indicate that its uses are present in their daily lives, promoting dynamism between the previous norms and the renormalizations.

Caregivers and community perceptions of blood transfusion for children with severe anaemia in Uganda

OBJECTIVE

To describe local perceptions of blood transfusion for children with severe anaemia in Uganda.

BACKGROUND

Blood transfusion is a common emergency treatment for children with severe anaemia and saves millions of lives of African children. However, the perceptions of transfusion recipients have not been well studied. A better understanding of the perceived risk may improve transfusion care.

METHODS

A qualitative study based on 16 in-depth interviews of caregivers of transfused children, and six focus group discussions with community members was conducted in three regions of Uganda between October and November 2017.

RESULTS

Caregivers of children and community members held blood transfusion in high regard and valued it as life-saving. However, there were widespread perceived transfusion risks, including: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission, too rapid blood infusion and blood incompatibility. Other concerns were: fatality, changes in behaviour, donor blood being 'too strong' and use of animal blood. In contrast, recent transfusion, older age, knowledge of HIV screening of blood for transfusion, faith in God and having a critically ill child were associated with less fear about transfusion. Respondents also emphasised challenges to transfusion services access including distance to hospitals, scarcity of blood and health workers' attitudes.

CONCLUSION

Perceptions of the community and caregivers of transfused children in Uganda about blood transfusion were complex: transfusion is considered life-saving but there were strong perceived transfusion risks of HIV transmission and blood incompatibility. Addressing community perceptions and facilitating access to blood transfusion represent important strategies to improve paediatric transfusion care.