1
|
Puliyanda DP, Jordan SC. Management of the sensitized pediatric renal transplant candidate. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14694. [PMID: 38400645 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with ESRD as it is associated with improved patient survival and better quality of life, especially in children. There are several barriers to a successful transplant including organ shortage, anatomic barriers, and immunologic barriers. One of the biggest immunologic barriers that precludes transplantation is sensitization, when patients have antibodies prior to transplantation, resulting in positive crossmatches with donor. 30%-40% of adult patients on the wait list are sensitized. There is a growing number of pediatric patients on the wait list who are sensitized. This poses a unique challenge to the pediatric transplant community. Therefore, attempts to perform desensitization to remove or suppress pathogenic HLA antibodies resulting in acceptable crossmatches, and ultimately a successful transplant, while reducing the risk of acute rejection, are much needed in these children. This review article aims to address the management of such patients both prior to transplantation, with strategies to overcome sensitization, and after transplantation with monitoring for allograft rejection and other complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dechu P Puliyanda
- Department of Pediatrics, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Stanley C Jordan
- Department of Pediatrics, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Habibabady Z, McGrath G, Kinoshita K, Maenaka A, Ikechukwu I, Elias GF, Zaletel T, Rosales I, Hara H, Pierson RN, Cooper DKC. Antibody-mediated rejection in xenotransplantation: Can it be prevented or reversed? Xenotransplantation 2023; 30:e12816. [PMID: 37548030 PMCID: PMC11101061 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the commonest cause of failure of a pig graft after transplantation into an immunosuppressed nonhuman primate (NHP). The incidence of AMR compared to acute cellular rejection is much higher in xenotransplantation (46% vs. 7%) than in allotransplantation (3% vs. 63%) in NHPs. Although AMR in an allograft can often be reversed, to our knowledge there is no report of its successful reversal in a pig xenograft. As there is less experience in preventing or reversing AMR in models of xenotransplantation, the results of studies in patients with allografts provide more information. These include (i) depletion or neutralization of serum anti-donor antibodies, (ii) inhibition of complement activation, (iii) therapies targeting B or plasma cells, and (iv) anti-inflammatory therapy. Depletion or neutralization of anti-pig antibody, for example, by plasmapheresis, is effective in depleting antibodies, but they recover within days. IgG-degrading enzymes do not deplete IgM. Despite the expression of human complement-regulatory proteins on the pig graft, inhibition of systemic complement activation may be necessary, particularly if AMR is to be reversed. Potential therapies include (i) inhibition of complement activation (e.g., by IVIg, C1 INH, or an anti-C5 antibody), but some complement inhibitors are not effective in NHPs, for example, eculizumab. Possible B cell-targeted therapies include (i) B cell depletion, (ii) plasma cell depletion, (iii) modulation of B cell activation, and (iv) enhancing the generation of regulatory B and/or T cells. Among anti-inflammatory agents, anti-IL6R mAb and TNF blockers are increasingly being tested in xenotransplantation models, but with no definitive evidence that they reverse AMR. Increasing attention should be directed toward testing combinations of the above therapies. We suggest that treatment with a systemic complement inhibitor is likely to be most effective, possibly combined with anti-inflammatory agents (if these are not already being administered). Ultimately, it may require further genetic engineering of the organ-source pig to resolve the problem entirely, for example, knockout or knockdown of SLA, and/or expression of PD-L1, HLA E, and/or HLA-G.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Habibabady
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gannon McGrath
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kohei Kinoshita
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Akihiro Maenaka
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ileka Ikechukwu
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gabriela F. Elias
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tjasa Zaletel
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ivy Rosales
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hidetaka Hara
- Yunnan Xenotransplantation Engineering Research Center, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Richard N. Pierson
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David K. C. Cooper
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rostaing L, Noble J, Malvezzi P, Jouve T. Imlifidase therapy: exploring its clinical uses. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:259-265. [PMID: 36404277 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2150965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Imlifidase, the IgG-degrading enzyme derived from Streptococcus pyogenes, can cleave all four human IgG subclasses with precise specificity. All IgG molecules can be inactivated for ~1-to-2 weeks, until new IgG synthesis is detected. AREAS COVERED Imlifidase was first studied for the desensitization of highly HLA-sensitized patients to enable kidney transplantation. It is currently being evaluated for kidney transplant recipients who have antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), those with acute kidney injury in the setting of anti-glomerular basement membrane disease, and those with Guillain-Barré syndrome. In 2020, imlifidase received conditional approval from the European Medicines Agency for use to desensitize deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients with a positive crossmatch. Literature search through PubMed revealed that so far, 39 crossmatched-positive patients, i.e. in the presence of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) on the transplantation day, have received imlifidase prior to kidney transplantation in four single-arm, open-label, phase II studies. Results at 3-year follow-up are good, i.e. allograft survival is 84%, despite 38% of patients presenting with acute AMR. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 years was 55 mL/min/1.73 m2. EXPERT OPINION The major hurdle now is how to prevent/avoid DSA rebound within days 5-15 post-transplantation. Thus, imlifidase represents a major breakthrough for highly HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates, particularly those that have calculated panel-reactive alloantibodies of ≥90%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel Rostaing
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France.,School of Medicine, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Johan Noble
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France.,School of Medicine, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Thomas Jouve
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France.,School of Medicine, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jouve T, Daligault M, Noble J, Terrec F, Imerzoukene F, Dard C, Bardy B, Malvezzi P, Rostaing L. Tocilizumab Evaluation in HLA-Desensitization before Kidney Transplantation as an Add-On Therapy to Apheresis: The TETRA Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12020424. [PMID: 36675353 PMCID: PMC9866000 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Desensitization strategies improve access to transplantation in highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Tocilizumab could be a valuable addition to more traditional desensitization regimens. We investigated the effect of tocilizumab as an add-on therapy to our standard of care (SoC) desensitization strategy based on rituximab and apheresis. METHODS In this study, we prospectively included highly sensitized patients to receive monthly tocilizumab infusions for 6 months before our SoC regimen (Toci + SoC group). We compared the reductions in the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) rebound at post-transplantation and kidney function at 1-year post-transplantation to patients treated by SoC (based on apheresis and two doses of rituximab). RESULTS Twenty-six patients were included in the SoC group; seven in the Toci + SoC group. Reductions in pre-transplantation MFI were similar between groups. At 1-year post-transplantation, there was no absolute difference in overall MFI rebounds, including donor-specific antibodies. Toci + SoC helped lower the rebound of antibodies with more elevated baseline MFIs. Graft function and survival rates were similar at one-year post-transplantation (median eGFR 62.8 vs. 65.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 for SoC and Toci + SoC, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Tocilizumab as an add-on to SoC desensitization may help control the post-transplantation rebound of antibodies with elevated baseline MFIs. However, reductions in pre-transplantation MFIs were similar with or without tocilizumab. Further studies are needed to validate this pilot study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Jouve
