1
|
Vascular access for apheresis: State of the art. Transfus Apher Sci 2023; 62:103669. [PMID: 36858831 DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2023.103669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
The vascular access is a crucial issue when performing a therapeutic apheresis treatment, therefore an updated knowledge of the available vascular access devices is recommended. There are not many vascular access devices designed for apheresis, but potentially useful devices may be found on the market. One of the most useful improvements in an apheresis unit is the use of an ultrasound system for cannulating peripheral veins.
Collapse
|
2
|
Bauer PR, Ostermann M, Russell L, Robba C, David S, Ferreyro BL, Cid J, Castro P, Juffermans NP, Montini L, Pirani T, Van De Louw A, Nielsen N, Wendon J, Brignier AC, Schetz M, Kielstein JT, Winters JL, Azoulay E. Plasma exchange in the intensive care unit: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med 2022; 48:1382-1396. [PMID: 35960275 PMCID: PMC9372988 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06793-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
In this narrative review, we discuss the relevant issues of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in critically ill patients. For many conditions, the optimal indication, device type, frequency, duration, type of replacement fluid and criteria for stopping TPE are uncertain. TPE is a potentially lifesaving but also invasive procedure with risk of adverse events and complications and requires close monitoring by experienced teams. In the intensive care unit (ICU), the indications for TPE can be divided into (1) absolute, well-established, and evidence-based, for which TPE is recognized as first-line therapy, (2) relative, for which TPE is a recognized second-line treatment (alone or combined) and (3) rescue therapy, where TPE is used with a limited or theoretical evidence base. New indications are emerging and ongoing knowledge gaps, notably regarding the use of TPE during critical illness, support the establishment of a TPE registry dedicated to intensive care medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe R. Bauer
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Marlies Ostermann
- Department of Critical Care, King’s College London, Guy’s & St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Lene Russell
- Department of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Chiara Robba
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Sascha David
- Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bruno L. Ferreyro
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Joan Cid
- Unitat d’Afèresi i Teràpia Cel·lular, Banc de Progenitors Hematopoètics, Servei d’Hemoteràpia i Hemostàsia, ICMHO, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Castro
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nicole P. Juffermans
- Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luca Montini
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Tasneem Pirani
- Critical Care Unit, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Nathan Nielsen
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, New Mexico, USA
| | - Julia Wendon
- Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anne C. Brignier
- Apheresis Unit, Immuno-Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Miet Schetz
- Division of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Clinical Department and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan T. Kielstein
- Nephrology | Rheumatology | Blood Purification, Academic Teaching Hospital Braunschweig, Brunswick, Germany
| | - Jeffrey L. Winters
- Division of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Elie Azoulay
- Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shallis RM, Stahl M, Bewersdorf JP, Hendrickson JE, Zeidan AM. Leukocytapheresis for patients with acute myeloid leukemia presenting with hyperleukocytosis and leukostasis: a contemporary appraisal of outcomes and benefits. Expert Rev Hematol 2020; 13:489-499. [PMID: 32248712 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1751609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Hyperleukocytosis, defined as a total white blood cell count (WBC) >50 or more commonly >100 × 109 cells/L, is a presenting feature of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in about 6-20% of cases and is associated with a higher risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), clinical leukostasis with end organ damage, and mortality.Areas covered: In this review, authors discuss the implications of hyperleukocytosis in AML and the current understanding of cytoreductive strategies with a focus on the use of leukocytapheresis.Expert commentary: Efforts to rapidly reduce peripheral myeloblasts have included the use of leukocytapheresis. Early studies demonstrated feasibility in reducing peripheral WBC and blast counts as well as clinically relevant patient outcomes which prompted its common use for many years. However, more recent data have directly challenged the previously touted reports of reduced TLS and DIC incidence as well as survival benefit, even in patients with clinical leukostasis. The use of leukocytapheresis remains highly controversial with wide practice variations among physicians, institutions, and countries given the lack of high-quality data, risks associated with leukocytapheresis itself, associated high costs, resource utilization, and lack of evidence-based clinical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rory M Shallis
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Maximilian Stahl
- Leukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jan Philipp Bewersdorf
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jeanne E Hendrickson
- Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Amer M Zeidan
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|