Medical chart validation of inpatient diagnosis codes for transfusion-related acute lung injury 2013-2015

Plasma Inclusive Resuscitation Is Not Associated With Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury Under Updated Guidelines

INTRODUCTION

Plasma inclusive resuscitation (PIR) uses fresh frozen plasma as an adjunct to crystalloid in the management of burn shock and has potential benefits over other colloids. Yet, safety concerns for transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) exist. The aim of this study evaluated the association between TRALI and PIR in a cohort of severely burn-injured patients using the updated Canadian Blood Services Consensus definitions.

METHODS

Burn-injured patients requiring PIR at a burn center from 2018 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. To assess for TRALI, data related to acute hypoxemia, bilateral pulmonary edema, left atrial hypertension, and changes to respiratory status up to 6 h after PIR were recorded. To identify other risks and benefits associated with PIR timing, resuscitative volumes and outcomes were compared between early (0-8 h) and late PIR (8-24 h) initiation.

RESULTS

Of the 88 patients included for study, no patient developed TRALI type I or II under the updated definitions. Early (n = 39) compared to late PIR (n = 49) was associated with a higher percent total body surface area (TBSA, 36.3%, 26.0%, P = 0.01). The predicted 24-h volume was higher for early PIR (10.1 L, 6.3 L, P = 0.049), but the observed 24-h volume (cc/kg/%TBSA) was not significantly different (5.2, 5.3, P = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of severely burn-injured patients undergoing PIR, no patient developed TRALI type I or type II under the updated Canadian Blood Services Consensus definitions. Earlier use of PIR was not associated with higher resuscitative volumes despite higher TBSA. Further studies are necessary to better ascertain the potential risks and benefits associated with PIR.

Evaluation of potential adverse events following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination among adults aged 65 years and older: Two self-controlled studies in the U.S

BACKGROUND

Our near-real-time safety monitoring of 16 adverse events (AEs) following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination identified potential elevation in risk for six AEs following primary series and monovalent booster dose administration. The crude association with AEs does not imply causality. Accordingly, we conducted robust evaluation of potential associations.

METHODS

We conducted two self-controlled case series studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) in U.S. Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years. Adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated following primary series doses for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), pulmonary embolism (PE), immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC); and following monovalent booster doses for AMI, PE, ITP, Bell's Palsy (BP) and Myocarditis/Pericarditis (Myo/Peri).

RESULTS

The primary series study included 3,360,981 individuals who received 6,388,542 primary series doses; the booster study included 6,156,100 individuals with one monovalent booster dose. The AMI IRR following BNT162b2 primary series and booster was 1.04 (95 % CI: 0.91 to 1.18) and 1.06 (95 % CI: 1.003 to 1.12), respectively; for mRNA-1273 primary series and booster, 1.01 (95 % CI: 0.82 to 1.26) and 1.05 (95 % CI: 0.998 to 1.11), respectively. The hospital inpatient PE IRR following BNT162b2 primary series and booster was 1.19 (95 % CI: 1.03 to 1.38) and 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.78 to 0.95), respectively; for mRNA-1273 primary series and booster, 1.15 (95 % CI: 0.94 to 1.41) and 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.79 to 0.96), respectively. The studies' results do not support that exposure to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines elevate the risk of ITP, DIC, Myo/Peri, and BP.

CONCLUSION

We did not find an increased risk for AMI, ITP, DIC, BP, and Myo/Peri and there was not consistent evidence for PE after exposure to COVID-19 mRNA primary series or monovalent booster vaccines. These results support the favorable safety profile of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines administered in the U.S. elderly population.

Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury: 36 years of Progress (1985-2021)

The term transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) was coined in 1985 to describe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after transfusion, when another ARDS risk factor was absent; TRALI cases were mostly associated with donor leukocyte antibody. In 2001, plasma from multiparous donors was implicated in TRALI in a randomized controlled trial in Sweden. In 2003 and in many years thereafter, the FDA reported that TRALI was the leading cause of death from transfusion in the United States. In 2003, the United Kingdom was the first among many countries to successfully reduce TRALI using male-predominant plasma. These successes are to be celebrated. Nevertheless, questions remain about the mechanisms of non-antibody TRALI, the role of blood products in the development of ARDS in massive transfusion patients, the causes of unusual TRALI cases, and how to reduce inaccurate clinical diagnoses of TRALI in clinical practice. Regarding the latter, a study in 2013-2015 at 169 US hospitals found that many TRALI diagnoses did not meet clinical definitions. In 2019, a consensus panel established a more precise terminology for clinical diagnosis: TRALI type I and TRALI type II are cases where transfusion is the likely cause, and ARDS are cases where transfusion is not the likely cause. For accurate diagnosis using these clinical definitions, critical care expertise is needed to distinguish between permeability versus hydrostatic pulmonary edema, to determine whether an ARDS risk factor is present and, if so, whether respiratory function was stable within the 12 hours before transfusion.

The Immune System in Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury Prevention and Therapy: Update and Perspective

As an initiator of respiratory distress, transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) is regarded as one of the rare complications associated with transfusion medicine. However, to date, the pathogenesis of TRALI is still unclear, and specific therapies are unavailable. Understanding the mechanisms of TRALI may promote the design of preventive and therapeutic strategies. The immune system plays vital roles in reproduction, development and homeostasis. Sterile tissue damage, such as physical trauma, ischemia, or reperfusion injury, induces an inflammatory reaction that results in wound healing and regenerative mechanisms. In other words, in addition to protecting against pathogens, the immune response may be strongly associated with TRALI prevention and treatment through a variety of immunomodulatory strategies to inhibit excessive immune system activation. Immunotherapy based on immune cells or immunological targets may eradicate complications. For example, IL-10 therapy is a promising therapeutic strategy to explore further. This review will focus on ultramodern advances in our understanding of the potential role of the immune system in TRALI prevention and treatment.