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Grenoble-Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France
- Institute for Advanced Biosciences (IAB), INSERM U 1209, CNRS UMR 5309, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38400 Grenoble, France
- Faculty of Health, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38400 Saint-Martin-d’Hères, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Mélanie Daligault
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Grenoble-Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France
| | - Johan Noble
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Grenoble-Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France
- Institute for Advanced Biosciences (IAB), INSERM U 1209, CNRS UMR 5309, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38400 Grenoble, France
| | - Florian Terrec
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Grenoble-Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France
| | - Farida Imerzoukene
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Grenoble-Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France
| | - Céline Dard
- Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS) Rhône Alpes, 38700 La Tronche, France
| | - Béatrice Bardy
- Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS) Rhône Alpes, 38700 La Tronche, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Grenoble-Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Grenoble-Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France
- Faculty of Health, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38400 Saint-Martin-d’Hères, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Seeking Standardized Definitions for HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplants: A Systematic Review. Transplantation 2023; 107:231-253. [PMID: 35915547 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no standard definition for "HLA incompatible" transplants. For the first time, we systematically assessed how HLA incompatibility was defined in contemporary peer-reviewed publications and its prognostic implication to transplant outcomes. METHODS We combined 2 independent searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2015 to 2019. Content-expert reviewers screened for original research on outcomes of HLA-incompatible transplants (defined as allele or molecular mismatch and solid-phase or cell-based assays). We ascertained the completeness of reporting on a predefined set of variables assessing HLA incompatibility, therapies, and outcomes. Given significant heterogeneity, we conducted narrative synthesis and assessed risk of bias in studies examining the association between death-censored graft failure and HLA incompatibility. RESULTS Of 6656 screened articles, 163 evaluated transplant outcomes by HLA incompatibility. Most articles reported on cytotoxic/flow T-cell crossmatches (n = 98). Molecular genotypes were reported for selected loci at the allele-group level. Sixteen articles reported on epitope compatibility. Pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies were often considered (n = 143); yet there was heterogeneity in sample handling, assay procedure, and incomplete reporting on donor-specific HLA antibodies assignment. Induction (n = 129) and maintenance immunosuppression (n = 140) were frequently mentioned but less so rejection treatment (n = 72) and desensitization (n = 70). Studies assessing death-censored graft failure risk by HLA incompatibility were vulnerable to bias in the participant, predictor, and analysis domains. CONCLUSIONS Optimization of transplant outcomes and personalized care depends on accurate HLA compatibility assessment. Reporting on a standard set of variables will help assess generalizability of research, allow knowledge synthesis, and facilitate international collaboration in clinical trials.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kälble F, Süsal C, Pego da Silva L, Speer C, Benning L, Nusshag C, Pham L, Tran H, Schaier M, Sommerer C, Beimler J, Mehrabi A, Zeier M, Morath C. Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in Patients With Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies After Desensitization With Immunoadsorption. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:781491. [PMID: 34977083 PMCID: PMC8719417 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.781491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to the current organ shortage, living donor kidney transplantation is increasingly performed across HLA (human leukocyte antigen) or ABO antibody barriers. There is still uncertainty about the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) episodes, which may limit long-term graft survival. From March 2007 to December 2016, 58 sensitized living donor kidney transplant candidates were identified and 38 patients eventually included in the study: 36 patients (95%) had pre-transplant and pre-desensitization Luminex-detected donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA), and 17/36 patients (47%) in addition had a positive crossmatch result. Two patients had no detectable DSA but a positive CDC B-cell crossmatch result. Patients were treated with pre- and post-transplant apheresis and powerful immunosuppression including the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (N = 36) in combination with thymoglobulin (N = 20) or anti-IL2 receptor antibody (N = 18). The results of the 38 successfully desensitized and transplanted patients were retrospectively compared to the results of 76 matched standard-risk recipients. Desensitized patients showed patient and graft survival rates similar to that of standard-risk recipients (P = 0.55 and P = 0.16, respectively). There was a trend toward reduced death-censored graft survival in desensitized patients (P = 0.053) which, however, disappeared when the 34 patients who were transplanted after introduction of sensitive Luminex testing were analyzed (P = 0.43). The incidence of rejection episodes without borderline changes were in desensitized patients with 21% similar to the 18% in standard-risk patients (P = 0.74). Thirty-six patients had pre-transplant HLA class I and/or II DSA that were reduced by 85 and 81%, respectively, during pre-transplant desensitization (P < 0.001 for both). On day 360 after transplantation, 20 of 36 (56%) patients had lost their DSA. The overall AMR rate was 6% in these patients, but as high as 60% in 5 (14%) patients with persistent and de novo DSA during year 1; 2 (40%) of whom lost their graft due to AMR. Eleven (31%) patients with persistent DSA but without de novo DSA had an AMR rate of 18% without graft loss while one patient lost her graft without signs of AMR. Our desensitization protocol for pre-sensitized living donor kidney transplant recipients with DSA resulted in good graft outcomes with side effects and rejection rates similar to that of standard-risk recipients. Adequate patient selection prior to transplantation and frequent immunological monitoring thereafter is critical to minimize rejection episodes and subsequent graft loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Kälble
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Caner Süsal
- Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.,Transplantation-Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Luiza Pego da Silva
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudius Speer
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Louise Benning
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Nusshag
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lien Pham
- Transplantation-Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hien Tran
- Transplantation-Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Schaier
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudia Sommerer
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Beimler
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Zeier
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Morath
