Transfusion support for matched sibling allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (1993-2010): factors that predict intensity and time to transfusion independence

Single-Unit Transfusion Policy in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Less is Not Worse

Single-unit red blood cell (1-RBC) transfusion policy has shown to effectively reduce transfusion burden while maintaining comparable clinical outcomes in hematological patients compared to the classical double-unit policy. However, its effects specifically after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have not been previously studied. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the 1-RBC policy on transfusion burden in a homogeneous cohort of patients undergoing ASCT. We retrospectively compared the transfusion requirements and the clinical outcomes of 187 patients transplanted from May 2019 to December 2022 under a 1-RBC policy, with a historical cohort of 153 patients transplanted from January 2016 to April 2019 under a double-unit policy. The 1-RBC policy was associated with a 32% reduction in RBC utilization and lower number of RBC transfusions at day 30 after transplantation (median 2 versus 3 units; P < .0001), with an odds ratio of 0.49 in multivariate analysis (P = .03). However, the number of transfusion episodes remained similar (median of 2 in both arms; P = .34). No significant differences in length of stay, hemoglobin levels at discharge or 30-day mortality were observed. In conclusion, transitioning to the 1-RBC represents a straightforward action in current practice that significantly reduces blood transfusions in patients undergoing ASCT, without negatively impacting clinical outcomes.

Transfusion Support in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Contemporary Narrative Review

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a cornerstone of modern medical practice, and can only be performed safely and effectively with appropriate transfusion medicine support. Patients undergoing HSCT often develop therapy-related cytopenia, necessitating differing blood product requirements in the pre-, peri-, and post-transplant periods. Moreover, ensuring optimal management for patients alloimmunized to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and/or red blood cell (RBC) antigens, as well as for patients receiving ABO-incompatible transplants, requires close collaboration with transfusion medicine and blood bank professionals. Finally, as updated transfusion guidelines and novel blood product modifications emerge, the options available to the transplant practitioner continue to expand. Herein, we detail contemporary blood transfusion and transfusion medicine practices for patients undergoing HSCT.

Age, CD34+ cell dose, conditioning and pre-transplant cytopenias can help predict transfusion support in lymphoma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is a widely used therapy for lymphoma patients and can nowadays be performed on an outpatient basis. This study aimed to describe transfusion support in lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT and identify increased or prolonged transfusion requirement predictors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of all consecutive lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT between 2010 and 2020.

RESULTS

Out of 226 patients, 145 (64%) received red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, whereas all 226 (100%) required platelet transfusion (PT). Transfusions between Day +1 and +30 were higher in patients over 60 (2 [1-4] vs. 2 [0-2] RBC; p = 0.001 and 4 [2-8] vs. 3 [2-4] PT; p < 0.001); patients with pre-transplant anaemia (4 [2.5-6] vs. 2 [0-2] RBC; p < 0.001 and 5 [3-9] vs. 3 [2-4] PT; p = 0.001); pre-transplant thrombocytopenia (2 [1-4] vs. 2 [0-2] RBC; p < 0.001 and 4 [3-8.5] vs. 2 [1-3] PT; p < 0.001) or CD34+ cell dose <4 × 106 /kg (2 [0-4] vs. 2 [0-2] RBC; p = 0.024 and 4 [2-6] vs. 2 [1-3.5] PT; p < 0.001). RBC transfusion independence was reached later in patients receiving carmustine, cytarabine, etoposide and melphalan (BEAM) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.6; confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.3) and those requiring RBC before infusion and/or with pre-transplant anaemia (HR 2.2; CI 1.4-3.4). Age above 60 (HR 1.4; CI 1.0-1.9), BEAM conditioning (HR 1.4; CI 1.0-2.0) and pre-transplant thrombocytopenia and/or requiring PT before infusion (HR 1.8; CI 1.4-2.5) entailed longer time until PT independence.

CONCLUSION

These four factors (age ≥60 years; BEAM conditioning, CD34+ dose <4 × 106 /kg and pre-transplant cytopenia and/or Day -10 to 0 transfusion) allowed dividing patients into three groups with significant differences between them regarding the time until transfusion independence.

