Platelet transfusion is associated with 90-day and 1-year mortality for adult patients requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Mortality on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Evaluation of independent risk factors and causes of death during venoarterial and venovenous support

INTRODUCTION

Most patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decease during therapy on the system. However, the actual causes of death have not been studied sufficiently. This study analyses the etiology, prevalence, and risk factors for the outcome variable death during ongoing ECMO for all patients and divided according to venoarterial (VA) or venovenous (VV) support.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed all patients receiving ECMO support at our institution between March 2006 to January 2021. Only the patients deceased during ongoing support were included.

RESULTS

2016 patients were placed on VA (n = 1168; 58%) or VV (n = 848; 42%) ECMO; 759 patients (37.7%) deceased on support. The causes of death differed between the support types: VA ECMO patients mostly died from cerebral ischemia (34%), low-cardiac output (LCO; 24.1%) and multi-organ failure (MOF; 21.6%), whereas in VV ECMO cases, refractory respiratory failure (28.2%), and sepsis (20.4%) dominated. Multivariate regression analysis revealed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and acidosis prior to ECMO as risk factors for dying on VA ECMO, while high inotropic doses pre-ECMO, a high fraction of inspired oxygen on day 1, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and international normalized ratio levels lead to an unfavourable outcome in VV ECMO patients.

CONCLUSION

Even in highly experienced centers, ECMO mortality remains high and occurs mainly on support or 24 h after its termination. The causes of death differ between VV and VA ECMO, depending on the underlying diseases responsible for the need of extracorporeal support.

The Year in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Selected Highlights From 2021

This review summarizes the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or extracorporeal life support literature published in 2021. This Selected Highlights article is not intended to be an exhaustive review of the literature, but rather a summarizing of key themes that developed in the ECMO literature during 2021. The primary topics presented include the following: ECMO for coronavirus disease 2019, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, periprocedural cardiopulmonary support with ECMO, and anticoagulation for ECMO.

[Pathophysiology of bleeding]

Bleeding is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. Anatomic and hemostatic causes play a central role in the pathophysiology of bleeding, with anatomic causes being by far more common. While trauma and invasive procedures are the leading causes of bleeding in surgical disciplines, gastrointestinal bleeding is the major cause of bleeding in internal medicine. Major bleedings lead to secondary homeostatic changes, which in turn not only contribute to further bleeding, but also to the pathogenesis of organ dysfunction. Acquired coagulopathies due to antithrombotic treatment or an underlying disease also contribute to the extent and the dynamics of bleeding, while hereditary bleeding disorders are seldom. The balance between the physiological pro- and anticoagulant pathway plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of bleeding and coagulation. Therefore, the pathophysiology of bleeding cannot be described by means of easily available laboratory coagulation workup. The aim of coagulation correction during the management of life-threatening bleeding is not to normalize coagulation, but rather to stop bleeding. Besides a careful clinical evaluation of the course of bleeding coupled with basic understanding of the physiology of coagulation, targeted laboratory coagulation workup can contribute to a rational coagulation treatment concept.