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ulisses LRDS, Paixão JO, Agena F, de Souza PS, Paula FJ, Bezerra G, Rodrigues H, Panajotopolous N, David-Neto E, de Castro MCR. Desensitization using IVIG alone for living-donor kidney transplant: impact on donor-specific antibodies. J Bras Nefrol 2022; 44:527-532. [PMID: 35438714 PMCID: PMC9838666 DOI: 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2021-0200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sensitization to human leukocyte antigen is a barrier to. Few data have been published on desensitization using polyvalent human intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) alone. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the of 45 patients with a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) or flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) against living donors from January 2003 to December 2014. Of these, 12 were excluded. Patients received monthly IVIG infusions (2 g/kg) only until they had a negative T-cell and B-cell FCXM. RESULTS During the 33 patients, 22 (66.7%) underwent living donor kidney transplantation, 7 (21.2%) received a deceased donor graft, and 4 (12.1%) did not undergo transplantation. The median class I and II panel reactive antibodies for these patients were 80.5% (range 61%-95%) and 83.0% (range 42%-94%), respectively. Patients (81.8%) had a positive T-cell and/or B-cell CDCXM and 4 (18.2%) had a positive T-cell and/or B-cell FCXM. Patients underwent transplantation after a median of 6 (range 3-16). The median donor-specific antibody mean fluorescence intensity sum was 5057 (range 2246-11,691) before and 1389 (range 934-2492) after desensitization (p = 0.0001). Mean patient follow-up time after transplantation was 60.5 (SD, 36.8) months. Nine patients (45.0%). Death-censored graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplant was 86.4, 86.4, and 79.2%, respectively and patient survival was 95.5, 95.5, and 83.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Desensitization using IVIG alone is an effective strategy, allowing successful transplantation in 87.9% of these highly sensitized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luiz Roberto de Sousa Ulisses
- Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de
Transplante Renal, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.,Correspondence to: Luiz Roberto de Sousa Ulisses. E-mail:
| | - Jenaine Oliveira Paixão
- Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de
Transplante Renal, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Fabiana Agena
- Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de
Transplante Renal, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Patrícia Soares de Souza
- Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de
Transplante Renal, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Flávio J Paula
- Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de
Transplante Renal, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Gislene Bezerra
- Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto do Coração da São Paulo,
Laboratório de Imunologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Hélcio Rodrigues
- Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto do Coração da São Paulo,
Laboratório de Imunologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Nicolas Panajotopolous
- Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto do Coração da São Paulo,
Laboratório de Imunologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Elias David-Neto
- Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de
Transplante Renal, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jouve T, Laheurte C, Noble J, Weinhard J, Daligault M, Renaudin A, Naciri Bennani H, Masson D, Gravelin E, Bugnazet M, Bardy B, Malvezzi P, Saas P, Rostaing L. Immune responses following tocilizumab therapy to desensitize HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:71-84. [PMID: 34080291 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Kidney transplant candidates (KTCs) who are HLA highly sensitized (calculated panel-reactive alloantibodies >95%) have poor access to deceased kidney transplantation. In this single-center prospective study, 13 highly sensitized desensitization-naïve KTCs received IV tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) every 4 weeks. We evaluated tolerability as well as immune responses, that is, T cell, B cell, T follicular helper (Tfh) subsets, blood cytokines (IL-6, soluble IL-6 receptor-sIL-6R-, IL-21), blood chemokines (CXCL10, CXCL13), and anti-HLA alloantibodies. Tocilizumab treatment was well-tolerated except in one patient who presented spondylodiscitis, raising a note of caution. Regarding immune parameters, there were no significant changes of percentages of lymphocyte subsets, that is, CD3+ , CD3+ /CD4+ , CD3+ /CD8+ T cells, and NK cells. This was also the case for Tfh cell subsets, B cells, mature B cells, plasma cells, pre-germinal center (GC) B cells, and post-GC B cells, whereas we observed a significant increase in naïve B cells (p = .02) and a significant decrease in plasmablasts (p = .046) over the tocilizumab treatment course. CXCL10, CXCL13, IL-21, total IgG, IgA, and IgM levels did not significantly change during tocilizumab therapy; conversely, there was a significant increase in IL-6 levels (p = .03) and a huge increase in sIL-6R (p = .00004). There was a marginal effect on anti-HLA alloantibodies (class I and class II). To conclude in highly sensitized KTCs, tocilizumab as a monotherapy limited B cell maturation; however, it had almost no effect on anti-HLA alloantibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Jouve
- Department of Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis, and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France.,Faculty of Health, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Caroline Laheurte
- University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, Interactions Hôte-Greffon-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, LabEx LipSTIC, Besançon, France.,INSERM CIC-1431, CHU de Besançon, Plateforme de BioMonitoring, Besançon, France
| | - Johan Noble
- Department of Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis, and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Jules Weinhard
- Department of Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis, and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Mélanie Daligault
- Department of Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis, and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Adeline Renaudin
- INSERM CIC-1431, CHU de Besançon, Plateforme de BioMonitoring, Besançon, France
| | - Hamza Naciri Bennani
- Department of Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis, and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Dominique Masson
- Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS Rhône-Alpes), Grenoble, France
| | - Eléonore Gravelin
- INSERM CIC-1431, CHU de Besançon, Plateforme de BioMonitoring, Besançon, France
| | - Mathilde Bugnazet
- Department of Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis, and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Béatrice Bardy
- Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS Rhône-Alpes), Grenoble, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Department of Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis, and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Philippe Saas
- University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, Interactions Hôte-Greffon-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, LabEx LipSTIC, Besançon, France.,INSERM CIC-1431, CHU de Besançon, Plateforme de BioMonitoring, Besançon, France
