Double drape tectonic patch with cyanoacrylate glue for surgical repair of corneal defects: 8 cases

Comparison of conjunctival pedicle flap to corneal fixation strength achieved by Tisseel® fibrin glue, ethyl cyanoacrylate adhesive, ReSure® hydrogel sealant, and conventional suturing with 8-0 VICRYL® ophthalmic suture

OBJECTIVE

To determine and compare the fixation strength of conjunctival pedicle flaps to cornea achieved via conventional ophthalmic suture and three different adhesive compounds.

ANIMALS STUDIED

Ex vivo porcine globes.

PROCEDURES

Following a 6 mm wide 500-micron-restricted depth lamellar keratectomy, conjunctival pedicle flaps were secured to the keratectomy site with either 8-0 VICRYL® suture or one of three adhesive products, including Tisseel® bioadhesive, ReSure® synthetic adhesive, or ethyl cyanoacrylate adhesive (n = 10 per surgical group). Adhesive application protocol varied by product based upon adhesive biocompatibility. Corneoconjunctival tissues were then harvested, clamped in a tensile testing device, and loaded at a rate of 1 mm/s under video surveillance until the point of failure. Peak load was determined for each test and used to compare fixation strength between samples.

RESULTS

Forty conjunctival flaps were performed, with 6 omitted from evaluation due to dehiscence prior to tensile testing. Of the 34 flaps analyzed, 10 were secured with suture, 10 with cyanoacrylate, 8 with ReSure®, and 6 with Tisseel®. Flaps secured with suture withstood significantly higher applied tensile force compared with cyanoacrylate (p = .02474), ReSure® (p = .00000), and Tisseel® (p = .00002). Flaps secured with cyanoacrylate withstood significantly greater force than those secured with ReSure® and Tisseel® (p = .01194 and 0.01798, respectively). There was no significant difference in fixation strength between ReSure® and Tisseel® glue (p = .95675).

CONCLUSIONS

Conjunctival pedicle flap fixation using 8-0 VICRYL® suture fixation was able to withstand significantly greater maximum tensile force compared to ReSure®, Tisseel®, or cyanoacrylate adhesives. Fixation strength achieved with cyanoacrylate adhesive was significantly greater than that achieved with ReSure® or Tisseel®.

Photocurable and Temperature-Sensitive Bioadhesive Hydrogels for Sutureless Sealing of Full-Thickness Corneal Wounds

Penetrating corneal wounds can cause severe vision impairment and require prompt intervention to restore globe integrity and minimize the risk of infection. Tissue adhesives have emerged as a promising alternative to suturing for mitigating postoperative complications. However, conventional water-soluble adhesives suffer formidable challenges in sealing penetrating corneal wounds due to dilution or loss in a moist environment. Inspired by the robust adhesion of mussels in aquatic conditions, an injectable photocurable bioadhesive hydrogel (referred to as F20HD5) composed of polyether F127 diacrylate and dopamine-modified hyaluronic acid methacrylate is developed for sutureless closure of corneal full-thickness wounds. F20HD5 exhibits high transparency, wound-sealing ability, proper viscosity, biodegradability, and excellent biocompatibility. It allows in situ cross-linking via visible light, thereby providing sufficient mechanical strength and adhesiveness. In vivo, the adhesive hydrogel effectively closed penetrating linear corneal incisions and corneal injuries with minimal tissue loss in rabbits. During the 56-day follow-up, the hydrogel facilitates the repair of the injured corneas, resulting in more symmetrical curvatures and less scarring in distinction to the untreated control. Thus, bioinspired hydrogel holds promise as an effective adhesive for sealing full-thickness corneal wounds.

Recurrence of perforation and overall patient survival after penetrating keratoplasty versus amniotic membrane transplantation in corneal perforation

PURPOSE

The following is a comparative analysis on the treatment outcomes of corneal perforations using amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) or penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

METHODS

This monocentric retrospective study was performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany. A total of 78 eyes of 78 patients were included. Thirty-nine eyes received an AMT, and 39 patients were treated with a PK. Primary outcome was recurrence of perforation. Secondary outcomes were patient mortality and visual acuity.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was observed with regard to a recurrence of perforation between the two groups (26% in AMT vs 23% in PK, p > 0.99). The time of recurrences was within the first two years and did not differ statistically (p = 0.97). In addition, a proportional hazards model with cox regression regarding recurrent perforation showed no significant differences (p = 0.5). After AMT, 41% and after KP, 28% of the patients died during follow-up (p = 0.2), respectively. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (p < 0.0001) and the age at the time of surgery (p = 0.0002) were statistically significantly higher in those who were deceased. A mean follow-up of 485 ± 517 days was recorded.

CONCLUSION

Both surgical methods show good results and no statistically significant difference regarding recurrent perforation rate. About a third of the patients died during the follow-up period. The decision regarding the appropriate method should therefore be based on a combination of all factors.

Corneal diamond burr debridement for superficial non-healing corneal ulcers in cats

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical outcomes and efficacy of diamond burr debridement (DBD) treatment for corneal ulceration in cats.

PROCEDURE(S)

Medical records of cats that received DBD at two private practices between 2015 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. DBD was performed using a battery-powered, handheld motorized burr and a bandage contact lens was placed in 18/21 eyes. Corneal ulceration was considered resolved if the cornea was fluorescein negative with a stable epithelial surface. Recurrence was defined as return of corneal ulceration. Descriptive statistics and a Fisher's exact test were conducted on the study population.

RESULTS

Twenty-one eyes from 20 cats with superficial corneal ulcers refractory to medical treatment underwent DBD. Domestic and Burmese were the most commonly encountered breeds and the median age of affected cats was 8.83 years (range 0.5-20 years). Corneal ulceration was present for a median of 14 days prior to DBD. Healing was achieved in 81% of eyes; with four eyes failing to heal and requiring further intervention. Corneal sequestrum was reported in one case that failed to heal. Of the healed cases, three cases recurred (17.6%) at a mean of 116.3 days (range 79-135 days). Burmese were overrepresented (p < .001) in cases that failed to heal or recurred (6/7 eyes; 85.7%). The median postoperative follow-up time was 93 days (range 6-1613 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Diamond burr debridement is a safe, non-invasive treatment for corneal ulceration in cats but, compared with published results, it had a lower success rate than superficial lamellar keratectomy.