Three-factor prothrombin complex concentrates for refractory bleeding after cardiovascular surgery within an algorithmic approach to haemostasis

4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Dosing Strategies: A Retrospective Evaluation

ObjectivesDetermine indication specific 4-Factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPCC) dosing strategies within a hospital system and subsequent effectiveness. Background: 4FPCC is FDA approved for reversal of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for acute major bleeding or need for urgent surgery/invasive procedure. Since its approval, off label use has expanded to include direct oral anticoagulant reversal and perioperative hemostasis. Optimal dosing strategies remain controversial, and recent studies have evaluated fixed-dose regimens with lower doses than those recommended in product labeling. Methods/Materials: Retrospective cohort with manual chart review for patients who received 4FPCC spanning 2 years. Primary outcome was to characterize dosing. Secondary outcomes were INR normalization, hemostatic efficacy, in-hospital mortality, and renal function change. Results: Of the 300 patients evaluated, 80% received 4FPCC for anticoagulant reversal, with 66% of those for VKA and 34% for DOAC. The remaining 20% received 4FPCC for a non-reversal indication. Of the patients requiring anticoagulation reversal, 25% received doses lower than recommended and 6% received higher. 71% of patients received 4FPCC for life-threatening bleed, and 45% of them had intracranial hemorrhage. Higher mortality with higher than recommended doses was the only statistically significant secondary outcome (P = .018). Conclusion: We found that lower doses than recommended were used in a significant number of patients. The higher than recommended doses group constituted a small proportion of patients and the higher mortality was attributed to patient acuity on presentation. Additional studies evaluating dosing approach are required to determine lowest effective dosing for various indications.

Prothrombin Complex Concentrate versus Fresh Frozen Plasma in Adult Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) are commonly used to manage bleeding in patients during cardiac surgery. However, the relative efficacy and safety of these 2 strategies remain uncertain.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for studies comparing PCC and FFP in patients who underwent cardiac surgery complicated by bleeding. Review Manager (RevMan) ver. 5.4 (Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration) was used for statistical analysis. Binary and continuous outcomes were compared using pooled risk ratios and mean differences, respectively. The meta-analysis protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews under protocol number CRD42022379144.

Results

We included 8 studies with 1,500 patients, of whom 613 (40.9%) received PCC. The mean follow-up period ranged from 28 to 90 days. The PCC group had significantly lower chest tube drainage at 24 hours (mean difference [MD], -148.50 mL; 95% CI, -253.02 to -43.99 mL; p=0.005; I2=42%). Fewer units of red blood cells (RBCs) were transfused within the first 24 hours (MD, -1.02 units; 95% CI, -1.81 to -0.24 units; p=0.01; I2=56%), and fewer patients required RBC transfusion within the first 24 hours (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93; p<0.007; I2=45%) in the PCC group. There were no statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes. Nonetheless, a subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials failed to corroborate the results obtained from the main analysis.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that PCC can be effective, without increased adverse events, when compared with FFP in patients undergoing cardiac surgery complicated by bleeding.

Prothrombin complex concentrate in cardiac surgery for the treatment of coagulopathic bleeding