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Department of Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis, and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France.,Faculty of Health, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lasa-Lázaro M, Ramos-Boluda E, Mancebo E, Castro-Panete MJ, González-Sacristán R, Serradilla J, Andrés-Moreno AM, Hernández-Oliveros F, Paz-Artal E, Talayero P. Antibody-removal therapies for de novo DSA in pediatric intestinal recipients: Why, when, and how? A single-center experience. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:1074577. [PMID: 36819192 PMCID: PMC9932897 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.1074577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) impact negatively on the outcome of intestinal grafts. Although the use of antibody-removal therapies (ART) is becoming more frequent in the last few years, issues regarding their timing and effectiveness remain under discussion. METHODS In the present study, we report our experience with eight ART procedures (based on plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab) in eight pediatric intestinal and multivisceral transplants with de novo DSA (dnDSA). RESULTS ART were performed when dnDSA appeared in two contexts: (1) concomitant with rejection (acute or chronic) or (2) without rejection or any other clinical symptom. Complete DSA removal was observed in seven out of eight patients, showing an effectiveness of 88%. In the group treated for dnDSA without clinical symptoms, the success rate was 100%, with complete DSA removal and without rejection afterward. A shorter time between DSA detection and ART performance appeared as a significant factor for the success of the therapy (p = 0.0002). DSA against HLA-A and DQ alleles were the most resistant to ART, whereas anti-DR DSA were the most sensitive. In addition, the 8-year allograft survival rate in recipients undergoing ART was similar to that in those without DSA, being significantly lower in non-treated DSA-positive recipients (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION The results confirm the effectiveness of ART in terms of DSA removal and allograft survival and encourage its early use even in the absence of clinical symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Lasa-Lázaro
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther Ramos-Boluda
- Unit of Intestinal Rehabilitation and Transplant, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther Mancebo
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - María José Castro-Panete
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Javier Serradilla
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.,IdiPaz Research Institute, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ane Miren Andrés-Moreno
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.,IdiPaz Research Institute, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco Hernández-Oliveros
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.,IdiPaz Research Institute, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Estela Paz-Artal
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.,School of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.,CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paloma Talayero
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nikolova A, Patel JK. Induction Therapy and Therapeutic Antibodies. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2022; 272:85-116. [PMID: 35474024 DOI: 10.1007/164_2021_570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Prevention of allograft rejection is one of the crucial goals in solid organ transplantation to ensure durability of the graft and is chiefly mediated by cellular and humoral pathways targeting cell surface alloantigens. The risk of rejection is highest in the first post-transplant year and wanes with time albeit the risk always exists and varies with the type of organ transplanted. Induction therapies refer to the use of high-intensity immunosuppression in the immediate post-operative period to mitigate the highest risk of rejection. This term encompasses chiefly the use of antibody therapies directed against one of the key pathways in T-cell activation or abrogating effects of circulating alloantibodies. These antibodies carry more potent immunomodulatory effect than maintenance immunosuppressive therapy alone and many of them lead to durable immune cell depletion. A variety of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies have been utilized for use not only for induction therapy, but also for treatment of allograft rejection when it occurs and as components of desensitization therapy before and after transplantation to modulate circulating alloantibodies.
Collapse
|
11
|
Cucchiari D, Tubita V, Rovira J, Ramirez-Bajo MJ, Banon-Maneus E, Lazo-Rodriguez M, Hierro-Garcia N, Borràs FE, Ventura-Aguiar P, Piñeiro GJ, Martorell J, Peri L, Musquera M, Hertig A, Oppenheimer F, Campistol JM, Diekmann F, Revuelta I. B Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Reveal Residual B Cell Activity in Kidney Graft Recipients Undergoing Pre-Transplant Desensitization. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:781239. [PMID: 34977082 PMCID: PMC8716735 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.781239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Living-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) recipients undergoing desensitization for Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-incompatibility have a high risk of developing antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). The purpose of the study is to evaluate if residual B cell activity after desensitization could be estimated by the presence of circulating B cell-derived extracellular vesicles (BEVs).Methods: BEVs were isolated by Sepharose-based size exclusion chromatography and defined as CD19+ and HLA-II+ extracellular vesicles. We analyzed stored serum samples from positive crossmatch LDKT recipients before and after desensitization at first post-transplant biopsy and at 12-month protocol biopsy (n = 11). Control groups were formed by hypersensitized patients who were not submitted to desensitization (n = 10) and by low-risk recipients (n = 9). A prospective validation cohort of 11 patients also included the analysis of B cells subpopulations in recipients' blood and lymph nodes recovered upon graft implantation, along with BEVs analysis before and after desensitization.Results: We found out that CD19+ and HLA-II+BEVs dropped significantly after desensitization and relapse in patients who later developed ABMR was evident. We validated these findings in a proof-of-concept prospective cohort of 6 patients who received the same desensitization protocol and also in a control group of 5 LDKT recipients. In these patients, B cell subpopulations were also studied in recipients' blood and lymph nodes that were recovered before the graft implantation. We confirmed the significant drop in BEVs after desensitization and that this paralleled the reduction in CD19+cells in lymph nodes, while in peripheral blood B cells, this change was almost undetectable.Conclusions: BEVs reflected B cell residual activity after desensitization and this could be a valid surrogate of humoral alloreactivity in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cucchiari
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- *Correspondence: Ignacio Revuelta
| | - Valeria Tubita
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Rovira
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria J. Ramirez-Bajo
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisenda Banon-Maneus
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Lazo-Rodriguez
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Natalia Hierro-Garcia
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc E. Borràs
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
- REMAR-IVECAT Group, “Germans Trias i Pujol” Health Science Research Institute, Badalona, Spain
- Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gastón J. Piñeiro
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Lluís Peri
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Federico Oppenheimer
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Josep M. Campistol
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
- David Cucchiari
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Olaso D, Manook M, Moris D, Knechtle S, Kwun J. Optimal Immunosuppression Strategy in the Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipient. J Clin Med 2021; 10:3656. [PMID: 34441950 PMCID: PMC8396983 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with previous sensitization events against anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) often have circulating anti-HLA antibodies. Following organ transplantation, sensitized patients have higher rates of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) compared to those who are non-sensitized. More stringent donor matching is required for these patients, which results in a reduced donor pool and increased time on the waitlist. Current approaches for sensitized patients focus on reducing preformed antibodies that preclude transplantation; however, this type of desensitization does not modulate the primed immune response in sensitized patients. Thus, an optimized maintenance immunosuppressive regimen is necessary for highly sensitized patients, which may be distinct from non-sensitized patients. In this review, we will discuss the currently available therapeutic options for induction, maintenance, and adjuvant immunosuppression for sensitized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Stuart Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (D.O.); (M.M.); (D.M.)
