Safe use of right lobe living donor livers with moderate steatosis in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective study

Future of U.S. living donor liver transplant: Donor and recipient criteria, transplant indications, transplant oncology, liver paired exchange, and non-directed donor graft allocation

In the United States, living donor liver transplant (LDLT), from both directed and nondirected living donors, has expanded over the past several years. LDLT is viewed as an important opportunity to expand the overall donor pool for liver transplantation (LT), shorten waiting times for a life-prolonging LT surgery, and reduce LT waitlist mortality. The LT community's focus on LDLT expansion in the United States is fostering discussions around future opportunities, which include the safe expansion of donor and recipient candidate eligibility criteria, broadening indications for LDLT including applications in transplant oncology, developing national initiatives around liver paired exchange, and maintaining vigilance to living donor and recipient candidate risk/benefit equipoise. Potential opportunities for expanding living liver donor and recipient candidate criteria include using donors with more than minimal hepatic steatosis, evaluating older donors, performing LDLT in older recipients to facilitate timely transplantation, and providing candidates who would benefit from an LT, but may otherwise have limited access (ie, lower MELD scores), an avenue to receive a life-prolonging organ. Expansion opportunities for LDLT are particularly robust in the transplant oncology realm, including leveraging LDLT for patients with advanced HCC beyond Milan, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and nonresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. With ongoing investment in the deliberate growth of LDLT surgical expertise, experience, and technical advances in the United States, the LT community's future vision to increase transplant access to more patients with end-stage liver disease and selected oncology patients may be successfully realized.

Safety of right liver donation after improving steatosis through weight loss in living donors: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Living donor liver transplantation using hepatic steatosis-improved grafts mitigates donor shortage. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of right-lobe adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using grafts improved through donor weight loss.

METHODS

In this retrospective study conducted in a single institution in the Republic of Korea, we reviewed the medical records of living liver donors who lost ≥ 10% of their body weight to improve steatosis before right lobe donation between January 2015 and December 2020. Overall, 1040 right-lobe donors were included, with 150 and 890 donors in the weight loss and control (non-steatosis) groups, respectively.

RESULTS

We performed 1:1 individual matching using the greedy matching method, by which 124 patients were included in each group. The median period from the date of the first visit to donation was 113 (interquartile range: 78-184) days in the weight loss group. As body weight changed from 82.8 ± 13.7 kg to 70.8 ± 11.8 kg (p < 0.0001), body mass index also improved from 27.8 ± 3.9 kg/m2 to 23.8 ± 3.1 kg/m2 (p < 0.0001). No significant between-group differences existed in the postoperative laboratory data for living donors and recipients. The incidence of postoperative complications in donors was comparable between the groups (control group, 9.7%; weight loss group, 13.7%; p = 0.3185). The graft and recipient survival rates were comparable between the groups (p = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

Weight loss through diet and exercise significantly could improve hepatic steatosis in living donor candidates for liver transplantation, with the surgical outcomes in recipients and donors being equivalent to those in recipients and non-steatotic donors.

Clinical significance and outcomes of adult living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure: a retrospective cohort study based on 15-year single-center experience

Purpose

This study aimed to describe adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for acute liver failure and evaluate its clinical significance by comparing its surgical and survival outcomes with those of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 267 consecutive patients (161 LDLT recipients and 106 DDLT recipients) aged 18 years or older who underwent liver transplantation between January 2006 and December 2020.