BACKGROUND

Coagulopathy following cardiac surgery is associated with considerable blood product transfusion and high morbidity and mortality. The treatment of coagulopathy following cardiac surgery is challenging, with the replacement of clotting factors being based on transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCCs) is an alternative method to replace clotting factors and warrants evaluation. PCCs are also an alternative method to treat refractory ongoing bleeding post-cardiac surgery compared to recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) and also warrants evaluation.   OBJECTIVES: Assess the benefits and harms of PCCs in people undergoing cardiac surgery who have coagulopathic non-surgical bleeding.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S) on the Web of Science on 20 April 2021. We searched Clinicaltrials.gov (www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov), and the World Health Organisation (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP; apps.who.int/trialsearch/), for ongoing or unpublished trials. We checked the reference lists for additional references. We did not limit the searches by language or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised trials (NRSs).  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.   MAIN RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included  (4993 participants). Two were RCTs (151 participants) and 16 were NRSs. Both RCTs had low risk of bias (RoB) in almost all domains. Of the 16 NRSs, 14 were retrospective cohort analyses with one prospective study and one case report. The nine studies used in quantitative analysis were judged to have critical RoB, three serious and three moderate.   1. PCC versus standard treatment Evidence from RCTs showed PCCs are likely to reduce the number of units transfused compared to standard care (MD -0.89, 95% CI -1.78 to 0.00; participants = 151; studies = 2; moderate-quality evidence). Evidence from NRSs agreed with this, showing that PCCs may reduce the mean number of units transfused compared to standard care but the evidence is uncertain (MD -1.87 units, 95% CI -2.53 to -1.20; participants = 551; studies = 2; very low-quality evidence). There was no evidence from RCTs showing a difference in the incidence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion compared to standard care (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.40; participants = 101; studies = 1; low-quality evidence). Evidence from NRSs disagreed with this, showing that PCCs may reduce the mean number of units transfused compared to standard care but the evidence is uncertain (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.98; participants = 1046; studies = 4; low-quality evidence). There was no evidence from RCTs showing a difference in the number of thrombotic events with PCC compared to standard care (OR 0.68 95% CI 0.20 to 2.31; participants = 152; studies = 2; moderate-quality evidence). This is supported by NRSs, showing that PCCs may have no effect on the number of thrombotic events compared to standard care but the evidence is very uncertain (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.99; participants = 1359; studies = 7; very low-quality evidence). There was no evidence from RCTs showing a difference in mortality with PCC compared to standard care  (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.12 to 2.35; participants = 149; studies = 2; moderate-quality evidence). This is supported by evidence from NRSs, showing that PCCs may have little to no effect on mortality compared to standard care but the evidence is very uncertain (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.51; participants = 1334; studies = 6; very low-quality evidence). Evidence from RCTs indicated that there was little to no difference in postoperative bleeding (MD -107.05 mLs, 95% CI -278.92 to 64.83; participants = 151, studies = 2; low-quality evidence).  PCCs may have little to no effect on intensive care length of stay (RCT evidence: MD -0.35 hours, 95% CI -19.26 to 18.57; participants = 151; studies = 2; moderate-quality evidence) (NRS evidence: MD -18.00, 95% CI -43.14 to 7.14; participants = 225; studies = 1; very low-quality evidence) or incidence of renal replacement therapy (RCT evidence: OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.14 to 3.59; participants = 50; studies = 1; low-quality evidence) (NRS evidence: OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.98; participants = 684; studies = 2; very low-quality evidence). No studies reported on additional adverse outcomes.   2. PCC versus rFVIIa For this comparison, all evidence was provided from NRSs.  PCC likely results in a large reduction of RBCs transfused intra-operatively in comparison to rFVIIa (MD-4.98 units, 95% CI -6.37 to -3.59; participants = 256; studies = 2; moderate-quality evidence).  PCC may have little to no effect on the incidence of RBC units transfused comparative to rFVIIa; evidence is very uncertain (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.56; participants = 150; studies = 1; very low-quality evidence). PCC may have little to no effect on the number of thrombotic events comparative to rFVIIa; evidence is very uncertain (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.16; participants = 407; studies = 4; very low-quality evidence). PCC may have little to no effect on the incidence of mortality (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.38 to 3.03; participants = 278; studies = 3; very low-quality evidence) or intensive care length of stay comparative to rFVIIa (MD -40 hours, 95% CI -110.41 to 30.41; participants = 106; studies = 1; very low-quality evidence); evidence is very uncertain . PCC may reduce bleeding (MD -674.34 mLs, 95% CI -906.04 to -442.64; participants = 150; studies = 1; very low-quality evidence) and incidence of renal replacement therapy (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.71; participants = 106; studies = 1; very low-quality evidence) comparative to rFVIIa; evidence is very uncertain. No studies reported on other adverse events.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: PCCs could potentially be used as an alternative to standard therapy for coagulopathic bleeding post-cardiac surgery compared to FFP as shown by moderate-quality evidence and it may be an alternative to rFVIIa in refractory non-surgical bleeding but this is based on moderate to very low quality of evidence.

