1
|
Ogilvie RP, Layton JB, Lloyd PC, Jiao Y, Djibo DA, Wong HL, Gruber JF, Parambi R, Deng J, Miller M, Song J, Weatherby LB, Peetluk L, Lo AC, Matuska K, Wernecke M, Bui CL, Clarke TC, Cho S, Bell EJ, Yang G, Amend KL, Forshee RA, Anderson SA, McMahill-Walraven CN, Chillarige Y, Anthony MS, Seeger JD, Shoaibi A. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 COVID-19 primary series vaccination in children aged 5-17 years in the United States: a cohort study. BMC Pediatr 2024; 24:276. [PMID: 38671379 PMCID: PMC11047006 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-04756-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 vaccines are authorized for use in children in the United States; real-world assessment of vaccine effectiveness in children is needed. This study's objective was to estimate the effectiveness of receiving a complete primary series of monovalent BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccine in US children. METHODS This cohort study identified children aged 5-17 years vaccinated with BNT162b2 matched with unvaccinated children. Participants and BNT162b2 vaccinations were identified in Optum and CVS Health insurance administrative claims databases linked with Immunization Information System (IIS) COVID-19 vaccination records from 16 US jurisdictions between December 11, 2020, and May 31, 2022 (end date varied by database and IIS). Vaccinated children were followed from their first BNT162b2 dose and matched to unvaccinated children on calendar date, US county of residence, and demographic and clinical factors. Censoring occurred if vaccinated children failed to receive a timely dose 2 or if unvaccinated children received any dose. Two COVID-19 outcome definitions were evaluated: COVID-19 diagnosis in any medical setting and COVID-19 diagnosis in hospitals/emergency departments (EDs). Propensity score-weighted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with Cox proportional hazards models, and vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated as 1 minus HR. VE was estimated overall, within age subgroups, and within variant-specific eras. Sensitivity, negative control, and quantitative bias analyses evaluated various potential biases. RESULTS There were 453,655 eligible vaccinated children one-to-one matched to unvaccinated comparators (mean age 12 years; 50% female). COVID-19 hospitalizations/ED visits were rare in children, regardless of vaccination status (Optum, 41.2 per 10,000 person-years; CVS Health, 44.1 per 10,000 person-years). Overall, vaccination was associated with reduced incidence of any medically diagnosed COVID-19 (meta-analyzed VE = 38% [95% CI, 36-40%]) and hospital/ED-diagnosed COVID-19 (meta-analyzed VE = 61% [95% CI, 56-65%]). VE estimates were lowest among children 5-11 years and during the Omicron-variant era. CONCLUSIONS Receipt of a complete BNT162b2 vaccine primary series was associated with overall reduced medically diagnosed COVID-19 and hospital/ED-diagnosed COVID-19 in children; observed VE estimates differed by age group and variant era. REGISTRATION The study protocol was publicly posted on the BEST Initiative website ( https://bestinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/C19-VX-Effectiveness-Protocol_2022_508.pdf ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - J Bradley Layton
- RTI Health Solutions, 3040 East Cornwallis Rd, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Hui Lee Wong
- US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Jie Deng
- Optum Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Christine L Bui
- RTI Health Solutions, 3040 East Cornwallis Rd, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | | | - Sylvia Cho
- US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mary S Anthony
- RTI Health Solutions, 3040 East Cornwallis Rd, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lu Y, Matuska K, Nadimpalli G, Ma Y, Duma N, Zhang HT, Chiang Y, Lyu H, Chillarige Y, Kelman JA, Forshee RA, Anderson SA. Stroke Risk After COVID-19 Bivalent Vaccination Among US Older Adults. JAMA 2024; 331:938-950. [PMID: 38502075 PMCID: PMC10951737 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.1059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
Importance In January 2023, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Food and Drug Administration noted a safety concern for ischemic stroke among adults aged 65 years or older who received the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2; WT/OMI BA.4/BA.5 COVID-19 bivalent vaccine. Objective To evaluate stroke risk after administration of (1) either brand of the COVID-19 bivalent vaccine, (2) either brand of the COVID-19 bivalent plus a high-dose or adjuvanted influenza vaccine on the same day (concomitant administration), and (3) a high-dose or adjuvanted influenza vaccine. Design, Setting, and Participants Self-controlled case series including 11 001 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older who experienced stroke after receiving either brand of the COVID-19 bivalent vaccine (among 5 397 278 vaccinated individuals). The study period was August 31, 2022, through February 4, 2023. Exposures Receipt of (1) either brand of the COVID-19 bivalent vaccine (primary) or (2) a high-dose or adjuvanted influenza vaccine (secondary). Main Outcomes and Measures Stroke risk (nonhemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic attack, combined outcome of nonhemorrhagic stroke or transient ischemic attack, or hemorrhagic stroke) during the 1- to 21-day