Blood components utilization in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Thirteen-year analysis from an apex oncology center of India

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative treatment modality for a range of hematological disorders including malignancies. The increasing volumes of HSCTs impact transfusion services and the requirement of blood products vary depending on the primary disease, type and phase of transplant, and the HSCT donor type.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study analyzed the factors affecting blood component requirements in patients undergoing HSCT. The authors studied the transfusion requirement of packed red blood cells (PRBC) and platelets (PLT) up to 100 days post-transplant among 617 adult patients undergoing HSCT during the study period (2007-2019).

RESULTS

Requirement of PRBC and PLT was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in allogenic HSCT cases across all three phases of transplant compared to autologous HSCT. Unlike PRBC requirement, the PLT requirement was significantly higher during peri-transplant period for haploidentical HSCT and major ABO-incompatible HSCT group compared to matched related donor HSCT and ABO identical HSCT, respectively. In subset analysis based on diagnosis with leukemia as reference, the multiple myeloma group required less while the anemia group required more PRBC and PLT transfusions. The leukemia group required more PRBC than lymphoma group, while the PLT requirement was vice-versa.

CONCLUSION

Factors such as allogeneic HSCT, haploidentical donor type, major ABO-incompatible HSCT, and primary diagnosis as leukemia or anemia were the predictors for increased need of blood products. As higher transfusion requirements may translate into increased costs of treatment, a study like this can help in managing blood component inventory and planning treatment costs of a HSCT program.

Transfusion Burden in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation over Time: Experience from a Single Institution

INTRODUCTION

Transfusion plays a main role in supportive treatment for patients who receive an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this study, we compare the transfusion requirements of patients undergoing different modalities of HSCT according to different time periods. The objective is to assess the evolution of HSCT transfusion requirements over time, from a single institution.

METHODS

The clinical charts and transfusion records of patients who underwent HSCT of different modalities at La Fe University Hospital during a twelve-year period were reviewed (2009-2020). For analysis, we divided the overall time into three periods: 1 from 2009 to 2012, 2 from 2013 to 2016 and 3 from 2017 to 2020. The study included 855 consecutive adult HSCT: 358 HLA-matched related donors (MRD), 134 HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUD), 223 umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) and 140 haploidentical transplants (Haplo-HSCT).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in RBC and PLT requirements or transfusion independence among the three time periods for MUD and Haplo-HSCT. However, the transfusion burden increased significantly for MRD HSCT during the 2017-2020 period.

CONCLUSION

despite HSCT modalities having evolved and changed over time, overall transfusion requirements have not significantly decreased and continue to be a cornerstone of transplantation-supportive care.

Impact of Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide on Transfusion Requirements in HLA-Matched Sibling Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis is being increasingly used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) from HLA-matched related donors (MRDs); however, information regarding the transfusion needs in this setting is lacking. This study compared RBC and platelet units transfused and time to transfusion independence according to the GVHD prophylaxis regimen in MRD HSCT. We performed a matched-pair analysis comparing the transfusion requirements and the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent MRD peripheral blood HSCT using PTCy between January 2017 and June 2021 (n = 100) with historical MRD HSCTs using standard cyclosporine A (CsA)-based prophylaxis (n = 100). Neutrophil engraftment was significantly delayed in the PTCy group compared with the CsA group (16 days versus 13 days; P = .003). PTCy was associated with increased RBC (median, 5 units versus 4 units; P = .04) and platelet (median, 6 units versus 3 units; P = .01) transfusion requirements during the first 30 days after transplantation. The proportion of patients requiring platelet transfusion during days 31 to 90 after transplantation was also higher in the PTCy group (55% versus 25%; P < .0001). In multivariate analysis, PTCy was associated with delayed RBC and platelet transfusion independence (hazard ratio, .61 [P = .007] and .51 [P < .0001], respectively). The cumulative incidence (CuI) of BK polyomavirus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis grade ≥2 at 100 days was higher in the PTCy group (34% versus 12%; P < .0001); however, the PTCy group had lower rates of grade II-IV acute GVHD (100-day CuI, 57% versus 23%; P < .0001) and moderate to severe chronic GVHD (1-year CuI, 49% versus 28%; P = .003), as well as better 2-year overall survival (74% versus 56%; P = .01). Our study shows that although PTCy increases the transfusion burden in MRD HSCT, it is associated with a low incidence of severe GVHD and with encouraging survival outcomes.