Thromboembolische Erkrankung bei COVID-19-Patienten: Eine kurze narrative Übersichtsarbeit

Die Infektion mit dem Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2, severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2) hat sich zu einer globalen Gesundheitskrise entwickelt. Berichten zufolge ist die Inzidenz von thromboembolischen Erkrankungen bei der SARS-CoV2-Krankheit hoch und betrifft ein breites Spektrum an Organsystemen, von Hautthrombosen bis zu Lungenembolien, Schlaganfall oder Koronarthrombose, bisweilen mit katastrophalen Folgen. Es liegen Hinweise vor, nach denen Thromboembolien, Hyperkoagulabilität und eine Überproduktion proinflammatorischer Zytokine, die einen Zytokinsturm nachahmen, der zu Multiorganversagen führt, eine Schlüsselrolle dabei spielen. Die vorliegende kurze narrative Übersichtsarbeit beleuchtet die Pathophysiologie und die Risikofaktoren der thromboembolischen Erkrankung und liefert einen Rahmen für das Antikoagulationsmanagement auf Grundlage der aktuellen Evidenzlage.

The Year in Cardiothoracic Critical Care: Selected Highlights from 2019

In 2019, cardiothoracic and vascular critical care remained an important focus and subspecialty. This article continues the annual series to review relevant contributions in postoperative critical care that may affect the cardiac anesthesiologist. Herein, the pertinent literature published in 2019 is explored and organized by organ system.

Thromboembolic disease in COVID-19 patients: A brief narrative review

Corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV2/ Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2) infection has emerged as a global health crisis. Incidence of thromboembolic disease is reported to be high in SARS-CoV2 disease and is seen in a multitude of organ systems ranging from cutaneous thrombosis to pulmonary embolism, stroke or coronary thrombosis sometimes with catastrophic outcomes. Evidence points towards a key role of thromboembolism, hypercoagulability and over production of proinflammatory cytokines mimicking a "cytokine storm" which leads to multiorgan failure. This brief narrative review highlights the pathophysiology and risk factors of thromboembolic disease and provides a framework for management of anticoagulation based on the current evidence.

Recent advances in use of fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate, immunoglobulins, and clotting factors for transfusion support in patients with hematologic disease

Hematologic diseases include a broad range of acquired and congenital disorders, many of which affect plasma proteins that control hemostasis and immune responses. Therapeutic interventions for these disorders include transfusion of plasma, cryoprecipitate, immunoglobulins, or convalescent plasma-containing therapeutic antibodies from patients recovering from infectious diseases, as well as concentrated pro- or anticoagulant factors. This review will focus on recent advances in the uses of plasma and its derivatives for patients with acquired and congenital hematologic disorders.

Prospective Evaluation of a Blood Transfusion Protocol for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Operations

BACKGROUND

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines recommend the creation of an interdisciplinary blood management team to implement protocols for improved blood transfusion practices. We report our center's prospective evaluation of a blood transfusion protocol.

METHODS

An interdisciplinary blood management team developed protocols for transfusion of packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate. The protocols were prospectively evaluated by tracking transfusions administered to consecutive patients undergoing cardiac operations, and the primary outcome of interest was the mean number of adjusted units of blood product transfused per patient. Protocol implementation phases were separated by washout phases to control for a potential Hawthorne effect associated with protocol implementation. Protocol compliance was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 1441 patients underwent cardiac operations during the 16-month study period. Although there was no statistically significant reduction in transfusions with an unadjusted analysis, there was a significant trend toward a reduction of the mean adjusted total units transfused per patient over the course of the study period (P < .001). The mean adjusted total units transfused per patient were significantly less during the second washout phase (2.8 units; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-3.3) and second protocol phase (2.8 units; 95% CI, 2.32-3.27) compared with the initial baseline survey phase (3.6 units, 95% CI, 3.1-4.1; P < .05 for both comparisons). Only 55.2% of all units were transfused in compliance to the implemented protocols: platelets, 46.8%; cryoprecipitate, 32.1%; packed red blood cells, 60.7%; and fresh frozen plasma, 53.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

During a prospective evaluation of blood transfusion protocols, a risk-adjusted analysis demonstrated a reduction in transfusions despite poor protocol compliance.