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (D.O.); (M.M.); (D.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Joher N, Matignon M, Grimbert P. HLA Desensitization in Solid Organ Transplantation: Anti-CD38 to Across the Immunological Barriers. Front Immunol 2021; 12:688301. [PMID: 34093594 PMCID: PMC8173048 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.688301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of anti-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in the potential solid organ transplant recipient's blood is one of the main barriers to access to a transplantation. The HLA sensitization is associated with longer waitlist time, antibody mediated rejection and transplant lost leading to increased recipient's morbidity and mortality. However, solid organ transplantation across the HLA immunological barriers have been reported in recipients who were highly sensitized to HLA using desensitization protocols. These desensitization regimens are focused on the reduction of circulating HLA antibodies. Despite those strategies improve rates of transplantation, it remains several limitations including persistent high rejection rate and worse long-term outcomes when compare with non-sensitized recipient population. Currently, interest is growing in the development of new desensitization approaches which, beyond targeting antibodies, would be based on the modulation of alloimmune pathways. Plasma cells appears as an interesting target given their critical role in antibody production. In the last decade, CD38-targeting immunotherapies, such as daratumumab, have been recognized as a key component in the treatment of myeloma by inducing an important plasma cell depletion. This review focuses on an emerging concept based on targeting CD38 to desensitize in the field of transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nizar Joher
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Henri Mondor, Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (Innovative Therapy for Immune Disorders), Créteil, France.,Université Paris Est Créteil UPEC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale INSERM U955, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale IMRB, Équipe 21, Créteil, France
| | - Marie Matignon
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Henri Mondor, Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (Innovative Therapy for Immune Disorders), Créteil, France.,Université Paris Est Créteil UPEC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale INSERM U955, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale IMRB, Équipe 21, Créteil, France
| | - Philippe Grimbert
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Henri Mondor, Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (Innovative Therapy for Immune Disorders), Créteil, France.,Université Paris Est Créteil UPEC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale INSERM U955, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale IMRB, Équipe 21, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Marginal Impact of Tocilizumab Monotherapy on Anti-HLA Alloantibodies in Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates. Transplant Direct 2021; 7:e690. [PMID: 33912657 PMCID: PMC8078280 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. Highly HLA–sensitized kidney transplant candidates are difficult to desensitize, which reduces their chances of receiving a transplant. Methods. We administered tocilizumab as a monotherapy (8 mg/kg once a mo) to 14 highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Highest mean fluorescence intensities of anti-HLA antibodies obtained before and after tocilizumab administration were compared from raw and diluted sera. Results. The administration of tocilizumab significantly reduced dominant anti-HLA antibody sensitization. However, this decrease in mean fluorescence intensities was minor compared with the initial values. Conclusions. Tocilizumab as a monotherapy was not sufficient to allow highly sensitized kidney–transplant candidates to undergo transplantation and, therefore, was not an effective desensitization method.
Collapse
|
15
|
Chih S, McDonald M, Dipchand A, Kim D, Ducharme A, Kaan A, Abbey S, Toma M, Anderson K, Davey R, Mielniczuk L, Campbell P, Zieroth S, Bourgault C, Badiwala M, Clarke B, Belanger E, Carrier M, Conway J, Doucette K, Giannetti N, Isaac D, MacArthur R, Senechal M. Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Cardiac Transplant Network Position Statement on Heart Transplantation: Patient Eligibility, Selection, and Post-Transplantation Care. Can J Cardiol 2020; 36:335-356. [PMID: 32145863 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Significant practice-changing developments have occurred in the care of heart transplantation candidates and recipients over the past decade. This Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Cardiac Transplant Network Position Statement provides evidence-based, expert panel recommendations with values and preferences, and practical tips on: (1) patient selection criteria; (2) selected patient populations; and (3) post transplantation surveillance. The recommendations were developed through systematic review of the literature and using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The evolving areas of importance addressed include transplant recipient age, frailty assessment, pulmonary hypertension evaluation, cannabis use, combined heart and other solid organ transplantation, adult congenital heart disease, cardiac amyloidosis, high sensitization, and post-transplantation management of antibodies to human leukocyte antigen, rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and long-term noncardiac care. Attention is also given to Canadian-specific management strategies including the prioritization of highly sensitized transplant candidates (status 4S) and heart organ allocation algorithms. The focus topics in this position statement highlight the increased complexity of patients who undergo evaluation for heart transplantation as well as improved patient selection, and advances in post-transplantation management and surveillance that have led to better long-term outcomes for heart transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Chih
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Michael McDonald
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anne Dipchand
- Labatt Family Heart Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Kim
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Anique Ducharme
- Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Susan Abbey
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mustafa Toma
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kim Anderson
- Halifax Infirmary, Department of Medicine-Cardiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Ryan Davey
- University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa Mielniczuk
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Christine Bourgault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Québec
| | - Mitesh Badiwala
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Michel Carrier
- Department of Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jennifer Conway
- Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Debra Isaac
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Mario Senechal