or 22- to 42-day risk window after vaccination vs the 43- to 90-day control window. Results There were 5 397 278 Medicare beneficiaries who received either brand of the COVID-19 bivalent vaccine (median age, 74 years [IQR, 70-80 years]; 56% were women). Among the 11 001 beneficiaries who experienced stroke after receiving either brand of the COVID-19 bivalent vaccine, there were no statistically significant associations between either brand of the COVID-19 bivalent vaccine and the outcomes of nonhemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic attack, nonhemorrhagic stroke or transient ischemic attack, or hemorrhagic stroke during the 1- to 21-day or 22- to 42-day risk window vs the 43- to 90-day control window (incidence rate ratio [IRR] range, 0.72-1.12). Among the 4596 beneficiaries who experienced stroke after concomitant administration of either brand of the COVID-19 bivalent vaccine plus a high-dose or adjuvanted influenza vaccine, there was a statistically significant association between vaccination and nonhemorrhagic stroke during the 22- to 42-day risk window for the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2; WT/OMI BA.4/BA.5 COVID-19 bivalent vaccine (IRR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.01-1.42]; risk difference/100 000 doses, 3.13 [95% CI, 0.05-6.22]) and a statistically significant association between vaccination and transient ischemic attack during the 1- to 21-day risk window for the Moderna mRNA-1273.222 COVID-19 bivalent vaccine (IRR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.06-1.74]; risk difference/100 000 doses, 3.33 [95% CI, 0.46-6.20]). Among the 21 345 beneficiaries who experienced stroke after administration of a high-dose or adjuvanted influenza vaccine, there was a statistically significant association between vaccination and nonhemorrhagic stroke during the 22- to 42-day risk window (IRR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.02-1.17]; risk difference/100 000 doses, 1.65 [95% CI, 0.43-2.87]). Conclusions and Relevance Among Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older who experienced stroke after receiving either brand of the COVID-19 bivalent vaccine, there was no evidence of a significantly elevated risk for stroke during the days immediately after vaccination.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273/adverse effects
- 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273/therapeutic use
- Adjuvants, Immunologic/adverse effects
- Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use
- BNT162 Vaccine/adverse effects
- BNT162 Vaccine/therapeutic use
- COVID-19/prevention & control
- COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects
- COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use
- Hemorrhagic Stroke/chemically induced
- Hemorrhagic Stroke/epidemiology
- Hemorrhagic Stroke/etiology
- Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects
- Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use
- Ischemic Attack, Transient/chemically induced
- Ischemic Attack, Transient/epidemiology
- Ischemic Attack, Transient/etiology
- Medicare
- Stroke/epidemiology
- Stroke/etiology
- Stroke/prevention & control
- United States/epidemiology
- Vaccination/adverse effects
- Vaccination/methods
- Vaccines, Combined/adverse effects
- Vaccines, Combined/therapeutic use
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./statistics & numerical data
- United States Food and Drug Administration/statistics & numerical data
- Ischemic Stroke/chemically induced
- Ischemic Stroke/epidemiology
- Ischemic Stroke/etiology
- Influenza, Human/prevention & control
- Aged, 80 and over
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Lu
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | | | | | - Yuxin Ma
- Acumen LLC, Burlingame, California
| | | | - Henry T Zhang
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | | | - Hai Lyu
- Acumen LLC, Burlingame, California
| | | | | | - Richard A Forshee
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Steven A Anderson
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lu Y, Lindaas A, Matuska K, Izurieta HS, McEvoy R, Menis M, Shi X, Steele WR, Wernecke M, Chillarige Y, Wong HL, Kelman JA, Forshee RA. Real-world Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Among US Nursing Home Residents Aged ≥65 Years in the Pre-Delta and High Delta Periods. Open Forum Infect Dis 2024; 11:ofae051. [PMID: 38505296 PMCID: PMC10950043 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Long-term care residents were among the most vulnerable during the COVID-19 pandemic. We estimated vaccine effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in Medicare nursing home residents aged ≥65 years during pre-Delta and high Delta periods. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study from 13 December 2020 to 20 November 2021 using Medicare claims data. Exposures included 2 and 3 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. We used inverse probability weighting and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate absolute and relative vaccine effectiveness. Results Two-dose vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-related death was 69.8% (95% CI, 65.9%‒73.3%) during the pre-Delta period and 55.7% (49.5%‒61.1%) during the high Delta period, without adjusting for time since vaccination. We observed substantial waning of effectiveness from 65.1% (54.2%‒73.5%) within 6 months from second-dose vaccination to 45.2% (30.6%‒56.7%) ≥6 months after second-dose vaccination in the high Delta period. Three doses provided 88.7% (73.5%‒95.2%) vaccine effectiveness against death, and the incremental benefit of 3 vs 2 doses was 74.6% (40.4%‒89.2%) during high Delta. Among beneficiaries with a prior COVID-19 infection, 3-dose vaccine effectiveness for preventing death was 78.6% (50.0%‒90.8%), and the additional protection of 3 vs 2 doses was 70.0% (30.1%‒87.1%) during high Delta. Vaccine effectiveness estimates against less severe outcomes (eg, infection) were lower. Conclusions This nationwide real-world study demonstrated that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines provided substantial protection against COVID-19-related death. Two-dose protection waned after 6 months. Third doses during the high Delta period provided significant additional protection for individuals with or without a prior COVID-19 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Lu
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Hector S Izurieta
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Mikhail Menis
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Whitney R Steele
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Hui Lee Wong
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Kelman
- Center for Medicare, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Richard A Forshee
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Layton JB, Peetluk L, Wong HL, Jiao Y, Djibo DA, Bui C, Lloyd PC, Gruber JF, Miller M, Ogilvie RP, Deng J, Parambi R, Song J, Weatherby LB, Lo AC, Matuska K, Wernecke M, Clarke TC, Cho S, Bell EJ, Seeger JD, Yang GW, Illei D, Forshee RA, Anderson SA, McMahill-Walraven CN, Chillarige Y, Amend KL, Anthony MS, Shoaibi A. Effectiveness of monovalent COVID-19 booster/additional vaccine doses in the United States. Vaccine X 2024; 16:100447. [PMID: 38318230 PMCID: PMC10840109 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Monovalent booster/additional doses of COVID-19 vaccines were first authorized in August 2021 in the United States. We evaluated the real-world effectiveness of receipt of a monovalent booster/additional dose of COVID-19 vaccine compared with receiving a primary vaccine series without a booster/additional dose. Methods Cohorts of individuals receiving a COVID-19 booster/additional dose after receipt of a complete primary vaccine series were identified in 2 administrative insurance claims databases (Optum, CVS Health) supplemented with state immunization information system data between August 2021 and March 2022. Individuals with a complete primary series but without a booster/additional dose were one-to-one matched to boosted individuals on calendar date, geography, and clinical factors. COVID-19 diagnoses were identified in any medical setting, or specifically in hospitals/emergency departments (EDs). Propensity score-weighted hazards ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated with Cox proportional hazards models; vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated as 1 minus the HR by vaccine brand overall and within subgroups of variant-specific eras, immunocompromised status, and homologous/heterologous booster status. Results Across both data sources, we identified 752,165 matched pairs for BNT162b2, 410,501 for mRNA-1273, and 11,398 for JNJ-7836735. For any medically diagnosed COVID-19, meta-analyzed VE estimates for BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and JNJ-7836735, respectively, were: BNT162b2, 54% (95% CI, 53%-56%); mRNA-1273, 58% (95% CI, 56%-59%); JNJ-7836735, 34% (95% CI, 23%-44%). For hospital/ED-diagnosed COVID-19, VE estimates ranged from 70% to 76%. VE was generally lower during the Omicron era than the Delta era and for immunocompromised individuals. There was little difference observed by homologous or heterologous booster status. Conclusion The original, monovalent booster/additional doses were reasonably effective in real-world use among the populations for which they were indicated during the study period. Additional studies may be informative in the future as new variants emerge and new vaccines become available.Registration: The study protocol was publicly posted on the BEST Initiative website (https://bestinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/C19-VX-Effectiveness-Protocol_2022_508.pdf).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hui Lee Wong
- US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Christine Bui
- RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Patricia C. Lloyd
- US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Joann F. Gruber
- US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Jie Deng
- Optum Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tainya C. Clarke
- US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Sylvia Cho
- US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Richard A. Forshee
- US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Steven A. Anderson
- US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Azadeh Shoaibi
