1
|
Rodriguez IE, Asher ZP, Klingenberg K, Wright FL, Nydam TL, Adams MA, Bababekov YJ, Peltz E, Smith JW, Saben JL, Kennealey P, Pomposelli JJ, Pomfret EA, Moore HB. Phase I clinical trial of the feasibility and safety of direct peritoneal resuscitation in liver transplantation. Am J Surg 2024:115815. [PMID: 39003094 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) is associated with improved outcomes in trauma. Animal models suggest DPR has favorable effects on the liver. We sought to evaluate its safety and assess for improved outcomes in liver transplantation (LT). METHODS LT patients with renal dysfunction and/or obesity were enrolled in a phase-I clinical trial. DPR lasted 8-24 h depending on postoperative disposition. Primary outcome was percent of patients completing DPR. Secondary outcomes evaluated complications. Controls with either obesity (control-1) or both risk factors (obesity + renal dysfunction, control-2) were analyzed. RESULTS Fifteen patients were enrolled (seven with both criteria and eight with obesity alone). DPR was completed in 87 % of patients, with one meeting stopping criteria. Controls included 45 (control-1) and 24 (control-2) patients. Return to operating room, graft loss, and late infections were lower with DPR. CONCLUSION DPR appears to be safe in closed abdomens following LT, warranting a follow-up phase-II trial to assess efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan E Rodriguez
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Zachary P Asher
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Katherine Klingenberg
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Franklin L Wright
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Trevor L Nydam
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Megan A Adams
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Yanik J Bababekov
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Eric Peltz
- Department of Surgery, Logan Health Medical Center, Kalispell, MT, USA
| | - Jason W Smith
- Department of Surgery, University of Louisville Health, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Jessica L Saben
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Peter Kennealey
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - James J Pomposelli
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Pomfret
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Hunter B Moore
- AdventHealth Transplant Institute at Porter, Denver, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Odenwald MA, Roth HF, Reticker A, Segovia M, Pillai A. Evolving challenges with long-term care of liver transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15085. [PMID: 37545440 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
The number of liver transplants (LT) performed worldwide continues to rise, and LT recipients are living longer post-transplant. This has led to an increasing number of LT recipients requiring lifelong care. Optimal care post-LT requires careful attention to both the allograft and systemic issues that are more common after organ transplantation. Common causes of allograft dysfunction include rejection, biliary complications, and primary disease recurrence. While immunosuppression prevents rejection and reduces incidences of some primary disease recurrence, it has detrimental systemic effects. Most commonly, these include increased incidences of metabolic syndrome, various malignancies, and infections. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to optimize immunosuppression regimens to prevent allograft dysfunction while also decreasing the risk of systemic complications. Institutional protocols to screen for systemic disease and heightened clinical suspicion also play an important role in providing optimal long-term post-LT care. In this review, we discuss these common complications of LT as well as unique considerations when caring for LT recipients in the years after transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A Odenwald
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Hannah F Roth
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Anesia Reticker
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Maria Segovia
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lim WH, Tan C, Xiao J, Tan DJH, Ng CH, Yong JN, Fu C, Chan KE, Zeng RW, Ren YP, Goh XL, Chew N, Tseng M, Syn N, Mak LY, Fung J, Muthiah M, Siddiqui MS, Tan EXX. De novo metabolic syndrome after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis on cumulative incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Liver Transpl 2023; 29:413-421. [PMID: 36724882 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Post-transplant metabolic syndrome (PTMS) has been associated with increased cardiovascular risk which significantly impacts the morbidity and mortality rates of liver transplant (LT) recipients. This study sought to conduct a meta-analysis and systematic review on the cumulative incidence, risk factors, and cardiovascular outcomes associated with de novo PTMS.Medline and Embase were searched for articles describing the incidence, risk factors, and cardiovascular outcomes of de novo PTMS. Meta-analysis of proportions was conducted to calculate incidence. Conventional pairwise analysis using random effects model was used to tabulate OR and hazard ratio for risk factors and cardiovascular outcomes, respectively. Fifteen studies involving 2683 LT recipients were included. Overall rate of de novo PTMS was 24.7% (CI: 18.0%-32.9%) over a mean follow-up period of 15.3 months and was highest in patients with NAFLD (60.0%, CI: 52.0%-67.5%) compared with other liver diseases. Older age (OR: 1.05, CI: 1.01-1.09, p = 0.02) and pre-LT type II diabetes mellitus (OR: 5.00, CI: 4.17-5.99, p < 0.01) were predictive factors of de novo PTMS. Patients with de novo PTMS had significantly higher likelihood of cardiovascular disease events compared with those who did not (hazard ratio: 2.42, CI: 1.54-3.81, p < 0.01). De novo PTMS is a common complication and is significantly associated with increased cardiovascular disease morbidity. High-risk patients such as elderly recipients, those with pre-LT type II diabetes mellitus, or NASH-related cirrhosis should undergo routine screening to allow timely intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Hui Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Caitlyn Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jieling Xiao
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Darren Jun Hao Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cheng Han Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jie Ning Yong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Clarissa Fu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kai En Chan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Yi Ping Ren
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xin Lei Goh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Chew
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Michael Tseng
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Biostatistics & Modelling Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lung Yi Mak
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - James Fung
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Mark Muthiah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Mohammad Shadab Siddiqui
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Eunice X X Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bellini MI, Lauro A, D'Andrea V, Marino IR. Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Long-Term Follow-Up Issues. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2022; 20:27-35. [PMID: 35570596 DOI: 10.6002/ect.pediatricsymp2022.l16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric liver transplant is an established life-saving procedure for children with end-stage liver diseases, achieving excellent graft and patient survival but with effects on quality of life and psychological welfare in the long-term. With the natural increase in the number of pediatric transplant patients becoming adults, it is essential to successfully plan and manage issues affecting late outcomes in the vulnerable pediatric transplant population. This study offers an overview of the long-term surgical complications, the consequences of immunosuppression (such as posttransplant diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and renal dysfunction), and the infection and malignancy risks. Finally, because quality of life is now an inclusive measurement of patient satisfaction, guidance on how to facilitate the transition to adulthood, empowering transplant recipients, is also provided.
Collapse
|