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), Université Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ge S, Chu M, Choi J, Louie S, Vo A, Jordan SC, Toyoda M. Imlifidase Inhibits HLA Antibody-mediated NK Cell Activation and Antibody-dependent Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity (ADCC) In Vitro. Transplantation 2020; 104:1574-1579. [PMID: 32732834 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) is an important pathway responsible for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Imlifidase (IdeS) cleaves human IgG into F(ab')2 and Fc fragments, potentially inhibiting ADCC. Here we examined the effect of IdeS on allo-antibody-mediated NK cell activation (Allo-CFC) and ADCC in vitro. METHODS For Allo-CFC, normal whole blood was incubated with third-party peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) pretreated with anti-HLA antibody positive (HS) or negative (NC) sera to measure IFNγ+ NK cell%. For ADCC, normal PBMCs were incubated with Farage B (FB) cells with HS or NC sera to measure 7-AAD+ lysed FB cell%. To assess the effect of IdeS on these assays, serum-treated PBMCs (Allo-CFC-1) and serum used for PBMC pretreatment (Allo-CFC-2) in Allo-CFC, and serum used for ADCC were preincubated with IdeS. Sera from IdeS-treated patients were also tested for Allo-CFC (Allo-CFC-3). RESULTS IFNγ+ NK cell% were significantly elevated in HS versus NC sera in Allo-CFC-1 (10 ± 3% versus 2 ± 1%, P = 0.001), Allo-CFC-2 (20 ± 10% versus 4 ± 2%, P = 0.01) and 7AAD+ FB cell% (11 ± 3% versus 4 ± 2%, P = 0.02) in ADCC. These were significantly reduced by IdeS treatment. Patient sera with significantly reduced anti-HLA antibody levels at 1 day postimlifidase lost the capacity to activate NK cells in Allo-CFC-3, but those at 1-3 months postimlifidase regained the capacity. CONCLUSIONS IdeS inhibited NK cell activation and ADCC in vitro and in treated patients. These results and reported inhibition of complement activating anti-HLA antibodies by IdeS suggest its possible role in treatment of AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shili Ge
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Maggie Chu
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jua Choi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sabrina Louie
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ashley Vo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Stanley C Jordan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Mieko Toyoda
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tafulo S, Malheiro J, Dias L, Lobato L, Ramalhete L, Martinho A, Bolotinha C, Costa R, Ivo M. Improving HLA matching in living donor kidney transplantation using kidney paired exchange program. Transpl Immunol 2020; 62:101317. [PMID: 32634478 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2020.101317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 06/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The inclusion of compatible pairs within kidney paired exchange programs has been described as a way to enhance these programs. Improved immunological matching for the recipient in compatible pair has been described to be a possible benefit. METHODS The main purpose of our study was to determine if the introduction of compatible pairs in the Portuguese kidney paired exchange program would result in a better match for these patients, but also to assess if this strategy would increase the number of incompatible pairs with a possible match. We included 17 compatible pairs in kidney paired exchange pool of 35 pairs and performed an in-silico simulation determining HLA eplet mismatch load between the co-registered and matched pairs using HLA MatchMaker, version 3.0. RESULTS Our study showed that the inclusion of fully HLA-A, -B, -DR mismatched compatible pairs within the national Portuguese KEP increased matched rate within ICP (0.71%) and improved HLA eplet matching within compatible pairs. 16 of 17 (94.12%) of the CP obtained one or more transplants possibilities and 13 (81.25%) would have been transplanted with significantly lower HLA class I and class II total and antibody-verified eplet mismatch load (83.9 ± 16.9 vs. 59.8 ± 12.2, P = .002 and 30.1 ± 5.5 vs. 21.2 ± 3.0, P = .003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS This strategy is a viable alternative for compatible pairs seeking a better matched kidney and Portuguese KEP program should allow them this possibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Tafulo
- Blood and Transplantation Center of Porto, Instituto Português do Sangue e da Transplantação, Porto, Portugal; Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Porto, Portugal.
| | - Jorge Malheiro
- Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Porto, Portugal; Department of Nephrology, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal
| | - Leonídio Dias
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal
| | - Luísa Lobato
- Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Porto, Portugal; Department of Nephrology, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal
| | - Luís Ramalhete
- Blood and Transplantation Center of Lisbon, Instituto Português do Sangue e da Transplantação, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - António Martinho
- Blood and Transplantation Center of Coimbra, Instituto Português do Sangue e da Transplantação, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Catarina Bolotinha
- National Transplantation Coordination, Instituto Português do Sangue e da Transplantação, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rita Costa
- National Transplantation Coordination, Instituto Português do Sangue e da Transplantação, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Margarida Ivo
- National Transplantation Coordination, Instituto Português do Sangue e da Transplantação, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pandey P, Setya D, Sinha V, Bhatt A, Devra A, Pande A, Kumar P, Ranjan S. Renal transplantation in HLA sensitized patients: Traversing the immunological barrier. Ther Apher Dial 2019; 24:578-590. [PMID: 31863544 DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.13467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Successful renal transplantation across HLA barrier in sensitized individuals has been on the rise during the past decade, primarily due to improved desensitization regimes. The aim of this study was to share outcome of desensitization in renal transplant recipients with donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). This was a retrospective analysis of all HLA immunized individuals who were prospective renal transplant recipients. All such patients underwent preconditioning as per the institutional desensitization protocol. Complement-dependent cytoxicity-based crossmatch (CDC-XM), luminex-based crossmatch (LM-XM) and flowcytometry-based crossmatch (FC-XM) were done in all cases. If any of these tests turned out positive, single antigen bead assay (SAB) was performed. Desensitization for DSA was performed in 55 patients and all patients were followed-up for 1 year to assess graft function and patient outcome. CDC-XM being a less sensitive assay, could not detect incompatibility in 29 (52.73%) cases. After desensitization, even though SAB and LM-XM results revealed an MFI within acceptable range, FC-XM being an extremely sensitive assay, continued to give a positive result in eight (14.55%) cases. The mean ± SD number of pretransplant TPE were 3.44 ± 0.98 (2-11). Out of 55, there were 10 patients who were lost to follow up. Patient and graft survival of 45 patients at 1 year was found to be 100%. Preconditioning for renal transplants in the form of immunosuppression with TPE is an extremely useful auxiliary for transplantation in HLA sensitized renal transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prashant Pandey
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Histocompatibility and Molecular Biology, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, India
| | - Divya Setya
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Histocompatibility and Molecular Biology, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, India
| | - Vijay Sinha
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, India
| | - Anil Bhatt
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, India
| | - Amit Devra
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, India
| | - Amit Pande
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Histocompatibility and Molecular Biology, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, India
| | - Praveen Kumar
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Histocompatibility and Molecular Biology, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, India
| | - Shweta Ranjan