Results

The mean periods from hepatic encephalopathy to liver transplantation were 5.85 days and 8.35 days for LDLT and DDLT, respectively (P = 0.091). Among these patients, 121 (45.3%) had grade III or IV hepatic encephalopathy (living, 34.8% vs. deceased, 61.3%; P < 0.001), and 38 (14.2%) had brain edema (living, 16.1% vs. deceased, 11.3%; P = 0.269) before liver transplantation. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (living, 11.8% vs. deceased, 15.1%; P = 0.435), 10-year overall survival (living, 90.8% vs. deceased, 84.0%; P = 0.096), and graft survival (living, 83.5% vs. deceased, 71.3%; P = 0.051). However, postoperatively, the mean intensive care unit stay was shorter in the LDLT group (5.0 days vs. 9.5 days, P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was associated with vasopressor use (odds ratio [OR], 3.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-7.96; P = 0.005) and brain edema (OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.16-6.52; P = 0.022) of recipient at the time of transplantation. However, LDLT (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.59-2.66; P = 0.553) was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

LDLT is feasible for acute liver failure when organs from deceased donors are not available.

Outcomes of 6000 living donor liver transplantation procedures: a pioneering experience at ASAN Medical Center

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has emerged as a favorable alternative to deceased donor liver transplantation, significantly reducing waitlist mortality, particularly in Asian countries with very low deceased organ donation rates. Asan Medical Center (AMC) in South Korea has pioneered innovative LDLT surgical techniques and become established as an extremely high-volume center for LDLT. This retrospective study analyzed 6000 consecutive LDLT procedures, including 510 dual-graft procedures, performed at AMC between December 1994 and January 2021. Of these, 312 LDLT procedures were performed in children aged < 18 years. In adult recipients, liver cirrhosis (LC) related to viral hepatitis was the most common indication, occurring in 69.8% of cases. Biliary atresia (46.8%) was the most common indication for pediatric LDLT. This study demonstrated outstanding long-term outcomes, with patient survival rates at 1, 5, 10, and 20 years of 92.7%, 85.9%, 82.1%, and 70.9%, respectively, in LDLT group for adults aged 50 and under at the time of LDLT, and 92.9%, 89.0%, 88.1%, and 81.9%, respectively, in the pediatric group. The in-hospital mortality rate of adult recipients was 3.8% (n = 214/5688). This study demonstrates the importance of refined surgical techniques, selection of grafts tailored to the recipient, and comprehensive multidisciplinary perioperative patient care in expanding the scope of LDLT and improving recipient outcomes.

Achieving 400 Living Donor Liver Transplantations Annually During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on liver transplantation (LT) and living donor programs globally.

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to present the principles and strategies of our LT program during the pandemic period and describe its achievements.

BASIC PROCEDURES

We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 1417 LTs performed at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, from 2020 to 2022. Of these, 216 recipients who received transplants from deceased donors were excluded, and 1201 recipients who received transplants from 1268 live donors were included in the study, including 38 children <18 years old.

MAIN FINDINGS

Among the 1201 living donor LT (LDLT) recipients, the most common indication for LT was unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (315/1163, 27.1%) in adults and biliary atresia (29/38, 76.3%) in pediatric recipients. Emergency LDLT was performed in 40 patients (3.3%). The median model of end-stage liver disease and pediatric end-stage liver disease scores were 13.9 ± 7.2 and 13.8 ± 7.1, respectively. In-hospital mortality of recipients was higher than usual at 2.2%, but the cause of death was not related to COVID-19 infection. Of the 1268 live donors who underwent hepatectomy for liver donation, 660 (52.1%) underwent hepatectomy using a minimally invasive approach. Although 17 (1.3%) live donors experienced major complications, there were no serious life-threatening complications and no mortality.

CONCLUSION

Even in a pandemic era, a team with well-established infection control protocols, patient-tailored surgical strategies, and thorough perioperative care can maintain LDLT at a similar quantitative and qualitative level as in a non-pandemic era.