ABO Mismatch in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: Effect on Short- and Long-term Outcomes

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

The impact of ABO incompatibility (ABO-I) on hematopoietic stem cell transplant outcomes is still debated.

Methods.

We retrospectively investigated 432 consecutive transplants performed at our center (2012–2020). All patients but 6 were affected by hematologic malignancies. The effect of different ABO match combinations on engraftment rate, transfusion support, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease incidences, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), disease-free survival, and overall survival was assessed in univariate and multivariate analysis. Significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results.

ABO match distribution among transplants was as follows: 223 ABO-compatible, 94 major ABO-I, 82 minor ABO-I, and 33 bidirectional ABO-I. At univariate analysis, major ABO-I delayed the engraftment of neutrophils, platelets, and erythroid cells. At multivariate analysis, major ABO-I transplants displayed delayed erythroid engraftment (odds ratio [OR], 0.51; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.38-0.70; P < 0.0001) and hindered transfusion independence for both red blood cells (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.72; P = 0.0001) and platelets (0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-0.86; P = 0.0048). Moreover, major ABO-I transplants received greater amounts of blood products (P < 0.0001 for red blood cells and P = 0.0447 for platelets). In comparison with other ABO matches, major ABO-I was associated with an increased NRM (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.01-2.75; P = 0.0427). No effects of ABO-mismatch were found on graft-versus-host disease, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

Conclusions.

Major ABO mismatch delays multilineage engraftment hinders transfusion independence and increases NRM. The prognostic impact of transfusion burden in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation deserves to be explored.

Red blood cell and platelet transfusion support in the first 30 and 100 days after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients often require substantial but variable transfusion support.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study evaluated the red blood cell (RBC) and platelet (PLT) transfusion data of first-time allo-HSCT recipients transplanted in 2011 to 2017. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the associations between patient and transplant-related factors and transfusion requirements.

RESULTS

The study included 1762 patients who received peripheral blood stem cells (88.2%), marrow (7.0%), or umbilical cord (4.8%) from matched related (38.3%), unrelated (49.2%), or haploidentical (7.8%) donors. Almost all patients required RBCs (88.3%) or PLTs (97.4%) during the first 30 days, with medians of 3 (range, 1-37) RBC and 6 (range, 1-144) PLT units transfused. Fewer patients required RBC (43.8%) or PLT (27.3%) transfusions during Days 31 to 100, but the median (range) numbers of RBC and PLT units remained high at 3 (1-36) and 6 (1-116) among transfused patients. RBC and PLT transfusion independence was reached in medians of 24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 22-26) and 12 (95% CI, 11-12) days, respectively. Haploidentical donor, cord graft, and requiring RBC transfusions in the 10 days before HSCT were the most significant independent factors predictive of increased transfusion requirements. Advanced disease, diagnosis, ABO incompatibility, conditioning intensity, CD34+ cell dose, presence of severe acute graft-vs-host disease, and changes in recommended transfusion triggers were also shown to independently impact transfusion requirements.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided for the first time quantitative and comparative transfusion data on a large contemporary cohort of HSCT recipients, including haploidentical and cord graft recipients, and identified factors predictive of increased transfusions.

Advances in gene therapy for hematologic disease and considerations for transfusion medicine

As the list of regulatory agency-approved gene therapies grows, these products are now in the therapeutic spotlight with the potential to cure or dramatically alleviate several benign and malignant hematologic diseases. The mechanisms for gene manipulation are diverse, and include the use of a variety of cell sources and both viral vector- and nuclease-based targeted approaches. Gene editing has also reached the realm of blood component therapy and testing, where cultured products are being developed to improve transfusion support for individuals with rare blood types. In this review, we summarize the milestones in the development of gene therapies for hematologic diseases, mechanisms for gene manipulation, and implications for transfusion medicine and blood centers as these therapies continue to advance and grow.