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Histocompatibility and Molecular Biology, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, India
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sinangil A, Ucar ZA, Koc Y, Barlas S, Abouzahir S, Ecder ST, Akin EB. Outcome of Desensitization Therapy in Immunologically High-Risk Kidney Transplantation: Single-Center Experience. Transplant Proc 2019; 51:2268-2273. [PMID: 31358450 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.04.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Revised: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM Sensitization to HLA antigens creates an immunologic barrier, linked to an increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection and poorer graft survival, that remains a persistent and often impenetrable deterrent to transplantation. Desensitization can improve transplantation rates in broadly sensitized kidney transplant recipients. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of immunologic high-risk kidney recipients who had desensitization treatment with the outcomes of those who did not. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent desensitization protocol due to immunologic risk between 2010 and 2018. Living-donor transplantation patients with panel reactive antibody positivity, retransplantation, donor specific antibody, and/or single antigen bead positivity were included in the study. We excluded deceased-donor transplantation recipients. Demographic data (age, sex, etiology of end-stage renal disease, blood transfusions, pregnancy, etc), immunologic status (HLA-mismatch [HLA-MM], panel reactive antibody, donor specific antibody, etc), induction and maintenance of immunosuppressive medications, and complications (all-cause hospitalizations, episodes of acute rejections, etc) were noted. We compared data and clinical outcomes of patients who had desensitization (Group 1) with data and clinical outcomes of patients who had not had desensitization (Group 2). FINDINGS There were 124 living-kidney donors (49 female, mean age 43.7 ± 12.2 years, mean body mass index [BMI] 25.8 ± 5.8 kg/m2, mean follow-up time 20.9 ± 14.6 months). Thirty-four of these patients (25 female, mean age 43.7 ± 12.5 years, mean follow-up time 26.1 ± 17.7 months, mean BMI 27 ± 6.5 kg/m2) had desensitization treatment (rituximab+plasmapheresis for 19 patients, rituximab for 11 patients, rituximab+plasmapheresis+intravenous immunoglobulin for 4 patients). Ninety patients (24 female, mean age 43.7 ± 12.2 years, mean follow-up time 18.9 ± 12.9 months, mean BMI 25.3 ± 5.4 kg/m2) had not had desensitization. There was no statistical difference between groups for age, sex, hepatitis serology, history of blood transfusion, history of pregnancy, or history of dialysis (P < .05 for all parameters). While scores for HLA-MM and HLA-relative intensity scale (RIS) were 2.7 ± 1.6 and 7.86 ± 6.2, respectively, in Group 1, in Group 2 the same scores were 2.1 ± 1.1 and 3.6 ± 2.5, respectively (P: .053 and .03). Delayed graft function, acute rejection episodes, and hospitalizations were similar between groups (P: .47, .29, and .34, respectively). Follow-up time and length of hospitalization were longer in Group 1 (P: .013 and .001, respectively). Total doses of ATG were higher in Group 1 patients (P: .007). CONCLUSION Despite the higher HLA-MM and RIS scores, clinical outcomes in desensitized patients were found to be similar to those in nondesensitized patients for acute rejection episodes and hospitalizations. Desensitization with rituximab in patients with high HLA-RIS scores can prevent acute rejection and hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayse Sinangil
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Zuhal Atan Ucar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yener Koc
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Soykan Barlas
- Unit of Renal Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sana Abouzahir
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Nephrology, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Suleyman Tevfik Ecder
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Emin Baris Akin
- Unit of Renal Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kwon H, Kim YH, Kim JY, Choi JY, Shin S, Jung JH, Park SK, Han DJ. The results of HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation according to pre-transplant crossmatch tests: Donor-specific antibody as a prominent predictor of acute rejection. Clin Transplant 2019; 33:e13533. [PMID: 30864255 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Revised: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Crossmatching (XM) between organ donors and recipients is correlated with clinical outcomes. This study evaluates the results of HLA-incompatible kidney transplant (HLA-i KT) according to pre-transplant XM modalities. METHODS This study included 731 consecutive patients. HLA-i KT was defined as a transplant under conditions of complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) XM positivity, flow-cytometric XM (FCXM) positivity, and/or maximal donor-specific antibody (DSA) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ≥5000. RESULTS The incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) within 1 year after transplant was significantly higher in the HLA-i group than in the HLA compatible (HLA-c) group (15 vs 9 patients, 14.2% vs 1.4%; P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis indicated that a DSA MFI ≥5000 (odds ratio [OR] = 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-6.98; P = 0.05) was significantly associated with acute rejection (AR), whereas CDC (OR = 2.09; 95% CI, 0.55-7.99; P = 0.28) and FCXM positivity (OR = 2.07; 95% CI, 0.73-5.87; P = 0.17) were not. Similarly, DSA MFI ≥ 5000 (OR = 4.14; P = 0.02) was the only significant factor affecting the risk of AMR. CONCLUSIONS Of the various XM tests, DSA MFI ≥5000 was the most prominent predictor of AR in patients undergoing HLA-i KT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunwook Kwon
- Division of Kidney & Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Hoon Kim
- Division of Kidney & Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jee Yeon Kim
- Division of Kidney & Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Yoon Choi
- Division of Kidney & Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Shin
- Division of Kidney & Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Hee Jung
- Division of Kidney & Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Su-Kil Park
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Duck Jong Han
- Division of Kidney & Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Desensitisation strategies in high-risk children before kidney transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol 2018; 33:2239-2251. [PMID: 29332219 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-017-3882-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Revised: 11/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transplantation is the preferred modality for renal replacement therapy in children. With increasing rates of re-transplantation within the paediatric population, there are more sensitised children on waiting lists. One issue with developing strategies to treat these children is the number of different definitions of sensitisation. and we would therefore recommend an immunological risk stratification approach. METHODS We discuss methods of sensitisation prevention, assessment and management, including paired exchange programmes and desensitisation protocols. RESULTS There are limited published evidence-based data for desensitisation in adults and none in children; thus, we present information on the available therapies currently in use. DISCUSSION Further research is required to investigate strategies which prevent sensitisation in children, including the healthcare utility of incorporating epitope-based matching into organ allocation algorithms. Controlled studies are also needed to establish the most appropriate desensitisation regimen(s).
