Growing evidence supports healthy older people continuing to donate blood into later life

Increasing the upper age limit for blood donation: Perspectives from older donors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In the Netherlands, as of April 2018, the upper age limit for blood donation has been raised from 69 to 79 years, providing an opportunity to study older donors' perspectives regarding donating at older age. This study aims to explore whether older donors agree with the increase of the age limit, if they feel obliged to continue donating, to identify their motivators and barriers for donating blood and describe donation-related experiences and complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey was distributed among Dutch blood donors aged 68-73 years. The survey contained questions regarding the increase of the upper age limit, motivations and barriers for donating, donation-related experiences and obligatory feelings to continue donating.

RESULTS

Six hundred sixty donors (55%) were included in the analyses, including 38 stopped donors. Most donors (92%) agreed with the increase of the upper age limit. Approximately 63% of participating donors felt obliged to continue donating, especially women with high education. Donors indicated they felt healthy enough to keep donating (95%), and 72% thought it is good for their health to keep donating. Few donors reported that they found it hard to keep donating (5%) or indicated that they did not feel healthy enough to donate or thought it was not safe for them anymore (3.4%).

CONCLUSION

Most of the older donors agree with the increase of the upper age limit for blood donation, report only few and minor donation-related experiences or complications and are highly motivated to continue their donor career at an older age.

The Impact of Age Group in Hierarchical Forecasting of Monthly Blood Donations in Zimbabwe

Background

To meet the blood requirements for transfusion therapy, blood banks need to ensure that blood inventories are maintained at desirable levels. There is a rising global need for optimal ways to manage blood supply and demand using statistical models in blood inventory planning and management. Thus, blood donation forecasting using donor-specific characteristics such as donor type and age is critical in managing the blood bank inventory.

Methods

The monthly blood donation data covering the period 2007 to 2018, collected from the National Blood Service Zimbabwe (NBSZ) was used in this study. The data is first disaggregated based on donor age, and further disaggregation is performed for each age group based on donor type. The hierarchical forecasting approaches, namely the bottom-up, top-down and the optimal combination methods were used in the data analysis. The Error-Trend-Seasonality (ETS) and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) methods are used in the hierarchical forecasting approaches to generate the forecasts.

Results

New blood donors account for more than 55% of blood donations in Zimbabwe. The younger donors (16-29 years) dominate the blood donations, accounting for 89.2% of the donations. Young and new donors account for nearly 50% of the donations. The middle-aged and older donors have lower blood donations. The bottom-up approach under the ARIMA model outperformed all the other approaches. The future projections show that new and young donors will increase in blood donations, regular donations will decline slightly while the occasional donations are projected to remain constant.

Conclusion

Hierarchical forecasting is a unique approach in that the different aggregation levels reveal important features of the blood donation data. The lower percentage of regular donations is worrisome to blood authorities as it points to new blood donors not returning for further donations. Blood authorities need to develop policies that will encourage new and young donor categories to become regular donors.

Supplemental findings of the 2017 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey

INTRODUCTION

This report provides supplemental results from the 2017 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey on characteristics of the donor population, autologous and directed donations and transfusions, platelets, plasma and granulocyte transfusions, pediatric transfusions, severe donor-related adverse events, cost of blood units, hospitals policies and practices, and inventory, dosing, and supply.

METHODS

Weighting and imputation were used to generate national estimates including number of donors, donations, donor deferrals, autologous and directed donations and transfusions, severe donor-related adverse events, platelet and plasma collections and transfusions, number of cross-match procedures, irradiation and leukoreduction, and pediatric transfusions.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2017, successful donations decreased slightly by 2.1% with a 10.3% decrease in donations by persons aged 16-18 years and a 14.4% increase in donations by donors aged >65 years. The median price paid for blood components by hospitals decreased from $211 to $207 for leukoreduced red blood cell units, from $523 to $517 for leukoreduced apheresis platelet units, and from $54 to $51 for fresh frozen plasma units. Plasma transfusions decreased 13.6%, but group AB plasma units transfused increased 24.7%.

CONCLUSION

Between 2015 and 2017, blood donations declined slightly because of decreases in donations from younger donors, but the number of donations from older donors increased. The price hospitals pay for blood has continued to decrease. Plasma transfusions have decreased, but the proportion of plasma transfusions involving group AB plasma have increased.

Understanding donation frequency: insights from current plasma donors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Encouraging existing plasma donors to donate more frequently is a key objective for blood donation services committed to expanding yield through voluntary non-remunerated plasmapheresis donation. This requires an understanding of donors' perspectives on their current donation practice and how this relates to their knowledge and beliefs about the need for plasma. To explore this, Australian plasma donors were interviewed about how they arrived at the frequency at which they donate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 105 Australian plasmapheresis donors.

RESULTS

Key themes identified were as follows: fitting donation into busy lives and how ideas about being an ongoing donor and the institutional context shaped their perspective on frequency; perceptions of the impact of donation on health; and wanting to make a greater contribution.

CONCLUSION

Experienced plasma donors work to maintain a donation practice in the context of busy lives often by adopting a flexible approach to donation frequency. Their knowledge of the contribution their donations make is key to their continued donation, yet most identified constraints to donating more frequently. Health concerns were a particular concern for some, and more research is needed to understand donors' perspectives on the impact of donating on their health.