- US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shoaibi A, Lloyd PC, Wong HL, Clarke TC, Chillarige Y, Do R, Hu M, Jiao Y, Kwist A, Lindaas A, Matuska K, McEvoy R, Ondari M, Parulekar S, Shi X, Wang J, Lu Y, Obidi J, Zhou CK, Kelman JA, Forshee RA, Anderson SA. Evaluation of potential adverse events following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination among adults aged 65 years and older: Two self-controlled studies in the U.S. Vaccine 2023:S0264-410X(23)00682-5. [PMID: 37344261 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our near-real-time safety monitoring of 16 adverse events (AEs) following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination identified potential elevation in risk for six AEs following primary series and monovalent booster dose administration. The crude association with AEs does not imply causality. Accordingly, we conducted robust evaluation of potential associations. METHODS We conducted two self-controlled case series studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) in U.S. Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years. Adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated following primary series doses for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), pulmonary embolism (PE), immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC); and following monovalent booster doses for AMI, PE, ITP, Bell's Palsy (BP) and Myocarditis/Pericarditis (Myo/Peri). RESULTS The primary series study included 3,360,981 individuals who received 6,388,542 primary series doses; the booster study included 6,156,100 individuals with one monovalent booster dose. The AMI IRR following BNT162b2 primary series and booster was 1.04 (95 % CI: 0.91 to 1.18) and 1.06 (95 % CI: 1.003 to 1.12), respectively; for mRNA-1273 primary series and booster, 1.01 (95 % CI: 0.82 to 1.26) and 1.05 (95 % CI: 0.998 to 1.11), respectively. The hospital inpatient PE IRR following BNT162b2 primary series and booster was 1.19 (95 % CI: 1.03 to 1.38) and 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.78 to 0.95), respectively; for mRNA-1273 primary series and booster, 1.15 (95 % CI: 0.94 to 1.41) and 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.79 to 0.96), respectively. The studies' results do not support that exposure to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines elevate the risk of ITP, DIC, Myo/Peri, and BP. CONCLUSION We did not find an increased risk for AMI, ITP, DIC, BP, and Myo/Peri and there was not consistent evidence for PE after exposure to COVID-19 mRNA primary series or monovalent booster vaccines. These results support the favorable safety profile of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines administered in the U.S. elderly population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azadeh Shoaibi
- Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U. S. Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Building 71, Silver Spring, MD 20993, United States.
| | - Patricia C Lloyd
- Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U. S. Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Building 71, Silver Spring, MD 20993, United States.
| | - Hui-Lee Wong
- Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U. S. Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Building 71, Silver Spring, MD 20993, United States.
| | - Tainya C Clarke
- Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U. S. Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Building 71, Silver Spring, MD 20993, United States.
| | - Yoganand Chillarige
- Acumen, LLC, 500 Airport Blvd. Suite 100, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States.
| | - Rose Do
- Acumen, LLC, 500 Airport Blvd. Suite 100, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States.
| | - Mao Hu
- Acumen, LLC, 500 Airport Blvd. Suite 100, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States.
| | - Yixin Jiao
- Acumen, LLC, 500 Airport Blvd. Suite 100, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States.
| | - Andrew Kwist
- Acumen, LLC, 500 Airport Blvd. Suite 100, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States.
| | - Arnstein Lindaas
- Acumen, LLC, 500 Airport Blvd. Suite 100, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States.
| | - Kathryn Matuska
- Acumen, LLC, 500 Airport Blvd. Suite 100, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States.
| | - Rowan McEvoy
- Acumen, LLC, 500 Airport Blvd. Suite 100, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States.
| | - Michelle Ondari
- Acumen, LLC, 500 Airport Blvd. Suite 100, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States.
| | - Shruti Parulekar
- Acumen, LLC, 500 Airport Blvd. Suite 100, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States.
| | - Xiangyu Shi
- Acumen, LLC, 500 Airport Blvd. Suite 100, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States.
| | - Jing Wang
- Acumen, LLC, 500 Airport Blvd. Suite 100, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States.
| | - Yun Lu
- Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U. S. Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Building 71, Silver Spring, MD 20993, United States.
| | - Joyce Obidi
- Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U. S. Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Building 71, Silver Spring, MD 20993, United States.
| | - Cindy K Zhou
- Formerly Affiliated with US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| | - Jeffrey A Kelman
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop B3-30-03, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850, United States
| | - Richard A Forshee
- Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U. S. Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Building 71, Silver Spring, MD 20993, United States.
| | - Steven A Anderson
- Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U. S. Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Building 71, Silver Spring, MD 20993, United States.
| |
Collapse
|