Preventing Small-for-size Syndrome in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a well-recognized complication following liver transplantation (LT), with up to 20% developing this following living donor LT (LDLT). Preventing SFSS involves consideration of factors before the surgical procedure, including donor and recipient selection, and factors during the surgical procedure, including adequate outflow reconstruction, graft portal inflow modulation, and management of portosystemic shunts. International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplant Society of India Consensus Conference was convened in January 2023 to develop recommendations for the prediction and management of SFSS in LDLT. The format of the conference was based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. International experts in this field were allocated to 4 working groups (diagnosis, prevention, anesthesia, and critical care considerations, and management of established SFSS). The working groups prepared evidence-based recommendations to answer-specific questions considering the currently available literature. The working group members, independent panel, and conference attendees served as jury to edit and confirm the final recommendations presented at the end of the conference by each working group separately. This report presents the final statements and evidence-based recommendations provided by working group 2 that can be implemented to prevent SFSS in LDLT patients.

Proceedings of the 27th Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society

After a virtual congress in 2021 and a previous absence in 2020 because of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the 27th Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society was held from May 4 to 7, 2022, in a hybrid format in Istanbul, with 1123 (58% on-site) liver transplant professionals from 61 countries attending the meeting. The hybrid format successfully achieved a balance of much yearned-for "in-person interaction" and global online participation. Almost 500 scientific abstracts were presented. In this report, the Vanguard Committee aims to present a summary of key invited lectures and selected abstracts for the liver transplant community.

Outcomes of right lobe donors with BMI≥30 for living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Donor BMI above 30 is generally considered contraindication for donor hepatectomy. We compared the donor outcomes based on BMI threshold and weight loss.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All potential donors were identified and data were collected retrospectively. Steatosis was assessed based on liver-spleen Hounsfield unit difference and absolute liver intensity values. We compared BMI≥30 (n = 53) and BMI<30 (n = 64) donor outcomes. Donors with weight loss (WL) prior to surgery were also analyzed separately. Complications were graded by Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

All donors underwent open right donor hepatectomy. There was no difference between BMI≥30 and <30 groups except female predominance in BMI≥30 group (p = 0.006). Both groups had similar rates of complication rates in all categories, similar remnant volume, operative time, length of stay and similar postoperative liver function recovery (all p>0.05). On the other hand, donors with WL were more commonly male, had smaller graft size, and higher biliary complications rates compared to no-WL donors (all p<0.05). Multivariate binary logistics regression analysis revealed no association between BMI or WL and outcomes.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that donors with BMI≥30 have similar outcomes compared to BMI<30 donors with our defined selection criterion, therefore BMI≥30 is not an absolute contraindication to donate right liver, provided that there is no significant steatosis and remnant liver is satisfactory. For potential overweight donors, WL down to BMI<30 is a reasonable target. Higher biliary complication rates after WL should be investigated further. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Learning Curve of Ex Vivo Liver Resection and Autotransplantation in Treating End-Stage Hepatic Alveolar Echinococcosis: A RA-CUSUM Analysis

Background: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety and learning curve of ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation (ELRA).

Methods: A total of 102 consecutive end-stage HAE patients who underwent ELRA between 2014 and 2020 in West China Hospital were enrolled. The primary endpoint was major postoperative complications (comprehensive complication index, CCI > 26). The ELRA learning curve was evaluated using risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) methods. The learning phases were determined based on RA-CUSUM analysis and tested for their association with intra- and post-operative endpoints.

Results: The median surgery time was 738 (659–818) min, with a median blood loss of 2,250 (1,600–3,000) ml. The overall incidence of major morbidity was 38.24% (39/102). Risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis demonstrated a learning curve of 53 ELRAs for major postoperative complications. The learning phase showed a significant association with the hemodynamic unstable time (HR −30.29, 95% CI −43.32, −17.25, P < 0.0001), reimplantation time (HR −13.92, 95% CI −23.17, −4.67, P = 0.004), total postoperative stay (HR −6.87, 95% CI −11.33, −2.41, P = 0.0033), and postoperative major morbidity (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09, 0.68, p = 0.007) when adjusted for age, disease course, liver function, and remote metastasis.

Discussion:Ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation is feasible and safe with a learning curve of 53 cases for major postoperative complications.