Collapse
|
22
|
Adams AB, Kim SC, Martens GR, Ladowski JM, Estrada JL, Reyes LM, Breeden C, Stephenson A, Eckhoff DE, Tector M, Tector AJ. Xenoantigen Deletion and Chemical Immunosuppression Can Prolong Renal Xenograft Survival. Ann Surg 2018; 268:564-573. [PMID: 30048323 PMCID: PMC6382078 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Xenotransplantation using pig organs could end the donor organ shortage for transplantation, but humans have xenoreactive antibodies that cause early graft rejection. Genome editing can eliminate xenoantigens in donor pigs to minimize the impact of these xenoantibodies. Here we determine whether an improved cross-match and chemical immunosuppression could result in prolonged kidney xenograft survival in a pig-to-rhesus preclinical model. METHODS Double xenoantigen (Gal and Sda) knockout (DKO) pigs were created using CRISPR/Cas. Serum from rhesus monkeys (n = 43) was cross-matched with cells from the DKO pigs. Kidneys from the DKO pigs were transplanted into rhesus monkeys (n = 6) that had the least reactive cross-matches. The rhesus recipients were immunosuppressed with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 T-cell depletion, anti-CD154, mycophenolic acid, and steroids. RESULTS Rhesus antibody binding to DKO cells is reduced, but all still have positive CDC and flow cross-match. Three grafts were rejected early at 5, 6, and 6 days. Longer survival was achieved in recipients with survival to 35, 100, and 435 days. Each of the 3 early graft losses was secondary to IgM antibody-mediated rejection. The 435-day graft loss occurred secondary to IgG antibody-mediated rejection. CONCLUSIONS Reducing xenoantigens in donor pigs and chemical immunosuppression can be used to achieve prolonged renal xenograft survival in a preclinical model, suggesting that if a negative cross-match can be obtained for humans then prolonged survival could be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Luz M Reyes
- University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | | | - Matt Tector
- University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Heidt S, Claas FHJ. Transplantation in highly sensitized patients: challenges and recommendations. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2018; 14:673-679. [PMID: 30004800 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2018.1498335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Highly sensitized patients awaiting a kidney transplant accrue on the transplant waiting list. The breadth of HLA antibodies in this subpopulation of patients precludes receiving a compatible organ offer through regular allocation within an acceptable time-frame. Areas covered: Several alternative options to receive a transplant exist for these patients, including additional priority in regular allocation, special programs based on allocation through acceptable antigens, kidney paired donation programs, desensitization protocols, or a combination of the latter two. In this review, these options and their outcomes are discussed as well as some possibilities to further enhance transplantation of this disadvantaged group of patients. Expert commentary: For highly sensitized patients, special attention is required, for which several strategies may apply. A step-wise approach may be the optimal strategy to facilitate successful transplantation of highly sensitized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan Heidt
- a Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , the Netherlands
| | - Frans H J Claas
- a Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Huang E, Jordan SC. Immunoglobulin G-Degrading Enzyme of Streptococcus pyogenes (IdeS), Desensitization, and the Kidney Allocation System: Complementary Approaches to Increase Transplantation in Highly HLA Sensitized Patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 13:799-801. [PMID: 29523676 PMCID: PMC5969484 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.12031017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund Huang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Okada D, Okumi M, Kakuta Y, Unagami K, Iizuka J, Takagi T, Ishida H, Tanabe K. Outcome of the risk-stratified desensitization protocol in donor-specific antibody-positive living kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective study. Transpl Int 2018; 31:1008-1017. [PMID: 29676803 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Revised: 01/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
Acceptable outcomes of donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive living kidney transplantation (LKT) have recently been reported. However, LKT in crossmatch (XM)-positive patients remains at high-risk and requires an optimal desensitization protocol. We report our intermediate-term outcomes of XM-positive LKT vs. XM-negative LKT in patients who underwent LKT between January 2012 and June 2015 in our institution. The rate of acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) within 90 days postoperation, graft function, and patient, and graft survival rates at 4 years were investigated. Patients were divided into three groups: XM-DSA- (n = 229), XM-DSA+ (n = 36), and XM + DSA+ (n = 15). The XM + DSA+ group patients underwent desensitization with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and rituximab. The rates of ABMR within 90 days in the XM-DSA-, XM-DSA+, and XM + DSA+ groups were 1.3%, 9.4%, and 60.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the graft function throughout the observational period, the 4-year patient or graft survival rates among three groups. This study showed that intermediate-term outcomes of XM-positive LKT were comparable to XM-negative LKT. However, our current desensitization protocol cannot avert ABMR within 90 days, and XM positivity is still a significant risk factor for ABMR. Further refinement of the current desensitization regimen is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daigo Okada
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Okumi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoichi Kakuta
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohei Unagami
- Department of Nephrology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junpei Iizuka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideki Ishida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazunari Tanabe
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Garcia P, Toro J, Borda C, Gonzalez C, Rodriguez M, Contreras K. Highly HLA Sensitized Kidney Transplant Patients in a Transplant Center. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:436-440. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.11.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 11/11/2017] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
27
|
|
28
|
|
29
|
Colovai AI, Ajaimy M, Kamal LG, Masiakos P, Chan S, Savchik C, Lubetzky M, de Boccardo G, Courson A, Chokechanachaisakul A, Graham J, Greenstein S, Kinkhabwala M, Rocca J, Akalin E. Increased access to transplantation of highly sensitized patients under the new kidney allocation system. A single center experience. Hum Immunol 2017; 78:257-262. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2016] [Revised: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 12/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
30
|
Desensitization: Overcoming the Immunologic Barriers to Transplantation. J Immunol Res 2017; 2017:6804678. [PMID: 28127571 PMCID: PMC5239985 DOI: 10.1155/2017/6804678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2016] [Accepted: 12/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
HLA (Human Leucocyte Antigen) sensitization is a significant barrier to successful kidney transplantation. It often translates into difficult crossmatch before transplant and increased risk of acute and chronic antibody mediated rejection after transplant. Over the last decade, several immunomodulatory therapies have emerged allowing for increased access to kidney transplantation for the immunologically disadvantaged group of HLA sensitized end stage kidney disease patients. These include IgG inactivating agents, anti-cytokine antibodies, costimulatory molecule blockers, complement inhibitors, and agents targeting plasma cells. In this review, we discuss currently available agents for desensitization and provide a brief analysis of data on novel biologics, which will likely improve desensitization outcomes, and have potential implications in treatment of antibody mediated rejection.
Collapse
|
31
|
Overcoming Immunologic Barriers to Kidney Transplantation: Desensitization and Paired Donation. CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s40137-016-0163-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|